Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TR Pamukkale White Terraces asv2020-02 img16.jpg

File:TR Pamukkale White Terraces asv2020-02 img16.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2020 at 14:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:TR Pamukkale White Terraces asv2020-02 img16.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TR Pamukkale White Terraces asv2020-02 img16.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Turkey
•  Info Partial view of the Pamukkale Travertine Terraces (World Heritage Site), near Denizli/Turkey --- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 14:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not a great overall view of the place, dull composition of very photogenic place. The light is rather harsh - highlights adjusted quite much which results in unnatural look + underexposure of white parts. I also do not like your practice of changing your photos to all Wikipedia pages, although better images are available. This should not be the lead picture in Pamukkale articles. Just google Pamukkale and see the images and you know what I'm talking about. —kallerna (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

  I change not on "all Wikipedia pages", but only where it seems a clear improvement to me. --A.Savin 15:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

• Generally that is of course a good practice. The problem here is that this is clearly a "partial view", and hence should not be the lead image on Pamukkale articles. —kallerna (talk) 15:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

"Discussion" which has nothing to do with this nomination

I agree with the revert on the Pamukkale article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)  Info First, this is an FP nomination and not the page to discuss the EN Pamukkale article (this would be en:Talk:Pamukkale). Second, the image which currently is there I didn't replace, please stop spreading lies (once again). --A.Savin 03:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC) Lies - once again? What? I'm talking about several Wikipedia articles, and definitely you have changed the lead image on several language versions. —kallerna (talk) 07:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC) As you might have seen on the comment's level, I was referring to Charlesjsharp's claim not yours. --A.Savin 13:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC) Please withdraw your allegation that I am spreading lies (once again) A.Savin. Please behave. You put this image as the lead image and it was removed and replaced with a more suitable one. Both the original one and the current one are more suitable than this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Of course it's a lie, as I didn't replace this picture by mine, as you may easily check in the history. That said, your claim I was reverted in English article is a lie, as I wasn't reverted and that's pretty obvious for anyone who is able to check the according revision history. Any more questions? No? You're welcome. --A.Savin 12:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support IMHO it is refreshing that this photo shows the Pamukkale terraces from another point of view than the most usual ones. --Aristeas (talk) 09:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. This is a rare photo. Usually in Pamukkale, the landscape is filled with crowds of tourists, and such a shot cannot be taken. Vibrant, clear colors, superior quality -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per George Chernilevsky, I think the composition is quite thoughtful and effective too. Cmao20 (talk) 07:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted 2° ccw. Looking at the platform and the haze layer. --Milseburg (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kallerna. Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per kallerna --StellarHalo (talk) 13:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Turkey