Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tomb of Horatio Nelson on Saint-Paul Cathedral.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tomb of Horatio Nelson on Saint-Paul Cathedral.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2015 at 12:42:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info created by mhx - uploaded and nominated by -- The Photographer (talk) 12:42, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- The Photographer (talk) 12:42, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 13:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 14:07, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. Hmm, I'm not sure. It's an interesting shot and not a place that many people get to see, but I'm put off by the HDR tone mapping used. It has hints of bad HDR, although I admit they don't completely spoil the image, they're mostly visible as the overly weak shadows, too much microcontrast and the haloes of light in the darker areas. Diliff (talk) 17:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support-- Fenerli1978 (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral per Diliff. This is an image that does so much right, but the HDR, while nowhere near as egregious as it can get, still leaves this looking misty and noisy in too many places. I might support a version without it, or with those effects mitigated. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Looks a little bit artificial, but the composition and the quality are FP-worthy, I think. --Code (talk) 06:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Not my best friend as a Napoleonist...This is a crypt isn't it ? However it makes me think of a hall of a commercial air-conditioned complex in the Emirates. My conclusion is that something could be wrong with HDR...--Jebulon (talk) 23:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Weak Oppose.It's a great shot and both the technical quality and composition are excellent. But the tonemapping makes it look too strange in some areas in my opinion. — Julian H.✈ 06:50, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes Julian, if you look the file history you will find that I was trying solve this problem. If you give me more information about what areas look too strange, it could be ussefull to improve the image. Thanks for your comments. A hug --The Photographer (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hm, I see your point. And I have a hard time defining exactly what looks strange to me, so I guess it's not fair to oppose. I think compositionally, what bugs me the most is that the columns that dominate the architecture don't actually stand out that much contrast-wise and therefore make it harder to anchor parts of the image in the third dimension. Anyway, maybe I'm just too critical. One thing though: There is a piece of white background form the perspective correction on the lower left. — Julian H.✈ 06:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are not too critical, its your opinion and I like it. --The Photographer (talk) 16:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hm, I see your point. And I have a hard time defining exactly what looks strange to me, so I guess it's not fair to oppose. I think compositionally, what bugs me the most is that the columns that dominate the architecture don't actually stand out that much contrast-wise and therefore make it harder to anchor parts of the image in the third dimension. Anyway, maybe I'm just too critical. One thing though: There is a piece of white background form the perspective correction on the lower left. — Julian H.✈ 06:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes Julian, if you look the file history you will find that I was trying solve this problem. If you give me more information about what areas look too strange, it could be ussefull to improve the image. Thanks for your comments. A hug --The Photographer (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination I feel that this picture is not completely well (please observe the two columns in front, look strange) , especially in the perspective, however, I find no way to fix it. --The Photographer (talk) 16:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)