Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:US Marshals with Young Ruby Bridges on School Steps.jpg

File:US Marshals with Young Ruby Bridges on School Steps.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 21:44:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:US Marshals with Young Ruby Bridges on School Steps.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:US Marshals with Young Ruby Bridges on School Steps.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-1969
•  Info created by United States Department of Justice - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Great historical picture. Yann (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Thi (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 23:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support per Yann. Adam, please update the link to the source file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

  Can't really do much with changes to websites that hide images. Plenty of evidence this is a DoJ photo, but websites change since we got the high-res copy, or maybe the high-res is from elsewhere. Unclear. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

• I'm not disputing who took the photo! I'm quite familiar with it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

  Understood! Just hard to be sure of the source. I've found a similar one, but it's slightly lower file size, and slightly worse. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Important contemporary document. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support This was printed in my school history textbook Cmao20 (talk) 10:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 12:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Although it has a great historical value, cropped out legs and a hat don't convince me.  Comment Otherwise, why the PNG thumbnail's grain is less harsh than in the JPEG thumbnail? (In the full resolution, there is no visible difference.) — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 09:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

  @Draceane: JPEGs are sharpened, PNGs aren't. Usually, this works in JPEG's favour for smaller thumbnails, but with a grainy image at large size... Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Meiræ 18:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1960-1969