Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 10 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Ambulyx_ochracea_MHNT_CUT_2010_0_87_Chiang_Mai_Thailand_male_ventral.jpg

[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 20:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Red-whiskered-bulbul-from-kottayam-kerala-1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The red-whiskered bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus) is a passerine bird found in Asia. By Deepugn --W.carter 10:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality, IMO, albeit slightly noisy. --Peulle 11:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bird is blurred. Charlesjsharp 15:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Image demonstrates key features and colours of the bird for identification purposes and is acceptably sharp considering this is not just a photo of a bird but a photo of a bird in habitat. -- Colin 13:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 20:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

File:View of Brøndby Strandpark with hooded crow in tree.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A hooded crow (Corvus cornix) in a tree. View of Brøndby Strandpark with hooded crow (Corvus cornix) in tree. --Bob Collowân 21:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  OpposeSorry but the bird is hard to find even if you enlarge the image. In other words far too small. --Ermell 10:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is a good photo, it is just mislabled. If you name after the crow, some users will think it is supposed to be an encyclopedic photo of the bird. :) Just rename it to something like "View of Brøndby Strandpark with bird in tree" and it will be better. --W.carter 11:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - I had no trouble finding the crow but saw it right away. I found it easy to spot because the tree has no leaves. How about "View, etc., with hooded crow in tree"? That sounds like a landscape painter's title. -- Ikan Kekek 12:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for your input. I have had the file renamed and changed its description slightly. --Bob Collowan (talk) 08:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Great! It is a lovely photo of good quality. --W.carter 10:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Parque_Herastrau,_Bucarest,_Rumanía,_2016-05-30,_DD_05.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Herastrau Park, Bucharest, Romania --Poco a poco 19:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  CommentThe skyscraper on the right is leaning.--Ermell 21:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Yes, it's, but it does it for real, see elements at left and right. If you still don't belive me, check this Poco a poco 21:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
      • Ha ha very good! --Ermell 13:14, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment There is a big dust spot in the sky. -- Slaunger 22:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
    • I see two. --A.Savin 13:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment ✓ Removed Poco a poco 18:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now. -- Slaunger 19:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality--Ermell 20:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Bergtocht van parkeerplaats bij centrale Malga Mare naar Lago Lungo 31.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m). --Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Since there is no FOP in Italy and there is some artwork involved in the poster, I'm not sure that this picture could be QI --Moroder 06:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm not sure that counts as artwork; it's more an illustration showing the shape of a geological formation. CR?--Peulle 00:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment For me it is an illustrative information board about the habitat of the wide valley and the surrounding mountains in the national park.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
  • We need more input. Moving to CR.--Peulle 13:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Excellent photo. If its presence at Commons violates Italian laws, the solution is to nominate it for deletion. -- Ikan Kekek 10:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment I don't know how to do that. Surely I'm not happy at all with the Italian low butdura lex sed lex--Moroder 21:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 20:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Miguel_Nunes_Ford_Fiesta_R5_(1).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Miguel Nunes Ford Fiesta R5 --Harpagornis 16:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment A bit too much noise, can you reduce it? Geocode would be nice too.--Peulle 12:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  CommentI can not find the RAW, but I do not think it has much noise --Harpagornis 01:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I do, e.g. when you look at the windshield. Moving to CR for further opinions. :) --Peulle 13:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Not the sharpest image but under this circumstances QI for me.--Ermell 20:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Mild  Oppose. I appreciate these images, they are difficult shots but this one seems a bit too unsharp to me, sorry. --Basotxerri 16:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 20:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)