Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 16 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:রবীন্দ্র_কুঠিবাড়ি,_শিলাইদহ.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Shilaidaha Kuthibadi. By User:Zulfikar Habib Khan --NahidSultan 05:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Haeferl 23:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I disagree. Insufficient level of detail --A.Savin 16:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient level of detail and blown out areas on the structures around the gate. W.carter 09:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:26, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

File:16-03-30-Ста́рый_го́род_Иерусали́ма-RalfR-DSCF7652.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Old City of Jerusalem, Lutheran Church of the Redeemer --Ralf Roletschek 22:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support GQ --Palauenc05 22:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Dust spots and needs tilt correction --A.Savin 01:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - May be fixable, but as it stands, the sky is too noisy and parts of the picture could use more focus. -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 03:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Hawa_Khana,_Puthia_PRG_8591.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hawa Khana, Puthia. By User:Porag61 --NahidSultan 08:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Smial 10:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, the image is almost fine but IMO it would need a slight perspective correction as both side are leaning out. --Basotxerri 17:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Basotxerri, it's not much, but it's there. W.carter 09:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Kurt-Schumacher-Allee 16 (Hamburg-St. Georg).13747.ajb.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Employment office Kurt-Schumacher-Allee 16 in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 07:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose I'm sorry but this seems too overexposed to me. Not a QI. BTW, it would have needed a perspective correction, too. --Basotxerri 09:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
    ✓ Done @Basotxerri: Thank you for review: Lights reduced, perspective corrected --Ajepbah 11:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
     Comment OK, the perspective is fixed, however it seems too overexposed to me, especially the clock and the sky on the right handside. I would like to hear other opinions. --Basotxerri 15:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
     Comment Yet another version uploaded ... --Ajepbah 17:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Not actually blown out if you look carefully at the histogram. --King of ♠ 06:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Per KoH.--Peulle 08:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Close to the edges slight problems with sharpness, but all in all reasonable work. --Smial 14:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you all for your comments! --Basotxerri 15:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sufficient quality, but not QI IMO. Too tight at top. Overexposed clock. Soft colors. Average quality. Not QI IMO--Lmbuga 21:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Crop too tight, not the best framing. Alvesgaspar 19:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Nothing wrong with the pic QI-wise, the crop is a bit tight, but since the building is surrounded by other buildings close by, that's probably unavoidable and the top crop matches the side and bottom ones. W.carter 09:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support In the border line --The Photographer 13:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 16:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)