Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 03:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

August 1, 2015[edit]

July 31, 2015[edit]

July 30, 2015[edit]

July 29, 2015[edit]

July 28, 2015[edit]

July 27, 2015[edit]

July 26, 2015[edit]

July 25, 2015[edit]

July 24, 2015[edit]

July 23, 2015[edit]

July 19, 2015[edit]

July 16, 2015[edit]

July 13, 2015[edit]

July 03, 2015[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Baked_apple_02.JPG[edit]

Baked apple 02.JPG

  • Nomination Baked apple. --Andrey Korzun 08:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad white balance SkywalkerPL 09:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done fixed. Uploaded a new version --Andrey Korzun 22:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Please see the new version of file --Andrey Korzun 13:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Much better now.Crisco 1492 06:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like it. --Tsungam 06:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks not quite like something I would like to eat, but quality is OK for me. --A.Savin 15:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --A.Savin 15:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Student from UNY reading short story by Evi Idawati 2015-06-08 02.jpg[edit]

Student from UNY reading short story by Evi Idawati 2015-06-08 02.jpg

  • Nomination Student from Yogyakarta State University performing a dramatic reading. Crisco 1492 14:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blurred, reflection from flashlight --Moroder 17:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No flash used (check the EXIF data). It is the reflection of stage lighting off the perspiration on her face. --Crisco 1492 12:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Student from UNY reading short story by Evi Idawati 2015-06-08 01.jpg[edit]

Student from UNY reading short story by Evi Idawati 2015-06-08 01.jpg

  • Nomination Student from Yogyakarta State University performing a dramatic reading. Crisco 1492 14:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose reflection from flashlight --Moroder 17:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No flash used (check the EXIF data). It is the reflection of stage lighting off the perspiration on her face. --Crisco 1492 12:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Student from UNY reading short story by Evi Idawati 2015-06-08 06.jpg[edit]

Student from UNY reading short story by Evi Idawati 2015-06-08 06.jpg

  • Nomination Student from Yogyakarta State University performing a dramatic reading. Crisco 1492 14:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose reflection from flashlight --Moroder 17:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No flash used (check the EXIF data). It is the reflection of stage lighting off the perspiration on her face. --Crisco 1492 12:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Creepy and fascinating at the same time. Given the circumstances I think it qualifies as QI. --Tsungam 12:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:19, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Beyenburger Klosterkirche 0016.jpg[edit]

Beyenburger Klosterkirche 0016.jpg

  • Nomination Beyenburger Klosterkirche --Atamari 17:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment nice picture, but tilted cw. --Hubertl 17:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done i rotate a little bit --Atamari 18:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion OK now. --Hubertl 18:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Purple fringe on the top of the building and the on the leaves. Not sharp. --Bgag 19:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The description “Ennepetal..” cannot be correct.--~~~~
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ennepetal is the location of the photographer --Atamari 21:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment renamed.--Hubertl 05:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp and CA in full view --A.Savin 15:36, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

File:302_p2.JPG[edit]

302 p2.JPG

  • Nomination Tram wagon 302 By User:Alfvanbeem --Atamari 17:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Strong magenta chromatic aberrations. --Cccefalon 13:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, mainly (but not only) in the trees at top left.--Jebulon 17:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Now I see the magenta chromatic aberrations. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 21:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Dome_in_Sant'Ignazio_(Rome)_HDR.jpg[edit]

Dome in Sant'Ignazio (Rome) HDR.jpg

  • Nomination Dome in Sant'Ignazio (Rome) HDR --Livioandronico2013 14:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not really fond of this type of images, btw there is also a lot of CA --Moroder 06:49, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Esagerato...un pochino Clin comunque ✓ Done --Livioandronico2013 11:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ma cos'è tutta quella luce azzurra, poi mi sembra sovraesposta la parte della lanterna...--Moroder 12:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Non credo che sia sovraesposta (è in HDR) comunque fai tu. La luce proviene da una vetrata azzurra vicino,thanks --Livioandronico2013 14:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, overexposed roof of the lantern (no detail specially on the right) --Moroder 17:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ask other opinions,thanks --Livioandronico2013 21:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ok for me.--Hubertl 05:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A very difficult light to be managed, but I Agree with Moroder.--Jebulon 16:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Temple_of_Apollo,_Didyma_01.jpg[edit]

Temple of Apollo, Didyma 01.jpg

  • Nomination Temple of Apollo in Didyma, Turkey --Bgag 14:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too overprocessed, oversharpened. Please try to reprocess from the Raw-Original. --Hubertl 15:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Not done in over a week --Daniel Case 15:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I would like to have another opinion. --Bgag 03:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oversharpened. Good shot otherwise, but in a current state it's sub-standard. --SkywalkerPL 21:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 17:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Temple_of_Apollo,_Didyma_02.jpg[edit]

Temple of Apollo, Didyma 02.jpg

  • Nomination Temple of Apollo in Didyma, Turkey --Bgag 14:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too overprocessed, oversharpened. Please try to reprocess from the Raw-Original. --Hubertl 15:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Not done in over a week --Daniel Case 15:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I would like to have another opinion. --Bgag 03:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose badly oversharpened. Good shot otherwise, but in a current state it's sub-standard. --SkywalkerPL 21:38, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 17:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Ballon PH-HOS van Nissan op de Jaarlijkse Friese ballonfeesten in Joure 01.jpg[edit]

Ballon PH-HOS van Nissan op de Jaarlijkse Friese ballonfeesten in Joure 01.jpg

  • Nomination Balloon PH HOS Nissan on the Hot Air Balloon Festival in Joure province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
    Famberhorst 04:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, nice picture, but unfortunately out of focus. --Code 05:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Question: is the balloon not sharp, or just the passenger compartment?
Famberhorst 15:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
The balloon IMO. --Code 21:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
It's not out of focus. It's diffraction. f/11 at 18Mpx APS-C sensor. It could easily be shot at f/5.6 --SkywalkerPL 21:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. -- KTC 23:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Additionally I think it should be a little brighter overall. --Code 05:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Slightly brighter. Thank you.--Famberhorst 16:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 05:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian_folk_dancers_and_musicians_in_Brussels_cropped.JPG[edit]

Bulgarian folk dancers and musicians in Brussels cropped.JPG

  • Nomination Bulgarian folk dancers after a performance in Brussels. (another version of this image (before cropping) was nominated a few days ago) --Tropcho 14:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It doesn´t make sense to crop an already promoted picture to get a second quality image from the same source. --Hubertl 15:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm aware of a rule that says that there cannot be two featured versions of the same image (only the better version retains featured status). Is there a similar rule for quality images? Tropcho 15:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a crop is significantly bringing out a detail or is giving another meaning to the photo, then I could accept the extract as a new photo. But here, it is just a cut of few pixels on top and on bottom. This should not be the new approach of adding more QI to Commons imo. --Cccefalon 06:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hubertl and Cccefalon. --Tsungam 06:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 04:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Phyteuma, Ariège, France.JPG[edit]

Phyteuma, Ariège, France.JPG

  • Nomination Phyteuma, Ariège, France --Rorolinus 09:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed, sorry. --Cccefalon 10:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I disagre. Imo it is QI --Moroder 11:30, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Cccefalon is always right--Livioandronico2013 12:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed, bad DoF. --SkywalkerPL 21:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 06:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Lotus corniculatus, Ariège, France.JPG[edit]

Lotus corniculatus, Ariège, France.JPG

  • Nomination Lotus corniculatus, Ariège, France --Rorolinus 20:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Atamari 22:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but this is too noisy, maybe over processed. --Hockei 13:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think, it´s acceptable as it is. --Hubertl 16:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think it's good. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's not understandable that these noisiness does not lead to the devaluation. You can see the artefacts most clearly at the bottom. It could be a much better work. You must take your time for this. As it is it is not QI even against other opinions. --Hockei 07:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei --Moroder 21:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 04:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Mairie d' Hellemmes-Lille.jpg[edit]

Mairie d' Hellemmes-Lille.jpg

  • Nomination Mairie d'Hellemmes-Lille Nord.- France.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 08:50, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no QI, artifacts (oversharpening? compression?) and picture looks distored (shouldn't the clock be round?) --Tsungam 07:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think, the clock can´t be round from this position, IMO the artefacts are fixable, also the slight perspective distortion --Hubertl 07:37, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done thank you for your advices. The artefacts are fixed, and the slight perspective distortion corrected.- --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Subject cover by tree, barrel distortion, seems to be overexposed and... overprocessed? Or is it just camera that produces such an oddly noisy and undetailed images at ISO 100? Hard to tell, but it really doesn't look as good as it should have at ISO 100. --SkywalkerPL (talk) 21:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 06:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)