Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 03:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

add nomination below this line, inside the gallery tags, in the following form — new nominations


March 23, 2019[edit]

March 22, 2019[edit]

March 21, 2019[edit]

March 20, 2019[edit]

March 19, 2019[edit]

March 18, 2019[edit]

March 17, 2019[edit]

March 16, 2019[edit]

March 15, 2019[edit]

March 14, 2019[edit]

March 13, 2019[edit]

March 12, 2019[edit]

March 10, 2019[edit]

March 9, 2019[edit]

March 8, 2019[edit]

March 4, 2019[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Papaver_pseudocanescens_-_polar_poppy_in_the_Altai_Mountains_03.jpg[edit]

Papaver pseudocanescens - polar poppy in the Altai Mountains 03.jpg

  • Nomination Papaver pseudocanescens - polar poppy in the Altai Mountains --Alexandr frolov 07:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but this plant was misidentified and misnamed; not a poppy, but something from the Asteraceae--Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I concur.--Peulle 17:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 17:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Horse_licks_salt_in_the_Altai_Mountains_01.jpg[edit]

Horse licks salt in the Altai Mountains 01.jpg

  • Nomination A horse licks salt in the Altai Mountains. Jazaor village --Alexandr frolov 13:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now. Please add geocode or fix the name of the village. Google doesn't know Jazaor --Podzemnik 23:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see no reason to add geocode. -- Spurzem 21:08, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Why not? -- Ikan Kekek 03:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Ermell 23:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Kurai_Range,_Yantrek_Top_04.jpg[edit]

Kurai Range, Yantrek Top 04.jpg

  • Nomination Kurai Range, Yantrek Top --Alexandr frolov 15:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMO a possaible QI, but please use better categories to show that this a paining and give the name of the painter --Michielverbeek 19:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Is this irony or just a lack of glasses? I think here we need a clearing about the nature of this picture --PtrQs 01:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I'm not seeing this as a painting but as a quite seriously noisy and posterized photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Ermell 23:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Erdene_Zuu_Monastery_04.jpg[edit]

Erdene Zuu Monastery 04.jpg

  • Nomination Erdene Zuu Monastery is a Buddhist monastery in Mongolia --Alexandr frolov 05:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Can you add geocode and remove CA? --Podzemnik 09:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Conditional oppose Needs also perspective correction. --C messier 09:46, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Ermell 23:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Leontopodium_ochroleucum,_эдельвейс_в_Горах_Алтая_06.jpg[edit]

Leontopodium ochroleucum, эдельвейс в Горах Алтая 06.jpg

  • Nomination Leontopodium ochroleucum, edelweiss in the Altai Mountains, the valley of the river Elangash --Alexandr frolov 15:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Double nomination. --Palauenc05 18:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Ermell 23:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Basilica_di_Santa_Maria_Maggiore_altare_maggiore_a_Roma.jpg[edit]

Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore altare maggiore a Roma.jpg

  • Nomination Apse of the Santa Maria Maggiore church in Rome. --Moroder 14:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree. It's too noisy; especially the lower part. --Tournasol7 11:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Considering the file's size, I think the picture is of at least adequate quality for QI. Sure, it's unfortunate that the right and left sides are less focused than the rest of the article, but the chapel itself looks pretty amazing. I hope you're not influenced too much by looking very closely at full size. -- Ikan Kekek 10:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ermell 22:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Kurai_Range_in_the_Altai_Mountains_02.jpg[edit]

Kurai Range in the Altai Mountains 02.jpg

  • Nomination Kurai Range in the Altai Mountains, Kosh Agachsky Aimak --Alexandr frolov 05:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think that the camera share is significant, especially on the left side. --Podzemnik 13:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Podzemnik --Palauenc05 18:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Billy69150 10:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Irisbus_Agora_L_n°653_DK'Bus_-_Amirauté.JPG[edit]

Irisbus Agora L n°653 DK'Bus - Amirauté.JPG

  • Nomination Bus in Dunkerque --Billy69150 22:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
    right part is leaning to the right --Michielverbeek 08:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done --Billy69150 17:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC) It looks better now, so no opppose --Michielverbeek 19:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 10:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Reino_Nordin_-_Ilosaarirock_2018_-_04.jpg[edit]

Reino Nordin - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 04.jpg

  • Nomination Finnish singer Reino Nordin performing. --Teevee 21:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it's a problem with his hairs. --Tournasol7 23:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slight overexposure, but acceptable. --Smial 09:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 00:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 00:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Lea_Schneider_bei_Fokus_Lyrik_2019_01.jpg[edit]

Lea Schneider bei Fokus Lyrik 2019 01.jpg

  • Nomination The poet and translator Lea Schneider at a panel discussion for Fokus Lyrik 2019 in Frankfurt --Kritzolina 08:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose her head is cropped in --MB-one 16:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I disagree. Composition and cropping are obviously intended and contribute positively to the picture's message. --Smial 22:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per MB-one --Sandro Halank 15:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 15:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per MB-one --Billy69150 17:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cropping a portrait like this is intended to create closeness and for me the partition of the pic is perfect. --PtrQs 19:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't like it when people do this for still photographs, but this kind of framing is a well-known and valid technique, and this image is well shot within the confines of said technique.--Peulle 17:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good composition -- Spurzem 21:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Peulle 17:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)