Jump to content

Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Nominations

[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 16:22, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

If you are not ready to Promote or Decline an image, you may leave a Comment instead.

If someone else has already promoted or declined an image and you disagree, you may cast an opposite voice or use Discuss — this will move the image to the Community Review section.

If you agree with a previous decision, there is no need to cast the same vote again, as doing so only delays the final closure of the nomination.

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).


July 14, 2026

[edit]

July 13, 2026

[edit]

July 12, 2026

[edit]

July 11, 2026

[edit]

July 10, 2026

[edit]

July 9, 2026

[edit]

July 8, 2026

[edit]

July 7, 2026

[edit]

July 6, 2026

[edit]

July 5, 2026

[edit]

July 4, 2026

[edit]

July 1, 2026

[edit]

June 30, 2026

[edit]

June 29, 2026

[edit]

June 28, 2026

[edit]

Consensual review

[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's and author's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".



File:Arabian_Toed.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination An Rare Arabian Toed from Sulabiya pivot feildsI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2026. By User:BirderSajan --Ovva olfa 11:23, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Noise is borderline here --Poco a poco 11:55, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose noise is below QI bar IMO --George Chernilevsky 12:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --روتانا 14:11, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per George --Jakubhal 16:28, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others, sorry. --Lmbuga 17:25, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 15:54, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Schnabelwaid_Maria-Magdalena-Kirche_Luftbild-20260712-RM-163553.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination St. Mary Magdalene Church in Schnabelwaid, aerial view --Ermell 11:05, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:12, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose bad Q --روتانا 14:43, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Harlock81 15:54, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Western_Barn_Owl_at_Night.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A beautiful Barn owl from Pivot feildsI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2026. By User:BirderSajan --Ovva olfa 22:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --روتانا 22:30, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A good capture, but it shows low level of detail at full resolution, most likely due to digital upscaling, possibly AI-assisted --Jakubhal 03:49, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jakubhal -- George Chernilevsky 06:36, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I see so many photos of animals where the subjects were hit directly by a camera flash. Is that actually a good idea? --Smial 11:23, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 08:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Steepe_Eagle_Take_off.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Take off of a Might steepe eagle from Salmi Deserts during raptor migrationI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2026. By User:BirderSajan --Ovva olfa 22:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --روتانا 22:32, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A good capture, but it shows a very low level of detail at full resolution, most likely due to digital upscaling, possibly AI-assisted --Jakubhal 03:48, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jakubhal -- George Chernilevsky 06:38, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 08:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Spotted_aflycatcher.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A mid air fly of spotted Flycatcher taken from Abu halifaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2026. By User:BirderSajan --Ovva olfa 22:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --روتانا 22:31, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A good capture, but it shows low level of detail at full resolution, most likely due to digital upscaling, possibly AI-assisted --Jakubhal 03:49, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Jakubhal, strong pixelation visible at full size -- George Chernilevsky 06:34, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 08:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Curious_European_Scops_Owl.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Something burning in the eyes. A beautiful European Scops Owl from Mutala Ranch farmI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2026. By User:BirderSajan --Ovva olfa 22:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --روتانا 22:32, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A good capture, but it shows low level of detail at full resolution, most likely due to digital upscaling, possibly AI-assisted --Jakubhal 03:49, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong pixelation visible at full size -- George Chernilevsky 06:32, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 08:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Desert_hedgehog.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A cutie Hedgehog from Abraq OasisI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2026. By User:BirderSajan --Ovva olfa 22:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --روتانا 22:32, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong noise, overprocessed --Jakubhal 03:44, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jakubhal -- George Chernilevsky 06:39, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 08:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Arabian_chameleon_(kuwait).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Arabian chameleon in Kuwait--روتانا 16:16, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 16:22, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Mohammed Qays 17:51, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose (temporarily) Needs more precise categories of the species. --Екатерина Борисова 01:21, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Underexposed, chamaleon should be identified. Alvesgaspar 10:25, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

 Comment @Екатерина Борисова ✓ Done.روتانا 14:15, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Harlock81 08:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Travelers_plan_their_day_very_early_in_Oman.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Travelers plan their day very early in Oman--روتانا 16:16, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Mohammed Qays 17:51, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Declined on June 27 because of red and green CA's on all objects (not fixed). --Екатерина Борисова 01:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor image quality. Alvesgaspar 10:26, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 08:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:A_group_of_camels_in_the_desert_of_Oman.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 08:07, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Fire Queen fireboat under restoration in Dock Two, Port Adelaide, June 2026 (028A7131).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fire Queen fireboat under restoration in Port Adelaide, June 2026. --Pangalau 02:28, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Not clear what this depicts. Needs more precise description and CAT. --Tagooty 03:12, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
    Done. --Pangalau 01:10, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
    Still not clear to me: appears to be the stern of a boat in a workshop. The caption says "Dock 2" and the CAT "Port Adelaide". What part of the dock is shown? --Tagooty 03:26, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
    This is obviously not the stern of the boat, this is the entire fire boat, from bow to stern, viewed from the side. Vsatinet (talk)
  •  Support Good photo as for me. --Vsatinet 07:29, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Temporary  Oppose Per QI guidelines, an accurate description is required. "Dock" is too general for this image. --Tagooty 11:06, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
    I have just requested a name change. --Pangalau 08:39, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
    Maybe I'm missing something, but as I understand "Dock 2" is maritime historic area in Port Adelaide. Why it's not sufficient description? Vsatinet 09:03, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Chaotic composition, crop too tight on boat. Alvesgaspar 10:28, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Harlock81 (talk) 08:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Renovation_of_a_section_of_national_road_no._94..,_Kraków-Wieliczka,_Poland.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Renovation of a section of national road no. 94., Kraków-Wieliczka, Poland --Igor123121 00:41, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:48, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
     Oppose You can't support your own images. --Екатерина Борисова 04:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Image is tilted. Alvesgaspar 10:29, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Екатерина Борисова 01:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Wieliczka_Park_train_station.....,.,_2026,_Wieliczka_City,_Poland.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wieliczka Park train station....,., 2026, Wieliczka City, Poland --Igor123121 00:41, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:48, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose You can't support your own images. --Екатерина Борисова 04:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looks blueish to me. -- Alvesgaspar 14:02, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • @Alvesgaspar: ✓ Done? --Igor123121 00:13, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Better but still too blue. Look at the chromatic curves. Alvesgaspar 10:32, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Екатерина Борисова 01:52, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

File:District_Court_building_in_Wieliczka._,Wieliczka_City_Poland.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination District Court building in Wieliczka ,Wieliczka City Poland --Igor123121 00:41, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Llez 05:34, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:48, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose You can't support your own images. --Екатерина Борисова 04:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  • @Екатерина Борисова: It was just a simple mistake while voting on my phone. The photo is already being promoted by another user, so my accidental vote doesn't change anything. You could have just tagged me instead of bringing the photo up for discussion. Igor123121 09:57, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very nice photo, good quality. It would be better if it were symmetrical. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:00, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This subject practically cries out for a symmetrical composition. We don't have that; the framing looks haphazard, and the crop at the top is too tight. --Smial 10:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Harlock81 15:52, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Wieprz_Majdan_Wielki_2025-08-28_p2.jpg

[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Harlock81 15:50, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

File:2025_Twierdza_Kłodzko,_skazamatowana_bateria_(07).jpg

[edit]

  •  Comment I don't understand why do you support an image with such an obvious and fixable issue, but I still wait for Jacek to come and fix it. --Екатерина Борисова 01:59, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Harlock81 08:06, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

File:2025_Twierdza_Kłodzko,_skazamatowana_bateria_(08).jpg

[edit]

  •  Comment I don't understand why do you support an image with such an obvious and fixable issue, but I still wait for Jacek to come and fix it. --Екатерина Борисова 01:59, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Harlock81 08:06, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

File:2025_Twierdza_Kłodzko,_skazamatowana_bateria_(09).jpg

[edit]

  •  Comment I don't understand why do you support an image with such an obvious and fixable issue, but I still wait for Jacek to come and fix it. --Екатерина Борисова 01:59, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Harlock81 08:06, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

File:2025_Twierdza_Kłodzko,_skazamatowana_bateria_(05).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress --Jacek Halicki 06:01, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:10, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The same error with CA's reduction on the trees as it was on some of your previous pictures. Please fix it. --Екатерина Борисова 02:54, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Igor123121 09:07, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't understand why do you support an image with such an obvious and fixable issue, but I still wait for Jacek to come and fix it. --Екатерина Борисова 01:58, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Harlock81 08:06, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

File:2025_Twierdza_Kłodzko,_skazamatowana_bateria_(06).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kłodzko Fortress --Jacek Halicki 06:01, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The same error with CA's reduction on the trees as it was on some of your previous pictures. Please fix it. --Екатерина Борисова 02:54, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Igor123121 09:07, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't understand why do you support an image with such an obvious and fixable issue, but I still wait for Jacek to come and fix it. --Екатерина Борисова 01:58, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Harlock81 08:06, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

File:Kirche-St.-Suitbertus-Kaiserswerth-2026.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Southwest view of the Basilica of St. Suitbertus in Kaiserswerth, Düsseldorf, Germany. --Tuxyso 07:29, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 08:32, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Extreme geometric distortion. -- Alvesgaspar 13:57, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me.--Tournasol7 06:00, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Alvesgaspar. Lvova 16:25, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality... --JackyM59 (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not so bad, but per Alvesgaspar. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:24, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.. --Igor123121 14:17, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:30, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Harlock81 15:50, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

File:McDonough_Memorial_former_location_(New_Orleans).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination McDonough Memorial former location in Lafayette Square in New Orleans --Ktkvtsh 21:04, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 23:49, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
     Oppose Perspective should be corrected. --Plozessor 03:20, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 09:31, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Harlock81 15:47, 14 July 2026 (UTC)