Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 12:57, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

June 30, 2015[edit]

June 29, 2015[edit]

June 28, 2015[edit]

June 27, 2015[edit]

June 26, 2015[edit]

June 25, 2015[edit]

June 24, 2015[edit]

June 23, 2015[edit]

June 22, 2015[edit]

June 21, 2015[edit]

June 20, 2015[edit]

June 19, 2015[edit]

June 16, 2015[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Двухэтажка.jpg[edit]

Двухэтажка.jpg

  • Nomination Canyon of the Tsitse river in Caucasian Biosphere Reserve, Russia. By User:Synaps-s --Ilya 11:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 11:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I could agree, but for an easy to take landscape photo, this is much too small resolution imo. --Cccefalon 15:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 05:13, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Statue_of_Lion_in_Norcia.jpg[edit]

Statue of Lion in Norcia.jpg

  • Nomination Statue of Lion in Norcia --Livioandronico2013 08:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good quality. , but please clear the clipped parts with the jpg artefacts on the forehead --Hubertl 10:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment jpg artefacts Hubertl ? do you mean the holes? --Livioandronico2013 17:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No, not the holes, see notes, please! White, high quality marble, especially when polished together with full sunlight is always difficult --Hubertl 19:15, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand...I don't see nothing...boh. Thanks. --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)::: I set it to discuss. It´s a good picture, it needs more opinions.--Hubertl 20:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 05:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Rathinda amor 07772.JPG[edit]

Rathinda amor 07772.JPG

  • Nomination Rathinda amor closeup --Vengolis 12:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No categories. Unfortunate species crop. --Cccefalon 09:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Categories fixed now. I disagree with "unfortunate crop" argument. This is purely intentional to show head details. Otherwise we end up with full body portraits only where we can capture littile details of the head. And what about head shots and tight face crops of homosapians? --Jkadavoor 02:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Pagoda_Xa_Loi,_Ciudad_Ho_Chi_Minh,_Vietnam,_2013-08-14,_DD_03.JPG[edit]

Pagoda Xa Loi, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 03.JPG

  • Nomination Xa Loi Pagoda, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 19:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, converging vertical lines. --F. Riedelio 10:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If perspective fully corrected, the building would look really distorted, and I doupt if the walls are vertical for real. But feels a bit tilted to the right. Sky could be better. --C messier 15:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File: Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg[edit]

Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg

  • Nomination Laach Lake. It is a volcanic caldera lake in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, about 24 km (15 mi) northwest of Koblenz and 37 km (23 mi) south of Bonn -- Spurzem 18:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice and moodful image. But according to QI criteria I have to deny it: Burnt hightlights and a lot of pure black. Probably a fill flash had compensate the high contrast situation. English description is missing on the file description page. --Tuxyso 18:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK. So unterschiedlich sind die Auffassungen von guten und grottenschlechten Bildern. Außerdem: Seit wann ist eine englische Beschreibung beim Bild vorgeschrieben? -- Spurzem 19:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sie ist nicht vorgeschrieben, nur wenn du dir schon die Mühe machst und das Bild hier auf Englisch beschreibst, ist es im Sinne von Commons als Medienarchiv nur sinnvoll die Beschreibung auch auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite zu integrieren. Ich habe ja geschrieben, dass ich das Bild sehr schön und stimmungsvoll finde, den QI-Kriterien genügt es aber dennoch nicht. Setze einfach auf Discuss, um weitere Meinungen einzuholen. --Tuxyso 18:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me it´s QI. --Hubertl 02:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:00, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Oruga_de_gusano_de_seda_del_ricino_(Samia_cynthia),_Mariposario_de_Icod_de_los_Vinos,_Tenerife,_España,_2012-12-13,_DD_01.jpg[edit]

Oruga de gusano de seda del ricino (Samia cynthia), Mariposario de Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 01.jpg

  • Nomination Caterpillar of Ailanthus silkmoth (Samia cynthia), Butterfly zoo of Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 19:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI enough for me. --Jkadavoor 15:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but there is almost no DOF (why f/2,8 ???), the head is out of focus and there are strong artefacts. --Hockei 17:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry; I overlooked on the artefacts. The shutter speed is already very slow; a higher ISO may required. Jkadavoor 05:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 06:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Shiva_temple_at_Puthia_01.JPG[edit]

Shiva temple at Puthia 01.JPG

  • Nomination The Bhubaneshwar Shiva Temple of Puthia is the largest Shiva temple in Bangladesh. It was built in 1823 by Rani Bhubonmoyee Devi. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 05:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Artefacts in the sky. --Cccefalon 19:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bara_Ahnik_Mandir_at_Puthia.JPG[edit]

Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia.JPG

  • Nomination Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia, constructed by the Char Ani Rajas of Puthia estate. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 06:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Magenta CA in the trees and loss of fine details. Never a QI! --Cccefalon 19:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Michael_Schumacher_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Michael Schumacher 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Michael_Schumacher_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hi Michael... Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The tight crop is done here on purpose (afterwards and not due to fast driving cars). IMHO a wider crop would be much better here. --Tuxyso 20:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Agree with Tuxyso. It needs lead space/room. --C messier 11:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Nico Rosberg 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's too tight IMHO, it needs lead room. If the uploader has kept the original it can be easily fixed. --C messier 11:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 10:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Mark Webber 2010 Malaysia 1st Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop, the spoiler is barely within frame. Easily fixable if the uploader has kept the original. --C messier 11:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 10:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Fernando_Alonso_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Fernando Alonso 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Fernando_Alonso_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Rubens_Barrichello_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Rubens Barrichello 2010 Malaysia 1st Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Rubens_Barrichello_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? --Cccefalon 17:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Tatsächlich dürfte der Zuschnitt ein bisschen weiter gefasst sein. Ansonsten ist es ein ausgezeichneter Mitzieher, und dass das Fahrzeug leicht schräg im Bild ist – vielleicht die Anfahrt einer Kurve? – verstärkt die Dynamik. Für mich Symbol support vote.svg Support. Bitte diskutieren. -- Spurzem 17:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Harbin Music park 2013.jpg[edit]

Harbin Music park 2013.jpg

  • Nomination Main building in Harbin music theme park. by Andrei1230 --Lzy881114 01:12, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 01:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I would agree, if the perspective is corrected. From this distance and considering the height of the building, I can expect rectilinear verticals. --Cccefalon 06:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 10:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Saint Alexander Nevsky Chapel (Korolyov June 2015).jpg[edit]

Saint Alexander Nevsky Chapel (Korolyov June 2015).jpg

  • Nomination The Memorial Chapel in the name of St. Alexander Nevsky in Korolyov, Moscow Oblast. --Dmitry Ivanov 16:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sky a bit oversaturated imo --Moroder 14:32, 17 June 2015 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The photo was taken in the early morning, the sun rose, but was low, the east of the sky was whitish and the west was deep, saturated. It doesn't seems to me that the colour of the sky is unnatural; quite the contrary, I think that I haven’t managed to show the real colour of the sky, it was more saturated. Dmitry Ivanov 19:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC).

  • Discussion Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Its ok to me. I don't see a problem. I would accept it. Discuss?-- DerFussi 05:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is good from my point of view. --Nino Verde 15:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Colours are IMHO OK, but you must apply blur more carefully, because some branches are very blurred and a corner of the chapel. (irrelevant propably) --C messier 11:17, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @C messier: Yes, some unpunctual blur can be noticed on the photo. I will try to fix it in 2-3 days. Dmitry Ivanov 20:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC).
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 16:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bengal_-_1.jpg[edit]

Bengal - 1.jpg

  • Nomination female Bengal --Medium69 12:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality. not sharp, not fixable IMO --Hubertl 12:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support --Billy69150 16:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad composition: Too much space at the top and not enough space at the bottom. --Code 05:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice cat but others as Code. -- Spurzem 14:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Jebulon 10:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 02:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Interior of departure hall at Beijing Capital International Airport.jpg[edit]

Interior of departure hall at Beijing Capital International Airport.jpg

✓ Done I won't have any further opportunities to correct this for a while, sorry. --Daniel Case 05:05, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 21:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distortions to be corrected.--Jebulon 10:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Jebulon 10:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Long view of inside of Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3.jpg[edit]

Long view of inside of Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3.jpg

  • Nomination Departure hall at Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3. --Daniel Case 19:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: chromatic aberrations in the roof windows, easy to fix --Cccefalon 05:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ✓ Done I won't have any further opportunities to correct this for a while, sorry. --Daniel Case 05:05, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 21:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose disturbing distortions, especially at left.--Jebulon 10:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Jebulon 10:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Spinne_Bratental_Ps.jpg[edit]

Spinne Bratental Ps.jpg

  • Thanks for the new info. I know species level can't be always asked, but Araneae was just like saying "spider". --Kadellar 20:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think that the species of the spider or of the bee has nothing to do with the quality of the image. It it's enough to read what happens. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kadellar. @Spurzem: Properly categorisation is a requirement of QIC. The user is categorizing in the top category which is considered to be bad practise. All taxonomic classification trees have for this purpose a sub-category like "Unidentified XXX". --Cccefalon 05:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sp. level identification is not necessary for Arthropoda as it is impossible in many cases without microscopic examination. So such a requirement will force people to make wild guess which simply means false information. But a lowermost possible identification of main subject (either one) is appreciated. We've a lot of experts here; please utilize it before proceeding to FP/QI/VI. (In this case, I made a request at User_talk:Kaldari#File:Spinne_Bratental_Ps.jpg.) Jkadavoor 06:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and avilable info added. Jkadavoor 06:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Jkadavoor: I agree and as I already proposed the "Unidentified .." category complies with the QIC requirements of proper categorization. --Cccefalon 07:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I just look into the details out of subject interest, and it seems from a new contributor through Wiki Loves Earth. I don't know the nominator too. We can help the beginners, and hope they pick the procedures soon. :) Jkadavoor 08:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 02:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Jakarta_Indonesia_National-Monument-01.jpg[edit]

Jakarta Indonesia National-Monument-01.jpg

  • Nomination Jakarta, Indonesia: A group of sport students in Merdeka Square listening to their instructor while relaxing in front of Monas, the National Monumente. --Cccefalon 04:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fustian. QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 05:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for me not a QI, the impression is very dusty, the main object and it's spire is not really sharp --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info Might be you focussed only on the background. The motif here is a group of sport students sitting in front of Monas ... For an image of the monument, I had choosen other settings. --Cccefalon 06:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me -- Spurzem 12:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 06:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 06:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Remains_of_the_temple_in_the_Imperial_Forums.jpg[edit]

Remains of the temple in the Imperial Forums.jpg

  • Nomination Remains of the temple in the Imperial Forums --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe the bar below cut? But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 15:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed (and a great part of it is burned) sky, maybe you should go back and photograph the temple when it isn't in the shadows. --C messier 16:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support shadows and lights. As in real life.--Hubertl 06:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 06:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)