Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 08:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

September 2, 2015[edit]

September 1, 2015[edit]

August 31, 2015[edit]

August 30, 2015[edit]

August 29, 2015[edit]

August 28, 2015[edit]

August 27, 2015[edit]

August 26, 2015[edit]

August 25, 2015[edit]

August 24, 2015[edit]

August 23, 2015[edit]

August 22, 2015[edit]

August 19, 2015[edit]

August 18, 2015[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Apollo_del_Belvedere_in_Vatican.jpg[edit]

Apollo del Belvedere in Vatican.jpg

  • Nomination Apollo del Belvedere --Livioandronico2013 13:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Excellent point of view and composition for this famous work. But some parts are overexposed IMO, and there is some noise. As an example, please see File:Apollo del belvedere, 01.JPG for comparison and better details. Anyway, I wish a third opinion before promoting.--Jebulon 09:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Dian HP playing the keyboard, 2015-08-22 01.jpg[edit]

Dian HP playing the keyboard, 2015-08-22 01.jpg

  • Nomination Indonesian composer Dian HP playing the keyboard Crisco 1492 01:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough.--PetarM 07:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, I see the same issues than another nominations of the uploader, too much noise reduction with loss of quality and probably ISO noise Ezarate 21:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 12:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Buchberg - Randen - Panorama.jpg[edit]

Buchberg - Randen - Panorama.jpg

  • Nomination Panoramic view of Buchberg and Randen from a field near Stühlingen-Grimmeslhofen --Llez 11:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Small issues, I added some notes. --Iifar 19:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I will correct it this afternoon --Llez 11:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done --Llez 13:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good now! --Hubertl 08:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 08:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Xylocopa violacea 1432.jpg[edit]

Xylocopa violacea 1432.jpg

  • Nomination Xylocopa violacea on a lavender flower. --C messier 09:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry,dark and not very clear --Livioandronico2013 10:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
✓ New version, brighter. --C messier 10:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep in mind that the black insect is in shadow. --C messier 10:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The word "shadow" isn't good in QI. Anyway in my opinion isn't QI --Livioandronico2013 12:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not in my hand to make it move to a sunny location. --C messier 12:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 07:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Сурнайист (Гиссар, Таджикистан).JPG[edit]

Сурнайист (Гиссар, Таджикистан).JPG

  • Nomination Musical Instruments in Tajikistan (Hissar, Tajikistan) --Шухрат Саъдиев 10:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could work, but some flaws... (composition, crop below...). Try and try again, good luck !--Jebulon 14:24, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Two dust spots in the sky, tight crop to the left, tilt/perspective IMHO should be corrected (see the building in the background). --C messier 12:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad framing, IMO no QI --Hubertl 07:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 04:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Aerial_photo_of_Mercer_Island,_Washington.jpg[edit]

Aerial photo of Mercer Island, Washington.jpg

  • Nomination Aerial photo of Mercer Island as seen from a commercial flight from Seattle to Detroit. --Dllu 11:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Color cast, haze and low contrast (fixable), blown out roofs, CA --Ralf Roletschek 10:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done I have applied some dehazing. Note that the original JPEG out of camera is looks like this. I've already tried hard to improve the contrast from the RAW file. I don't see any significant chromatic aberration, although there are some demosaicing artifacts in the docks to the left (both the AHD and VNG demosaicers in ufraw-gimp struggle with the lack of antialiasing filter in the Sony ILCE-7R's sensor). Dllu 17:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Way better and works for QI now imho, though RR is right: there is fixable CA (edges of white buildings in the centre of the settlement and coast in the upper right quarter. Denis Barthel 07:30, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 04:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Gesù_e_Maria_(Rome)_-_Interior.jpg[edit]

Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Interior.jpg

  • Nomination Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Interior --Livioandronico2013 07:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wrong and oversaturated colours. Look here, here and here. --Code 07:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
    Others please --Livioandronico2013 07:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed. -- Smial 00:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 04:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

File:San_Giacomo_in_Augusta_(Rome)_-_Interior.jpg[edit]

San Giacomo in Augusta (Rome) - Interior.jpg

  • Nomination San Giacomo in Augusta (Rome) - Interior --Livioandronico2013 07:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The colours are completely unnatural, look here, here and here. --Code 09:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Others please --Livioandronico2013 10:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Livio, can you tell us how you process your HDRs? I have to agree that it looks very unrealistic right now (much too red), but I think that it can be corrected. Do you use the HDR of Photoshop (PS has problems with reds)? Can you try to redo the tonemapping? --DXR 13:09, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • @DXR: Er beantwortet zwar unsere Fragen nicht, hat jetzt aber eine neue Version hochgeladen, bei der die Farben normal aussehen. Komisches Verhalten. --Code 12:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed. -- Smial 08:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 10:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)