Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 09:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

May 29, 2023[edit]

May 28, 2023[edit]

May 27, 2023[edit]

May 26, 2023[edit]

May 25, 2023[edit]

May 24, 2023[edit]

May 23, 2023[edit]

May 22, 2023[edit]

May 21, 2023[edit]

May 20, 2023[edit]

May 19, 2023[edit]

May 18, 2023[edit]

May 17, 2023[edit]

May 16, 2023[edit]

May 15, 2023[edit]

May 12, 2023[edit]

May 9, 2023[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".



File:2023_Spryskiwacz_z_myjką_Karcher_(2).jpg[edit]

2023 Spryskiwacz z myjką Karcher (2).jpg

  • Nomination Karcher spray bootle with wiping cloth 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very good for the dark part, but the white parts bleed into the background too much, sorry. --Mike Peel 21:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Schleswig-Holstein,_Itzehoe,_Laurentii-Kirche_NIK_2652.jpg[edit]

Schleswig-Holstein, Itzehoe, Laurentii-Kirche NIK 2652.jpg

  • Nomination Impressionen aus dem Inneren der Stadtkirche St. Laurentii in Itzehoe. --Nightflyer 20:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Discussion The perspective and the brightness would have to be corrected. Also, the candles and flowers should have been put away before the picture was taken. -- Spurzem 10:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
    GA candidate.svg Weak support I think the picture could be sharper and, yes, a little bit brighter, but it is still good enough for a QI. Spurzem's request to redecorate the temple is unfeasible and should not be part of the evaluation. --Jakubhal 03:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

File:New_York_Stock_Exchange_August_2017_03.jpg[edit]

New York Stock Exchange August 2017 03.jpg

  • Nomination New York Stock Exchange August 2017 (by ArildV) --Sebring12Hrs 13:31, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. The motif is largely in the shadows; not a quality image for me. But maybe others think differently. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 12:51, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Spurzem. I am usually pretty tolerant of shadows, but they are so prevalent in this picture that they are really problematic to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with you both. Not a QI for me --Halavar 08:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Halavar 08:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC) (UTC)

File:2023-02-05_48._Hallorenpokal_A-Final_Men_(Martin_Rulsch)_189.jpg[edit]

2023-02-05 48. Hallorenpokal A-Final Men (Martin Rulsch) 189.jpg

  • Nomination A-Final Men at the 48th Hallorenpokal in diving in Halle (Saale) on 5 February 2023. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 08:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Leg cropped off. --BigDom 16:11, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment I think this image is well composed and would like to ask for more opinions. --Augustgeyler 20:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I think the crop is not a problem, and the composition is good. However, the depth of field is very low, and it looks like the focus is on the boy's torso, not his face. -- Jakubhal 09:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Crop --Tagooty 09:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of the crop and the color -- Spurzem 12:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Augustgeyler 08:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Clove_close_up.jpg[edit]

Clove close up.jpg

  • Nomination Macro image of the dried Clove bud --sanjay_ach 19:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  • I agree it is good quality, but I think it would look better symmetrically cropped. --BigDom 16:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Not sure if @BigDom: is opposing or only commenting, so moved to CR. Note that QICvote's "Comment" changed "Promotion" to "Review" which is not the correct flow. --Tagooty 08:45, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
      • Definitely not opposing, it's a great macro shot. I just don't get why it's not in the middle. Never intended it to come to CR, it was just a comment in case the uploader wanted to fix it. BigDom (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
        • Just would like to add my thought here while taking the picture. The reason why it's not in the middle is to give a perspective view from the bud end so that the viewer can see the complex details from that end. Hope that helps. --sanjay_ach 14:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I hope he wasn't opposing. Amazing closeup. -- Ikan Kekek 06:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks ok. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

File:2022-05-21_50._Internationales_Dixieland_Festival_Dresden_1DX_1526_by_Stepro.jpg[edit]

2022-05-21 50. Internationales Dixieland Festival Dresden 1DX 1526 by Stepro.jpg

  • Nomination 50th International Dixieland Festival Dresden: Dresdner Jazzmeile, Terrence Ngassa & The new Louis Armstrong Band (Kamerun). By --Stepro 19:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Pictogram-voting question.svg Question Visible Warning Symbol – Chromatic Aberration.svg chromatic aberration on arms. Can you correct it, please? --LexKurochkin 13:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks, I fixed it (hope so). --Stepro 22:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Yellow check.svg Half done @Stepro: Better, but, please pay attention to magenta CA on his right sleeve --LexKurochkin 08:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Let's discuss --LexKurochkin 12:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment I can't fix that easily. I also don't know if that's CA or from the colored stage lights. --Stepro 15:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment I have no doubt that that's a magenta CA border on part of the top of his sleeve. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. It's a pity that the left hand is slight cropped. But otherwise it is good for me. -- Spurzem 20:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment There's CA on the instrument also. Try reducing the saturation of Aqua color. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --LexKurochkin 11:03, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Penne_Arrabbiata.jpg[edit]

Penne Arrabbiata.jpg

  • Nomination Penne all'arrabbiata --PetarM 06:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality: the mobile phone hasn't quite been able to capture the level of detail needed, IMO. --Peulle 06:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see plenty of detail at larger than life size, so I think your standards are too demanding. -- Ikan Kekek 19:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good quality. I've the impression that more and more people are judging by the camera which was used to take the photos. -- Spurzem 10:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment I've been wondering about that, too - both ways, though. I've seen some comments suggesting that cellphone pictures might be fairly judged at a lower standard than DSLR pictures. We should just judge what we're seeing. I'd add, though, that this is not "100% sharp minute detail candidates," just "Quality image candidates." If our standard becomes that we not only have to see the ribs on the penne clearly but that they must be 100% sharp at larger than life size, what in the world are we doing? -- Ikan Kekek 17:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose With Peulle. --August Geyler (talk) 15:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough for QI for me --Kritzolina 17:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan Kekek. BigDom 17:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop isn't very good and there are some blurred areas. --Sebring12Hrs 20:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unfortunately per Sebring12Hrs. --MB-one 12:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting question.svg Question An entire dish doesn't have to all be equally sharp, does it? -- Ikan Kekek 20:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose – dislike the top right and the poor crop. --SHB2000 10:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Per others. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment IMO, the crop is good. We see the whole pasta dish. We don't need to see the whole bowl. -- Ikan Kekek 06:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --SHB2000 10:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)