Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 13:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

March 17, 2018[edit]

March 16, 2018[edit]

March 15, 2018[edit]

March 14, 2018[edit]

March 13, 2018[edit]

March 12, 2018[edit]

March 11, 2018[edit]

March 10, 2018[edit]

March 9, 2018[edit]

March 7, 2018[edit]

March 3, 2018[edit]

February 28, 2018[edit]

February 19, 2018[edit]

Consensual review[edit]


These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

Consensual Review[edit]


American bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus) hiding in tall grass.jpg

  • Nomination American bittern hiding in tall grass --Carlowenby 10:45, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blurry image, disturbing foreground --Basile Morin 02:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The motive (American Bittern) is recognizable but not a QI for me, sorry --Fischer.H 08:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
The purpose of this photo is to show the subject, an American bittern, [in perfect focus] effectively camouflaged in tall grass. Given the long focal length and large aperture, it is difficult to have every blade of grass in sharp focus.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'll go along with this one. Normally, disturbing surroundings and/or foreground objects can serve as distractions, but here they are part of the composition: it's not just a photo of a bird, but a photo of the bird hiding. Since this is also specified in the file name, I'm in favour.--Peulle 12:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As Peulle. Fascinating example of camouflage. --Smial 12:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Took a while to find the bird. O.K. for me.--Ermell 14:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Peulle. This photo shows the bird hiding very effectively. -- Ikan Kekek 04:06, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Ikan Kekek 04:06, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Karlovy Vary. The Tepla river. Czech Republic.jpg[edit]

Karlovy Vary. The Tepla river. Czech Republic.jpg

  • Nomination Karlovy Vary. The Tepla river. Czech Republic --Ввласенко 09:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeI'm sorry, but apart from the nice scene I search for sharpness and find a lot of chromatic noise. Maybe the ISO 500 were a bit too high. --PtrQs 20:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Seems still acceptable. --Basotxerri 18:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per PtrQs--Sandro Halank 12:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, per PtrQs --Michielverbeek 22:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality; see no noise. It has the look of a painting. DonFB 07:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty good composition, but I'm not swayed by the sharpness. That the right side is in the dark is OK, but even the left side has some problems with the level of detail.--Peulle 12:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Sandro Halank 12:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)