User talk:Moroder/Archives 2013-4A

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI despite rain, good composition, high level of details and nice composition and exposure.--ArildV 16:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)cmt Thanks fo your appreciation--Moroder 07:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara San Florian.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß kapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 15:34, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Miglanz Villnöß 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 21:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterschleller Hof Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for the Ufos :-). --Cayambe 14:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sky darkened? Or trees lightend? There is an ugly halo. -- Smial 13:32, 26 September 2013 (UTC) Comment Sincerely I don't see any halos, could you please put a note,thanks. --Moroder 20:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Comment I'v seen your enhanced image, thanks. I think there is nothing wrong because the halo is natural i.e. it does not depend on image processing but it is real. You can see it with your eyes when there are clear skyies. --Moroder 10:37, 1 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok, perhaps I've seen too many editing accidents that day. --Smial 21:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church in La Val, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support I don't like those colors and grey light but it is my personal opinion. And they should not be decisive to support and gain VI status! Quote from the criteria: "A VI is the best available image of its type on Commons, not the best that can be conceived of." I try to be objective, so I'm gonna support your image. Halavar (talk) 13:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Colours are for me too gloomy and the crop below is to tight. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Hof Punter in Villnöß.JPG

I'm afraid something went wrong with the resolution of the new version. --P e z i (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Using your photo

My name is Robert Berryman. I have posted your image of the Rialto Bridge to my facebook timeline with the following text:

"The famous Rialto Bridge in Venice, photographed at night in April 2013 by Wolfgang Moroder. Posted at Wikimedia."

https://www.facebook.com/robert.berryman.73?ref=tn_tnmn

Thank you for the beautiful picture!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans maison du directeur 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and great picture! (I would only make some partial sharpening on the building) --P e z i 18:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and great picture! (a tiny bit too much sky perhaps IMO) --P e z i 18:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Michael Vilnöß Fresko an Fassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Lippenmöser 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciasa Rü La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 16:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Plawatsch in Sankt Magdalena Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 19:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans derriere la maison du directeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 10:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans entree b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality (a tilt of 2.5 CW would let the house stand upright in middle bottom) --P e z i 10:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)cmt Thanks for the reviw. I tried the tilt correction but it doesn't any better--Moroder 20:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Punter in Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments two dust spots (see notice) --P e z i 19:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Moroder 11:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC) Comment OK now. --P e z i 16:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Miglanz Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans la maison du directeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciasa Rü La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 08:05, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of Saint Michael in the "Sankt Katharina in Breien" church in Völs am Schlern, Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Scope too broad and must include the name of the church and the city. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Oswald (Kastelruth) church with apse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please add side of the building and name of the town in the scope. After that I'm gonna support your image. Halavar (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Royal Saltworks of Arc-et-Senans, carriage house and stable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Archaeodontosaurus, this image don't have problem with perspective? It is not perfect straight. We should be objective and fair for everyone... Halavar (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

 Fixed the vertical lines, thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Thank you. Great image. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chateau de Font Joyeuse (Louzac), NE facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice imo. --JLPC (talk) 19:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Saint Margareth church in Obervöls, winged altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside shrine Rezzato.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 23:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla calonia La Val 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de bois ou Pont de Bouet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 15:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre d'Angeac-Charente 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Èglise Saint-Pierre Angeac Charente 2013 sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 17:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Folk dancing in Courcoury-Charente 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 15:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise saint pierre de chaniers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. There are dust spot(s).--XRay 13:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Fixed, thanks!--Moroder 18:28, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --XRay 19:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint Césaire 2013 interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint Césaire 2013 facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint Césaire 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cianacëi Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! -Sorà Kolfuschg Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. (fortunately you mentioned "north side :-)) --P e z i 18:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seventeenth century altar in Val Badia in a housechapel overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauskapelle in Villnöß innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Housechapel Val Badia Pieta detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sompunt Mühle aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a renomination, and yes, I don't understand why it was not distinguished at the first presentation, cause It is a QI.--Jebulon 14:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colz a San Linert dovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 dust spots (see notice); needs perspective correction --P e z i 21:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC) fixed Thanks --Moroder 11:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Comment OK now --P e z i 16:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Folk dancing in Courcoury-Charente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Font Joyeuse NE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison a Sant Andre Lussac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments strange spot (see notice) --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Fixed, thanks --Moroder 21:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment OK now. --P e z i 21:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß Lourdeskapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It looks like less contrast. What do you think?--XRay 16:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Sharpened I think there is plenty of contrast, look at the histogram, what it needed is sharpening. I hope you like it now. Thanks for te review --Moroder 23:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC) I like it. Good quality. :-) --XRay 05:41, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Miglanz Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, nice picture. --P e z i 20:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good now. --Bahnfrend 10:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Bahnfrend 05:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version a big improvement --Bahnfrend 09:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite porica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tilted. Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed horizontal lines, thanks --Moroder 21:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite duc i sanc.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please correct L/R perspective to make horizontals horizontal. Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed horizontal lines. Thanks --Moroder 16:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 20:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Césaire in Saint-Césaire, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment VI criteria no. 5 - it must be geocoded, so please add your location. Halavar (talk) 23:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

 Comment The server was down, thankfully Archaeo did it for me --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)  Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 11:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesus is condemned to death St. Bartholomew church Nafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:34, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Étienne Bassac èglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 17:56, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église paroissiale Notre-Dame Gondeville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Lippenmöser 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 20:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment I've uploaded a brightened version; please revert if you don't like it. --P e z i 20:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks!--Moroder 07:45, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cianacëi Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! -Sorà Kolfuschg Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. (fortunately you mentioned "north side :-)) --P e z i 18:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seventeenth century altar in Val Badia in a housechapel overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauskapelle in Villnöß innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Housechapel Val Badia Pieta detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sompunt Mühle aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a renomination, and yes, I don't understand why it was not distinguished at the first presentation, cause It is a QI.--Jebulon 14:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colz a San Linert dovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 dust spots (see notice); needs perspective correction --P e z i 21:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC) fixed Thanks --Moroder 11:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Comment OK now --P e z i 16:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Font Joyeuse NE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison a Sant Andre Lussac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments strange spot (see notice) --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Fixed, thanks --Moroder 21:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment OK now. --P e z i 21:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite porica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tilted. Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed horizontal lines, thanks --Moroder 21:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite duc i sanc.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please correct L/R perspective to make horizontals horizontal. Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed horizontal lines. Thanks --Moroder 16:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 20:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar Engel Mitte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar Engel oben li.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:41, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar Engel oben re.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:49, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Pierre Ecurat 2013 detail droit.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Llorenzi 14:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar putti li.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Heiligen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciasa Sompunt porta de ciule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrmesner in St. Peter 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Saint-Pierre" church (Angeac-Charente), eastern aspect.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Saint-Pierre" church (Chaniers), interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Kanzel Statue 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 17:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Kanzel und Fresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 13:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Geislerspitzen und Sankt Magdalena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Aufsatz Seitenaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint Césaire 2013 sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)