As far as I'm aware, the ultra-detailed 50-page table of contents was specifically NOT ruled to be copyright-free in the United States when the rest of the book was declared to be out of copyright, and so should not be uploaded here... AnonMoos (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin, so I can't delete myself. See the link I've just now added to the deletion discussion page.... AnonMoos (talk) 09:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
I have only a very moderate and sporadic interest in Urantia, but it's one of the things that I've been aware of for a long time (along with the Aquarian Gospel, Oahspe, etc.), and I did read Martin Gardner's book when it came out about ten years ago (and more recently uploaded File:Urantia three-concentric-blue-circles-on-white symbol.svg)... I was following along near the beginning of the lawsuit about ten years ago (as much because of the strange legal copyright convolutions as anything), which is how I already knew about the stipulation when I came across your file (there was a document I read on-line back then -- which didn't turn up prominently in a current Google search -- which laid down the detailed legal rationale for excluding the "Contents of the Book" from the lawsuit).
As for my Wikipedia user page, the "Shield of the Trinity" article is the one medium-size Wikipedia article where I've been the main author, and the one Wikipedia article which I launched as a full article (not just a stub), and it's since been rated "class A" by others. I've been vaguely aware of this diagram for a long time, I think, but I got more actively interested in it ca. 2004 as a result of participating in on-line discussions with Muslims over Usenet, and in early summer 2005 or thereabouts I realized that I knew more and/or cared more about the diagram than any other active Wikipedia editor did (which still seems true today), and so started working up the article (to see the earliest on-line records of my efforts, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AnonMoos&dir=prev&action=history and scroll down towards the bottom)... To see the range of my interests in visual form, go to my image gallery page here on Commons. AnonMoos (talk) 11:49, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)