User talk:Harke/Archiv/2009

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Analogmultimeter Multavi.jpg

Hi! Kannst du eventuell von der Skala dieses wunderhypschen Museumsstücks noch ein bzw. zwei Fotos für den Artikel de:Spiegelskala machen, mit denen man die Ablesestechnik bzw. Ablesefehler verdeutlichen könnte? Ich habe zwar selbst noch ein Instrument, aber das ist so alt und verkratzt, daß man davon kein vorzeigbares Foto machen kann. -- smial (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Werde ich gerne machen, aber es kann noch etwas dauern.--Harke (talk) 12:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Keine Hektik, lieber gut statt schnell :-) -- smial (talk) 16:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Ich habe endlich Zeit gefunden, mit der Spiegelskala etwas zu experimentieren. Gar nicht so einfach, paralaxfrei zu fotografieren! Ich denke, das Ergebnis ist brauchbar. File:Paralaxfrei Spiegelskala.jpg, File:Paralaxenfehler Spiegelskala.jpg, File:Paralaxenfehler Spiegelskala (2).jpg, File:Spiegelskala Multimeter.jpg. Weitere Ideen, was man noch anstellen könnte?--Harke (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Vermutlich wäre es sinnvoll, die beiden ersten Bilder zusammenzumontieren, dann könnte das gemeinsam beschrieben werden, wenn man die in einen Artikel setzt.-- smial (talk) 11:29, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hab jetzt einfach mal eins reingebaut. -- smial (talk) 11:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Herzlichen Dank für die Mühe auch :-) -- smial (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Man könnte doch die beiden Bilder als Galerie zusammentun. Ich habe das so versucht. Das sieht doch gut aus? Mit jpg zusammenmontieren kenne ich mich noch nicht so aus.----Harke (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


Contents

Quality Image Promotion

[[File:|75px|center|]]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Harke/Archiv!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

GB Network PCI Card.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GB Network PCI Card.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Glasrahmen offen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glasrahmen offen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Hygrometer probe rotronic DV-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hygrometer probe rotronic DV-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Thermocouple Multiplexer Agilent.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thermocouple Multiplexer Agilent.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Thermocouple K (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thermocouple K (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Reflecta CS2 Diarahmen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reflecta CS2 Diarahmen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Thermohygrometer rotronic A1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thermohygrometer rotronic A1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Rotkäppchen

Hallo Harke,

bei den beiden Bildern (File:Offterdinger Rotkappchen (2).jpg, File:Offterdinger Rotkappchen (1).jpg) ist mir aufgefallen, dass du bei "Author" bzw. "Urheber" Deinen Namen hineingeschrieben hast, was nicht korrekt ist. Offterdinger ist der Urheber. Die exakte Reproduktion eines zweidimensionalen Kunstwerks begründet keine eigene Urheberschaft.

Insofern kommt auch kein QI zustande (wobei ich die Regel nun auch nicht sonderlich gut finde).

Wäre einscannen hier eigentlich nicht einfacher gewesen als abfotografieren? --afrank99 (talk) 07:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Afrank99,
Danke für dein Kommentar, ich bin in der Sache noch ein Neuling, deshalb freue ich mich über jede Korrektur. Noch zwei Fragen dazu:
1) Reicht beim Autor nicht aus, wie ich es geschrieben habe 'photo by Harke'. Name des Künstlers steht schon im Feld Description.
2) Nach dieser Interpretation können grundsätzlich Reproduktionen von zweidimensionalen Kunstwerken niemals QI sein, wenn sie nicht vom Künstler selbst eingestellt werden. Ist bei Offterdinger ja nicht möglich, er war im 19 Jh kein Wikipedianer! Ich sehe bei den QI viele Reproduktionen zweidimensionaler Kunstwerke. Was nun?
Wegen dem Einscannen: Ich habe keinen hochauflösenden Scannener zur Verfügung. --Harke (talk) 10:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
zu 1) Nein, denn so wie du es schreibst, suggeriert es, dass Du der Autor wärst - was ja nicht stimmt. Du könntest Author: Offterdinger (photo/scanned by User:Harke) oder so ähnlich schreiben. Eben so, dass es dem ahnungslosen Leser sofort klar wird, wer was gemacht hat.
zu 2) Ist im Prinzip richtig, aber ehrlich gesagt, habe ich mich bei deinen Vorschlägen zum ersten Mal damit befasst - möglicherweise ist die Regel neu, oder wurde/wird bisher nicht beachtet. Oder ich lege sie zu genau aus. Kann auch sein. (die Qualität an sich würde schon für QI reichen) --afrank99 (talk) 17:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
zu 1) Dieser Vorschlag ist gut, so wird die Sache wirklich deutlicher. Ich werde das auch bei den anderen Reproduktionen ändern.
zu 2) Diese Regel kenne ich nicht. Mal abwarten, was die Nominierung ergibt. --Harke (talk) 18:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Hier steht's: Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons by the copyright holder --afrank99 (talk) 19:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
OK. Die deutsche Übersetzung sagt aber leider was anderes, Qualitätsbilder müssen unter verwendbarer Lizenz hochgeladen werden.[hier]--Harke (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Falls du es nicht mitbekommen hast: hier gibt's eine Diskussion zu dem Thema - wobei es eigentlich nur darum geht, die Richtlinien eindeutig zu formulieren. --ƛƭƦѦɳҞԳԳ (talk) 16:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Titles incorrect

Hi, Harke. The files File:Low efficiency fins.png e File:High efficiency fins.png have their titles inverted: in fact fins are more efficient when the temperature difference is higher (= more colors), while fins are less efficient when the temperature difference is smaller (= less colors). Similarly, File:Low efficiency fins (2).png could be called "File:High efficiency fins (2).png". If the images are present in some wikipedias, they eventually need to be corrected. Can you do it, please? --Aushulz (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello Aushulz,
Sorry, you are wrong. The files have correct titles. See my detailed description in de:Kühlrippe. In short: The fins are more efficient, if the temperature difference fin-to-ambient is higher over the whole fin area (higer surface temperature=higher heat transfer rate). This is in File:High efficiency fins.png the case - see the temperature scale. --Harke (talk) 19:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Harke is right, the files are correctly named. -- smial (talk) 21:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
You are right: if the fins are of a material more conductive, it means that the temperature on its surface is more uniform and higher. Sorry. :P --Aushulz (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Diabetrachter Hama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diabetrachter Hama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Offterdinger Rotkappchen (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Offterdinger Rotkappchen (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Sendemast Hirschlanden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sendemast Hirschlanden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Universalmagazin.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universalmagazin.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Ditzingen Schulhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Schulhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Krieger von Hirschlanden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krieger von Hirschlanden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Schwetzingen Moschee Wandelhof (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwetzingen Moschee Wandelhof (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Wasserspeiende Voegel (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserspeiende Voegel (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Ditzingen Altes Rathaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Altes Rathaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ditzingen Dreigiebelhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Dreigiebelhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Feuerwehrhaus

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ditzingen_Feuerwehrhaus-retouched.jpg

Vielleicht guckste Dir mal an, ob Dir einer der beiden Korrekturversuche gefällt. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Danke, sieht wirklich besser aus. Wenn du willst, kannst du mein Original mit deiner neuen Version überschreiben. Oder soll man beides stehen lassen? --Harke (talk) 16:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Mir ist lieber, Du lädst sie drüber, es ist Dein Bild. Sach mir kurz Bescheid, dann lösch ich die Variante. Viele gute Bilder übrigens, Kompliment!
mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Gemacht. Und danke für das Kompliment. --Harke (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Ditzingen Dekanatsamt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Dekanatsamt.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Schwetzingen Moschee Wandelhof (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwetzingen Moschee Wandelhof (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Ditzingen Feuerwehrhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Feuerwehrhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ditzingen Schloss.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Schloss.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ditzingen Galerie Am Laien.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Galerie Am Laien.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Schwetzingen Orangerie.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwetzingen Orangerie.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Schwetzingen Schloss Eingang.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwetzingen Schloss Eingang.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Schöckingen Pfarrhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Pfarrhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Schöckingen Altes Rathaus (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Altes Rathaus (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Air velocity meter sensor.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air velocity meter sensor.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Air velocity meter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air velocity meter.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Sendemast Hirschlanden Dachkapazität.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sendemast Hirschlanden Dachkapazität.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Schöckingen Mauritiuskirche (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Mauritiuskirche (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Schöckingen Altes Rathaus (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Altes Rathaus (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Konstanzer Kirche Grabplatte (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konstanzer Kirche Grabplatte (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Ditzingen Schlossmühle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Schlossmühle.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Schöckingen Firstständerhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Firstständerhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Schöckingen Schloßstraße.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Schloßstraße.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Wohnhäuser Hirschlanden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wohnhäuser Hirschlanden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Konstanzer Kirche Grabplatte (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konstanzer Kirche Grabplatte (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Konstanzer Kirche Grabplatte (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konstanzer Kirche Grabplatte (3).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Speyrer Kirche Ditzingen (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speyrer Kirche Ditzingen (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Speyrer Kirche Ditzingen (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speyrer Kirche Ditzingen (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Clampmeter Fluke 337.jpg touchup

Hello! I just wanted to let you know I created an edited version of one of your photos, File:Clampmeter Fluke 337.jpg, which is currently nominated at QIC. My version is here: File:Clampmeter Fluke 337 edit.jpg. I whitened and removed the background (but kept the shadow), rotated the image so the text is more readable, and fixed some perspective distortion; it was just a quick little touchup, but I think the clean background is a little easier on the eyes.

If you like my edit you can upload my version of the file over your original file and I'll delete the edited image's page; if not, it can just be added to your image's "other versions" section so people have both options. Cheers, and thanks for all your great contributions! -- Editor at Largetalk 12:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Editor at Large, thanks for your edit! The clean backgroud looks really good and it was also a good idea to rotate the picture. I appreciate all comments to my pictures and all suggestions for improvement. Only, I am not very happy with the sharp yellow color of the housing, the original color was warmer. But it is not an important issue, maybe it is only an impression of myself. I will upload your version above my version when the QI nomination closes (I think, it is not OK to change the images during the nomination). --Harke (talk) 20:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Check Clampmeter Fluke 337 edit.jpg now; is that colour better? You might have to clear your cache or purge the page before the new version shows up. I warmed the yellow up a bit and it seems to be closer to the colour of the original image now.
I'm glad you like the white background! I try to clean up backgrounds on object photos when I can; I find that a nice all-white background makes the subject pop a little more and is less distracting on Wikipedia article pages. The problem is that it can be difficult to get the background white when you're taking the photo; even against white paper the lighting can cause colour casts and shadows. I've done a lot of background cleanups in photoshop though, and I have a nice quick formula for getting clean white backdrops :D
Would you mind if I cleaned up a couple more of your object photos? I noticed you have a lot of great object photos on white backgrounds, like the one at the top of the page. All the backgrounds need is a little brightening and they'd be nice and crisp white. I've been cleaning up a few of my own object photos before uploading them, so I can do some of yours at the same time. -- Editor at Largetalk 15:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
It's really perfect now, thanks for your effort! I agree with you: most objects look better with a white background on the white Wiki pages (with exception of bright objects). I use white plotter paper as a background, manual white balance and daylight from the window. However there is always a non uniform illumination and shadows. I try some corrections with Nikon Capture NX2, but the possibilities are limited (and I'm not an expert in image editing). If you like, you can edit my images. I know, some of the backgrounds could certainly be improved. But please, let me know. ----Harke (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


Re: the funny rotation effects? I'm not quite sure what the "upright" perameter is for - I've never seen it before! However, I tried putting in "upright=1", which for you made the picture rotate 90° inside the upright frame; it worked fine for me though, with no noticeable change whatsoever. I'm not sure why it would be acting funny for you. I tested the "upright" perameter on de.wp in preview, and then in my sandbox so I could save to see if that made a difference; both turned out fine. Maybe it's your cache? Other than that I'm really not sure what could be making it act funny. My edit shouldn't affect that perameter, as it's a jpeg and doesn't have any complicated stuff like an SVG would. I really can't say what could be going on, other than try clearing your cache and test it again? -- Editor at Largetalk 22:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

If white balance function of the camera sometimes does not work as expected when using white paper as background, this can originate from optical brightener in the paper. This can cause a blueish tint, or, if the WB takes this into account, the background will be white, but everything else is warm coloured. For small objects I use ink jet photo paper (glossy or matt), which has no brightener. -- smial (talk) 23:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Today, all is OK with the rotation. It was probably the cache. Sorry. And thanks to Smial for the hint. I will try.--Harke (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Wappentafel Schöckinger Schloß.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wappentafel Schöckinger Schloß.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Schöckingen Schloßeinfahrt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Schloßeinfahrt.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Schöckingen Schloß.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Schloß.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ditzingen Bahnhof.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Clampmeter Fluke 337.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clampmeter Fluke 337.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Hirschlanden Rathaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hirschlanden Rathaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Schöckingen Neues Rathaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöckingen Neues Rathaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Kochenmuehle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kochenmuehle.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

St. Peter und Paul Heimerdingen (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Peter und Paul Heimerdingen (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Heimerdingen Bahnhof.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heimerdingen Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Eltingen Dorfstrasse (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eltingen Dorfstrasse (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Eltingen Dorfstrasse (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eltingen Dorfstrasse (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Eltingen Dorfstrasse (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eltingen Dorfstrasse (3).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Eltingen Dorfstrasse (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eltingen Dorfstrasse (4).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Ditzingen Tonmühle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Tonmühle.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Eltingen Dorfstrasse (5).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eltingen Dorfstrasse (5).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Eltingen Sonnenuhr.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eltingen Sonnenuhr.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Mulfingen von Jagstberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mulfingen von Jagstberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Jagstberg Fachwerkhaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jagstberg Fachwerkhaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Wappentafel Friedrich Albrecht von Gaisberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wappentafel Friedrich Albrecht von Gaisberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Eltingen Dorfstrasse (6).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eltingen Dorfstrasse (6).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Roudnice nad Labem -zámek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roudnice nad Labem -zámek.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Hrensko 2009, Hotel Praha.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrensko 2009, Hotel Praha.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

St. Anna-Kapelle Mulfingen (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Anna-Kapelle Mulfingen (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

St. Anna-Kapelle Mulfingen (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Anna-Kapelle Mulfingen (4).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Ditzingen Wochenmarkt Am Laien.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ditzingen Wochenmarkt Am Laien.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

ST. Anna-Kapelle Mulfingen (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST. Anna-Kapelle Mulfingen (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Hrensko 2009, Kamenice.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrensko 2009, Kamenice.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Edmundsklamm Fischtreppe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edmundsklamm Fischtreppe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Labe u Roudnice.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Labe u Roudnice.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Glemstalviadukt B10 (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glemstalviadukt B10 (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Glemstalbrücke Markgröningen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glemstalbrücke Markgröningen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Glemstalviadukt B10 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glemstalviadukt B10 (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Scheffelmühle Höfingen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheffelmühle Höfingen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Schwieberdingen Stumpenmühle (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Stumpenmühle (3).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Schwieberdingen Stumpenmühle (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwieberdingen Stumpenmühle (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.