User talk:JLPC/Archive 3

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Genouillé (Facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aneth FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Amant 16 Blé et folle avoine 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Prenn 08:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lys blanc détail FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais de Justice d'Angoulême (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:01, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbe Pampa FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 22:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Profondeurs insondables

"Mon anglais manque vraiment de profondeur de champ" : Voilà un Mot que j'aurai aimé faire! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Là je dois reconnaître que j'ai bien ri, en effet. Mais comme tu m'avais précédemment bluffé avec la DOB et la DOD de Pigalle, j'ai vraiment cru qu'il s'agissait là d'un acronyme d'Outre-Manche que j'ignorais. Pas de malice donc dans ma demande. Pour la couronne, elle n'est pas spécifique à Angoulême, mais bien à toutes les cités ceintes de remparts. (J'ai un très gros faible pour l'héraldique, si tu as des besoins dans ce domaine, n'hésite pas !)--Jebulon (talk) 22:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coreopsis FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Prenn 01:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray 86 Post-box 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice and good for me, but the left side can be cropped IMO--Lmbuga 22:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC) New review: Otherwise, QI for me--Lmbuga 00:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC) OK for your suggestion. Thanks. --JLPC 21:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lys royal 2 FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Is it better now ? --JLPC 17:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC) Yes, better now indeed Poco a poco 12:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angoulême town hall, gargoyles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

I think the category and the scope should be renamed Gargoyle. Yann (talk) 09:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

"Gargoyle" would be a too lage scope IMO... But I forgot to translate my scope title in English. Is it better now ? --JLPC (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Shouldn't the name of the category be in English? Yann (talk) 14:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

You're right, of course... -- One more time, thanks to Archeo (my modified link was red : another Wikipedian renamed the existing category this afternoon.) --JLPC (talk) 18:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Best in this scope. Some french speaking activists insists for the enforcement of use of french language for french-related categories. They are right IMO. But in VIC, categories must remain in english...--Jebulon (talk) 23:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courgettes boutons FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better indeed Poco a poco 15:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Armoiries marché 1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Image de Qualité (qu'est ce que ça veut dire :"DOF" ?)--Jebulon 21:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC) Sorry, corrected. Thanks. --JLPC 21:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Lion couronné 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très bien--Jebulon 21:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Le complot

Bonsoir,

Rien d'illégal là-dedans, que veux-tu, tu as trouvé un enthousiaste ! Ton fan club s'enrichit ! J'ai annoté la "nomination" afin que toi et les trois autres soyez "crédités", mais ce type de propositions est usuel. Ta photo lui a plu, hop, il la propose. Il peut. C'est maladroitement fait, mais plutôt flatteur, finalement ! L'inconvénient, c'est que c'est lui qui probablement recevra la notification de la promotion. En conséquence, je te conseille de "suivre" cette image ! Par exemple, tu auras peut-être vu à l'instant sur ma page une "FP promotion", car c'est moi qui l'ai proposée. Mais je n'en suis pas l'auteur. Mon usage et mon éthique veulent que je rapatrie ledit bandeau vers l'auteur de l'image, ce que je vais faire incessamment. Disons pudiquement que tous n'y pensent pas...--Jebulon (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 514 L 1 Angoulême 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent photo, very good background. -- Lothar Spurzem 22:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 514 L 2 Angoulême 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Lothar Spurzem 22:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême HdV Gargouilles&cheminées 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and good. --Cayambe 12:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Logis du Maine-Giraud

Il manque le geocodage... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Bon comme tu es parti très loin j'ai fais comme pour moi...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Obézine Tympan 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You are welcome to nominate pictures from other users, but it should be fair to credit the author User:JLPC, Thanks.--Jebulon 22:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC).Excellent quality -- Lothar Spurzem 22:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Egl Obézines Vierge 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Denoising of the statue a bit too strong IMO, but very nice and surprising composition. A QI, in my opinion.--Jebulon 23:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Balcons 4 saisons 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vendoire peat-bogs (Ecological museum, exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:09, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination. Thanks to Archaeo, but cmadler left me a message this afternoon : there's no FOP in France... --JLPC (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
  • IMO, this is not original enough to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
    • New nomination :

This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page. The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2012082910007812. If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard. Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2012082910007812 Find other files from the same ticket:

•  Support All correct now, and always useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I think the formulation of the scope is a little awkward, but this is certainly best in scope for the building, and since it survived deletion discussion, I will support. cmadler (talk) 13:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your support and your reviews, cmadler. I've suppressed the local French name of the museum in the formulation of the scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleome hassleriana FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 20:00, 7. September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanule FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 22:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Description photo abbaye de Mortimer

Bonjour, J'ai oublié de photographier le panneau d'explication. Je fais mes photos à la volée dans le cadre de longues randos à vélo. En plus dimanche dernier le Soleil tapait vraiment dur au moment du passage à l'abbaye, j'étais pas trop lucide ... Pas trouvé de plan sur internet. --Pline (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logis du Maine-Giraud, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Dampierre ?

Bonjour

On n'a pas les mêmes Dampierre en magasin, toi et moi... Mais je vais chercher, y'a des branches !

Amitiés --Jebulon (talk) 15:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Pardon pour cette (Dam)pierre dans ton jardin! Mais comme je te le dis, il y a plusieurs familles nobles portant ce nom, sans lien de parenté. Je cherche. Rien d'autre que ce que j'ai dans l'"Armorial Dubuisson" au nom de Dampierre. On y précise "de Picardie", ce qui laisse entendre qu'en effet, y'en a d'autres ailleurs ! La seule certitude concernant le blason, c'est que la bande est bleue. On peut en déduire un certain nombre de choses (ainsi, le fond de l'écu est obligatoirement soit "argent" (blanc), soit "or" (jaune), idem pour les étoiles, et que les besants (les ronds) ne sont ni l'un ni l'autre). Mais ça laisse quand même des possibilités dans de nombreuses combinaisons. Je ne renonce pas, mais ça ne va pas être facile...--Jebulon (talk) 10:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Balcon d'Angoulème

Bonjour,

comme déjà dit dans mon commentaire sur QIC, la dominante bleue apparaît souvent sur les structures blanches quand le soleil tape. Il est bien possible que l'oeil capte cette dominante, mais que notre cerveau, qui 'sait' que ces parties sont blanches 'en réalité', redresse le défaut (excuse-moi, c'est le biologiste, à la retraite aussi, qui parle).

J'ai mis du temps à m'en rendre compte ... et depuis je recherche systématiquement ce défaut sur mes propres photos. Le remède : sélectionner les parties touchées de l'image et y réduire carrément la saturation des couleurs cyan et bleu.
Je vois que nous partageons, avec d'autres ici, le plaisir des images de qualité. Cordialement, --Cayambe (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray 86 St-Nicolas Archivolte Ange 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray 86 St-Nicolas Archivolte Scorpion 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bégonia FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Balcon Tête 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now. --Cayambe 19:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:Zlatopramen Radler

Hello

new version is very good! Thank you very much! I couldn't not corrected this burnt...

Best regards - Pudelek

La mare au diable

Cette image m'a émue, en remuant des couches archéologiques de ma mémoire. Je suggère que tu rajoute le titre dans le scope. En plus, très bon travail photographique. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Hôtel Montalembert portail 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buisson ardent FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Chapiteau 1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Prenn 03:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charroux 86 Mascaron 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Prenn 03:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Dôme Csse d'épargne 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 06:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Cathédrale Enfeu Aumont 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 21:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Châtaignier H 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Iifar 06:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charroux 86 Chapiteau 2 Tour Ch 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 18:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponds in Indre (La Mare au Diable).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentI suggest to add "La Mare au Diable" in the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Done --JLPC (talk) 07:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Usefull --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Fiat L(ux)

Si tu rajoute "L" au scope, çà permettra de promouvoir les autres modèles de carrosserie, qui sont eux aussi bien intéressant, la cas échéant. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Fait ! Merci (encore une fois) de ta suggestion et de ton soutien. -- Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 20:20, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Voûte Chapelle-St-André 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Perhaps a bit underexposed--Lmbuga 21:43, 15 September 2012 (UTC) New file uploaded. --JLPC 22:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG TD Angoulême 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alvis Angoulême 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good technical quality. But I don't like the tarpaulin on the cockpit. -- Lothar Spurzem 23:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Catégories

Bonjour JLPC.

Je viens de renommer Category:Détails Architecturaux d'Angoulême en Category:Architectural elements in Angoulême, au nom plus conventionnel. Les noms de catégories ici sur Commons doivent être de préférence en anglais, et sans majuscules aux noms communs. Quand tu crées une catégorie, assure-toi que le lien ne soit pas rouge, et rattache-la à au moins 2 catégories existantes. Celles-ci forment une arborescence. Les photos ne doivent ensuite plus se retrouver dans la catégorie du dessus (voir COM:SURCAT), sauf exception, par exemple la vue d'une église de village qui a sa catégorie, mais où on voit d'autres détails intéressants du bourg.

Félicitations pour tes images de qualité ! N'hésite pas à mitrailler des églises ou châteaux près de chez toi, surtout s'ils sont monuments historiques et souvent dont les articles manquent parfois cruellement (n'oublions pas que le but de Commons est uniquement une base de données pour meubler ces articles fr, existants ou à créer). Bonne continuation, Jack ma (talk) 08:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Souci FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment one dark line on the upper right part. --Iifar 09:38, 19 September 2012 (UTC)  Done : corrected. Hope it's better now. --JLPC 10:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC).  Support --Iifar 14:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lys blanc Fleur&bouton FR 2012rt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Imho you can add here a bit more exposure. --Iifar 09:35, 19 September 2012 (UTC)  Done : corrected. Hope it's better now. --JLPC 10:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC). Yes, looks better. --Iifar 14:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oenothera speciosa 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phalaenopsis cultivar FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. --PierreSelim 22:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Paleolithic stitching awl

J'ai créée la catégorie, elle contient une catégorie qui est l’objet lui même. C'est déroutant, car à l'époque il s'agissait d'une expérimentation sur les catégorisations. Ceci n'a pas eu de suite. Car trop avant gardiste. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Échebrune 17 chapiteau 1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 10:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Échebrune 17 chapiteau 2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, useful.--Jebulon 10:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Abbaye la Réau Croix 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dirac 16 Statue brisée-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pixellisation, trop de recherche de netteté, puis trop de débruitage, à mon avis. Je pense que c'est correctible à partir de ton fichier initial.--Jebulon 23:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)  Done ? (New file uploaded).--JLPC 21:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC) Not perfect, but better. Can pass as QI.--Jebulon 13:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rolland-Pilain vehicles (Emblems).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochefoucauld 16 Maison Gourville 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.... and I like plaques. --Cayambe 08:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochefoucauld Enseigne géomètre 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Rolland-Pilain Emblèmes 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 17:07, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colocasia FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Althea FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Géomètre experts, quoique français

Il serait peut être utile de restreindre le scope à Géomètre français car cette enseigne n'est pas universelle en dehors de notre pays. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Exact : je n'avais pas assez réfléchi au problème du scope. Je rectifie. -- Coïncidence : je vois apparaître ton message au moment où je venais de réussir mon premier "empilage", bien qu'il me reste encore un ou deux détails à régler ! -- Merci une fois de plus ! -- Bien amicalement. --JLPC (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Premier résultat avec trois clichés : ici. Encore perfectible il me semble et, de toutes façons, à suivre sur des terrains plus ardus... --JLPC

My VI candidate Ingenheim - your advice

Hi JLPC,

first: I think there is no reason to worry about yout english, IMO it is pretty good. Thank you for your advice about my VIC, I am really grateful for it. Unfortunately I still habe my problems with the VI-stuff. Best regards from Lake Constance --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 16:35, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Done (at least I hope so). Thank you very much! --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 16:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Fiat 514 L.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Fiat 514 L.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:56, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Catégories (suite)

Bonjour JLPC. Pour renommer des catégories, je n'ai pas trouvé de meilleure solution que de créer une au nom nouveau et d'y transvaser les photos (dans les gadgets, il y a "Cat-a-lot" qui facilite cette tâche, commande "Déplacer"), puis de faire supprimer la vide en y mettant comme seul contenu {{speedy|empty}} (si on est sûr qu'elle n'est pas employée dans aucun wiki). Sinon, j'ai enfin appris à maîtriser le redressement des perspectives (verticales), sous Photoshop, que je vais m'employer à utiliser. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochefoucauld 16 Chasse-roue et passage 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Même problème...--Jebulon 12:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC) New file uploaded with a different processing. --JLPC 19:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC) Good now.--Jebulon 18:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dirac 16 Bénitier 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dirac 16 Lumière colonne 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bien. Evocateur et poétique, en plus.--Jebulon 09:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echebrune 17 Chapiteau et pointes de diamant 2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echebrune 17 Chapiteau et pointes de diamant 1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Cheminée Taillefer 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fin septembre FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and interesting. --Jkadavoor 05:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame d'Obezine church (Tympanum sculpture).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocus automne FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Prenn 00:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mante religieuse FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Puerta del Vino

Bonsoir voisin,

Je ne comprends pas ta remarque sur mon image de la Puerta del Vino à Grenade en QI.

Pourrais-tu mettre une note pour m'orienter s'il te plaît ?

"L'ombre de gauche" correspond aux tuiles au dessus, et je n'ai rien "bidouillé" dans ce coin-là.

À te lire, bien amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Je voulais parler de la partie gauche de l'ombre qui se situe sous le porche, à l'aplomb des feuilles, entre le mur éclairé de gauche et celui près duquel un personnage est assis. Il me semble voir dans cette partie une sorte de floconnement grisâtre. Désolé d'avoir voulu trop ramasser l'expression hier soir, à la suite d'une journée chargée (!). J'ajoute une note dans la zone concernée, note facile à supprimer une fois le problème résolu. -- Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 07:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Je vois. Tu préfères un floconnement, ou un gros touriste hollandais cramoisi (pléonasme) ? Je vais essayer de corriger ça, merci !--Jebulon (talk) 09:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Bon, j'ai essayé quelque chose. Pas parfait, mais mieux à mon avis. Peux-tu être assez aimable pour jeter à nouveau un coup d'oeil ? Merci d'avance !--Jebulon (talk) 15:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

J'ai bien sûr donné mon feu vert : il me semble qu'il est difficile de faire beaucoup mieux. J'ai moi-même passé une heure, hier après-midi, à essayer de comprendre ce qui se passait sous ce porche et à tenter d'y clarifier l'ombre (si je puis me permettre cet oxymore !). En fait, rien à faire pour ce qui me concerne, je veux dire, rien de probant... Et comme je suis persuadé qu'il ne faut pas demander aux autres plus qu'on ne peut donner, le QI s'imposait quoi qu'il arrive. -- Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 17:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

J'ai zigouillé des touristes, et je n'ai fait que copier l'ombre existant déja. Je te remercie pour la promotion, mais tu sais, ça n'est jamais obligatoire! Si tu l'sens pas, tu l'sens pas !--Jebulon (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Eglise Villars-en-pons

Hello and thank you for the message. The photo is definitely still a QI for me. Cheers! Óðinn (talk) 05:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Surveying (French sign).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Not sure to understand the scope. For me, under a scope like "Surveying sing", something like Category:Trig points would be expected.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
• Thanks for your comment but, I only mean "Sign"', which is different from "Trig point". Nevertheless, according to a friend's suggestion, I've restrained the scope to "French sign". I hope it's better now. --JLPC (talk) 14:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support good scope now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment If I understand well, this is the official French emblem for a Géomètre-expert, which is an official position in France. This is a good scope and the nominated image illustrates it very well, but its wording is hard to understand out of France. I can't give a fully satisfying option, but something like "Official emblem of Géomètre-experts in France" could be clearer.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:50, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de Dirac (Charente) (Facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Villars-en-pons.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Egl Obézine Fronton 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although it is a bit soft --Poco a poco 08:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontdouce 17 Salle capitulaire 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good picture -- Lothar Spurzem 21:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontdouce 17 Salle capitulaire détail 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 21:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Boisseaux chargement 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 08:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Reflet vitraux Dirac

Bonjour JLPC,

C'est marrant, ta photo. Elle me rappelle qu'à mes débuts, j'avais tenté [1] quelque chose de similaire, mais sans succès: même pas QI , sniff...

Ils ne sont pas prêts...

--Jebulon (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontdouce 17 Fontaine 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good composition and QI to me. The tower on the left seems slightly tilted, but is IMO still OK. The crop on the bottom makes the picture - to me - more interesting. --DKrieger 22:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontdouce 17 chapelles 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi to me, and an impressive picture besides --DKrieger 22:34, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-félix 16 Tombe J.A. Cros 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit soft, but very good compo and light.--Jebulon 10:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Villars-en-Pons (France) (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cheminée du Palais Taillefer (Angoulême, France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anémone Japon rose&fruits FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asters FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Félix 16 Chapiteau 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, très bien. --Cayambe 15:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Egl Obézine NW 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbey of Fontdouce (France) (Chapter house).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Valued images/Recently promoted

Hello,

In which category would you add your picture? Regards, Yann (talk) 06:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, et désolé de n'avoir pas été plus clair. Il s'agit d'ajouter une catégorie avec le VI categorization tool dans la page ci-dessus. Yann (talk) 07:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raisin d'Amérique FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomise FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonneuil 16 Carrefour Bellevue 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bouteville 16 Gratte-pieds église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Maison redressée

Bonjour JLPC,

merci beaucoup pour tes remarques, il est vrai que la rue tout comme la porte Renaissance sont très anciennes mais l'inclinaison de la rue et l'usure des vieilles pierres ont perturbé mon sens de l'équilibre... Je viens donc de téléverser deux nouvelles versions de ces photos, corrigées avec justesse je l'espère. Bravo à toi pour ton corpus de photos, très intéressant et toujours de qualité. Bonne continuation & à bientôt!

--Selbymay (talk) 10:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blanzac 16 église porte sud 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 06:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blanzac 16 tympan 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good crop and quality. --Selbymay 06:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteauneuf 16 Chapiteau&frise b 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Bgag 11:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Châteauneuf 16 Chapiteau&frise 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality et valued

Bonjour JLPC. Je n'y comprends plus rien car il y a Category:Quality images of Charente et Category:Valued images of Poitou-Charentes; ce n'est pas la même chose ? Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 08:50, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de La Roche, Magné (Vienne).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:43, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle monolithe de Gurat, Charente (Interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:20, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scots crown post boxes (Isle of Skye).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac Blanc, Hautes-Pyrénées (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose trémière 2 FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:21, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Pont enneigé 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:01, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plassac-Rouffiac église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Chasse-roue métallique 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:48, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arbre de Judée FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 15:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Col d'Aspin (versant sud-est).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray 86 Porte Hôt LXIII 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rochechouart 87 MonumM Allégorie 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and good crop. --Selbymay 07:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noyer feuilles&fruits été FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. - A.Savin 22:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Pérignac Monument.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pérignac Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 07:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalais 16 Plaque Chpelle ND 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Balzacien... J'adore "Euphrosine"!--Jebulon 16:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charroux 86 Portail de l'église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail.--Jebulon 16:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peugeot Partner PN des Pyrénées Barèges 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault Kangoo La Poste Civray 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Pierre (Châteauneuf-sur-Charente) (portal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and very didactic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinan 21 Cartes postales 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourcefranc 17 R.Trémières 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments "Bourcefranc", mais QI quand même ! ;)--Jebulon 22:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC) Where is the binomial id of the plant? --Coyau 22:55, 18 October 2012 (UTC) @ J : Mistake corrected. Sorry for the natives of C.-M.! --JLPC 09:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)--Jebulon 11:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Abbaye la Réau Vue SW 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment perspective correction needed for me --Rjcastillo 01:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)  Done Is it better now ? --JLPC 08:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)  Support Good sharpness and light --Iifar 13:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fouquebrune 16 Chassagne 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 13:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barèges 65 Garages 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pivoine FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Prenn 04:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capucine FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now to me. --Cayambe 10:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

COM:QIC

Hello!

I have just undid this edit by you. You have nearly blanked the hole page. Please feel free to re-promote the image which was lost during my re-installation of the page. Please be more careful with this page in the future. Thanks in advance. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournesols&ciel FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors! --Poco a poco 03:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scabieuses FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really nice --Poco a poco 03:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pied d'alouette FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cosmos 2 FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angoulême Town hall (SW view) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good quality, best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris AlexandreIII Fillette coquille&cadenas 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Selbymay 07:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac de Dera Yunco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support this one is the best --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I agree that this one is best, because it better shows the overall aspect of the lake. As an added bonus, it's annotated. cmadler (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Barèges Jonquère 2011.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Barèges 65 Dera Junco 2012.jpg: +2
=>
File:Barèges Jonquère 2011.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Barèges 65 Dera Junco 2012.jpg: Promoted.

--Yann (talk) 09:46, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Porte cochère rue La Bruyère 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, and QI to me --DKrieger 18:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Bicyclette VIIIe arr. 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Orsay Cheval Rouillard 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blanzay 86 Église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blanzay 86 Croix église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Crs la Reine Bolivar 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 13:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romagne 86 Portail atelier 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rare view, good quality. --Selbymay 19:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: File:Universidad de Tallin, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 05.JPG

Dear JLPC, I answered on my page, thanks and best regards, Poco a poco (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)