User talk:Johann Jaritz/Archive/2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Damit die Dinge strukturierter werden

hab ich mal zwei neue Kategorien für dich/uns angelegt:

1. Eine Userkategorie Quality images by Johann_Jaritz

2. Eine Bundesländerkategorie, die es (wie unverschämt) bislang nicht gegeben hat: Quality images of Carinthia.

Letztere Kategorie lässt sich durchaus noch verfeinern und unterteilen, zB Pörtschach/Wörthersee/Pyramidenkogel, you name it, aber zumindest ist diese Überkategorie nun einmal gemacht!

Das sind jeweils verborgene Kategorien, damit man einen Überblick hat, was es jeweils an guten Bildern zum Land Kärnten gibt. Da - soweit ich bis jetzt gesehen habe, du fast alle gemacht hast, ist es nun an dir, diese zu füllen. ich werde auch meinen Teil dazu beitragen.

--Hubertl (talk) 08:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 10 Hausboot 29122014 914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Promenade 04112012 366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and good quality. --Steindy 10:23, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Sonnengrund 29122014 577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Difficult conditions for the photo, but good quality. --Steindy 10:23, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Winterpark 29122014 679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 160 Oesterreichischer Hof 29122014 999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and great colours --ArildV 12:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Werzer´s Boothaus 29122014 924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Hotel Astoria Platane 29122014 912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 14:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfsberg Reinfelsdorf 20 Wirtschaftsgebaeude von Schloss Weissenau 29082014 768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Brockweg vulgo Ostermann Brennholz-Stapel 01012015 750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. made some adjustments --Hubertl 10:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Brockweg Alte Schmiede 01012015 755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. made some overexposing corrections. --Hubertl 09:49, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Woerth Karner gotisches Portal 25092014 952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Quellweg Teich 09122012 849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Quellweg 09122012 821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. Great impression. --Dnalor 01 10:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Winterlandschaft 09122012 666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --Dnalor 01 09:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte 09122012 493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Doerrkasten 09122012 402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 1 dustspot (see note) --Christian Ferrer 05:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC) --Johann Jaritz 08:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Correction dust spot.  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Doerrkasten 09122012 401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments One dustspot and one blurry bird yet to be removed. --Cccefalon 06:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done --Hubertl 16:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Complete new version from original File, no more artefacts, dustspot removed. Please additional review, Uwe! --Hubertl 09:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Ooooooh - well done! Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferlach Bodental Bodenbauer 16102013 964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenthurn Stossau 2 Eingang ehem Gewerkenhaus Wrolch 18072012 227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, perhaps cropping left side some pixels tighter to avoid the plastic. --Cccefalon 08:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte 09122012 487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Imkerei Oliva 01012015 444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Hubertl 11:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Ich hab dir eine neue User-Kategorie eingerichtet

Siehe hier. Das ist eine, die jeder hat, der mit QI, VI und FP arbeitet. Es ist eine sogenannte "verborgene" Kategorie. Bitte bedenke, dass das Eintragen dieser Kategorie nicht automatisch erfolgt, sondern Handarbeit ist, dh. Bilder, die positiv bewertet wurden, musst du selbst dort kategorisieren, sonst tauchen sie in dieser Liste nicht auf. Ist aber eine praktische Übersicht, auch über die Anzahl der Bilder. Bist ja knapp über 30 inzwischen (auch wenn du etwas älter ausschaust ;-)). Ich meinte die Anzahl der QI-Bilder! --Hubertl (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Als Dankeschön erhältst Du einen innigen langen Kuss von dieser Königstochter.
Genieße den Schmatz, sie ist eine ganz besonders liebe Prinzessin. Lass Dich nur nicht allzusehr betören! ;0) --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfsberg Thuern 1 Schloss Thuern 29082014 444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichberg-Trautenburg Hoehenweg Karnerberg Kreuzbergwarte 07072014 222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good and detailed. --Steindy 18:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichberg-Trautenburg Hoehenweg Karnerberg Kreuzbergwarte 07072014 250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great view! An excellent photo. --Steindy 18:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Der Froschkoenig 28011014 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Muehlweg 24 Wirtschaftsgebaeude 24112012 778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems to require a perspective and/or tilt correction & crop unfortunate: Too tight at the top and too much green at the bottom. --NorbertNagel 16:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support The photo beautifully composed. It lives by the old tree, which accentuates the diagonal. The quality can not be faulted. For me clearely QI. --Steindy 22:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keutschach Höhe 7 vulgo DRESCHL Hube 22062010 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesachtal Tscheltsch 5 Joergishof 16072014 609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenstein Kraig Kirchweg 6 Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T westl Säulenvorhalle 15102006 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feistritz Sankt Michael ob Bleiburg Filialkirche hl Katharina 09102014 604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Kloster Kirche Hauptaltar 14112014 937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, though in future I'd go a bit looser at the top. Mattbuck 21:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wernberger Altar

hallo Hans, das Bild ist bereits am 29. Dezember nominiert worden, inzwischen auch schon positiv bewertet. Kein Grund, es ein zweites Mal zu nominieren. Kannst du es von deiner heutigen Nominierung zurückziehen? --Hubertl (talk) 08:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Woerther See Segelboot 30102014 949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Woerther See Segelboot 30102014 942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Drautalbahn II von Scherzweg-Bruecke OEBB 4024 City-Shuttle 06012015 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Dnalor 01 09:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Scherzweg-Bruecke Railjet 06012015 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments An unusual perspective, but well done and sharp. --Steindy 22:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Der Froschkoenig Koenigstochter 04012015 649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments That the picture was taken by the shop window, it's amazing sharp and without annoying reflections. --Steindy 23:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micheldorf Lorenzenberg 68 Filialkirche hl Laurentius Apsis-Stuetzmauer Bogenportal 07082014 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Bootsanlegesteg 07122015 375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting colorisation from olive to light blue. Even the stones are to see on the ground. Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Bootsanlegesteg 07122015 377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though a slight rotation ccw would bring back perfect symmetrie. --Cccefalon 06:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mussen Paradisea liliastrum 16072014 156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mussen-Wanderweg Dactylorhiza maculata 16072014 419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Skulptur von Prof Muhr 27052013 633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Laterne 07012015 533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:09, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Pavillon 07012015 535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Sumpf-Schwertlilie 27052013 444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Noise is quite high due to high ISO, can you reduce it? --Uoaei1 07:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Noise correction due to high ISO done. --Johann Jaritz 07:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support Ok now, but do not forget to sign your changes here! --Uoaei1 10:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Villacher Vorstadt Kreuzberglkirche 29092014 329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The shadow of a tree on the wall is somewhat disturbing, but GQ anyway. --Palauenc05 15:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Almweg Bauernhaus Poertschacher Alm 26122014 333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Woerth Karner gotisches Portal 25092014 961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dinkel-Feld von Ing Johannes Tomic 18072014 725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 3 dustspots (see note), not easy to see --Christian Ferrer 08:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected version (dust-spots removed) uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 012:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 12:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach 10 Oktober Strasse Euonymus europaeus 05102014 475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblumen Biohof Tomic 18072014 661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice fading out of sharpness over the flowers row --Cccefalon 09:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mussen-Wanderweg Berg-Aster 16072014 367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mussen-Wanderweg Arnika 16072014 376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tigring Pfarrkirche hl Egyd mit Rundkarner 23092014 401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks! Good quality. --DXR 09:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Kloster Arkadenhof Einfahrt 14112014 955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Superb. --Steindy 21:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Wenn deine Bilder mit offenen Anfragen in der QI-Liste stehen

dann bitte nicht vergessen, darauf zu reagieren! Ganz wichtig! Falls es Probleme sind, deren Lösung Dir Schwierigkeiten bereiten, schick einfach ein Mail mit der Angabe der Dateinamen. --Hubertl (talk) 08:57, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

so wie im konkreten Fall von Christian Ferrer und den beanstandeten Dust-Spots? Die habe ich so gut wie möglich korrigiert. Werde mir auch den Sensor bei Gelegenheit vornehmen und mit dem Speck-Grabber drübergehen; ich liebe diese Arbeiten mehr als alles andere! --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micheldorf Lorenzenberg 68 Filialkirche hl Laurentius Westwand reliefierter Pilaster mit Akanthusmotiv 07082014 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Kloster Arkadenhof Brustrelief Georg Khevenhueller 14112014 947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 14:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Stadtpfarrkirche Epitaph Nicolaus Platzer 19102014 488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himmelberg Pfarrkirche hl Martin Grabplatte Balthasar von Pibriach 20062007 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himmelberg Ausserteuchen alte Volksschule Fenster 19102013 681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful color combination. The blurred yellow leaves frame perfectly the ancient window. Perfect for me! --Steindy 14:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesachtal Tscheltsch 5 Joergishof 16072014 608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfsberg Reideben 1 Schloss Osttor 03092014 376.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter bei Taggenbrunn 12012015 271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 16:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Stift Sankt Georgen 12012015 261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Taggenbrunn Burgruine und Weingut 12012015 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfsberg Forst Pfarrkirche hl Johannes der Taeufer Orgelempore 03092014 207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Shouldn't you try to shift both of the sidewalls a little bit or is this the original condition of this walls? --Dnalor 01 10:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
For me it is the natural view of the human eye and certainly an excellent photo. Therefore  Support --Steindy 01:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Taggenbrunn Burgruine und Weingut 12012015 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Mitterteich Rohrkolben 02112014 551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Ich habe es geahnt

du nimmst dir deine Viktring-Bilder vor... Wird auch Zeit! ;-). Achtung, viele sind zu dunkel - die Tendenz geht bei der Abstimmung gegen die Tiefen. --Hubertl (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

ist mir ohnedies alles bewusst. Vor etlichen Jahren ist dies eine Foto von Stift Viktring in der deutschen WIKI Commons als FP-Foto ausgezeichnet worden, Na ja, über kurz oder lang werde ich dieses Motiv wohl nachfotografieren gehen (wenn Sonneneinstrahlwinkel und alles drumherum passt). Dann unter anderen Bedingungen: nicht mit der 4 MP Nikon D2H sondern mit höherer Bildgröße und Bildqualität.--Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weissensee Techendorf Ruderboot zieht Schlauchboot 24072014 477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Herzogsburg Eisen-Tuerl 19102014 883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade Schiffsanlegestelle 13012015 945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Overall good quality, but there are two dust spots. I left annotations. --Code 05:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Dust-spots removed, corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 08:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support Good now. --Code 10:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerstrand und Parkhotel 22092013 898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality and a very nice picture. --Code 05:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesachtal Tscheltsch 4 Joehrerhof weidende Schafe 16072014 638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The new version is slightly too much for me, it could be an XP "Heidi"-wallpaper. –Be..anyone 04:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Reverted to former version. --Johann Jaritz 08:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Tnx. –Be..anyone 10:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liesing Niedergail 3 Peintnerhof 13062014 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit Herzogsburg Wohnfluegel Fenster 19102014 888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality after correction --Hubertl 12:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfsberg Reideben 1 Schloss Sued-Portal 03092014 406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. The door and windows on the left leans inward. --Halavar 10:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC) *  Comment uploaded new, perspective corrected version. --Hubertl 11:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support Good now. --Halavar 12:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfsberg Reinfelsdorf 20 Schloss Weissenau 29082014 777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mussen Hirtenhuette 16072014 266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs a perspective correction - the nice motif is pretty distorted yet. --Cccefalon 05:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC) * ✓ Done new version uploaded, perspective distortion is corrected (was massive!) --Hubertl 06:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Parkbaenke Winterquartier 06012015 777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, nice idea! --Hubertl 05:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Lorettoweg 55 Restaurant Maria Loretto 27052014 358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs perspective correction. --Bgag 04:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)* ✓ Done new version uploaded, perspective distortion is corrected --Hubertl 06:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC) OK now. --Bgag 14:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 102 Lieleg-Schloessl Einfahrtstor 07012015 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks. Good quality. --DXR 17:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

10.000 und kein Bild zuviel

Für deinen Einsatz für die Bebilderung von Wikipedia und dem kleinen Rest der Welt alle Hochachtung! --Hubertl (talk) 20:48, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferlach Sapotnica herbstliche Buchen 16102013 228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Sportplatzstrasse Sportplatz 28012014 157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Kloster Kirche Hochaltar Kruzifix 14112014 925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Heiligengeistplatz Heiligengeistkirche Schiff Triumphbogen und Altaere 27102014 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:57, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Idared-Bluete 15042014 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Viktring Ost-Ansicht 16012015 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:57, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Viktring SO-Ansicht 16012015 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Famberhorst 06:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 102 Lieleg-Schloessl 30052014 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please get the fence posts and house walls vertical --Uoaei1 07:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Vertical alignment done, corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 13:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support This is fine now. --Uoaei1 17:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christian Scheider Buergermeister Klagenfurt 04072014 727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berndie 11062014 444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 11:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georgen Rottenstein 1 Schloss Einfahrt Baer 15102006 221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tigring Pfarrkirche hl Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Lukas 23092014 824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 14:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albeck Seebachern Lattersteig und Kalteben 25102013 728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 06:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feistritz Sankt Michael ob Bleiburg Pfarrkirche hl Michael Konsolfigur Madonna mit Kind 09102014 772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villaggio del Pescatore Muschelstecher 02112013 570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feistritz Suetschach Kulturpark Steinskulptur sitzendes Kind 15012014 572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 22:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Wahlissstrasse 19 See-Appartement Wienerroither 19012015 777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Excellent technical quality. --Code 06:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 133 Bootshaus der Villa Seehort 19012015 943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment There is a tiny dust spot next to one of the clouds. I left a note. --Code 06:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Dust spot removed, corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 07:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. Nice impression. --Dnalor 01 08:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Bootshaus der Wasserrettung 19012014 870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Badehaus 19012014 869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Hotel Astoria und Badehaeuser 19012014 334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality and a very nice composition. --Code 06:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Schilfguertel in der Ostbucht 18042013 622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The picture wins by the diagonal of the tree. --Steindy 20:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Lippitz Roggenfeld 17072013 951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberstein Hochfeistritz Kapelle in Wehrkirchenanlage Ost-Ansicht 19102012 825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg 5 Villa Woerth Einfahrtstor Detail 19012015 945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Viktring Ost-Ansicht mit Parkteich 16012015 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Bichl Lippitz Strohernte 01082013 955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad St Leonhard Schoenberg Aussichtswarte Kaerntner Sonnenturm 02102013 522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting view, good quality. --Dnalor 01 06:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz 19012014 661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice impression, very good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel-Strand 19012014 675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine view, very good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg 5 Villa Woerth Einfahrtstor Detail 19012015 944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade Schiffsanlegestelle 13012015 946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 205 Werzer Weisses Roessl 13012015 888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weissensee Techendorf Ruderboot zieht Schlauchboot 24072014 481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This picture is already a quality picture. --Bgag 04:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Sorry, I placed the wrong one here; here is the "sibling" of the other one, now corrected. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
The new one is of good quality. --Cccefalon 06:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Still-Leben Aprikosen und Haselnüsse 29072014 255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Ostteil 28012014 224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyramidenkogelturm Treppen in der Skybox 08072013 383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Brockweg Birnbaumallee 04052013 177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albeck Seebachern Schafferalm 01112013 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albeck Seebachern bizarre Laerche 25102013 872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful autumn mood. --Steindy 00:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraeutersalz-Herstellung mittels Steinmoerser 23012015 141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyramidenkogelturm Konstruktions-Detail Treppe Rutsche 08072013 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyramidenkogelturm Konstruktions-Detail Treppe 08072013 287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Georgen Rottenstein 9 Schlossanlage Badehaus 15102006 237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade Schiffsanlegestelle 13012015 944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality image --DKrieger 12:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyramidenkogelturm Skybox 08072013 385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The right side is leaning in yet. --Cccefalon 06:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 07:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:24, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyramidenkogelturm Konstruktions-Detail Treppe 08072013 303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moerser mit Stoessel vor Lavendel 26012015 555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stift Viktring SW-Ansicht 16012015 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Mitterteich mit Eisdecke 26012015 171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Mitterteich Silber-SUV vom Eislaufverein 26012015 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyramidenkogelturm Konstruktions-Detail 08072013 277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter am Bichl Leiten Weingut Tuerschloss 27012015 232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter am Bichl Leiten Weingut Tuerschloss 27012015 222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter am Bichl Leiten Weingut Tuerband 27012015 224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Bgag 15:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter am Bichl Leiten Weingut Karnburg Rieden 27012015 249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Idared-Bluete 15042014 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Luggau Servitenkloster 22082013 710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:33, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Prangl-Kran 08042014 458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Sankt-Primus-Weg Privatkapelle Glasrosette 5-Elemente 28012015 451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The center could be less magenta but still good quality. --Cccefalon 09:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Strandbad Woerthersee-Architektur Detail 11012009 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is as perfect as it really is! Thats the view while leaving. --Hubertl 04:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Sankt Primus Filialkirche im Steinbruch Dachreiter 28012015 262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt NW-Ansicht 28012015 313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Kreuzbergl Kalvarienberggruppe 28012015 326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Kreuzbergl Waldweg 28012015 333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Filialkirche hl Bartholomaeus mit Friedhof 31012015 863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Filialkirche hl Bartholomaeus Friedhofs-Kruzifix 31012015 844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberstein Schlossberg 4 ehem Pfarrhof Portal 14112013 331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Sankt Martin Winterwald 31012015 750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice image, sharpness could be better. But IMO still QI. --XRay 05:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Sankt Bartlmae Bushaltestelle und Messnerwirtin 31012015 857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 05:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Filialkirche hl Bartholomaeus mit Friedhof 31012015 835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise in the sky, otherwise very nice and good quality.--ArildV 06:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Ausgelagert

lb Hans, ich habe die Nominierungsliste von Dir auf eine Unterseite von Dir gelegt, du findest alles nun hier. Nicht dass ich zuwenig Platz hätte, aber ich verarbeite grad meine Käsebilder, da verlier ich vor lauter neuen Bildern die Übersicht. Es kommen sicher zusätzlich 200 dazu. Aber du wirst sicher gerne auch eine eigene Seite mit eigener Struktur haben wollen. Damit nicht alles Kraut und Ruabn is.--Hubertl (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

lb Hubertl, du sprichst mir aus der Seele und hast das umgesetzt, was mir schon seit Tagen ein Anliegen war, ich aber vor mir hergeschoben habe. Besten Dank für diese längst fällig gewordene Bereinigung. Irgendwann kommt immer der "Abnabelungsprozess". Gut, dass er durch Dich jetzt vollzogen wurde. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Sankt Martin Feldweg 09112011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Sankt Martin Waldfriedhof Kriegerdenkmal von Josef Dobner 05062013 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Sankt Martin Gemeindeamt mit Feuerwehr 31012015 728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Sankt Martin Pfarrstadel 31012015 735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Sankt Martin Pfarrhof und Pfarrkirche 31012015 724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Llez 20:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Kaplanei 31012015 752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Sankt-Primus-Weg Privatkapelle 28012015 446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The right side is leaning in. Also a very common problem: If the blue saturation of the sky is very high, the branches of trees are getting magenta. Usually, reducing the magneta saturation and raising the blue luminance as well as slightly raising the magenta defringing amount will help. --Cccefalon 09:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC) I'm still trying to figure out the standards here. Cccefalon seems to me to be comparatively rigorous here. For me the image seems to be ok. --Milseburg 17:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 Info For standards, see COM:IG. I'm not comparatively rigorous, Milseburg, I am comparatively user friendly. Before you spread allegations, please take some time to make a statistica, how many images I promote and how many images I decline. After that you might think, that you owe me an apology. Thanks, --Cccefalon 19:33, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Calm down! Sorry for inability to share your opinion. --Milseburg 12:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality for me --Milseburg 19:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peter am Bichl Leiten Weingut Fensterladen Ausschnitt 27012015 229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good details and very nice colors however the shadows (not the image) are very dark and even are black --Christian Ferrer 11:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support I don’t see any problem with the shadows. Clearly QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 03:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tigring Pfarrkirche hl Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Markus 23092014 821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but why not, for example f5.6 and f11 for more depth?--Famberhorst 07:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Friedhof Tuerdruecker des frueheren Nordausgangs 06012012 188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Bahnhofsbereich Drautalbahn II Railjet 02022015 218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Spurzem 08:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Maximilian-Brunnen und Pfarrkirche 31012015 722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The tower is crooked.--Famberhorst 05:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 04 February 2015 (UTC)Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Johannaweg?

ein Tiff mit zwei Ebenen (die identisch sind) und dazu noch 46 MB hat? War das ein Irrtum? --Hubertl (talk) 03:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Das kommt davon, wenn Rookies sich aufs Glatteis der RAW-/TIFF-/NEF-Files begeben. Habe mir bei meinem Foto-Spaziergang an der Halbinselpromenade ein Herz gefasst und die Kamera auf "RAW plus JPEG" gestellt. Das iPhoto unter OS X Yosemite hat das spielend hochgeladen, dargestellt und ich hab es dann mit *.tiff abgespeichert. Dabei wurde die Datei auf den doppelten Umfang "aufgeblasen". Hab mich selbst gewundert. Na ja, erste Gehversuche auf Neuland. Ich wollte es einfach mal probieren. Du bist der erste, dem das sofort aufgefallen ist. Kompliment. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Das ist noch so eins: Poertschach_Hans-Pruscha-Weg_Blick_auf_Maria_Woerth_02022015_371.tif ... Ich haette es gerne angeschaut, aber die Bandbreite im Hotel ist zu klein, um das in vernuenftiger Zeit zu oeffnen. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:26, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 02022015 287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Wintertag im Park 02022015 254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Notable magenta CA in the branches but should be fixable. --Cccefalon 07:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 05 February 2015 (UTC)
Very good -- Spurzem 10:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 Support Well done! --Cccefalon 12:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Elisabethstrasse Spaziergaengerinnen 02022015 228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and QI -- Spurzem 06:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
I agree, that it is beautiful, but the hard magenta CA on the left side need to be removed for QI. --Cccefalon 07:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 08:21, 05 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Blick auf Maria Woerth 02022015 371.tiff, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--NoRud 09:22, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Good quality, but why are there two "pages"? Mattbuck 22:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

CA auf Deinen Winterbildern

Hallo Johann, Du hast einige sehr schoene Winterbilder mit stimmungsvollen Landschaften eingestellt. Ich glaube aber, Du hast beim Bearbeiten vergessen, den Defringing-Schalter anzuknipsen. Vielleicht kannst Du das schnell noch nachholen und die CA beseitigen, es waere schade, wenn die Bilder abgelehnt werden, Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Uwe, ganz genau, so wie Du es richtig analysiert hast. Ich habe in der Tat vergessen, den besagten Schalter anzuknipsen. Das kommt daher, dass ich erst seit ein paar Tagen das Lightroom installiert habe und somit noch nicht alles auf die Reihe gebracht habe. Werde künftig besser darauf achten! Besten Dank für Deinen freundlichen Hinweis. LG. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Ah, willkommen bei den LR-Nutzern; eine sehr gute Wahl. Wenn Du den Schalter angeknipst hast, dann gibt es unter den entsprechenden Reitern noch Schieberegler fuer die Staerke der CA-Korrektur (und die Art der Farbaweichung). Bei 95% meiner Bilder fahre ich gut damit, den Wert fuer Magenta als Standard auf "2" zu setzen.
LR hat auch eine coole Funktion, um Staubflecken zu detektieren. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Achja, da ist ja noch das Bild von der Gurnitzer Feuerwehr, das ich ins CR geschickt habe und das vermutlich auf die gleiche Weise gerettet werden kann. Schau doch nochmal kurz aufs RAW. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Nochmals vielen Dank für die wertvollen Hinweise und das Willkommen bei den LR-Nutzern. Jahrelang habe ich diesen Fragenkomplex vor mir hergeschoben, außerdem das vermeintliche Auslangen gefunden mit nur JPEG-Aufnahmen, bis ich begonnen habe, Fotos bei den QI-Kandidaten zu nominieren. Da bin ich rasch eines Besseren belehrt worden, dass allein die RAW-Fotografie das Alpha und das Omega ist. Ich wollte das nie wahr haben, dass bei großen Kontrastumfängen (so ab 1:11) im JPEG die ausgebrannten oder die abgesoffenen Stellen nicht mehr "zurückgebracht" werden können; wohl aber mit RAW. Besser spät als nie gehe ich nun endlich durch diese schmerzliche Lehre und werde nur noch die RAW-Einstellung auf meiner Kamera verwenden. Ich war zu geizig, soviel mehr an Speicherplatz zu "opfern"; typisch weitläufig menschliches Verhalten. Und bin dabei dem alten Trugschluss aufgesessen, was man letztendes will: "Die Kamera oder das Bild?".
Damit habe ich auch die Aufforderung, die Gurnitzer Feuerwehr durch das RAW-Original zu retten, beantwortet. Geht leider nicht, da keines vorhanden. Macht nichts. Ist sozusagen ein "Bauernopfer". Von nun an nur noch RAW-Bilder. LG. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
LR kann auch mit JPG arbeiten. Schieb dazu das JPG einfach mal in den Import. Du musst dann spaeter beim Export darauf achten, dass Du die Qualitaet auf 100% stellst, dann halten sich die Verluste in Grenzen --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Will es einmal versuchen. Nochmals vielen Dank für den freundlichen Hinweis. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Guten Morgen aus Indonesien. Ich habe mir das Ergebnis angeschaut. Das neue Bild ist in den Tiefen zu hell, dadurch kommt so eine tuchartige Struktur in diesen Bereichen hoch. Ich wuerde vorschlagen, Du ziehst im Histogramm bei 75% die hellen Bereiche mehr nach links. Schaerfe und Rauschen wuerde ich mal auf 50 setzen. Alles nur jetzt aus dem Bauch raus, vielleicht liege ich falsch. Ich habe LR gerade nicht auf dem Schirm und fahre gleich zum Sonnenaufgang nach Borobodur. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 20:12, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Eben ebenso schönen wie guten Morgen aus einem frischverschneiten Kärnten im Süden Österreichs. In Europa haben wir genau das gegenteilige Wettergeschehen von dem Teil der Welt, in dem Du gerade weilst. Abermals herzlichen Dank für Deine Bemühungen, um einem Greenhorn wie mir die Spitzfindigkeiten eines Lr näherzubringen. Hab in etwa das umzusetzen versucht, was Du mir angeraten hast; vielleicht ist das besagte Foto doch noch "hinzukriegen"? Und wenn nicht, habe ich wieder viel gelernt. Darauf kommt es schließlich an. Bin schon auf Fotos vom Sonnenaufgang in Borobodur gespannt; vielleicht bei den QI-Kandidaten? --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hohe Gloriette und Burgruine Leonstain 02022015 446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Maria Woerth-Blick 02022015 276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Woerth Halbinsel 02022015 283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 05 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment very nice but a bit too blue, and even if not necessary for a promotion a little clarity and vibrance would improve it IMO --Christian Ferrer 18:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 06 February 2015 (UTC) Support well composed --Christian Ferrer 11:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha Weg 5 Wintertag 02022015 248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. QI for me. --Hubertl 12:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Sankt Primus Bildstock im Steinbruch 28012015 266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokoladen-Genuss 06022015 195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 02022015 447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Westbucht 02022015 453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 77 Zocklwirt 07022014 9619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Wegweiser 07022014 9582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach 10-Oktober-Strasse 89 Pension Christl 07022015 9567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Quellweg altes Bienenhaus 07022014 9627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laterne 29122014 888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Clipped highlights. I left a notes, where. --Halavar 15:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 08 February 2015 (UTC)
 Support After another upload, now it's good. --Halavar 15:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Anonymisierung

Hallo Hans, ich habe die beiden Fotos umbenannt und den Namen entfernt, wie besprochen, auf die beiden Weiterleitungen habe ich einen Schnelllöschantrag gestellt. Ich glaube, es ist besser so. Es beeinträchtigt die Qualität des Fotos keinesfalls, auch wenn man nicht gleich weiß, wen es darstellt. --lg K@rl (talk) 06:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo K@arl, vielen herzlichen Dank für Deinen Liebesdienst. Du korrigierst damit, was ich ein wenig leichtfertig beschrieben und hochgeladen habe. Beim nächsten persönlichen Treffen ist mir das schon mindestens einen Cappuccino wert, auf den ich Dich dann einladen werde. ;=0) Merci Merci Merci! Lg. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Abzweigung Tscheberweg 07022015 9583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Quellweg 38 Gimplhof 07022014 9622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 51 vulgo Komar Scheune 07022014 9585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Abzweigung Tscheberweg Wegweiser Zocklwirt 07022015 9584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach 10-Oktober-Strasse 89 Pension Christl 07022015 9569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks, better! --DXR 11:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T re Seitenaltar 17092014 872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 51 vulgo Komar 07022014 9587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 69 Brennholz vor Fenster 07022014 9590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kronprinz Rudolf-Bluete 11042014 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Sankt Martin 3 Kaplanei 31012015 718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albeck Seebachern Neuwirtalm 25102013 338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Woerth Karner SW-Ansicht 25092014 939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafenstein Werda 3 Bauernhof 08122011 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Villacher Vorstadt Kalvarienberg mit Kreuzberglkirche 29092014 9747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt NW-Ansicht mit Petzen 11022015 9741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach 10-Oktober-Strasse-Ende und Neubau Court 07022015 9572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Bahnhofsbereich Drautalbahn II POLIZEI-Railjet 02022015 222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Villacher Vorstadt Kreuzberglkirche 11022015 9750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --EurovisionNim 10:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Villacher Vorstadt Kreuzbergl Schweizerhaus Kink-Denkmal 11022015 9760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse 96 herbstliche Villa Fenster 07102008 1197.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 51 vulgo Komar Scheune Ausschnitt 07022014 9586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:49, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Dobratsch Rosstratte Almhuetten mit Hoehenrain 13022015 9830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Dobratsch Rosstratten 13022015 9823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Dobratsch Rosstratten Schispur 13022015 9820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Mittagskogel 13022015 9807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Rizzibruecke ueber Lendkanal 07102008 1057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnoldstein Dreilaendereck 13022015 9784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Coordinates of cameraposition would be fine --Hubertl 08:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Wallfahrtskirche Zu Unserer Lieben Frau gotischer Fluegelaltar 13022015 9836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Wallfahrtskirche Zu Unserer Lieben Frau barocker Anna-Altar 13022015 9837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:20, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Wallfahrtskirche Wappengrabstein Grotta von Grottenegg 13022015 9840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Villacher Vorstadt Kreuzbergl Schweizerhaus 11022015 9754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Lendkanal Wasserspiegelung 07102008 1113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Category discussion warning

Vulgo names has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberndorf Gablern Filialkirche hll Johannes und Paulus Portal 16022015 7524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberndorf Gablern Filialkirche hll Johannes und Paulus Vorhalle 16022015 7523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberndorf Gablern Filialkirche hll Johannes und Paulus 16022015 7530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberndorf Gablern Filialkirche hll Johannes und Paulus Kruzifix an S-Wand16022015 7522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Wallfahrtskirche Zu Unserer Lieben Frau gotischer Fluegelaltar Predella 13022015 9871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse Rizzibruecke ueber Lendkanal 07102008 1045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villacher Alpe Rosstratte Almhuetten 13022015 9829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht 04042014 945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Maria Gail Wallfahrtskirche Wappengrabstein Grotta von Grottenegg 13022015 9841.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Burgruine 17022015 9915.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade Schiffsanlegestelle Sonnenuntergang 17022015 7558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Ich glaub,

mit dem 70-200er gehst ab jetzt ins Bett. Geil! Wenn noch die D4 vom Service zurückkommt, was dann? Abheben, 5cm über´m Boden vorbeischweb?--Hubertl (talk) 17:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

ganz und gar nicht. In meiner Altersklasse hat man sich bereits einen gewissen Pragmatismus zugelegt. Obwohl diese Aussage im Widerspruch steht zum Erwerb des von Dir oben erwähnten Objektivs. Im Prinzip wird die Situation mit jedem neuen Stück nur viel komplizierter; aber das hatten wir doch schon, oder? Und der Tag hat immer noch vierundzwanzig Stund. Womit alles zum Ausdruck gebracht scheint. Oder doch nicht? Im Grunde genommen ist alles nur ein evokativer Versuch. Nicht mehr. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Withdraw

Hallo, ich seh grad, daß du deine Herbstlaub-Bilder zurückgezogen hast. Obwohl ich bei den meisten davon mit Kontra gestimmt habe und die Entscheidung damit für richtig halte, bedaure ich sie doch, denn die Bilder sind vom Motiv her wirklich größtenteils über dem Durchschnitt dessen, was bei QI abgeliefert wird, und ich frage mich, ob sich etwas an deinem Workflow verbessern ließe, um die technische Qualität der inhaltlichen und gestalterischen ebenbürtig zu machen. Wenn man ein JPEG erst in den Bonbonfarbenbereich übersättigt und es dann wieder „normalisiert“, dann fehlt natürlich massiv Information, was zu dem beobachteten „Matscheffekt“ führt. Ich persönlich habe mir kürzlich für paarunddreißig Euro eine externe Festplatte gekauft, auf die (nach der ersten Aussortierung von unbrauchbaren Bildern) alle Rohdateien kommen, damit ich das Ausgangsmaterial immer wieder zur Verfügung habe und sich keine Generationen von Detailverlusten aufbauen, indem man die Bearbeitung einer Bearbeitung nochmals bearbeiten muß. Woher die JPEG-Artefakte in einigen deiner Bilder kommen, ist rätselhaft, denn ein gewissenhafter Fotograf speichert seine Bilder doch niemals mit so hoher Kompression ab, daß die sichtbar werden. Vielleicht mal die Nachschärfung übertrieben? Weniger ist mehr. Andererseits sind die Bilder ja schon 7 Jahre alt, vielleicht war damals Speicherplatz knapp. Schade jedenfalls – schön sind sie, aber QI sind sie halt leider nicht. Ich freue mich aber auf viele neue Nominationen von dir! --Kreuzschnabel 07:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine präzise Analyse meines Irrtums, dem ich seit 2003 aufgesessen bin, als ich die analoge Fotografie auf digitale umstellte. Bis vor rund einem Monat habe ich mich hartnäckig geweigert, sämtliche Bilderfassung auf RAW umzustellen. Verbohrt und verstockt, wie viele von uns eben nun mal sind - Speicherplatz sparen und es sei ohnedies ausreichend, was JPEG hergibt - habe ich in all den zwölf Jahren immer nur mit JPEG-Einstellung an der Kamera operiert. Mein nächster Irrtum war jener, zu glauben, es gehe ohne Photoshop oder Lightroom. Außerdem habe ich mich bis Dezember 2014 stets von den Quality Images Candidates ferngehalten, was einen weiteren Fehler bedeutete. Man meint, es immer besser zu wissen als die Anderen; dem ist ganz und gar nicht so. Ich habe vor rund drei Wochen einen kompletten RESET meiner Fotografie gemacht (nur noch RAW-Einstellung an der Kamera und habe mir Lightroom angeschafft). All das habe ich der konstruktiven Kritik der an den QI-Kandidaten aktiv und passiv Beteiligten zu verdanken. Ich habe in dieser kurzen Zeit mit einem Schlag mehr gelernt als in dem Dutzend Jahren zuvor. Und man geht auch anders zu Werke in der Erfassung wie Ausarbeitung der eigenen Fotos. Die alten Fotos lasse ich nun ruhen, die habe ich für QI vergeigt. Nun gilt es, die Gegenwart "richtig" zu handeln und die Zukunft besser zu gestalten. Danke auch für eure Geduld, bis ich endlich eingesehen habe, dass die QI-Kandidaten-Plattform keine Spielwiese persönlicher Eitelkeiten ist. Bezüglich der Herbstlaub-Fotos gibt es in acht Monaten einen neuen Herbst und dann kann ich es versuchen, mit all den Erkenntnissen besser zu machen. Einstweilen kommen andere spannende Frühlingstage auf uns zu, wo vorläufig andere Herausforderungen auf unsere Fotoausrüstungen warten. Auch ich harre schon mit spannender Erwartung Deiner Nominationen. LG --Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Deine Einstellung gefällt mir :-) Ich persönlich arbeite allerdings viel nur mit JPEG; was die Olympus-Engine in dieser Hinsicht hergibt, ist phänomenal. Lightroom habe ich noch nicht, und Open-Source-Werkzeuge wie RawTherapee unterstützen leider die RAWs der E-M1 nicht. Umso wichtiger, das Out-of-camera-JPEG aufzuheben und niemals anzufassen. Mir geht es auch so, daß ich auf QIC viel dazulerne, und mir sind hier auch schon Kandidaten um die Ohren geschlagen worden – es ist wichtig, dann keinen Streit anzufangen und keine bösen Absichten zu vermuten, sondern sein eigenes Bild nochmals mit mehr Distanz zu betrachten. Bislang bin ich noch jedes Mal zu dem Ergebnis gekommen, daß die Kritiker recht hatten. --Kreuzschnabel 07:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Die hervorragenden Bilder des frei stehenden kahlen Baumes auf einem Feld nahe Bettringen sind besonders schöne Schöpfungen aus Deiner «Fotoküche». Sollte diese Landschaft die weitere Umgebung Deines Heimatortes sein, kann ich Dir nur zu der schönen Gegend gratulieren, die Deine heimatlichen Gefilde sein dürften. Spontan fiel mir das bekannte hübsche Lied von «de Schwäb`sche Eisenbahne» ein, die ja in Deiner Gegend über´s Land fahren dürfte (oder gar nimmer?): [[1]]. Mit Olympus habe ich vor rund 38 Jahren zu fotografieren begonnen; damals war ich 24 Jahre alt und leistete mir die Olympus OM-2, natürlich eine analoge Kamera, in der man noch Kleinbild-Filme 24 x 36 mm verwendete. Mein Gott, was hat sich doch die Technik in den Jahren verändert! Die Fotografie ist aber die selbe geblieben. Nur die Möglichkeiten sind mannigfacher geworden. Damals lebte ich rund 160 km südlich von Schwäbisch Gmünd, in der Allgäuer Kleinstadt Isny, wo ich im Wohnwagenwerk Dethleffs beschäftigt war. Ich liebe Land und Leute in Württemberg, alles ist so charmant, freundlich und liebenswürdig. Ich hatte mit dem TÜV Stuttgart zu tun, weil ich für die Typisierung der Wohnwagen zuständig war. Mittlerweile bin ich fast 62 und längst wieder in Kärnten/Österreich, was auch mein Heimatland ist. Doch die ersten Schritte der Fotografie habe ich im Allgäu gemacht. LG --Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hohe Gloriette 18022015 7602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer Lakes Parkhotel 18022015 7589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gloriettenweg Waldbank 18022015 7604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Martinsteig 11 Mesnerhaus 19022015 7635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Martinsteig 11 Mesnerhaus Gedenktafel 19022015 7626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Faning Filialkirche hl Agnes und Hll Simon und Judas Thaddaeus 20022015 7728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl Egyd mit Rundkarner 20022015 7683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Kreuzschnabel 18:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl Egyd Sonnenuhr 20022015 7687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:23, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Martinsteig 11 Mesnerhaus 19022015 7625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tigring Pfarrkirche hl Egyd Turmaufgang und Chorschluss 20022015 7708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Faning Scheune 20022015 7742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:32, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Schloss Mageregg S-Ansicht 20022015 7750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:31, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Schloss Mageregg Ost-Detailansicht 20022015 7772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Martinsteig 6 Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin 19022015 7631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality in my opinion --Milseburg 16:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Agree, QI, Poco a poco 16:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenstein am Faaker See Altfinkenstein 14 Burgruine 17022015 9917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Schloss Mageregg SW-Ansicht 20022015 7747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Schloss Mageregg S-Ansicht Ziergeiebel mit Uhr 20022015 7751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Schloss Mageregg SW-Turm 20022015 7756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Strussnighof Forst- und Teichwirtschaft 06112010 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Famberhorst 05:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Strussnighof Forst- und Teichwirtschaft 06112010 9541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl Egyd Turmaufgang und Chorschluss 20022015 7707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:45, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tigring Pfarrkirche hl Egyd mit Friedhof und Rundkarner 20022015 7720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tigring Kriegerdenkmal 20022015 7697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Bootssteg 23022015 4857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz 23022015 4929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Blumeninsel mit Bruecke 23022015 4952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinsel Landspitz Pavillon 23022015 4918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinsel Landspitz Schiffslandebruecke 23022015 4945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinsel Landspitz Landebruecke Braunfaeule 23022015 4953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg schwimmende Pollen 23022015 4863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality, perfect composition. --Dnalor 01 09:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinsel Landspitz Reifenspuren 23022015 4956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, interesting view. --Dnalor 01 09:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Villacher Vorstadt Kalvarienberg mit Kreuzberglkirche 29092014 9746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Typha angustifolia 23022015 4912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Stockenten auf Bootssteg 23022015 4968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graupen lose 26022015 8674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulgur lose 26022015 8675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 18:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Villen Woerth Seehort und Miralago 23022015 4900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine. --Palauenc05 18:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Westbucht Blumeninsel 21122014 255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. after reducing the blue, its ok for me. --Hubertl 21:52, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Schloss Mageregg Ost-Detailansicht 20022015 7769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Reifenspur 26022015 5009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There's a bit of noise in the shadow areas, but that's tolerable for me. --El Grafo 15:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Maria Woerth-Blick 23022015 4921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Noise reduced,Ok for me --Isiwal 22:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 69 07022014 9589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl Oswald 27022015 0124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Schloss Krastowitz 27022015 0026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Gottscheer Strasse 1 Park von Krastowitz alte Eiche 27022015 0059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Am Kåte Feldweg durch Streuobstwiese 27022015 0154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl Oswald 27022015 0134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nicely, you want the dot in the sky tower right away?--Famberhorst 17:49, 1 March 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you for your assessment. Dust spot removed. Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 02 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Jakob im Rosental Rosenbach Karawanken 28022015 0202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:08, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Oberjeserz Filialkirche hl Michael Vorhalle 28022015 0173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Oberjeserz Filialkirche hl Michael 28022015 0194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Oldtimer RR and MG 09062013 444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perhaps these cars are washed too much. ;-) For the side of the Rolls-Royce is too bright. -- Spurzem 09:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for your review. Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 Support GQ. --Palauenc05 16:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Herbecks Ruhe 01032015 0269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer-Bad Detail 01032015 0226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 21:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer-Bad 01032015 0223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Cygnus olor 01032015 0248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Sankt Martin Sportplatz Toyota Auris 28022015 0212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel 23022015 4876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Some CAs on the tree on the right. --Halavar 13:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for your assessment. Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 Support Good now. --Halavar 00:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Karnburg Pfalzstrasse Pfarrkirche hll Peter und Paul 03032015 0307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Zweikirchen Filialkirche hl Stephanus Glockenturm 03032015 0163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Hardegg Burgruine 03032015 0331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 23:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosegg Schloss S-Ansicht 02032015 0301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer-Bad 01032015 0220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferlacher Stausee und Gerloutz mit Sechter 03032015 0230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Stausee und Strassenbruecke 03032015 0234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. May be FP. --XRay 17:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
+1 --Hubertl 18:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Hollenburg Stausee und Strassenbruecke 03032015 0215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Bichl Ost-Ansicht 03032015 0156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:39, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche Wappengrabplatte 05032015 0377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:44, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Pfarrkirche Epitaph Ulrich von Ernau II 05032015 0373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Nassweg und Gerlitzen 05032015 0270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Eisenbahnbruecke ueber Stausee 03032015 0226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koettmannsdorf Hollenburg Hollenburg 03032015 0213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Kanzian Stein im Jauntal Draubruecke der Koralmbahn 06032015 0419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Kanzian Stein im Jauntal Draubruecke der Koralmbahn 06032015 0446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebenthal Gurnitz Propstei und Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin 06032015 0283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Kanzian Kleindorf II alte Eisenbahnbruecke ueber die Drau 06032015 0413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:41, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Glanhofen Gallinblick 2 Mesnerei 07032015 0292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Glanhofen Gallinblick 2 Mesnerei Eingang 07032015 0293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf am Ossiacher See Tiffen Pfarrkirche hl Jakobus d Ae 07032015 0460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 21:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ossiach ehem Benediktinerstift Westfluegel Aussen-Ansicht 07032015 0387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:26, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ossiach Friedhof und Stiftskirche 07032015 0406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ossiach Stiftskirche Portal Supraporte 07032015 0410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ossiach Stiftskirche Fromiller-Deckengemaelde Mariae Himmelfahrt 07032015 0414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ossiach Stiftskirche Kanzel 07032015 0412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Kanzian Stein im Jauntal Draubruecke der Koralmbahn 06032015 0421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overexposed IMHO (foreground rocks), and tilted CCW --Kreuzschnabel 18:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you for your assessment. Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 07 March 2015 (UTC)
OK now --Kreuzschnabel 07:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Volksschule und Pfarrkirche hl Egyd 05032015 0369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche roem Grabbaurelief tanzende Maenade 07032015 0373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche Grabbaurelief Satyr mit Pedum und Traube tanzende Maenade 07032015 0374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche roem Grabbaufries Windhunde mit Hasen 07032015 0370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebenthal Kohldorf Sattnitz Felswand 06032015 0397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *  Support its better now.--Hubertl 12:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Friedhof Grab Franz Baumgartner Portrait 02032015 0274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Personally I would have chosen for f11, but okay for me.--Famberhorst 16:41, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche Grabsteine Familie Greinig 07032015 0375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. IMO the wall is nearly white and not overexposed. --XRay 17:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf am Ossiacher See Tiffen Pfarrkirche hl Jakobus d Ae 07032015 0468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebenthal Rottenstein Pfarrkirche hl Magdalena 06032015 0382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 106 Villa Edelweiss 08032015 0508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality,--Famberhorst 18:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche romanisches Kapitell 07032015 0354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Hermann mit Mangart 10032015 0546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. What a home run! --Hubertl 18:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Hermann 10032015 0550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Hermann 10032015 0562.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Hermann 10032015 0563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predilsattel Artillerie-Batterie mit Fort 10032015 0536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Hermann 10032015 0517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Log Pod Mangrtom und Rombon 10032015 0593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flitscher Klause Suedost-Ansicht 10032015 0622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flitsch oesterr-ungar Frontlinie Uebergangsgraben 10032015 0648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Rabensdorf 33 Marienhof West-Ansicht 07032015 0324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Stausee und Strassenbruecke 03032015 0234.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Koettmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Stausee und Strassenbruecke 03032015 0234.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/KTC (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bovec Spodnja Trenta Soča-Bruecke 10032015 0679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bovec Spodnja Trenta Soča 10032015 0686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bovec Trenta Pri Cerkvi 10032015 0689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bovec Trenta Mlinarica 10032015 0698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great picture, great light!. --Ralf Roletschek 20:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bovec Vršič-Pass 10032015 0725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:49, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steindorf Tiffen Pfarrkirche roem Grabbaufries Kantharos zwischen zwei Panthern 07032015 0353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Veit an der Glan Tanzenberg Schloss und Seminarkirche 13032015 0801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Meiselberg Schloss 13032015 0539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Sankt Michael Pfarrkirche hl Michael 13032015 0546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Arndorf Filialkirche Heiliger Leonhard 13032015 0780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach am Berg Pfarrkirche hll Lambert und Ulrich 13032015 0557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinsel-Parkplatz Toyota Auris 26022015 5028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sehr gute Schärfe, aber die Farbe des Autos wirkt sehr „flau“. Lässt sich das noch verbessern? -- Spurzem 18:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)*  Comment du bist wohl nur noch gewaschene Oldtimer gewöhnt, Lothar ;-) --Hubertl 21:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your review. I apologize for leaving the vehicle unwashed before taking the photograph. Sorry! --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Das hat mit Gewaschen oder Ungewaschen nichts zu tun. Schaut mal in den Bereich von Vorderrad und Radkasten bzw. innerem Kotflügel. Aber betrachtet meine Anregung gern als gegenstandslos. -- Spurzem 09:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for your review. Reworked version uploaded. I wonder if it helped. Otherwise those noisy parts might be a result of the specific flaws of that camera/lens combination? --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Now it's seriously oversharpened (schau dir mal z.B. die Kanten der Türen an: Schwarze Linie in der Mitte mit Treppchenbildung, helle Säume außen). F11 probably wasn't necessary to achieve sufficient depth of field, something around F8 might have given you a bit more overall sharpness (depending on when diffraction starts to become visible with your lend). A wider aperture could also have enabled you to go down to ISO 100, possibly reducing noise a bit. But usually shooting at ISO 200 (like you did) should be perfectly fine (I don't know much about the D7000's performance, though). --El Grafo 19:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you for your patience with my image. Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 08 March 2015 (UTC)*  weak but whith the new version QI --Hubertl 07:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach am Woerther See Johannaweg 5 Villa Woerth 13032015 0837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Annastrasse 43 Hotel Astoria 13032015 0814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Strandschloessl 13032015 0816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Parkhotel 13032015 0819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Kloster Nordportal mit Supraporte mit Khevenhueller Brustreliefs 12032015 0777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Klosterkirche Langhaus Deckenfresko Orgelempore Mariens Schwangerschaft 12032015 0771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. in the first moment it seems, that the crop is not symetrical, but its the ceiling itself, which is not symetrical! --Hubertl 15:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Klosterkirche Zum Kostbaren Blut Chor 12032015 0763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Schloss-Komplex S-Ansicht 12032015 0755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:37, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach und Stallhofen 12032015 0750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:36, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach am Woerther See Johannaweg 1 Villa Venezia 13032015 0836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Isiwal 20:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Stallhofen Ortstafel 12032015 0531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Koestenberg Pfarrkirche hll Philipp und Jakob 12032015 0520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Ebenfeld Filialkirche hl Vitus 12032015 0735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Sankt Michael Pfarrkirche hl Michael 13032015 0542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago del Predil Geschuetz mit Monte Canin 10032015 0503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago del Predil Strunk und Monte Canin 10032015 0506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 12:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forte Lago Predil Haubitze und Cima del Lago Jerebica 10032015 0484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and very good quality -- Spurzem 11:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Lago Predil mit Haubitze 10032015 0477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Darf ich Dich um etwas bitten?

Johann, entschuldige, wenn ich direkt bin: Du musst etwas mehr Sorgfalt hinsichtlich offensichtlichen Bildfehlern walten lassen: Beim File:Horch 853 innen, Bj. 1936.JPG waren deutliche CA schon in der 800er Pixelauflösung zu sehen und beim Bild Porta Nigra Trier (2009-05-20 Sp-1).jpg ist links unten ein Beschnittfehler. Es erzeugt immer Unfrieden, wenn bereits positiv bewertete Bilder wegen solcher Sachen dann wieder auf GELB gesetzt werden müssen. Also nichts für ungut, manchmal reisst einen die Begeisterung für ein Bild dazu hin, nicht sorgfältig genug zu schauen, aber ich muss Dich hier halt mal bremsen und bitten, sorgfältig vorzugehen. Manchmal hilft es auch schon, wenn man den Fehler annotiert und die Promotion mit der Bedingung verknüpft, dass der Fehler noch behoben wird. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Uwe, Du hast vollkommen Recht. Ich lasse mich zu sehr von der Bildaussage leiten und übersehe dann solche Fehler, wie Du sie oben beschrieben hast. Dafür entschuldige ich mich, denn ich sehe ein, dass ich mehr Sorgfalt an den Tag legen muss. Ich will mich künftig mehr am Riemen reißen, damit solche Fehlbewertungen möglichst hintan gehalten werden. Ich hoffe, die QI Candidates Community in nächster Zeit nicht mehr zu enttäuschen und sende beste Grüße. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Na, von enttäuschen würde ich hier nicht sprechen wollen! Du bist ja ein total fleissiger Mitmensch und investierst viel Zeit für die Community. Dass ich mich auf der Talk page von Dir melde, hat ja auch etwas mit Wertschätzung zu tun. Gruss aus Köln --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
An dieser Stelle wollte ich auch meine Wertschätzung Dir gegenüber für Dein unermüdliches fotografisches Schaffen auf permanent höchstem Niveau zum Ausdruck bringen. Köln ist eine wunderschöne Metropole, gerade der Dom, die Eisenbahnbrücke über den Rhein und die gemütlichen Lokale in der Innenstadt habe ich in bester Erinnerung, als ich in jungen Jahren ein paar Mal dort war; es war in der Regel zur INTERUM, der Zubehör-Messe für Möbelbau. Würde diese Stadt am Rhein gerne wieder mal besuchen. Gruss vom Wörthersee. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Ja, wenn Du wieder nach Köln kommst, sag rechtzeitig Bescheid, dann ergibt sich sicher die Gelegenheit zum persönlichen Kennenlernen :) --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Abgemacht! ;=) --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Quellweg altes Bienenhaus 18032015 0886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nothing straight. pretty typical. QI for me! ;-) --Hubertl 11:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg vulgo Ostermann West-Ansicht 18032015 0864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 11:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg alte Schmiede und vulgo Ostermann 18032015 0852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Quellweg 38 Gimplhof 18032015 0881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Karawankenblickstrasse Wegweiser 18032015 0891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flitsch oesterr-ungar Frontlinie Stacheldrahtverhau 10032015 0646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good picture from a historical artefact. --Hubertl 17:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radovljica Linhartov trg Gostilna Lectar 19032015 0918 0933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radovljica Linhartov trg drei Blechblasinstrumente 19032015 0925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kranjska Gora Gozd Martuljek Fahrradwegbruecke Wurzener Save 19032015 0906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kranjska Gora Gozd Martuljek Fahrradwegbruecke Wurzener Save 19032015 0908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kranjska Gora Gozd Martuljek Fahrradwegbruecke Wurzener Save 19032015 0911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Einkaufszentrum ATRIO 19032015 0905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Seltenheim Schloss 21032015 0566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Jakob im Rosental Maria Elend Wallfahrtskirche Maria Elend 20032015 0981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Kein Vergleich zu 2013. --Hubertl 18:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Jakob im Rosental Sankt Oswald Suchergraben Eisenbahnbruecke 20032015 1000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radovljica Linhartov trg Pfarrhof Innenhof Kruzifix 19032015 0950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting shadow and good quality -- Spurzem 19:00, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Zweikirchen 1 Pfarrkirche hl Johannes der Taeufer 03032015 0161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Image is little bit tilted to the right. --Halavar 01:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you for your assessment. Corrected version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 Comment The tower still is not straight, please see the note, the left side of the tower is leaning. It need to be corrected. --Halavar 12:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 Not done Mattbuck 22:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Sorry for my late reaction to your assessment. Version with straightened tower uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now, GQ. --Palauenc05 17:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC) *  Support Also for me --Hubertl 17:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Tultschnig Filialkirche Heiliger Johannes Baptist 21032015 1005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Ponfeld Herrrlich-Realitaet Geraeteschuppen 21032015 1023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Martin am Ponfeld Pfarrkirche 21032015 1044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. But please removed that small black spot (see the note). --Halavar 19:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Ponfeld Sankt Martin Grabsteine Dietrich 21032015 1030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wernberg Stallhofen Blick auf den Dobratsch 12032015 0524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 01:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 207 Weisses Roessl Veranda 22032015 1072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 207 Weisses Roessl Veranda-Detail 22032015 1073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 205 Reliefplatte F W 1835 22032015 1079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago del Predil mit Kanone 10032015 0495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Lederergasse Hegerhaus 23032015 1088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villach Lederergasse Hegerhaus Gedenktafel 23032015 1092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 12:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnoldstein Radendorf Wallfahrtskirche Maria Siebenbruenn 23032015 1099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnoldstein Radendorf Wallfahrtskirche Maria Siebenbruenn Portal 23032015 1109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gemeindeamt Muenzfernsprecher 22032015 1058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Hubertl 07:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Griffen Lind Filialkirche hl Matthaeus 24032015 1133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Griffen Lind Filialkirche hl Matthaeus Christophorus-Fresko 24032015 1137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 11:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Paul im Lavanttal Goenitz A2-Autobahnbrucke Granitztal 24032015 1130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberndorf Gablern Filialkirche hll Johannes und Paulus 24032015 1146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberndorf Gablern Filialkirche hll Johannes und Paulus Kruzifix 24032015 1148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Benediktinerplatz Marienkirche Grabstein 27022015 0020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Grabbaurelief Kroenung Mariens 27022015 0092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Epitaph Achilles slew Hector 27022015 0095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Grabbaurelief Reisewagen in die Unterwelt 27022015 0088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Bischofsweg 1 Kanonikerhaus Wappen Salzburger Erzbischof 27022015 0099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Tultschnig Filialkirche Heiliger Johannes Baptist Portal und Grabplatten 21032015 1009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 06:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom mit Wehranlage SO-Ansicht 27022015 0118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 23:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Wehranlage SO-Ansicht 27022015 0118 0122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Am Platzl 7 Marktgemeindeamt 27022015 0097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Schnerichweg 1 27022015 0111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnoldstein Radendorf Wallfahrtskirche Maria Siebenbruenn Masswerkfenster 23032015 1123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Bahnhof Briefkasten 22032015 1057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok and QI for me. --Hubertl 21:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Anteilnahme

Vielen Dank für deine Anteilnahme (bei der QI-Bewertung eines meiner Bilder). Wir wohnen in der Nachbarstadt und es sind nur wenige Minuten bis Haltern am See. Aber durch die vielen Verbindungen zu der Stadt ist auch hier die Trauer und Anteilnahme sehr groß. Es gibt kaum jemanden, der keinen direkten Kontakt nach Haltern am See hat. Es bleibt die Frage nach dem "Warum". --XRay talk 11:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Ja, das ist eine ganz schreckliche Sache, die den ganzen Erdball erschüttert. Wie fürchterlich, wenn man auf diese Art und Weise ein Famlienmitglied verliert. Das sind Katastrophen, die mit einem Schlag das ganze Leben verändern. Hat der Co-Pilot nicht daran gedacht, welch Leid er über so viele Menschen und Familien mit seiner Wahnsinnstat bringt? Für mich ist das alles unfassbar und es bewegt mich wirklich sehr. --Johann Jaritz talk 12:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Burgruine Leonstain Verwaltungs-Gebaude im aeusseren Hof 26032015 0598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Ruine Leonstain Burgfried 26032015 0602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Leonstainer Weg bemooster Baum Wegweiser 26032015 0588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Zentrum Blick von Hoher Gloriette 26032015 0605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:30, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Blick von Hoher Gloriette 26032015 0611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Saal Am Platzl 1 27022015 0115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Overall nice composition prevails over the unfortunate cut out of the rear edge of the building --Moroder 14:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse 36 neuer Pfarrhof 28032015 1201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse 37 alter Pfarrhof und Bildstock 28032015 1198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Zcebeci 09:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse 37 Friedhofseingang Wasserstelle 28032015 1206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Friedhof romanischer Rundkarner 28032015 1186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thoerl Blick auf den Jôf di Montasio 08022013 202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 06:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna oesterr Heldenfriedhof 1915-1918 30032015 1236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna Pfarrkirche hl Dreifaltigkeit 30032015 1263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna Kirchenmauer Grabsteine 30032015 1286 1272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 06:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Malborghetto Valbruna Julius Kugy-Bueste 30032015 1286.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna Julius Kugy-Bueste 30032015 1286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Pfarrkirche inmitten Friedhof 28032015 1176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Friedhof Bildstock Maria-Dorn-Figur 28032015 0626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Pfarrkirche Portal Kapitell links 28032015 0633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Pfarrkirche Portal Kapitell rechts 28032015 0632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Friedhof ehem Wehrturm Urnenhalle 28032015 1191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse 36 37 gotischer Bildstock 28032015 1172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality - I believe that the roof is inclined in reality too --Isiwal 20:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna Saisera Montasch 30032015 1229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI overall but I wonder why the right side gets more blurry than the left. Maybe some smudge/moisture on the lens or filter. --Ximonic 07:23, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna oesterr Heldenfriedhof 1915-1918 Tafel 30032015 1235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Ximonic 07:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna oesterr Heldenfriedhof 1915-1918 30032015 1262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna oesterr Heldenfriedhof 1915-1918 Gedenktafel 30032015 1239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna oesterr Heldenfriedhof 1915-1918 Steinwender-Grab 30032015 1243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna oesterr Heldenfriedhof 1915-1918 30032015 1237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna oesterr Heldenfriedhof 1915-1918 Gedenktafel 30032015 1245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna Sommeraufenthaltshaus des Julius Kugy 30032015 1289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna cassetta postale 30032015 1268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malborghetto Valbruna Via Emilio Comici cassetta postale 30032015 1284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 160 Oesterreichischer Hof Therapiezentrum 01042015 1387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Karlstrasse 12 Hotel Vindobona 01042015 1386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Karlstrasse 14 Strandschloessl 01042015 1385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good dof and quality--Lmbuga 08:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Parkhotel 01042015 1371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Schiffsanlegestelle Landspitz 01042015 1367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 112 Marienvilla 03042015 1449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Annastrasse 10 Appartement-Villa 01042015 1322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Wahlißstrasse 1 Villa 01042015 1323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Tuer zum Badestrand der Villa Johanna 01042015 1330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Woerth Winterkirche und Wallfahrtskirche 03042015 1438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden am Woerther See Seecorso 10 Hotel Schloss Velden 03042015 1432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden am Woerther See Seecorso Strandpark und See-Blick 03042015 1431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality but yet the sides are still leaning in. --Cccefalon 08:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for your assessment. Version with straightened sides uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 08:35, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden am Woerther See Seecorso Strandpark Laterne 03042015 1429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden am Woerther See Seecorso mit See-Blick 03042015 1433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden am Woerther See Seecorso Roy Black-Bueste 03042015 1435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC) *  Comment This so-called artist should live long prohibit to exhibit any of his works in public. Additionally every year a public "Bastonade", as long this bust is standing on this position. IMHO.--Hubertl 08:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winlern Am Kåte Landschaft mit Wolken 05042015 1471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Techelsberg Toeschling Appartement-Anlage 03042015 0661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Unterwinklernstrasse 12 Villa Maire 03042015 0655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Rosentaler Strasse 10 Villa Klutzke 03042015 1423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Unterwinklern Filialkirche Heilige Johannes und Paul 03042015 1397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velden Kranzlhofen Pfarrkirche hl Johannes der Taeufer 03042015 1409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Winlern Am Kåte Brennholzstapel vor Streuobstwiese 050420151465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Brockweg Brock-Hof Nebengebaeude und Ostermann 05042015 1458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Brockweg Brock-Hof Nebengebaeude und Pyramidenkogel 05042015 1463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Stoffpuppe am Wegrand 05042015 1474.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 06:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Du erhältst einen Orden!

Der Fleißorden
500 Quality-Images sind ein Meilenstein! Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Template PH

Hello.

You can use it :

Template:User PH-4

on your user page.

Regards.

--ComputerHotline ([[User talk:ComputerHotline|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Congratulations and thank you

Just few words: I like your pictures very much. :) --Jebulon ([[User talk:Jebulon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup, très gentil! Thank you for your charming compliment. Although I find that I still have to learn a lot in terms of photography. I also do enjoy your images lots and am already waiting for your new entries every day. By the way, I like your beautiful country France very much, especially the Provence, where I have been several times. What a pity, that I don`t have any opportunity to visit France at the moment, but maybe one day ... Kind regards.--Johann Jaritz talk 17:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

OOOOOPS

lb Johann, beim Promoten hast du heute die Tasten vertauscht... Schau dir das mal an. Überhaupt stelle ich fest, dass die Übergabe aktuell nicht 100%ig funktioniert. Ich gehe zu früh schlafen und du stehst später auf. ;-) Falls du mich in den letzten 2 Wochen angerufen hast und ich nicht abgehoben habe, dann liegt das daran, dass ich mein Handy schon glaubte verloren zu haben (schnieef), es aber gestern bei jemandem wieder aufgetaucht ist. Welches Glück, mein 13 Jahre altes Handy wieder zu haben! Und keine Visitenkarten nachdrucken zu müssen! --Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

lb Hubertl, das sind die kleinen Hoppals, Peinlichkeiten oder Ausrutscher, die manchmal passieren. War ganz versehentlich. Natürlich hat es der Uwe Aranas als erster bemerkt. Zur Klarstellung: bin und war nicht betrunken; ist lediglich eine Folge von übertriebenem Multitasking. Kommt manchmal davon, wenn man zwischen zu vielen offenen Browser-Fenstern hin und her springt. Da verlier ich schon leider mal den Überblick. Nein, ich habe Dich nicht angerufen; aber ich bin beruhigt zu erfahren, dass Dein Mobil-Telefon wieder bei Dir ist. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Schon erledigt... Template:Smile

Guten Morgen! --Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Es gibt ja doch noch bezaubernde "Jeannies". Gerade am "Tag der Arbeit". Einen ebenso schönen Morgen! --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:05, 01 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Weil heute der QI-Bot Schnupfen hatte, hier der Service...

Diese nachfolgenden Dateien von dir wurden heute als QI ausgelistet, allerdings nicht als QI mit der Kategorie Quality images vom Bot kategorisiert. Das macht dieser im Normalfall mit folgender Vorlage:{{QualityImage}}, die er am Ende einer Bildbeschreibungsseite einfügt. Ich würde mal warten, ob diese Kategorie nochmal von Dschwen gemacht wird, wenn nicht, dann in ein paar Tagen selbst kategorisieren bzw. Template einsetzen. Der Beleg dafür, dass es QI ist, der findet sich hier --Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Ich fürchte, dir ist ein Fehler unterlaufen...

der aber wahrscheinlich durch eine Falschinterpretation eines Bearbeitungskonfliktes durch das Programm passiert ist (nicht ungewöhnlich!):

Du hast mit diesem Edit die vorherige Aktion von Livioandronico rückgängig gemacht. Das war nicht seine Intention, er wollte diese Nominierung von Decline auf Discuss setzen, du hast das wieder auf Decline gesetzt. Bevor der arme Livio ganz verdattert ist, solltest du das reparieren. --Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:51, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Die Nachricht ist an den wahren Verursacher dieser "Unannehmlichkeit" zu richten, nämlich an Gzzz und nicht an mich. Macht aber nichts! Irren ist menschlich. LG. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:18, 09 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Und jetzt

noch läppische 299, dann hast den Tausender. --Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:08, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Wie geil ist das denn..

19. Mai 2015. So ein Wetter, solche Motive. Und dann spielt die 810er sammt dem 24-70er wirklich alles aus, was möglich ist. Das beeindruckt! Ich werd mir zwar die 5Ds R nie leisten können, aber an diesen Bildern sieht man, dass das Pixelhochjagen durchaus seine Berechtigung hat. Das Objektiv spielt zumindest bis 36 MP noch locker mit. Bei 50 MP wird man es noch sehen. Aber so einfach scheint es nicht zu sein, noch immer gibt es kein Exemplar zu kaufen. Ähnlich wie mit dem 11-22er f/4 von Canon. Da geht auch nix. Was mich wundert ist, dass ich noch keine Detailaufnahmen von dem Brunnen vor dem Lobisseratelier gesehen habe von dir. --Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

22. Mai 2015. Am heutigen Freitag sieht die Chose schon ganz anders aus. Die "wahren Eisheiligen" finden aufgrund der Verschiebung infolge der Kalender-Reform gerade jetzt statt. Hier ist alles Grau in Grau und viel zu kühl. Auf den Bergen liegt wieder Schnee. Allerdings besteht Hoffnung. Wie ließ Geheimdienstmann "007" seinerzeit verlauten: << Die Hoffnung stirbt zuletzt>>. Ja, ich bin ein totaler Fan der D810 geworden und orte nun schon gewisse Schwächen bei den Gummilinsen. Natürlich kann man schnell in Haarspalterei abgleiten, aber die alte Binsenweisheit "das Bessere ist des Guten Feind" hat eben immer seine absolute Berechtigung. Die Latte wird immer höher gelegt. Aber das ist dann wieder eine Frage des Aufwands, der nur mit sehr viel mehr finanziellem Einsatz zu erzielen ist. Die Prime Lenses (Normal bis Teleobjektive) von 55 bis 200 mm und dann von Carl Zeiss weisen laut Testberichten immer noch die beste Schärfeleistung auf. Aber man ist dann eben sehr auf einen Ausschnitt fixiert. Allerdings stellst Du mit dem Canon 2,8/400 mm unter Beweis, dass auch dieser Einschränkung durch geeignete Motiv- und Ausschnittwahl bestens beizukommen ist. Zum Brunnen im Stiftspark St. Paul nahe dem klassizistischen Stöckl (Lobisser-Atelier) bin ich noch nicht vorgedrungen. Allein für den Gesamtkomplex des Benediktinerstifts Sankt Paul müsste ich mir ein paar Tage geben, um dort wenigstens 60% durchzufotografieren. Also, bis jetzt keine Brunnen-Detail-Aufnahmen von meiner Seite. Allerdings habe ich diese Anregung bereits in meiner To-Do-Liste für meinen nächsten Lavanttal-Besuch eingetragen. Vielleicht machst Du dann einen Kurz-Abstecher über die Koralm, wenn Du demnächst Dein Projekt in Graz umsetzen wirst? So, nun wünsche ich Dir ein gestaltungsreiches Pfingst-Wochenende und viel Gut-Licht. LG. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Mit St. Paul machma eher was anderes, nämlich einen gemeinsamen Wikipediabesuch. Mit Führung und so. In Graz werden wir so beschäftigt sein (weil wir auch Nachtsessions und Panoramaworkshops machen werden), dass wir froh sein werden, dass wir das dortige Programm absolvieren können. Inzwischen hab ich schon den ersten Blitzkoffer gemeinsam mit deutschen Kollegen bestellt und genehmigt bekommen, Anfang Juni wird er geliefert. [Siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Raboe001/Antrag-Blitze#Vorl%C3%A4ufiger%20Kostenplan%20Teil%20I%20%28Radtourkit%29] Vorerst nur mit 4 Blitzen (dazu kommen noch die zwei, die wir haben), die man alle parallel schalten kann. Entfesselt. Wir werden ihn erstmalig in 10 Tagen beim Nordtirolprojekt einsetzen. --Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:54, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate Olivier ([[User talk:Olivier|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Olivier ([[User talk:Olivier|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:25, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 22:16, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

heading

Hallo Johann Jaritz, irgendwas stimmt bei deinen heading-Angaben (manchmal?) nicht. Etwa File:Maria Woerth Filialkirche hl Anna am Zackel 22062015 1271.jpg hat heading:5 heißt 5° von Nord im Uhrzeigersinn, auf Kagis würde ich die Richtung allerdings auf 70° schätzen. Heading nimmt Werte zwischen 0 und 360° an. Hast du eine Idee woran das liegen könnte? >2700 Treffer für heading:5 in Kärnten lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki, das rührt daher, dass ich mir über die Bedeutung dieser Zahl "Fünf" nach dem "heading:" nicht im Klaren bin; ich dachte, das gehört zum fixen Bestandteil der Region "Kärnten", der ja die Zahl "Zwei" zugedacht ist (AT-2). Möglicherweise kannst Du mir Licht ins Dunkel bringen, indem Du mir erklärst, welche Bedeutung diese für mich "ominöse" Zahl hat. Danke im Voraus und lg--Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Und ich dachte, das stammt aus deinem GPS Tagger. Trägst du die Koordinaten auch händisch ein? Der UploadWizard übernimmt die Koordinaten, so sie in der Exifbeschreibung drinnen stehen. Ad heading, siehe Template:Location#Vorlagenparameter, Abschitt #3 heading: heading: indicate the direction in which the camera was pointing. It is given as degree values 0-360 (clockwise with north as 0) or a compass point abbreviation (up to four letters) as defined in Points of the compass. (Example: heading:NW) zu gut Deutsch, die Richtung in die die Kamera schaut, in Graden von 0 bis 360° von Nord im Uhrzeigersinn. d.h. 45° = NE, 180° = S. Du kannst auch die gängigen Abkürzungen verwenden. Ohne den Parameter heading handelt es sich um richtungslose Koordinaten. Da ich davon ausgehe, dass du keine Lust haben wirst, die Richtung bei 2700 Bildern manuell nachzutragen, kann ich dir anbieten, das per VisualFileChange zu löschen. Du bist aber auch herzlich willkommen, wenn du es selbst machen möchtest. Sonst gelten Anregungen natürlich immer für die Zukunft.
Bei diesem Bild fällt mir auf, das Objektkordinaten (Template:Tl) und Kamerakoordinaten (Template:Tl) übereinstimmen, obwohl du doch etliche Meter vom fotografierten Objekt entfernt gestanden bist, was eigentlich nicht sein kann. Die Kamerakoordinaten sind immer der Aufnahmestandpunkt (wichtig z.B. wenn du vom Pyramidenkogel herunterfotografierst), Objektkoordinaten sind die Koordinaten des auf dem Bild abgebildeten (Haupt)Objekts. Nur Kamerakoordinaten können sinnvollerweise eine Richtung (heading) haben. Übereinstimmen können die beiden eigentlich nur, wenn du auf Gebäuden drauf stehst oder dich drinnen befindest. Hier haben 2627 Objektkoordinaten eine Richtung. Kann es sein, dass es sich bei deinen Kamerakoordinaten immer um Objektkoordinaten handelt? Weil dann sollten wir das auch ändern, kann mit VisualFileChange mitgemacht werden. (Die Suche ist nicht zuverlässig, die genauen Zahlen können andere sein).
du müsstest mal klären, welche deiner Koordinaten Objekt- und welche Kamerakoordinaten sind. Und ob du manuell nachbessern willst, oder ob wir mit einem Script drüberrauschen sollen. Und wie. lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für Deine ausführliche Aufklärung; damit hast Du in der Tat einiges Licht ins Dunkel gebracht. Also der Reihe nach: ich besitze keinen GPS Tagger, alle Koordinaten (jene der Objektposition) sind manuell von mir eingetragen (ein Riesen-Zeitaufwand und eine Heiden-Arbeit). Sämtliche "heading_5"-Einträge sind ergo dessen unsinnig und folglich zu entfernen. Vielen Dank, wenn Du mir diesen Liebesdienst machst und alle rund 2.700 Einträge mit dem VisualFileChange heraus löschst. Künftig werde ich diesen Eintrag nicht mehr vornehmen, da er ja wirklich nur Sinn macht, wenn er bei Kamerapositionen angeführt wird. Ich trage schon seit Jahren nur noch Objektpositionen ein, meistens hole ich mir diese von den Einträgen bei den denkmalgeschützten Objekten. Nochmals, für eine "Flurbereinigung" durch Deine Hand bin ich Dir im Vorhinein zu großem Dank verpflichtet. Nochmal: in den vergangenen Jahren habe ich lediglich Objektkoordinaten eingetragen. Kamerapositionen machen allerdings dann einen Sinn, wenn Panorama-Aufnahmen von Landschaften oder Städten gemacht werden. Ich werde das künftig so beherzigen. Für all Deine Mühen und Erklärungen danke ich Dir vielmals und möchte Dich auf einen Umtrunk einladen, solltest Du einmal nach Pörtschach am Wörther See kommen. Vielleicht begleitest Du den Hubertl (H. E.) einmal, wenn er wieder nach Kärnten fährt. Dann können wir einmal bei einem Fläschchen besten Rotweins über Gott und die Welt, vor allem aber über meine Defizite bei WIKI COMMONS, sprechen. Und wenn ein Fläschchen nicht langt, dann können es auch mehr sein. Selbstverständlich steht es Dir absolut frei, auch alkoholfreie Getränke zu trinken, solltest Du keine alkoholischen Getränke verkosten. Liebe Grüße aus Karantanien.--Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Hallo Johann, damit ich das machen kann, brauche ich eine Kategorie. Entweder eine temporäre Kategorie, die ich nachher weglösche, oder eine die bleibt, ich schlage dir eine versteckte und flache User-Kategorie Category:Images by Johann Jaritz vor, die du gerne weiter verwenden kannst (z.B. um deine neuen Bilder zu markieren). Wie hättest es gern? Danke auch für das manuelle Eintragen der Koordinaten, es ist extrem nützlich, wenn Koordinaten an den Bildern kleben (auch wenn sie einmal nicht genau sind, sind ja GPS-Koordinaten auch nicht immer). Bleib dabei, aber vielleicht kommst du irgendwie zu einem GPS Tagger? Danke für die Einladung, schau ma mal, mit Hubertl glaub ich aber eher nicht. Bedarf an Kracherl bestünde keiner. lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Hallo Herzi-Pinki, perfekter Vorschlag. Die Idee mit der versteckten und flachen User-Kategorie Category:Images by Johann Jaritz gefällt mir bestens. Ich hätte die ohnedies von Anfang an einführen sollen. Bitte erschaffe, verwende und belasse diese auch gleich bei meinen hochgeladenen Fotos. Danke vielmals! Den GPS Tagger merke ich mir schon mal vor. Vielleicht schreibe ich einen Brief ans Christkind, das eh schon in genau einem halben Jahr kommt. Liebend gern würde ich nach etlichen Jahren wieder einmal nach Wien fahren. Sollte es tatsächlich dazu kommen, dann melde ich mich vorher bei Dir. Dann könnten wir in Grinzing einen heben gehen. Oder in einem feinen Weinlokal Deiner Wahl, nachdem feststeht, dass Du Dich nicht auf Kracherln festlegst. Hab ich Dir schon erzählt, dass meine beiden Töchter aus erster Ehe in Wien leben? Die würden mich eh so gern mal in der Bundeshauptstadt begrüssen; aber deren Papa sitzt lieber in Pörtschach vor dem Computer und lädt Bilder auf Commons hoch. lg --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

So ich beende meine Servicetätigkeit vorerst:

  • Es gibt noch rund 200 Kategorien mit heading:5 in Kärnten. Ich kenne keinen Automatismus und habe auch keinen Botbetreiber gefunden. Magst du als Verursacher das nacharbeiten und das sinnlose heading:5 entfernen?
  • Die Category:Images by Johann Jaritz ist gut befüllt, ich habe alle (den Großteil?) der Files hineingeschoben, die mit Autor=User:Johann Jaritz gekennzeichnet waren. Es könnte sein, dass mir einige durch die Lappen gegangen sind, bei großen Mengen funktionieren die Tools nicht immer nachvollziehbar zuverlässig. Trag einfach nach, wenn dir wo was auffällt. Es könnte auch sein, dass ich dir fälschlicherweise Files zugeordnet habe, aber dann würde Autor=User:Johann Jaritz wohl zu Unrecht drinnen stehen. (Mir ist das bei den Bildern passiert, die ich von extern hochgeladen habe, und wo ich als Uploader, aber nicht als Urheber drinnen gestanden bin)
  • Unter de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:WikiProjekt_Österreichische_Denkmallisten#Benutzerspezifische_Kategorien_.26_Lizenzen_im_UploadWizard findest du eine Anleitung wie du die usercat automatisch im Upload Wizard erzeugen kannst.

lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Du hast WIKI COMMONS und mir unsäglich wertvolle Servicedienste geleistet; besten Dank für die Opferung eines Teiles Deiner wertvollen Lebenszeit. Das sinnlose heading:5 habe ich aus den betroffenen Kärnten-Kategorien entfernt; dabei habe ich mich an Deine Auflistung gehalten. Ich hoffe, dass dies damit bereinigt und erledigt ist. Dumm, wenn solche Fehler dann zweihundertfach repliziert worden sind. Aber besser heute 200 als morgen 2000 händisch reparieren. Du hast auch entscheidend zur COMMONS-Hygiene beigetragen. Bleibt nur zu hoffen, dass ich nicht noch weitere U-Boote eingebaut habe. Danke auch für die Anleitung zur Applikation der usercat. Ich werde mich bei Gelegenheit damit beschäftigen. lg--Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Kategorienbezeichnung

Hallo Johann Jaritz, ein Wahnsinn, was du alles abbildest und hier in Commons ordnest. Hast du deinen verdienten Orden schon bekommen dafür? - Aber wenn du noch einmal eine Burgenland- oder Tirol-Kategorie anlegst und dabei den Artikel "the" verwendest, erschieß ich dich :-))). LG --Eweht ([[User talk:Eweht|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Eweht, das kann ich Dir mittlerweile bestens nachempfinden, weil ich eingesehen habe, dass die Voranstellung des Artikels im Englischen der beiden betroffenen Bundesländer nicht zweckdienlich, ja vielmehr kontraproduktiv ist. Zur Erklärung, woher das rührt: Im Englisch-Unterricht vor mehreren Jahrzehnten wurde uns beigebracht, dass der Artikel bei diesen beiden Regionen anzuwenden ist. Möglicherweise hat man sich zwischenzeitlich aus praktischen Überlegungen auf die Weglassung des "the" geeinigt. Ich bedauere, dass ich in dieser Hinsicht für "troubles" gesorgt habe. Das kommt bei allfälligen Kategorie-Neuanlagen gewiss nicht mehr vor. Für all die mühsamen Korrekturen der beiden Bundesländer-Kategorien danke ich Dir, ebenso für das Lob. Die Anlage von erforderlichen Kategorien hilft mir persönlich beim Vertiefen und Erlernen neuer Fachbegriffe im Englischen wie im Deutschen. Außerdem bin ich von dem grandiosen Projekt des WIKIPEDIA und der WIKIMEDIA COMMONS mehr als überzeugt. Künftig werde ich Dir in dieser Hinsicht keinen Anlass mehr liefern, der Dich an den Rand der gedanklichen Überlegung bringen könnte, zur Schusswaffe greifen zu müssen ;=0)). LG --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Ach, kein Grund zu großartiger Rechtfertigung! (Der bestimmte Artikel wird im Englischen ja bei Orts-, Typen- u. ä. Bezeichnugnen sowieso weit weniger verwendet als im Deutschen, was dann in den Beschreibungen sehr oft "Denglisch" bzw. "Germanish" wirkt.) Ja, und Vokabular erlerne ich auch viel hier bei dieser Arbeit - und bekomme auch bei vielen Dingen mehr Sachkenntnis. Habe vor, in nächster Zeit die "the"-Kategorien gegen solche ohne den Artikel auszutauschen, damit die Bundesländer dann auch in den betreffenden Navigationsleisten aufscheinen. Na denn: Wohl an! LG --Eweht ([[User talk:Eweht|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Ja, das sehe ich genau so wie Du. Beim Kategorisieren lernt man in fachlicher wie in sprachlicher Hinsicht sehr viel dazu. Gleichzeitig bemerkt man, wie vieles noch nicht getan ist und Lücken erst gefüllt werden können. Gerade bei geographischen, historischen wie architektonischen Themenbereichen. Darum finde ich WIKI ja so spannend, weil gerade der Forscher-Drang in einem erweckt und befriedigt werden kann. Ist selbstverständlich eine zeitintensive Beschäftigung, aber allemal besser, als sinnentleerten Tätigkeiten nachzugehen. IMHO. LG --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Honda

File:Honda VT 600 in Norcia.jpg Thanks for the "Felicitazioni" but this isn't mine,anyway if you want know italiano next time you must say :"Congratulazioni". Felicitazioni you can use for a birth or a marriage. The term "Felicitazioni" is a term anyway old normally the people use the term "auguri" that can be use for all (motorbike,birth,marriage,ecc) but NOT before and exame for example,before a show in teathre to speak only a things that happened. Saluti (nomally the people in italy say...ciao). Template:Clin--LivioAndronico talk 17:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Caro Livio, thank you so much for telling me the differences of the meanings of tha appropriate words. My wife speaks Spanish and so I often confuse the corrct idiom between these two languages. What a pity, that the Honda is not yours, but I imagine, you have a Moto Guzzi or an Aprilia at home, don`t you? Ciao. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
After I broke the skull, arms, femur and several bones .... I think I will not go in motion for quite a while. In Italy they do not arrest even if somebody invest you.Asta luego --LivioAndronico talk 11:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Very wise decision, after what happened to you. What a horrible cesura in your life. You have all my compassion and empathy. By the way, one of my best friends died last Friday on his bicycle, when a truck crashed him. What a dreadful way of losing a life. What for? Sad greetings from Carinthia/Austria, ciao. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Photos of other von Villach Murals?

Do you have a photo of the Schutzmantelmadonna by Thomas von Villach (um 1460) in Gerlamoos, Filialkirche? If so, would you mind sharing them with me for use in an academic book about images of death?

Ashby Kinch ashby.kinch@umontana.edu

The photo of Virgin of Mercy (Schutzmantelmadonna) at Gerlamoos subsidiary church I can share with you for use in an academic book about images of death is the one, I uploaded to WIKI COMMONS. So feel free to use it. File:Steinfeld_Gerlamoos_Virgin_of_Mercy_by_Thomas_von_Villach_20122012_9306.jpg Hopefully the quality is sufficient for your purposes. Kind Regards --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Hello Johann, We are trying to understand the restrictions for the image of the Virgin Mary reading in the Eberndorf Gablern Filialkirche--an image that we would like to use. Do you mean that you do not want this image used on a book cover? We would like to use it as a small part of a book cover along with other images. Is this acceptable to you? Please contact me at lsimmons@ltp.org. Our print date is August 3. Thank you, LS, Editor Liturgy Training Publications Chicago

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Complimenti Template:Clin --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your support at this FP. Can you clarify your comment "Kind of Blue". I took it as a music reference and play on the blue helicopter's colour. But I think Daniel has interpreted it as you thinking the white balance was a little too blue. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

As I have been a big fan of Miles Davis for many years, my comment only relates to that great album of his. You took it the way it was meant as a music reference and play on the blue helicopter`s colour. Nothing else. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 02:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Glasfenster

Hallo Johann, Du könntest vielleicht die Tiroler Glasmalerei in Innsbruck kontaktieren um zu fragen um welchen Heiligen es sich hier handelt. Ich hatte auch für die Antoniuskirche angefragt und Herr Gernot Fussenegger (gernot.fussenegger@aon.at) war sehr hilfbereit. LG --Wolfgang Moroder ([[User talk:Moroder|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Wolfgang, genau das habe ich vor. Danke auch für den Hinweis auf Gernot Fussenegger. Ich vermute und hoffe, die Tiroler Glasmalerei in Innsbruck hat die Aufzeichnungen von den Arbeiten in der Pörtschacher Pfarrkirche hl. Johannes d. T. vor einhundertzehn Jahren noch in ihren Archiv-Beständen. Denn hier im Pörtschacher Pfarramt scheinen sich die Unterlagen "verflüchtigt" zu haben; was immer die Gründe dafür gewesen sein mögen. Hervorragend sind Deine Fotos von den Glasfenstern der Grödener St. Antonius-Kirche. Die Handschrift ist auch dort unverkennbar und entspricht jener der Glasfenster in unserer Kirche. Ich werde ein Email zusammenstellen und Herrn Fussenegger fragen. Alle Heiligen-Bilder der vier Chorfenster und der sechs Galeriefenster würde ich gerne in Erfahrung bringen. Dazu möchte ich ihm alle Fotos schicken, vielleicht kann er auch anhand der Bilder die Heiligen identifizieren; wäre sehr wünschenswert. Denn von unserer Pörtschacher Pfarrkirche existiert nämlich bedauerlicherweise kein Kirchenführer und da wäre doch einiges zu klären. Schande für unseren bekannten Ort am Wörther See! Auch die Biografien der drei Brüder Adolf, Jacob und Konrad Campidell (Altäre und Heiligenfiguren) wären von großem Interesse. U.s.w. und so fort. LG. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 14:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

"last" vs. "latest"

Thanks for the information :) Now is "latest". Unfortunately, My English is poor :( Best regards! --Pudelek ([[User talk:Pudelek|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

No, that is not true at all. This "mistake" is very common and widely spread even among German speaking people. I only mentioned it, not to lecture you, but to help improve the whole performance of your presentation. Because your photos are marvellous indeed. I admire your photographic work and I wish, I might come up to your high level of photography one day. I imagine you live in Poland. A country rich of beautiful landscapes, cities and monumetns. Many kind regards from Austria to Poland. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 11:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup, Christian. Thank you for your sympathic effort. But I imagine, the image has no chance because of what Jebulon wrote in his comment. Let us see what happens. Many nice greetings from Austria. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 02:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Johann Jaritz, das Bild File:Klagenfurt Ursulinengasse 3 14072009 77.jpg ist irgendwie kaputt. Kannst du das nochmals hochladen? lg --Herzi Pinki ([[User talk:Herzi Pinki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki, nach einer Frischzellenkur in meiner Wellness-Oase sollte das Foto wieder einsatzbereit sein. lg --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 03:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hedera identity

Hi Johann - on File:Poertschach Friedhof Hedera rhombea 06012012 177.jpg, how do you know it is Hedera rhombea (extremely rare in cultivation in Europe), rather than Hedera helix (an abundant native species in Europe)? Thanks! - MPF ([[User talk:MPF|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi MPF - to be honest, I only compared photos of "Hedera rhombea" with my image and I found, that this hedera resembles the most to the "Hedera rhombea". If you suggest, I should better change the category to "Hedera helix", I will do. Sorry for my late reply, but I was quite busy. Regards --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 04:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Will do - MPF ([[User talk:MPF|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) ([[User talk:Raimund Liebert (WMAT)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:08, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die freundliche Einladung, beim Kalender 2016 mitzumachen, aber bisher habe ich noch kein würdiges Foto gefunden, das auch den Bedingungen entsprechen würde. Gleichzeitig entschuldige ich mich für die verspätete Antwort, wünsche aber den anderen Teilnehmern exzellente Einreichungen. Template:Smile LG.--Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 07:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Gratulation!

... fürs Mitmachen!

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich - und herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Fotos File:Althofen Burgstrasse 9 Wohnhaus Schwarz am Berg 24062015 5223.jpg und File:Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 7 Pfarrhof SO-Ansicht 17092015 7585.jpg gehören zu den 40 Fotos, die ex aequo Platz 11 belegen. Insgesamt wurden dieses Jahr 7757 Fotos eingereicht. Die Liste der Preisträger findest du hier: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/2015/11/04/gewinner-wiki-loves-monuments-2015-oesterreich/.

Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn du persönlich an der Preisverleihung teilnehmen kannst, die am 9. Dezember 2015 um 17 Uhr in der Wiener Hofburg stattfindet. Wir werden dich diesbezüglich noch per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) ([[User talk:Raimund Liebert (WMAT)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /Laitche ([[User talk:Laitche|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Dein Bild ...

... File:Krumpendorf_Parkweg_mit_Laternen_im_Park_11102015_2339.jpg solltest du nicht zurückziehen. Ich habe die ganze Zeit überlegt, ob es nicht wohl doch gut genug ist. Manchmal bin ich mir nicht so richtig schlüssig. Ich prüfe es noch einmal, da ich denke, dass ich es noch intensiver betrachten sollte. --XRay talk 10:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Ich denke, dass meine Bedenken ob meiner Entscheidung richtig waren. Ich habe dein Bild auf "promotion" gesetzt, bitte ich aber, noch ein wenig am Rauschen zu verbessern. Ich hoffe, du trägst es mir nicht nach. Manchmal ist es so, dass ich bei einem Bild die so scheinbar klare Entscheidung doch falsch getroffen habe. Und dann sollte man das auch ändern. --XRay talk 10:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Danke für Deine freundlichen Zeilen! Auch ich habe in der Vorauswahl lange überlegt, ob ich dieses Bild überhaupt nominieren soll, da es keine besondere Aussage hat. Aus Gründen der Serie von diesem Ort am Wörther See habe ich es dann doch genommen und damit nicht unbedingt eine glückliche Hand bewiesen. Die Blende 1:16 wählte ich der größeren Tiefenschärfe halber; allerdings lässt der untere Telebereich keinen so großen durchgehenden Schärfenbereich zu. Und ... und ... und. Dennoch will ich nochmals versuchen, das Rauschen, welches gerade in den dunklen Bildpartien unübersehbar ist, etwas nachzubessern. Danke für Deine Revision und Abmilderung Deines Erst-Urteils! Liebe Grüße --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 12:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Fotos auf Austria-Forum

Hallo Johann, beim Durchblättern beim Austria-Forum habe ich gesehen, dass viele Fotos von dir Anklang gefunden haben :-)

Bis jetzt habe ich folgende gefunden:

File:Noetsch mit Dobratsch 20052007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Nötsch_im_Gailtal/Ort
File:Noetsch Saak mit Wasserleonburg 20052007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Nötsch_im_Gailtal/Wasserleonburg
File:Guttaring 21092007 05.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Guttaring/Ort
File:Guttaring Marktgemeindeamt 21092007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Guttaring/Marktgemeindeamt
File:Grafenstein Marktgemeindeamt 29072007 02.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Grafenstein/Marktgemeindeamt
File:Grafenstein Pfarrkirche Heiliger Stefan 02102007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Grafenstein/Pfarrkirche
File:Himmelberg Gemeindeamt 20062007 01.jpg - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Himmelberg_Gemeindeamt_20062007_01.jpg
File:Himmelberg Pfarrkirche heiliger Martin 20062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Himmelberg/Pfarrkirche
File:Diex Wehrkirche 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Diex/Wehrkirche
File:Gloednitz Pfarrkirche 22072007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Glödnitz/Pfarrkirche
File:Gloednitz Pfarrkirche Wehrturm 22072007 09.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Glödnitz/Wehrturm
File:Moosburg Karolingermuseum 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Moosburg/Karolingermuseum
File:Deutsch Griffen Pfarrstadel Krippenmuseum 2062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Deutsch-Griffen/Krippenmuseum
File:Deutsch Griffen Gemeindeamt 2062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Deutsch-Griffen/Gemeindeamt
File:Deutsch Griffen Pfarrhof 2062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Deutsch-Griffen/Pfarrhof
File:Poggersdorf Gemeindeamt 15062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Poggersdorf/Gemeindeamt
File:Poggersdorf Pfarrkirche heilige Georg und Jakobus major 15062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Poggersdorf/Pfarrkirche
File:Poggersdorf Pfarrkirche heilige Georg und Jakobus major portal 15062007 03.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Poggersdorf/Pfarrkirche_Portal
File:Klein Sankt Paul Marktgemeindeamt 21092007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Klein_Sankt_Paul/Gemeindeamt
File:Klein Sankt Paul Hauptplatz Pfarrkirche 21092007 06.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Klein_Sankt_Paul/Pfarrkirche
File:Baldramsdorf Unterhaus Schloss 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Baldramsdorf/Schloss
File:Baldramsdorf Ortenburg mit Gmeineck 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Baldramsdorf/Ort
File:Maria Rain 24042008 94.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Maria_Rain/Ort
File:Maria_Rain_Gemeindeamt_26062007_01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Maria_Rain/Gemeindeamt
File:Maria Rain Pfarrkirche 26062007 04.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Maria_Rain/Pfarrkirche
File:Fresach Diözesanmuseum Bethaus 12052008 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Fresach/Diözesanmuseum
File:Fresach Evangelische Kirche 12052008 21.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Fresach/Evangelische_Kirche
File:Fresach Katholische Kirche heiliger Blasius 12052008 41.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Fresach/Katholische_Kirche
File:Preitenegg Suedost Ortsansicht 23102010 001.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Preitenegg
File:Gailtal Blick auf Hohenthurn 20052007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Hohenthurn
File:Oberdrauburg Drau mit Kaerntner Tor 23012011 683.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Oberdrauburg/Drau
File:Oberdrauburg Hauptplatz 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Oberdrauburg/Hauptplatz
File:Globasnitz Gemeindeamt 19062007 02.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Globasnitz/Gemeindeamt
File:Globasnitz Iuenna Museum 19062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Globasnitz/Juenna-Museum
File:Globasnitz Schloss Elberstein 19062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Globasnitz/Schloss-Elberstein
File:Globasnitz Hemmaberg Kirche 19062007 07.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Globasnitz/Hemmaberg
File:Ebendorf Stift Suedtor zur Pfarrkirche 09062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Eberndorf
File:Krems Sankt Nikolai Filialkirche heiliger Nikolaus 26082007 06.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Krems_in_Kärnten/Filialkirche
File:Ludmannsdorf Pfarrkirche 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Ludmannsdorf
File:Lendorf Maria Bichl 08042007 04.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Lendorf
File:Feistritz Gail Pfarrkirche 20052007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Feistritz_an_der_Gail
File:Brueckl 01082007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Brückl
File:Koettmannsdorf Pfarrkirche Sankt Georg 28062007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Köttmannsdorf
File:Krems Innerkrems Pfarrkirche heiliger Andreas 26082007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Bildlexikon_Österreich/Orte_in_Kärnten/Krems_in_Kärnten/Pfarrkirche
File:Rosegg Schloss Suedansicht 25022007 01.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Burgen_und_Schlösser/Kärnten/Rosegg%2C_Schloss
File:Rosegg Schloss 07.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Burgen_und_Schlösser/Kärnten/Rosegg%2C_Schloss
File:Rosegg Schloss Nebengebaeude 14.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Burgen_und_Schlösser/Kärnten/Rosegg%2C_Schloss
File:Rosegg Schloss Suedansicht 31122010 222.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Burgen_und_Schlösser/Kärnten/Rosegg%2C_Schloss
File:Rosegg Suedeinfahrt zum Schlosspark von Schloss Rosegg 31122010 229.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Wissenssammlungen/Burgen_und_Schlösser/Kärnten/Rosegg%2C_Schloss
File:Globasnitz Hemmaberg Kirche 19062007 17.jpg - http://www.austria-lexikon.at/af/Heimatlexikon/Hemmaberg_und_Rosaliengrotte

Du findest dabei jeweils dein Foto bei Commons und die Adresse im Artikel beim Austria-Forum. Es ist leicht möglich, dass sich noch weitere unter den vielen von Commons verwendeten befinden. Nachdem die Bilddatenbank laufend vergrößert wird, können es sicher noch mehr werden :-) Falls eine oder andere Bildbeschreibung dort noch nicht ganz passt bzw. nicht lizenzkonform ist - so wird das in den nächsten Tagen repariert.

gratuliere und gruß K@rl (Verbessern ist besser als löschen) 16:35, 12. Dez. 2011 (CET)

Vielen herzlichen Dank für diese Frohbotschaft und die Benachrichtigung über diesen Sachverhalt. Würdet ihr mich nicht auf diese Umstände hinweisen, es würde glatt an mir vorüber gehen, ohne es zu bemerken. Besonders freundliche Adventgrüße an K@rl den Großen --Johann Jaritz (Δ) 04:55, 15 Dezember 2011 (UTC)
Ich meine, dass genau das, was wir besprochen haben, die Verwendung deiner Bilder noch verstärken kann. Nämlich die bezirksmässige oder auch verbesserte Ortsmässige Strukturierung. Was man nicht findet, wird man auch nicht verwenden. Wenn ich richtig liege, dann sind das eh alles QIs. Und wenn sich das dann herumspricht, dann weiß man schon, auf wessen Seiten man zu gehen hat, wenn man was braucht aus Kärnten. --Hubertl 22:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
So nebenbei: Hast du überhaupt andere Bilder als solche, die QI sind? --Hubertl 22:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Ich meine natürlich HDR

mit RAW. Nicht der eingebaute Mist, den die Kameras haben. Ich sehe schon, der nächste Projekt- und Qualitätsschritt, der im nächsten Jahr ansteht ;-). Einfach mal das Handbuch der Kamera lesen, dann die AEB-Funktion genauer studieren. Dann machst einmal deine RAW-Reihe mit 5, eventuell sogar 7 Bildern und ich entwickle dir das dann testweise. Dann kann man ja sehen, ob das einen Vorteil bringt. IMO ja, auch wenn es natürlich nur mit sehr ruhigem Wasser möglich ist. Die im Schatten liegende dunkle Seite des Holzes ist natürlich kaum rauszuholen, wenn vorne alles in der Mittagssonne brennt. Da hilft nur: Stativ, lb Freund! ;-) Ich bin gerade bei diesem Motiv scharf drauf, weil ich meine, dass es einzigartig ist. Wo noch gibt es sowas in Holz. --Hubertl 05:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Vielleicht hast Du Recht. Das mit der AEB-Funktion (sofern es eine solche bei der D810 überhaupt gibt) ist noch nicht in mein Bewusstsein getreten; im Gegensatz zu Dir lese ich Bedienungsanleitungen erst dann, wenn "Feuer am Dach" ist. ;=0) Wenn ich in der RAW-Funktion bin, sperrt die D810 die HDR-Option, die nur in JPEG möglich ist. Soviel mein Wissensstand. Aber ich werde mich noch gesondert der für mich zum gegebenen Zeitpunkt noch nicht erschlossenen AEB-Funktion annehmen. Vielleicht ist diese auch wie bei der Canon 6D bei der Nikon D810 vorgesehen. Auch mir liegt an diesem hölzernen Rutschenturm sehr viel, weil er auch für mich ein sehr reizvolles Motiv darstellt. Und sollten alle Stricke reißen, dann bleibt noch der Ausweg, Hubertl mit seinem Equipment vor Ort zu bekommen. Nur der hat ja keine Zeit, weil an der Uni sehr engagiert. ;=) A propos Rutsche, ich hoffe, Du wirst Dir in der Silvesternacht nicht den Hosenboden durchwetzen ob all der mitternächtlichen Aktivitäten auf dem Stefansplatz. Dennoch hoffe ich, dass Du gut ins Jahr 2016 hinübergleiten mögest. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Natürlich gibt es die AEB-Funktion! Das ist Standard ab Mittelklasse. Vergiss die eingebaute HDR-Funktion, schließlich wollen wir über das Ergebnis bestimmen und das nicht der Kamera überlassen. Heute ist für mich die Auswahl zwischen Normal und AEB eine Frage von drei Sekunden. Kircheninnenräume ohne AEB - praktisch unmöglich, wenn man Richtung FP geht. Und das Jahr 2016 wird unser FP-Jahr sein, wart ab! Du hast heuer 12 FP gemacht, nächstes Jahr werden es zumindest 25. Mindestens! Ich habe mir 36 als Ziel vorgenommen. Drei/Monat. Kircheninnenräume deswegen, weil wir versuchen werden, über die Diözesen einen privilegierten Zugang für Wikipedianer zu Kirchen zu bekommen. Wir beginnen mal in Wien, dann werden wir sehen. In Folge dann aber auch andere öffentliche Gebäude von kunsthistorischem Wert. Privilegiert bedeutet, dass man angemeldet kommt und wenn notwendig auch stundenlang in Ruhe arbeiten kann, ohne ständig das Gefühl haben zu müssen, man wird rausgestampert, wenn man erwischt wird. Und genau diese Ruhe beim Fotografieren ist so wichtig, sonst versteht man ja selbst nicht, was man tut. Ein gutes Beispiel sind die Bilder der Jesuitenkirche, da war ich über drei Stunden drinnen und es ist mir nicht langweilig geworden. Und bis jetzt sind es drei FP geworden, drei sind noch offen. Alles mit Belichtungsreihe gearbeitet. Wenn du LR schon aktualisiert hast auf 6.1, dann hast du bereits eine eingebaute HDR-Funktion drinnen. Allerdings ist die nicht wirklich perfekt, Photomatix ist da um eine Spur besser.. --Hubertl 06:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Danke für Deine höchst spannende wie brisante Stellungnahme zu diesem essentiell wichtigen Thema. Vielleicht schaffe ich es doch, Deinen wertvollen Ratschlägen zu folgen. Ich lass mich von mir selbst überraschen. Klingt natürlich verheißungsvoll und verlockend und alles was Du ins Feld führst, macht absolut Sinn! Nochmal herzlichen Dank! Liebe Grüße --Johann Jaritz 07:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Ein Wahnsinnsmotiv

Hmmm

Was mich nur wundert ist, dass du um halb acht in der Früh schon soviel Licht hattest. Aber abgesehen davon, was macht es aus, dass die Konstruktion verwaschen wirkt, nicht wirklich knackscharf und kontrastierend? Nichts scheinst du falsch gemacht zu haben, und trotzdem hab ich den Eindruck, dass da noch was machbar wäre... Wie denkst du darüber? Der Kampf um die Perfektion - aber bei dem Motiv ist es das wert, sag ich mal. Ich meine, dass bei dieser Entfernung zum Turm ein möglicher Morgendunst keine Rolle spielt. Hat es vielleicht damit zu tun, was wir über das Objektiv besprochen haben? --Hubertl 11:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Exhibitionistischer Sonnengott

"Mein" Rutschenturm kann "Deinem" exhibitionistischen (Rolf Heinrich-Attribuierung) Sonnengott ganz und gar nicht das Wasser reichen. Soviel sei einmal angemerkt. Außerdem wurde dieses Bild wie das tags zuvor nominierte Bild am selben Tag auch um die Mittagszeit aufgenommen. Um die Morgenstunde habe ich es noch nicht geschafft, weil mich zu dieser eiskalten Tageszeit (Minusgrade und hohe Luftfeuchtigkeit) keine zehn Pferde hinunter an den See zu bringen vermögen; aber ich glaube, Du kennst mich da schon. Aber wer weiß, vielleicht eines Tages, sollte mich die Muse küssen, könnte es vielleicht doch einmal passieren ... Kann alles sein, was wir über das Objektiv besprochen haben. Leider sind auch meine Mittel begrenzt und ich muss mich noch mehr am Riemen reißen, dass das Geld für das Foto-Hobby nicht mehr so locker sitzen kann. Tamma amoi schau`n, wia de Soch si weida entwicklt ... --Johann Jaritz 15:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Auf den Burschen hatte die Kirche keinen Zugriff, sonst hätte er sein Tücherl nicht nur in der Hand gehalten. Ganz schön pfiffig, der Johannes Benk... Ich bin überhaupt nicht der Meinung, dass der Rutschturm rein vom Motiv her geringer zu bewerten ist. Im Gegenteil, weil es nämlich so ideal eingebettet ist, inkl. Spiegelung. Ich bin sicher, dass man dafür einfach mehrere Sessions benötigt, auch vom selben Standort aus. Hab aber gerade gesehen, dass ich noch mal zum Naturhistorischen hin muß, so um 7 Uhr im Sommer, zu Mittag ist einfach schon die Luft viel zu stark am Wirbeln. Auch ist der Wind schon merkbar. Aber im Sommer habe ich sicher schon das schwere Videostativ, gemeinsam mit dem GigaPan Epic Pro. --Hubertl 19:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Da bleibt mir doch glatt der Mund offen vor lauter Staunen! Du wirst ja noch den Diliff in den Schatten stellen, wenn Du so akribisch und konsequent Deinen Weg zum Adepten weiter verfolgst. ;O) --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist ([[User talk:Tremonist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Many greetings from Austria and the best wishes for the New Year 2016! Thank you very much for your greetings. --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 07:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you George! I hope you are spending nice holidays as well. All the best wishes for the coming up NEW YEAR! --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 07:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Fireworks from the Philippines to celebrate 2016
Happy New Year Johann Jaritz! I hope you still do your great work in 2016! Template:Smile Poké95 07:11, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year! to you the same. Thank you for the gorgeous fireworks from the Philippines. We won´t have any because of draught and terrorism threat. So only some verbal greetings to the beautiful islands in the warm climatic zone. The best wishes for 2016! --Johann Jaritz ([[User talk:Johann Jaritz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) Johann Jaritz 07:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)