User talk:NicolasMachiavel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, NicolasMachiavel!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

I've changed the category set by you to this file since Theridion sisyphium is deprecated name of that spider. See Platnick's Catalog. Mithril (talk) 01:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yes, carelessness... NicolasMachiavel (talk) 20:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Malthonica ferruginea has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Peter coxhead (talk) 09:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tartarocreagris[edit]

Bonjour, tu as catégorisé File:Tartarocreagris infernalis IMG 4067.jpg en Tartarocreagris infernalis mais son auteur a placé l'image sur WP:en sur Tartarocreagris texana (ici). Vu ses imports de fichier, j'ai l'impression qu'il sait ce qu'il fait, qu'il s'est trompé dans le nom du fichier et qu'il s"agit bien de Tartarocreagris texana . Pourrais-tu jeter un oeil à cela ? Cordialement - Goudron92 (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,
J'ai catégorisé en me basant que sur le nom du fichier. Dans les descriptions de Muchmore, 1969 la principale différence :
  • infernalis : A total of 27 setae on carapace, with four at anterior margin and six along posterior margin. Coxal area typical; palpal coxa with three large, apical setae; coxa IV with 12 or 13 setae.
  • texana : A total of 23 setae on carapace, with four at anterior margin and six along posterior margin. Coxal area typical; one palpal coxa with three large, apical setae, other with four setae; each coxa IV with 10 setae.
sur la photo 23 ou 27 ? la photo vient de Cotterell Cave dans le comté de Travis : texana, de Tooth Cave dans le comté de Travis et infernalis de Inner Space Caverns (Core Hole Cave) dans le comté de Williamson, et nom commun Tooth Cave pseudoscorpion celui de texana et l'auteur met la photo sur texana donc ta remarque est probablement juste, NicolasMachiavel (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Merci pour tes recherches et ces précisions. Cordialement - Goudron92 (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]