User talk:Piotrus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
It is possible I will not log in to this account for days. Please leave me a message on en-Wikipedia - I log there everyday.

Archive 1 Archive 2

Contents

zdjecie[edit]

Zdjęcie było załadowane na pl.wiki przez niejakiego SzymonaS, a jako autor podany był Jacek Białołęcki - zgody oczywiście nie było. Właśnie dlatego zdjęcie zostało usunięte.

A co do bloga... po przeczytaniu tych wypocin odechcialo mi sie pisać jakiejś frustratce, która, jak widać, zawsze wie lepiej.

PS. Widzę, że chyba dostałeś taka samą informację od kogoś innego, więc potraktuj to tylko jako potwierdzenie.

Pozdrawiam.

--Szczepan talk 01:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Berlin[edit]

Pan kazał, sługa ... [1]. Jeszcze tylko dokończę Narwik i definitywny koniec z mapkami. Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 11:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Dzięki, obserwuję od początku, może coś trzeba zmienić, ale najlepiej zrobi Orionist poprzez wersję angielską. Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Może w przyszłości warto przetłumaczyć i , jest dużo artykułów o Katyniu w innojęzycznych Wiki — dla mnie to byłoby proste do wykonania, ale nie jestem angielskojęzyczny i nie chcę narobić błędów. serd. lonio17 (talk) 08:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Piotrze, ja już jestem stary i wolno myślę! Moja propozycja (nie do odrzucenia — translation User:Piotrus), zechciej przetłumaczyć "Zbrodnia katyńska", zeskanować i wrzucić na Image Shack — resztę zrobię, tak jak [2][3] tutaj, gdzie przetłumaczenie było stosunkowo proste. Może tą metodą pójdziemy dalej? Serdecznośi lonio17 (talk) 09:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Bardzo Cię przepraszam, z mojej przeróbki Katynia, niestety, będą nici. Małżonka przez przypadek usunęła mój plik-matkę w Corelu, jestem wściekły. Będzie musiał, jeśli zechce, pomóc Orionist, ale inne mapki oczywiście do obrobienia. Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Piotrze, namieszałem jak tylko zgrzybiały starzec potrafi! Po 3. godzinach znalazłem sposób na konwersję pliku png abarotno do cdr. Mam go, mogę zmienić Katyń polski na angielski — jeśli otrzymam tłumaczenie!!! :)) lonio17 (talk) 16:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Generalnie jestem secundo niemieckojęzyczny, nie napisałem w dyskusji o blokadzie, ponieważ mój angielski jest wiecej niż kulawy, ale przez te trzy dni z serca kibicowałem Tobie, cieszę się bardzo, że to koniec a podobi High Co.... bardzo mnie zniechęcają do projektu. Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 18:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Teraz nastąpi przerwa w malunkach, ale jeszcze to. Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 08:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Public policy coverage.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Public policy coverage.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of[edit]

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of for the following reason: . If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 23:35, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "What? I am a Commons editor in good standing, with thousands of quality images uploaded, including Valued and Quality images. I never got warned that anything I've done was putting me in danger of blocking. Sure, over they years a few of my images got deleted, a small percentage of total. Now suddenly out of a blue I've been blocked by an admin who didn't even bother to leave an explanation on my talk page; the block explanation is misleading. "unfree files after warnings: and uploading spam; this user has been warned for several times but she/he did not react" - as I've said, I've received no warnings (about doing something blockable); an occasional file deletion warning mention nothing about a block, and I usually comment in all of the deletion discussions I am aware of. And what spam?? PS. Ah, I see. I guess I forgot to comment in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Public policy coverage.png, a screenshot of a metawiki page, but hardly a controversial case. If I got to comment, I'd point out we have many other screenshots of Wikipedia and other websites; what made this one out of scope? I guess that this is the image that made High Contrast block me, as he did so immediately after closing that deletion discussion (I had to comment out diffs as the unblock template is apparently broken by them), calling it a "classic case of spam". I'll again note the image I uploaded was free and no different from hundreds of images we have at Category:Wikimedia screenshots, and that closure occurred in three days after the image was nominated, thus reducing the chances I and others could comment, in violation of Commons:Deletion_policy#Closure which notes that the standard time a regular deletion discussion should be open is seven days. To recapitulate, I have never received any warning that I am doing anything worth of a block, and the blocking admin just accused me of some generalities, without any specific examples of what I've done wrong. I had to trace the possible case myself by looking at his edits, and what I found was a clear case of non-violation (clearly free, and sharing a popular category - thus suggesting uncontroversial in-scope) image, and instead, improper handling of a deletion case. I see my block as either a gross misunderstanding or an admin abuse, and I am waiting for an apology from the blocking admin. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)"
Unblock reason: "I reviewed the case and unsuccessfully tried to contact user:High Contrast (blocking admin) about it. The reason for unblocking is that I do not see any evidence of deliberate wrongdoing by user:Piotrus and see no evidence of user:Piotrus being worn that he will be blocked. Also since user:Piotrus had less than 50 edits and hardly any uploads in last month it is hard to see how this block serves as a preventative measure and not a punitive one.

One of the reasons for the block (not explained anywhere on user talk:Piotrus) was "unfree files after warnings" which seems to suggest that block was to prevent user:Piotrus from uploading more of "inappropriately licensed media". However I looked and I can not find many of his uploads deleted on because of the inappropriate license. All I found was several deleted photos taken by Piotrus of collection of movie robots like [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pitt Car Sci Mus 85.JPG|Maschinenmensch from 1927 Metropolis movie]] or Star War characters which are still copyrighted. However those uploads was a tiny fraction of much larger photo collection, and I did not find any warnings that they are being deleted for copyright violations (derivative of copyrighted character). I see no evidence of repeated uploads of such copyrighted materials.

Second reasons for the block was "uploading spam". Unfortunately I do not know what that means and could not find any explanation of this in Commons:Blocking policy or user talk:Piotrus. It might be related to Piotrus uploads of large volume of images with very poor documentation and categorization (discussed here), many of which are also of poor quality. I also would prefer few good quality images with detailed descriptions and categories, instead of 200 poor ones, but that does not seem to be the reason for blocking, especially with no warning. The spam charge might also be due to this file.

Jarekt (talk) 12:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)"

This template should be archived normally.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | हिन्दी | magyar | македонски | Plattdüütsch | português | русский | +/−

Thank you, but I think the Commons unblock may be bugged: as of now I am still blocked. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:27, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Seems fixed now. Thanks. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Wiem, że musztarda po obiedzie, ale dopiero teraz przeczytałem twojego mejla, który mój program pocztowy zakwalifikował wcześniej jako spam. Przepraszam, że nie pomogłem, ale dobrze, że interweniował ktoś inny. Masur (talk) 17:31, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Zamoyski pod Byczyna (Matejko).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Zamoyski pod Byczyna (Matejko).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 10:15, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Kluszyn[edit]

Przeczytalem, zapisalem - pomysle :)) lonio17 (talk) 04:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 19:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Corfu beach 02.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Corfu beach 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 19:41, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Albania from Corfu 066.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Albania from Corfu 066.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 19:42, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Albania from Corfu 015.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Albania from Corfu 015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 19:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Florida by Piotrus 105.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Florida by Piotrus 105.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 19:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Corfu town 84.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Corfu town 84.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 19:53, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 20:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 20:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Bush Gardens - 06.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bush Gardens - 06.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 20:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Bush Gardens - 114.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bush Gardens - 114.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vienna by Martin - 21.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vienna by Martin - 21.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

As you are not the author of these photos, you are unable to release them into the public domain under {{PD-self}}. You will need to complete the steps as set out in COM:OTRS to have the public domain release of these 135 photos verified. russavia (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

I have asked the author for permission. I expect it will be given shortly. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:23, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Great, if you run into any snags with this, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. russavia (talk) 06:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Beaches of Tenerife 10.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Beaches of Tenerife 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bestiasonica (talk) 15:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Beaches of Tenerife 06.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Beaches of Tenerife 06.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bestiasonica (talk) 15:19, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

User problems[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems

More generally, I'd suggest that you simple cease contributing to Commons and just upload your images locally, where they will be appreciated and you won't have to put up with abuse from the likes of Russavia. You will also get to avoid associating with the toxic dump that this place has become.Volunteer Marek (talk) 17:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of panoramas in Greece[edit]

Express your opinion here. Commons:Deletion requests/Deletion of panoramas in Greece.

Dimboukas (talk) 21:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 02:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Tram Krakow old.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tram Krakow old.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zyxist (talk) 09:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Tram Krakow new.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tram Krakow new.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zyxist (talk) 09:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Boston - Hip Hop concert 02a.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boston - Hip Hop concert 02a.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 23:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Useful[edit]

User:JJ Harrison/Template

File:Florida by Piotrus 067.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Florida by Piotrus 067.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 16:59, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 17:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana by Martin - 01.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ljubljana by Martin - 01.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely Eleassar (t/p) 09:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Location?[edit]

Hi Piotrus - could you add a photo description / location to File:Gladysszow lipiec 2012 26.JPG, please? - Thanks! MPF (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - giant poster (dragon) - 01.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - giant poster (dragon) - 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Trixt (talk) 21:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Balice - samolot na pasie 11.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Balice - samolot na pasie 11.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tadam (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Balice - samolot na pasie 10.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Balice - samolot na pasie 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tadam (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Balice - samolot na pasie 08.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Balice - samolot na pasie 08.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tadam (talk) 20:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Museum of Asian art of Corfu 271.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Museum of Asian art of Corfu 271.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tadam (talk) 09:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Wladyslaw Orkan.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Wladyslaw Orkan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this <articlefeedback-table-heading-page>, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ankry (talk) 16:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Musée Mécanique 238.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Musée Mécanique 238.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 20:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 08:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 12:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Bodiak[edit]

Bodiak jest już dawno posprzątany. Tak od dwóch czy ilu tam lat. Masur (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

  • No nic nie odpisywałem, bo i co? ewidentnie kasacja orazu Stachowicza musiala byc bledem - nie, nie była, co zresztą wyraził Philosopher. W przeciwieństwie do porządnie opisanego np. File:Przygoda.jpg, pozostałe pliki pozostawiały wątpliwości, a autor nie uzupełnił wymaganych danych. Wystarczyłby link do "tego" Stachewicza, żeby było wiadomo, że chodzi np. o zmarłego kiedyś tam malarza. W innym wypadku (szczególnie, jak to skan z książki współczesnej!) traktuje się to jak "brak zgody", bo przecież przy każdym kasowaniu nie będzie się robić śledztwa co ładujący (a raczej kogo, jeśli mowa o autorze) miał na myśli. Po to właśnie szablonuje się plik, a ładujący dostaje o tym komunikat. Ponadto, jak czytam undel. req. ich PD wciąż nie jest oczywiste - miej to proszę na uwadze. Masur (talk) 07:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Denver doll museum 095.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Denver doll museum 095.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

88.64.118.148 02:19, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Denver doll museum 064.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Denver doll museum 064.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

88.64.118.148 02:20, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Dziwne *[edit]

Hej, licencja PD-Polish dotyczy wyłącznie zdjęć, Ty skanujesz grafiki, więc muszę to pousuwać. Krzysiu (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Chyba się pomyliłeś. To nie Ty wyrażasz zgodę co mogę kasować. http://pl.wikisource.org/wiki/Prawo_autorskie_%28ustawa_z_10_lipca_1952_r.%29 - tu masz konkrety. Art. 1. § 2. dotyczy Twoich zeskanowanych grafik, Ty załadowałeś na podstawie Art. 2. § 1, który tyczy się fotografii. Jak masz pisać tym tonem to sobie daruj. Chyba, że dam zgodę, żebyś mógł do mnie napisać. Krzysiu (talk) 22:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
To nie jest żadna samowola. Nie trzeba pytać nikogo o zgodę, jak ktoś łamie prawo. Krzysiu (talk) 22:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Becuna 84.JPG[edit]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Becuna 84.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 10:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Becuna 84.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Becuna 84.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 17:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

.[edit]

Chciałem tylko napisać, że pamiętam o sprawie, ale odrabiam priorytetowe rzeczy, bo jak zauważyłeś, to nie było mnie przez trochę. Krzysiu (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks. We have Commons:Bar. Krzysiu (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Znaczki[edit]

Nie są. Podobnie jak banknoty, monety etc. Masur (talk) 16:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Józef Brandt.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Józef Brandt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

King of ♠ 00:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Westerplatte[edit]

Witam Cię Piotrze. Wstyd mi, że dopiero teraz dopatrzyłem się karygodnego, z mojej strony, zaniedbania, nie narysowałem Obrony Westerplatte. I pomimo zadeklarowanego przeze mnie dania sobie spokoju z mapkami, honor kazał mi tę lukę wypełnić. Oto ta mapka [4]. A do Ciebie prośba o przesłanie angielskiego tłumaczenia polskich napisów, ja w idiomach narobię byków i będzie tylko wstyd. Szybko zrobię angielską wersję. Staruszkowi nie możesz odmówić! Serdecznie Cię pozdrawiam i przy okazji życzę pogodnych i radosnych Świąt (w Polsce?) i wspaniałego 2013 roku i lat następnych lonio17 (talk) 15:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Mapka bitwy pod Kłuszynem [5] wisi na Commons od 8 maja 2012, widocznie nie zaglądałeś na polską stronę bitwy. Na tłumaczenie będę cierpliwie czekał. Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 20:26, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Dzięki Piotrze, ale... pod rysunkiem jest tytuł z legendą i tu boję się błędów, poproszę o dalszy ciąg. Duże i małe litery - to musi ze starości! Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 09:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Dziękuję, Lenino może jeszcze uda mi się narysować, Bory i Szack - faktycznie brak dobrych materiałów. Pozdro lonio17 (talk) 08:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Poproszę o korektę: wersja angielska i to na razie koniec próśb. lonio17 (talk) 12:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Dziękuję, wersję w .svg potrafiłem i potrafię "tworzyć", ale ponieważ praktycznie (i fizycznie) kończę z zabawą na Wiki (myślę, że zaznaczyłem swoją obecność) a nikt nie chce podjąć trudu kontynuowania rysowania militarnych mapek, nie znajduję powodu, żeby ułatwiać wszelakie artystyczne dziwadła, które można tworzyć na plikach z rozszerzeniem .svg. Serdeczności Piotrze lonio17 (talk) 21:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Piotrze, nikt nie chce podjąć trudu znaczy dosłownie to co napisałem. Proponowałem kolegom, z którymi współpracuję by skorzystali z darmowego programu Inkscape, spróbowali go opanować i rysować na początek proste rysunki właśnie w formacie .svg - nikt z mojej sugestii nie skorzystał! O przepraszam jeden narysował, jeden rysunek, który troszeczkę skorygowałem i na tym koniec. Nie lubię tego programu (Inkscape), ale też czasami z niego korzystałem, tak z pod dużego palca: [6], [7].

Dzisiaj nie ma problemu z zamianą .png, .jpg na .svg, tyle tylko, że program Corel, który to robi, kosztuje 2 698,99 PLN i ja go na pewno nie kupię a mój stary Corel nie ma tej funkcji. Myślę, że właśnie z niego, lub podobnego, korzystał Twój znajomy, który "przerobił" na angielską wersję to: [8]. Mając moje lata, rozsądek nakazuje oszczędzić wzrok i kościec (siedzenie godzinami przed ekranem). Trzeba usilnie szukać następców! Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 22:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Lenino[edit]

Popełniłem bitwę pod Lenino - przetłumaczysz? Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 10:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Spoko, nie pali się :)) lonio17 (talk) 20:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

KA - Korpus Armijny, DS - Dywizja Strzelecka (nie strzelców), ps - pułk strzelecki - tymczasem wielkie dzięki lonio17 (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Tak napisałem, ale czekałem na zdanie eksperta Piotra, dzięki :)) lonio17 (talk) 20:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Wszystko już jest OK! Dziękuję, Pogodnych Świąt i sukcesów w Nowym Roku lonio17 (talk) 21:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Żółte Wody[edit]

Spróbowałem skonwertować te pliki do formatu svg za pomocą [9] i innych - efekt jest fatalny, rysunki zrobione są dziwną techniką, trudno byłoby się pod nimi podpisać. Jedynym wyjściem jest narysowanie ich "od nowa", bardziej na podstawie tej mapki. Jeśli nie znajdziesz innego chętnego, to wpiszę je na listę oczekujących, może jeszcze zdążę, "produkcja" posuwa się z ogromnymi oporami. lonio17 (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Jednak przemogłem się i to narysowałem. Nie ukrywam, że rysunek Alexa Tora zupełnie do mnie nie przemawiał, zresztą on może to samo powiedzieć o moim rysunku. Jest, jak jest, każdy ma prawo moje malowidło umieścić w koszu. Poważniejsza sprawa jest z bitwą nad Żółtymi Wodami. Rysunek aktualnie zamieszczony ma się nijak do miarodajnych źródeł jest wziętą z księżyca wyobraźnią autora tegoż Alexa Tora. Cała sprawa polega na tym, że w rejonie jest wieś Żółta i rzeczka Żółta, która ma parę odnóg o tej samej nazwie. Miejscowość Żółte Wody, którą bez trudu można znaleźć np w Google Earth to inna sprawa, bitwa nazywana jest nad, a nie pod i to generalnie nie bitwa a wielodniowe oblężenie obozu Stefana Potockiego i potem w ciągu jednego dnia wycięcie ucieczki resztek polskich wojsk nad wodami rzeczki Żółta (jest i w pobliżu rzeczka Zielona). Z rysunku zamieszczonego w [10] to zupełnie nie wynika. I co mam biedny zrobić z tym fantem??? lonio17 (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Zamieszczam moją wersję: ŻW, nie powiem, siedziałem nad tym parędziesiąt godzin. Teraz robię sobie dłuższe kanikuły od ekranu. Pozdrawiam lonio17 (talk) 11:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Wanda Wasilewska 2.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wanda Wasilewska 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Plushy (talk) 15:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Achilleion 1 21.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Achilleion 1 21.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rudko (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Walka o sztandar turecki.jpg[edit]

Hi, I tried to add more info and multilingual descriptions to File:Walka o sztandar turecki.jpg. Maybe you can review and further expand the {{Artwork}} fields. Some of the descriptions (imported from WP usage) talk about a Turkish-Polish battle, other by a battle of Vienna. And the source is missing. Maybe you can cleanup a bit. Nice upload and painting! Best. --Codrin.B (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2013 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at NikNaks's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Mapa[edit]

Mapa odzwierciedla stan faktyczny granic RP w latach 1773-1789. Po rozbiorze było to już państwo w nowych granicach i nikt nie przewidywał, że będzie kiedyś II rozbiór. Pozdrawiam Mathiasrex (talk) 06:58, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Image:Becuna 81.JPG[edit]

Hi Piotrus. I noticed the file Image:Becuna 81.JPG which you uploaded and started to think: this pictures quality is extremely poor and the image is not used. I do not know actually, where to use this image. Are you agree to delete? Taivo (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Ssanggyesa 007.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ssanggyesa 007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Carnegie Museum of Art - Hall of Sculpture.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Carnegie Museum of Art - Hall of Sculpture.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Powers (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Jindo Miracle Sea Road Festival 020.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jindo Miracle Sea Road Festival 020.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 06:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)


File:Jindo Miracle Sea Road Festival 020.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jindo Miracle Sea Road Festival 020.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 07:05, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Jimmy Carter Library and Museum 90.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jimmy Carter Library and Museum 90.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 14:34, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Skyrim[edit]

Hi, you have some images in Category:Cosplay of Skyrim. I just added three of mine that have the character race named. Do your characters have races like mine to include in articles on them?--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:46, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

If we can identify the characters then we can include them in articles on the characters. I have a few myself that I an trying to sort out still in Category:Cosplay at Calgary Expo 2013. I am sure that File:Steampunk and Atomic Girl cosplay 2013 Calgary Expo.jpg is w:Black Widow (Natalia Romanova). This other character: File:Red Warrior male cosplay 2013 Calgary Expo.jpg I think is w:Deadpool. Many of the ones I took may not be based on characters. An anon IP helped identify File:Silver Elf female cosplay 2013 Calgary Expo.jpg as of the Altmer High Elf race from w:Races of The Elder Scrolls.--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Controversial changes[edit]

  • The changes you have proposed for "Category:Monuments in Busan" etc. are controversial. Take the time to discuss them. Best regards. Pldx1 (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
  • In reponse to your message:
Category:Monuments in Busan. How are the changes controversial, and where would you like to discuss them? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
A good place could be the talk page of the category "Monuments in Busan". Best regards. Pldx1 (talk) 17:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Baptism of Poland.Mural in Gniezno.JPG[edit]

Oczywiście, masz rację - do usunięcia. Przepraszam. Z pozdrowieniami --Pqrs (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Nawet nowy szablon na Commons, jak widzę. Dziękuję. Dobrze wiedzieć o słynnym już powoli art. 33... Ale na przyszłość będę ostrożniejszy. Pozdrawiam. --Pqrs (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:J Haller by Kossak.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:J Haller by Kossak.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Kotwica monument in Poland.JPG[edit]

Gdzie zostało zrobione to zdjęcie? Zwiadowca 21 22:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

User:Zwiadowca21: nie pamietam. Moze cos mozna by zgadnac na postawie innych zdjec, ktore wrzucilem w tym samym czasie? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Please give images descriptions[edit]

I found one of your images whilst browsing Special:NewFiles that needed rotating, and I noticed there was no description. I see you have uploaded a lot of files in the last few days, great stuff, except none of them have descriptions in the {{information}} template. Could you please give these files descriptions, and please remember it in future as well. Cheers, russavia (talk) 06:08, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

@User:Russavia: I rarely bother with descriptions, instead I try to ensure that there are informative categories. Most time they serve as descriptions (describing the object by type, location and time). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 06:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
The problem with that is that categories are in English, and having descriptions give people looking for images more chance of finding images using search. As you are bilingual, adding a description in Polish and English will only go further to making images easier to find. When you don't use descriptions, files get added to Category:Media lacking a description, and as you can see there are over 100,000 images in this category which need maintenance by the community. It's easier at the point of upload (if using upload wizard) to provide descriptions at that stage, rather than waiting for others to come along in some years from now to do it. Please keep that in mind. russavia (talk) 06:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
I know there is a ton of things to do, but one cannot do everything. I'll add descriptions to images where categories are not enough, but I am afraid I may not have time to do it elsewhere. You are welcome to point me to any images where categories are not enough, and I'll see what I can do. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

War 1792[edit]

Adam Wolański, Wojna polsko-rosyjska 1792 r, Wydawnictwo Volumen, Warszawa 1996, ISBN 83-85218-48-3, passim. Mathiasrex (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Jestem[edit]

Tylko nie zawsze robię coś od razu :) Masur (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Gdansk July 2013 23.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gdansk July 2013 23.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 04:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Swieta Lipka July 2013 34.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Swieta Lipka July 2013 34.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 12:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Zboralski-waldemar2004.jpg[edit]

Hi! Regarding to my OWN WORK File:Zboralski-waldemar2004.jpg - despite I am British citizen, I would like to communicate with you in Polish language :)
Zajmuję się fotografią od ok. 40 lat - zaczynałem jako 13-latek zabytkowym "Druhem". Od zawsze używałem samowyzwalacza (en: self-timer, de: Selbstauslöser) w takich aparatach jak lustrzankowe Leica, Zenith, Canon. Sam wywoływałem filmy i sam robiłem odbitki w dostępnych laboratoriach: w "podstawówce", "ogólniaku".Tak, tak, za "okropnej komuny" ZMUSZANO młodzież do darmowego korzystania ze szkolnych laboratoriów fotograficznych w ramach "kółek fotograficznych"!!! Straszne, prawda: za darmo musieliśmy korzystać z "komuszego" sprzętu... Robiłem zdjęcia również sprzętem zakonnym i w laboratorium klasztornym, jako kleryk-student u paulinów.
Oczywiście, zapewniam Kolegę jeszcze raz, że inkryminowane przez Kolegę zdjęcie, wykonałem (jak wiele innych) samodzielnie z zastosowaniem "samowyzwalacza" (self-timer) jako doświadczony, od lat zaprawiony w boju z "samowyzwalaczami". M.in. dlatego, ponieważ tzw. "pornografia" w latach siedemdziesiątych XX wieku nie była za "Żelazną Kurtyną" w Polsce łatwo dostępna. "Pornusy" musieliśmy sami sobie robić zamowyzwalaczami - nie to co dzisiaj: dzieciaki zdejmują majtk wygodnie przed laptopem i reszta "sama się dzieje".
Tak, młodzież była zasze tak samo głupia, zdejmowała majtki i robiła sobie zdjęcia wysyłane potem obcym ludziom w świat. Gdy ja miałem 14-15 lat, też to robiłem samowyzwalaczem. Dziś młodzież robi to KOMPUTERAMI - ale zawsze robi TO SAMO...
Gdy nastała era aparatów cyfrowych, swój pierwszy używany ("z grugiej ręki") aparat cyfrowy Casio QV-30 byłem w stanie kupić dopiero w 1999, gdy pracowałem jako redaktor w "Gazecie Nowosolskiej"... Ten aparat miałem wciąż w 2004 r. Jakość zdjęcia File:Zboralski-waldemar2004.jpg jest tylko dowodem na to, że wykonanałem je tym aparatem! Jakość zdjęć z tych pierwszych cyfrówek była "dramatyczna". Nie wspominając o trudnościch z połączeniem tego aparatu z komputerem kablem do dawnego wejścia na myszkę (porównaj stare łącze myszki: gniazdo, wtyczka), kupowanymi specjalnie w Niemczech, bo w Polsce nikt ich nie oferował... Zdjęcie to musiałem później poprawiać na starym, ale LEGALNYM "CorelDRAW 3", żeby nadawało się do pokazania. Jest to więc - w każdym tego słowa znaczeniu - zdjęcie "zabytkowe". Ze względu na jego jakość, byłbym Ci nawet wdzięczny, gdybyś wymienił je w moich biogramach (polskim: pl:Waldemar Zboralski i angielskim: en:Waldemar Zboralski), na nowszą wersję zdjęcia. To zdjęcie, File:Zboralski-waldemar-2012.jpg, również zrobiłem SAMODZIELNIE cyfrówką z "samowyzwalaczem", ale już aparatem Samsung PL211 (nie potrzebuję droższego...) i obrabiałem je na legalnym, już prywatnym "CorelDRAW X6 Home & Student Edition"... Myślę, że tą przydługą opowieścią rozwiałem twoje wątpliwości co do mojego autorstwa zdjęcia i z góry dziękuję za ewentualną podmiankę starego "zabytku" na nowszę wersję zdjęcia w moich biogramach. Dziękuję za zaintersowanie i pozdrawiam z nienormalnie ciepłej o tej porze roku Anglii! Zboralski (talk) 19:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome[edit]

I'm new here, so I didn't know how to reply before :). I'm a graphic and web designer, so if you have any problem with the photos, I'd be glad to help

Warsaw 1831[edit]

Image taken (zdjęcie wykonane) oznaczam tylko gdy sam je robię w muzeum i posiadam pełnię praw autorskich, gdy robię zdjęcie reprodukcji podaję jedynie jej źródło. Mathiasrex (talk) 06:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Map[edit]

hi there,

I am afraid I don't know what you mean. I use two different computers and on both the colours are perfectly visibly. Gryffindor (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Siedziba NIK - front.jpg[edit]

Takie zastosowanie PD to interpretacja tego użytkownika oparta na interpretacji (nieskodyfikowanej w żaden sposób) kilku innych prawników przy okazji różnych spraw. Macham na to ręką, bo nie chce mi się wszczynać wojny polsko-polskiej na commons o to. Masur (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Piotrus,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:Szkieletor in Krakow.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Szkieletor in Krakow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Yeti 14:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:ASA conference 2008 - 43.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ASA conference 2008 - 43.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 19:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 19:35, 16 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Piotrus,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Promotional models are not cosplayers[edit]

Cosplay is a hobby, not a job. --Niemti (talk) 21:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

No, the job is "modeling" and possibly crafting costumes. Cosplay is a hobby activity. "Play" as in having fun. ("In psychology and ethology, play is a range of voluntary, intrinsically motivated activities normally associated with recreational pleasure and enjoyment.") So revert yourself. --Niemti (talk) 00:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Map of Istria[edit]

Hi, Piotrus. I can't determine whether sl:Slika:Istra0312.png is free or not. It is based on an image uploaded to the Polish Wikipedia (pl:Plik:Istria0312.png) that was deleted in 2006 as 'niepotrzebne'. Can you please have a look at it and tell me whether it was free or unfree? Thank you. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:29, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

--  Gazebo (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Piotrus,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:동흥빌딩 아차산로197, 광진구, 서울특별시.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:동흥빌딩 아차산로197, 광진구, 서울특별시.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Revicomplaint? 13:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

myself (User:Piotrus)[edit]

Hi Piotrus, do you have any serious reason to write "myself (User:Piotrus)" into the author-entry of your uploads? This will probably confuse re-users when trying to credit your work. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Do you have a suggestion what should I write instead? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, usually editors use simply their username, i.e. in your case Piotrus, Piotr Konieczny or Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus. Others use their real name. Of course, you are rather free to use what you want. However, one should also take into account that re-users have to use the author-entry for their credit of CC-BY-licensed images, if there is no addition or special credit instruction, such as I have put in File:HummelGestartet 9851a.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 12:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Antietam National Battlefield Memorial - memorial 23.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Antietam National Battlefield Memorial - memorial 23.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 01:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Religie[edit]

Korzystałem z wielu atlasów historycznych. Mathiasrex (talk) 04:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

niestety teraz już nie pamiętam dokładnie ale były to atlasy przedwojenne, powojenne i zupełnie współczesne. Mathiasrex (talk) 10:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Ethnographic map of Slavs, Lubor Niederle.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ethnographic map of Slavs, Lubor Niederle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ankry (talk) 21:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Cfd-announce1.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Cfd-announce1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 20:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

--  Gazebo (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Becuna 81.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Becuna 81.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Zdjęcia Kłodzka[edit]

Wrzuciłeś 138 zdjęć Kłodzka, do głównej kategorii miasta, kiedy praktycznie wszystkie sfotografowane obiekty mają swoje kategorie. Poza tym zdjęcia nie mają opisów. Możesz z tym robić porządek? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:56, 21 October 2014 (UTC)