User talk:Piotrus/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Fan art[edit]

I have made a proposal to replace the current policy page on fan art with something more legally correct and I hope useful. It's at Commons:Fan art/Proposal. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Piotrus!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Gen_Con_Indy_2007_-_video_game_advertisement_-_(The_Witcher).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gen_Con_Indy_2007_-_video_game_advertisement_-_(The_Witcher).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Belgrano (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Mapy[edit]

Źródłem zarysu granic powiatów woj. wileńskiego są posiadane przeze mnie przedwojenne mapy wojskowe (pochodzę z tamtych stron), mające ponad 70 lat i stanowiące własność publiczną. Ale to nie jest kalka! Resztę robię osobiście - przed wojną takich kolorów nie stosowano! Cała koncepcja mapy jest moja. Czy narysuję inne? Jeśli zdrowia i życia starczy - może. Serdecznie pozdrawiam--lonio17 (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

[1] Nocka (w Polsce, u Ciebie dzień) i Twoja sugestia "była się zmaterializowała" Serdeczności--lonio17 (talk) 13:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Oczywiście jest w planie, dziękuję za uznanie, pozdrawiam--lonio17 (talk) 08:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Zerknij: 1, 2, 3. Samochwała... To było ostatni raz, pozdrawiam--lonio17 (talk) 12:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Dziękuję Ci bardzo za wspaniałe wyróżnienie, nawet 70. letni "staruszek" potrafi się cieszyć jak dziecko. Dziękuję za linki, cieszę się bardzo z poznania, serdecznie pozdrawiam --lonio17 (talk) 19:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Tak, jestem "przedwojenny", urodziłem się około 11 km od wschodniej granicy II RP, Ojciec był oficerem KOP, serdeczności, trzymaj się za Wielką Wodą--lonio17 (talk) 20:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Mam nadzieję, że widziałeś: 1--lonio17 (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Witam Cię, mapka się rodzi w nieopisanych bólach, dwie wersje mapki, totalna krytyka i dyskusja nad najmniejszymi szczególikami trwa już kilka dni. Muszę przerwać na trochę rysowanie, brakuje mi 100% źródeł. Wyruszam w Polskę na Święta, ale nie zrezygnowałem! Życzę Ci Pięknych Dni Świątecznych choć wiem, że to inne Święta niż w Kraju. Serdecznie pozdrawiam--lonio17 (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Kosciol[edit]

Mógłbyś stworzyć własną kategorie tego kościoła File:Parafia pod Wezwaniem Trojcy Swietej - 04.JPG? Nie opisałeś gdzie ten budynek stoi i kategoria "Churches in Poland" nie jest zbyt dokładna. Pozdrowienia --PetrusSilesius (talk) 08:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Map request[edit]

Witam, pomyślę, potrzebuję tylko trochę czasu - parę różnych "rzeczy" napocząłem (niekoniecznie na Wiki) - daj mi 2 tygodnie. Stosowne mapki będę umieszczał w nowej kategorii. Pozdrawiam --lonio17 (talk) 07:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Dzięki, mam już materiały, siedzę "nad nimi", będą dwie mapki: granice 22.06.1941 i od tej daty do 1945, serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 08:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Proszę oceń efekt nowa mapka. Będę, pomalutku, rysował drugą. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --lonio17 (talk) 10:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Jest "druga" mapka [2], serdeczności--lonio17 (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Witam Cię, mea culpa, w natłoku różnych tematycznie rysunków (nie tylko do Wiki) i chyba starczego wieku, niestety, coraz częściej popełniam błędy. Ta czerwona linia to oczywiście Pakt R-M z 23-08-1939 - poprawię, dorysuję drugą linię. Do GG włączono "malutki rejonik" - Przemyśl, Dobromil, Chyrów (nie ma tam naturalnej granicy) - IMHO rysunek jest i tak "przeładowany", ta dodatkowa linia będzie wymagała dodatkowego opisu a wielkiego znaczenia nie ma, można porównać te dwie mapki.
  • Twoje "zamówienia" wywołały już tego rodzaju wpisy na mojej stronie dyskusji w pl.wiki:Ja Ci mówię wróć do źródeł:)). okręgi centralne AK czekają, inspektoraty w powijakach...barwa LWP nie ruszona w ogóle (przynajmniej proporczyki rodzajów wojsk do szablonów). A Ty po obcych landach i tematach kursujesz. Wróciłem... i co widzę? Jakieś wysoko wyspecjalizowane graficzki szanownemu Panu się śnią:). Tylko żeby potem nie było na mnie że oczka bolą;). Koniec żartów. Potraktuj to jako żart, duże coś z Twojego zamówienia zrealizuję.
  • Dzięki specjalne za kategoryzację malunków, serdecznie pozdrawiam--lonio17 (talk) 08:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Czy myślałeś o takich [3]mapkach? :))--lonio17 (talk) 11:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Zerknij proszę na art: [4]. Jest tam zdjęcie por. Stanisława Synoradzkiego - mojego Ojca Chrzestnego (przyjaciela mojego Taty), który zginął 17 września 1939 w Bitwie nad Bzurą - jakoś nie mogę narysować tej bitwy, choć "zahaczyłem" o nią tutaj. Cieszę się, że trafiłem w Twoje widzenie Wartheland, narysuję pozostałe. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --lonio17 (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] i to by było na tyle... :))--lonio17 (talk) 12:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Uprzejmie proszę o skategoryzowanie pliku [12], pozdrawiam--lonio17 (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Witaj, "zamówienie" zostało umieszczone na liście kolejkowej (niekoniecznie na ostatnich miejscach), serdecznie pozdrawiam--lonio17 (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Uprzejmie proszę o skategoryzowanie pliku: legiony. Serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 12:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Zamówione: DG i DK. SP (serdecznie pozdrawiam)--lonio17 (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Oczywiście masz rację - pośpiech i zmęczenie materiału SP--lonio17 (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Niech tymczasem pozostanie z tymi DK poprawkami, w wolnej chwili (???) domaluję granice dystryktów SP--lonio17 (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Witaj Druhu, bardzo dziękuję, nie ma znaczenia co mam a czego nie mam, wszystko się przyda, jeśli zdrowia wystarczy. Zaczynamy (z Żoną) 7 czerwca kanikuły z Wnuczkami, nie wszędzie będę miał dostęp do netu - sprawa przeciągnie się w czasie, ale będę próbował coś upichcić. Serdeczności--lonio17 (talk) 07:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Cosik mi się wydaje, że sam nie znajdziesz Battle of Bologne, serdeczności--lonio17 (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Copyvio?[edit]

Ja sie nei odzywam, ale pliki sparwdzam. 1szy polecial, w 2gi wstawilem szablon. Masur (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

  • ps. oj przeoczylem cie :) Ale ja nie jestem adminem na Commons :) Masur (talk) 23:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Deletion vote[edit]

Hello, looking at the talk page of File:Historisches deutsches Sprachgebiet.PNG I saw oppose that image; it would be of great help if you'd list your opposition to it. Thank you.HP1740-B (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Del req[edit]

Ja zajmuje sie tylko przypadkami copyvio. Herr Kriss (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

ASA Conference 2008[edit]

I tried to do some cleanup work on the categories you chose for the ASA Conference 2008 photos. I know you are an experienced user, so I will not fuss too much :) but in my own experience, I have always found it much more efficient to create the correct categories for my submissions (and properly categorize those new categories, of course) rather than using several vague categories to triangulate upon each image. So I reduced "American Sociological Association; Boston; Conferences in 2008" to just American Sociological Association Conference 2008, which is itself categorized to Category:Conferences in 2008, Category:American Sociological Association Conferences, and Category:Conferences in Boston. (I think I created about 5 or 6 categories to properly parent everything, down to the level of Category:Conferences in the United States.)—Notyourbroom (talk) 05:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

mapa 1931 z "Historii Polski"[edit]

Dzięki za linki. Oczywiście zakładający zgłoszenie na Commons nie był łaskaw mnie powiadomić, ani nawet podać rzeczywistego powodu swego zgłoszenia. Pies go drapał, znamienne jest wszakże to, że jest on aktywny na de:wiki, zatem być może dwudziestowieczny nacjonalizm niemiecki gotów jest przypisywać w identycznej mierze swoim sąsiadom... Dyskusja na en:wiki natomiast zniechęca mnie swoją obszernością - przy mojej angielszczyźnie, w której nie potrafię wyczuć niuansów wypowiedzi boję się źle zrozumieć, albo tym bardziej - źle być zrozumianym, gdybym się odezwał.

Faktem jest, że w miarę bezstronnych informacji na temat wieku XX doczekają się pewnie dopiero nasi praprawnukowie za pół tysiąclecia. A póki co, ścierają się POV-y różnych narodów, różnych poziomów wykształcenia, i różnych okresów, w których dyskutanci uczyli się historii...

Julo (talk) 21:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

reply[edit]

File:Rozwój terytorialny Krakowa.jpg[edit]

(You wrote)
Perhaps you could translate this? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Mam w domu gościa z Polski do czwartku 8-go maja. Zajmę się tłumaczeniem mapy dopierio pod koniec tygodnia albo w najbliższy weekend. Cześć na razie. --Poeticbent talk 03:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Niechorze - Liwka Canal 01.JPG[edit]

Witam. Chciałbym się upewnić, że chodzi to ujście wody z jeziora Liwia Łuża (Kanał Liwia Łuża), a nie rów Liwia, który wpada do jeziora od południowej strony. Na temat tego cieku zainicjonowałem art. pl:Kanał Liwia Łuża. Liwka to rów wpadający do Kanału Lądkowskiego. JDavid (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Dragoni_et_kozak.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dragoni_et_kozak.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dragoni_et_kozak.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 04:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

  • ja sie juz rozgladalem tu i owdzie za czyms do tego pliku i takze nic nie moglem znalezc (przejrzalem skasowane strony etc). A sparwa szczegolnie wazna, bowiem sam plik byc moze ukazal sie gdzies drukiem, wiec bez zgody to serio wyglada na czyste NPA. Masur (talk) 22:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
    • sie robi szefunciu. Zajmij sie tylko - jak ta skasowana byla w jakims hasle, wlinkowaniem jej z powrotem. Aczkolwiek dla mnei to "fanart", wiec chyab nie bardzo nadaje sie jako ilustracja do encyklopedii. Masur (talk) 19:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
      • kategoria OR zatem :) Dopoki autor nie bedzie Matejką ;)Masur (talk) 21:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
        • OK, albo cos nie tak z baza, albo ten jeden plik byl i wsialk. Nie moge odtowrzyc pliku, moge strone. Masur (talk) 21:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Konstancja rakuszanka coat of arms 17th century.gif[edit]

Jestes pewien ze to PD-Old? Wzór moze jest PD-old, ale niekonicznie wykonanie. Innymi slowy - Mona Lisa jest PD-Old, ale jak narysuja moja wlasna, ktora sila rzeczy bedzie moja jej interpretacja, to niekoniecznie jest pd-old, o ile nie wykonam dokladnej kopii. A tu napewno nei wykonano dokladnej kopii, bo to nie skan, ale praca zdigitalizowana. Co wiecej zrodla merytoryczne - skad wiadomo, ze taki herb to rzeczywiscie herb kogostam? Masur (talk) 06:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

  • o ten herb pisze, bo na plwiki w dyskusji wypatrzylem, ze ktos (IP) lekko skwaszony zdziwił sie, ze jego praca stala sie PD :) I fakt, wzor jak mowie moze byc PD, ale wykonanie niekoniecznie. ale w tym wypadku bardziej chodzi o wp:wer. Dzieki za pomoc! Masur (talk) 21:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
    •  :) to byla strona dyskusji pliku na plwiki, ktora juz skasowalem, bo napisalem ze skontaktuje sie z ladujacym. [13] = Prawa autorskie do rysunku tego herbu wygasły, bo autor umarł ponad 70 lat temu? 70 lat to nie minęło nawet od moich narodzin, a co dopiero od śmierci. A tak się nabiedziłem, żeby napaćkać te wszystkie pola herbu. Nie roszczę sobie zbyt wielkich praw do tego rysunku - ale możnaby chyba co innego tam umieścić, a nie takie teksty o śmierci. A.K.

Masur (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Armia_Czerwona,Wehrmacht_23.09.1939_wspólna_parada.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Armia_Czerwona,Wehrmacht_23.09.1939_wspólna_parada.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

24.61.11.153 17:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


Category:Cemeteries of train[edit]

How is this better or different than Category:Railway museums? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:54, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Salut, in a museum, there are trains very beautiful ... but ... in a cemetery ... trains are in a dead, disassemble, sales,tatters, ... !! bref, il y a une difference --Bernard Piette (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
For example ... File:Hawthorn Leslie 0-6-0ST.jpg ... there was no way to find a Category ! alors, so that the image is seen .... just a idea, --Bernard Piette (talk) 16:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Posters by Stanisław Miedza-Tomaszewski[edit]

PD-Polish license is only for photos (see: Photographs by Jerzy Tomaszewski). Stanisław Miedza-Tomaszewski died in 2000, so his works cannod be uploaded here without permission from legal successors. Obvious copyright violation can be deleted on sight without discussion Commons:Copyright_violations#Speedy_deletion. Please let me know if you want to:

  • initiate regular deletion procedure anyway
  • upload some or all of mentioned files to en:wiki as "fair use"

Regards, A.J. (talk) 11:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Będzie tego niestety więcej; tym razem jednak zwyczajnie zgłoszę do COM:DEL, żeby nie było powtórnej wtopy, za którą jeszcze raz się kajam i przepraszam. Na razie! A.J. (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Gniezno[edit]

Chciałbym serdeczne podziękować za wspaniałe fotografie eksponatów z Muzeum Archidiecezjalnego w Gnieźnie. Łączę pozdrowienia --WłosProsiOGłos (talk) 20:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Language policy[edit]

Hi, in an effort to move the Commons:Language policy closer to completion, I have been editing it and cleaning it up for the last few days. I have tried to make the page as neutral and consistent as possible with the relevant policy and guidleine pages that it cross references.

I would appreciate it, as someone who has discussed some of these policies in the past, if you could look at Commons talk:Language policy and contribute your thoughts. This is the version that exists as I am writing it and I am encouraging everyone to consider the "static" page until everything gets sorted out.

Many thanks. Evrik (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Boston - bird on a lampost.JPG[edit]

Where was the photo taken, please? Boston in Lincolnshire, England, or Boston, MA, USA? If the latter, the identity is Larus smithsonianus, not Larus argentatus - Thanks! MPF (talk) 14:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! No problem! - MPF (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified church 1[edit]

Piotrus, the images in Category:Unidentified church 1 are yours. Do you know what city these were in? - Jmabel ! talk 05:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Blood Bowl game.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Blood Bowl game.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jappalang (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

FP Nomination[edit]

Mirów Castle - 15.JPG
Nomination Notification
G'day! I love File:Mirów Castle - 15.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mirów Castle - 15.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


File:Lindos002.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lindos002.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 21:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Gen Con Indy 2008 - robots.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gen Con Indy 2008 - robots.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Dcoetzee (talk) 04:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token a8be2d70e661f0d3d62e106b541989c9[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

a8be2d70e661f0d3d62e106b541989c9


File:Musée Mécanique 239.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Musée Mécanique 239.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Kungfuman (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Kamien Pomorski - plac.JPG[edit]

Czy mogę prosic o opis zdjęcia? Zwiadowca 21 02:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Map_of_the_Minsk_Ghetto.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Map_of_the_Minsk_Ghetto.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Commonist licenses[edit]

Dear Piotrus,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to a few thousand files (started with about 1,8M files). Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt? You can also copy a new licenses.txt from here.

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}
{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much, --MGA73 (talk) 19:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your permission to add 3.0 [14]. I have some problems with my bot so it might take some time before all images is changed. --MGA73 (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
I think my bot changed them all now. Thank you :-) --MGA73 (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

VP question[edit]

I admit I am confused w/ regards to the status of Commons:Valued image candidates/Dolphins at Loro Parque 13.JPG. Is it going to be valued or not? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

  • The review has been broadened to a "Most Valued Review" with several images in competition; the aim is to choose the most illustrative picture for the scope. That one has received the most supports until now. --Myrabella (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Gdynia-KamiennaGora.PNG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Kategorie[edit]

Takie jak Geografia czegos to tak, ale nazwy dzielnic zostawiamy oruginalne, czyli Dąbrowa (district of Gdynia) etc. Masur (talk) 06:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Duzo kategorii do przeniesienia[edit]

Hej,
z opisu umieszczonego na stronie nie wynika, żeby wnioski o przeniesienie wymagały zatwierdzenia przez administratorów i nie pamiętam, żeby tak było kiedykolwiek. Bot pewnie ma jakieś lagi, ale w końcu powinien zająć się Twoimi kategoriami. Pozdrawiam, odder (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Pitt - first building.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Log Cabin (University of Pittsburgh).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Zalipie - painted cottage 04.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zalipie (Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Nastepna[edit]

Blyskawiczny jestes. Kolejna to znowu cala seria z jednej mańki: korpusówki głównie. Wszystko {{polishsymbol}} (uwaga - CHelp bedzie je przerzucac, ale bedzie omijac szablony licencji!). Jak bylbys w stanie przed piatkiem to zrobic to byloby super, bo w piatek chce posprzatac cala kategorie, a te troszke w niej wadza :) Nie zapomnij o ladnych nazwach. Dzieki!!! Masur (talk) 07:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

  • rzadzisz :) Jest ekstra. Nam sie tymczasem zepsulo narzedzie do listowania przeniesionych plikow i nie wiemy o co chodzi, bo dla innych wiki dziala. Mam nadzieje, ze do piatku cos wymyslimy, bo bez tego nie da sie przelinkowywac ;) Masur (talk) 05:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
    • To jak masz ochote to mamy Dixi. Wiekszosc jest ok. Tam gdzie jest samo PD winno byc PD-old albo self. Tylko, ze nieraz zrodlo podane jest w taki sposob, ze trzeba guglnac, zeby je podac w "ładny" sposob. Np. jest lakonicznie podane "Encyklopedia Gutenberga z 1911" to warto dopisac cos wiecej, jak sie uda znalezc. I nazwy oczywscie, bo te w wiekszosci sa zbyt ogolne/enigmatyczne. Dzieki. Masur (talk) 06:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC) ps. wszystkie narzedzia juz dzialaja.
      • Jak Dixi pusta (chyba cos jeszcze zostalo?) to mamy jeszcze Kpjasa. Wszystko ze zrodlami. Kaszka z mleczkiem, tylko ładne nazwy trzeba podac. I jak zwykle: dziękuję! Masur (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
        • To po Kpjasie mamy [15], z czego 80% ma niezbedne dane. Pamietaj o ladnych nazwach i podawaniu autor/zrodel w odpowiednich polach na Commons. Dzieki! Masur (talk) 16:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
  • To jak masz ochote, to wygrzebalem wlasnie Arkada. Wszystkie ladnie oznaczone pd-oldy, albo gfdl-self. Jak bedziesz to robil nei zapomnij zmieniac licencji (z GFDL na GFDL-self najczesciej) i podawac oryginalnych zrodel na Commons (bo na plwiki on ladnie podal). Masur (talk) 10:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

re: Please be careful with categorizing[edit]

Jestem w trakcie tworzenia poszczególnych kategorii w tej grupie (Category:National Museum in Poznań), jeżeli nie zauważyłeś.BurgererSF (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Phipps - 003.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Phipps - 003.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Hammersoft (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Phipps - 001.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Phipps - 001.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Hammersoft (talk) 14:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Phipps - 001.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Phipps - 001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--SV1XV (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Phipps - 003.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Phipps - 003.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--SV1XV (talk) 07:22, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Phipps - 002.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Phipps - 002.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Odp[edit]

Zauwaz, ze usunales other version link stad. Czemu? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Wyłącznie przez niedopatrzenie, więc jeżeli dopatrujesz się w tym jakiegokolwiek wrogiego działania w stosunku do siebie, nie powinieneś. Trudno uniknąć błędów, przy takiej ilości plików do skategoryzowania, więc twoje uwagi w stylu: category did not exist; I created it (you should've done so), są niestosowne - nie ja wprowadzałem te pliki do commons i nie było moim obowiązkiem je kategoryzować, ponadto byłem w trakcie tworzenia odpowiedniej kategorii. Jeżeli zauważysz inne pomyłki po prostu je popraw zamiast bawić się w detektywa. BurgererSF (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Haraki/Lindos[edit]

Hello; some of your photographs named "Haraki" look like Lindos castle...are you sure you took them in Haraki?--Phso2 (talk) 12:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Grafika[edit]

Witaj. Wg historii pliku Jestes autorem tej grafiki na commonsie "File:Parafia pod Wezwaniem Trojcy Swietej - 01.JPG", czy Moglbys wskazac jakies namiary gdzie to sie znajduje ? thanks 217.190.244.10 23:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Niestety nie pamietam, mam nadzieje, ze ktos to kiedys zidentifykuje. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Naminacja (e)[edit]

Witaj Piotrze, wielkie dzięki za uznanie, to Ty decydujesz, w każdym przypadku będzie super. Serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Niestety musiałem bardzo ograniczyć działalność w projektach Wikimedia. Na pewno nie będę zmieniał rozszerzeń z .png na.SVG - szkoda mojego czasu, którego coraz mniej mogę poświęcić na ślęczenie przed ekranem. Może coś tam jeszcze poprawię ale to dopiero po wakacjach wnuczek (wrzesień), teraz Mierzeja Wiślana właśnie tutaj. Jak doktorat? Serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 10:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Polish_abacus_-_Liczyd%C5%82o.JPG[edit]

Jesteś autorem tej fotografii, czy możesz mi powiedzieć z którego (mniej/więcej) roku jest przedstawione liczydło?

[16]

Dziękuję i pozdrawiam.

87.206.204.149 02:23, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, moge zapytac sie rodziny, ale raczej na pewno - przedwojenne. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Polska 1039 - 1058.png [edit]

Nie mam praktyki w zmianie trybu zabezpieczeń plików, więc sprawdź, proszę, czy teraz jest OK. Moim celem było pozostawienie zabezpieczenia przeciw edycjom osób niezarejestrowanych
Kategorię dodałem Julo (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Not undertaking rename requests[edit]

Gday, rename requests specifically state Commons:File_renaming#What_files_should_be_renamed.3F that the language component is not sufficient for a rename, subsequently, the rename requests with that as the criteria will not be undertaken.  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:35, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


  • Add {{subst:delete-subst|REASON (mandatory)}} on the page
  • Notify the uploader with {{subst:idw|Archive 2}}--~~~~
  • On the log, add :
    {{User talk:Piotrus/Archive 2}}


Category:Cosplay of Inuyasha[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Cosplay of Inuyasha has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Michele-sama (talk) 20:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


Please give images good descriptions[edit]

العربية | català | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | polski | português | русский | українська | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Pittsburgh_International_Airport_-_blue_plane.JPG and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

Mono (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Map of Reichkomissariate Ukraine[edit]

Hello, I saw the map Reichkomissariate Ukraine. Is it your work? Best! Is there such map of Reichkomissariate Maskau?--85.235.223.57 19:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Dear anon, can you link the map you refer to? There was no Rk Maskau, do you mean w:Reichskommissariat Moskowien? Usually if we have a map of something it is in the en Wiki article on the subject. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Monuments and memorials[edit]

Czesc, Piotr. The bot can take a couple of weeks to move the content - the delay is due, in part, to allow anyone with concerns time to express them. I'm not sure if there would be any concerns here, given that the entire category tree is moving to the "Monuments and memorials" format, but best to be cautious, I suppose. Cheers. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

If you are concerned with the timing, I would happily move over content manually. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
I think when it's a redirect of this type they purposely wait for two weeks. When it's more straightforward, and listed at CommonsDelinker, it's faster. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:44, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rehman(+) 09:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


Please give images good descriptions[edit]

العربية | català | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | polski | português | русский | українська | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Okęcie - samolot w powietrzu, 20 minut po starcie.JPG and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 15:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Krauscampo.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Krauscampo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GrapedApe (talk) 18:32, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Corfu_town_99.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Corfu_town_99.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 18:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Choinka.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Choinka.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 17:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Pociągi pancerne[edit]

Witaj, "sto lat" nie pisaliśmy do siebie. Dzięki za życzenia i ja Ci życzę dużo zdrówka, rodzinnej atmosfery w Święta i spełnienia marzeń w Nowym Roku. Obserwuję Wasz trud przy aratach o pociągach. Jak będę miał "siłę w palcach i umyśle" to może coś wykugluję! Serdecznościlonio17 (talk) 19:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Dzięki, chociaż Jedna Osoba docenia wysiłek, moc serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 09:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Faksymile rozkazu pilsudskiego.png[edit]

Witaj Piotrze, nie mogę sobie poradzić z autorstwem i źródłem (J. Piłsudski Pisma zbiorowe t. V, Instytut Józefa Piłsudskiego, Warszawa 1937) zamieszczonego przeze mnie pliku jw. Ratuj, bo myślę, że warto, serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Dzięki, udało mi się dociec błędu (o jeden nawias "}" za mało), pozdr. --lonio17 (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Monarch A321 Photo[edit]

Hello, I am going to see if I can find the registration of the Monarch A321 in corfu on Libhomeradar.org for you

--MKY661 (talk) 17:56, 9 January 2011

G-OZBG from Gatwick --MKY661 (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Mapki lokacyjne[edit]

Witaj, i to niby ja mam to zrobić? Chyba na tamtym świecie, szkopuł w tym, że nie wiem jak przesłać na Wiki! Serdeczności--lonio17 (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Jeszcze słówko - nie rysuję w formacie .svg (a takie muszą być mapki lokacyjne) i już nie będę uczył się Inkscape, przykro mi, pozdr.--lonio17 (talk) 19:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Skany dokumentow historycznych 003.jpg[edit]

OK, znalazłem datę i w drugiej części, gazety z 1941 niestety dopiero za rok będą public domain. A.J. (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

To się dowiedziałem z dokumentu 004: z 1941 pochodzą skany gazety 001 i 002. A.J. (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Herb Księstwa Cieszyna.jpg[edit]

Witaj. Chciałbym zapytać o plik File:Herb Księstwa Cieszyna.jpg. Otóż została zmieniona licencja tego pliku przez Ciebie na GFDL. A oryginalny plik na pl.Wiki miał licencję {{PD-old}}. Wiem, że przepisanie miało miejsce przez bota, ale jednak zatwierdziłeś tę zmianę. Dzięki za odp. JDavid (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)


File:Bush Gardens - 100.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bush Gardens - 100.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Atlanta - generic 23.JPG[edit]

Hello Piotrus. Can you please add a little description to that file? People would certainly like to know what kind of truck that is. I've also changed your license because {{PD-Polish}} is for old photos only where the copyright is no longer valid. You can license your very own photos with {{PD-user|Piotrus}}. Regards, De728631 (talk) 21:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Ah, that's what I guessed. I think I'll just call it a MARTA maintenance truck then. And well, yes, you're not the first one to complain about Commonist :) De728631 (talk) 22:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Cecylia_renata.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cecylia_renata.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BurgererSF (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Paper Museum in Atlanta 127.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Paper Museum in Atlanta 127.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Paper_Museum_in_Atlanta_127.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paper_Museum_in_Atlanta_127.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--ZooFari 17:23, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of images of Polish money[edit]

Several images of Polish money have been listed for deletion so that the community can discuss if they should be kept or not. We would appreciate if you could contribute your opinion, seeing as you uploaded one or more of the images that is now up for deletion. The discussion is here: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of Poland. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Musée_Mécanique_181.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Musée_Mécanique_181.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 15:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Started again. --Saibo (Δ) 02:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Berlin'45[edit]

Witaj Piotrze, naprawdę cieplutko Cię witam, Budziszyn mam namalowany, bez fałszywej skromności w lepszym wydaniu, niebawem zamieszczę. Pozostałe przesłane przez Ciebie szkice muszą czekać, niestety nie wiem jak długo i czy doczekają się? Mam propozycji malunków tyle, że pewnikiem nie obrobiłbym ich do końca życia. Powoli odchodzę od Wiki, zrobiłem tyle, na ile mnie było stać. Zabrałem się za edytowanie o cztery lata za późno a nie będę robił czegoś, co już nie sprawia mi przyjemności - luksus starego człowieka. Może mi kiedyś przejdzie i zatęsknię. Moc serdeczności a za szkice i pamięć dziękuję pięknie. lonio17 (talk) 19:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Piękne dzięki Piotrze, będę coś dłubał, ale naprawdę bardzo "pomalutku", serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 06:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Ale coby Twoja praca, tak do końca, się nie zmarnowała - zrobię w czasie pobytu wakacyjnego z wnuczkami w Piaskach zdjęcie kościółka jest moje "położenie jednostek 25 kwietnia" czyli Twój scan zamieszczony jako ostatni. Zgoda, a Bóg ...? Trzymaj się lonio17 (talk) 07:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
No comment - będzie jeszcze drugi. Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 09:45, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Piękna karta Twojego Dziadka. Dzięki. Dzisiaj zamieściłem fotografię oficer. Ten oficer zaraz po ślubie został skierowany do pułku KOP w Wołożynie. Serdeczności lonio17 (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Witaj Piotrze, jeszcze żyję, dzięki za pamięć, "Berlin" na ukończeniu, w grudniu zawieszę na 100 %, moc serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Witaj za wodą, trochę podrysowuję, ale idzie mi to jak krew z ...., gdyby nie te piekielne ulice w Berlinie pewnikiem rysunek byłby zrobiony. Jeśli znajdę uproszczony plan Berlina (1939) to spróbuję, ale to potrwa parę tygodni, teraz ślęczę nad nową wersją bitwy o Bolonię. Serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 08:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Już mam precyzyjny plan Berlina - 1939 :)) --lonio17 (talk) 13:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Z przykrością nie, jest to wycinek precyzyjnej, rozkawałkowanej mapy. Pozdrawiam --lonio17 (talk) 09:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Swiatlo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Swiatlo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kpalion(talk) 22:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - costumes 13 (Storm Troopers and Darth Vader).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - costumes 13 (Storm Troopers and Darth Vader).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--ANDROBETA 20:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - costumes 14 (Storm Troopers and Darth Vader).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - costumes 14 (Storm Troopers and Darth Vader).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--ANDROBETA 20:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - costumes 15 (Darth Vader and a pirate).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gen Con Indy 2007 - costumes 15 (Darth Vader and a pirate).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--ANDROBETA 20:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

MON[edit]

Piotrus, po tylu latach :)? Nemo5576 (talk) 10:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Kombinowane nad zdobywaniem zgód dawno mi przeszło. Szkoda czasu :) Za 5 lat okaże się znów że zgoda g... warta bo na commons się zasady zmienią i stara zgody jakichś wymogów formalnych nie spełniają. Nemo5576 (talk) 05:31, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Sunset_sea_Tenerife_2.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sunset_sea_Tenerife_2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Civa (talk) 15:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Rhodos454.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rhodos454.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

— Cheers, JackLee talk 17:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Musée_Mécanique_113.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Musée_Mécanique_113.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 03:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Phipps_-_004.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Phipps_-_004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 01:43, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Archangelos22.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Archangelos22.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 01:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Musée_Mécanique_228.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Musée_Mécanique_228.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 02:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Airpoort_rhodes_12.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Airpoort_rhodes_12.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.131.15 19:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons talk:Bots#Need a bot to add Own work to my images, source field in the description[edit]

Hi Piotrus, I see you've uploaded a lot of files. If you want to ask for bot work to be done, please go to Commons:Bots/Work requests. In near future, VisualFileChange will support multiple-(regex-)replace. (Currently it supports only one replacement but author=myself should also be replaced) When it does you can poke me to fix your uploads, if I should forget in the meantime. Thank you, HNY and happy uploading. -- RE rillke questions? 22:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

File:World copyright-terms.jpg requires updating[edit]

Hi Piotrus,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:World copyright-terms.jpg is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again.Stefan4 (talk) 12:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Cher[edit]

Hi, I am Kekkomereq4 from Wikipedia Italia. Could you upload this photo of Cher please? --79.23.81.90 10:11, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Um. Why me, and why cannot you do it yourself? If you need general help, try Commons:Help desk. I am afraid I am a bit busy right now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Florida by Piotrus 200.JPG and others[edit]

Hello Piotrus/Archive 2!

First of all, thank you for your contributions!

Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{own}} as source instead of "myself". This is essential for keeping this image on Commons because this shows explicitly that this photograph is your own work.

Thanks in advance for your support. --High Contrast (talk) 18:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_209.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_209.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_207.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_207.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:19, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_203.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_203.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:20, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_191.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_191.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_185.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_185.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:25, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_154.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_154.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_156.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_156.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_167.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_167.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_165.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_165.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_152.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_152.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_150.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_150.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.110.44 22:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


Please, don`t upload every image that you find on your digicam. Think first if it may be useful and the upload it . Thank you 22:54, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_193.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_193.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_144.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_144.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_114.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_114.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_122.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_122.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_124.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_124.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_126.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_126.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_128.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_128.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_134.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_134.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_136.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_136.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_138.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_138.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_142.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_142.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_140.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_140.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_087.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_087.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_090.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_090.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_098.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_098.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_100.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_100.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_102.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_102.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_104.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_104.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_106.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_106.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_108.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_108.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_112.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_112.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_045.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_045.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_056.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_056.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_058.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_058.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_060.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_060.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_062.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_062.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_064.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_064.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_069.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_069.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_071.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_071.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 23:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_077.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_077.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 00:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_081.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_081.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 00:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_010.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:New_York_by_Piotrus_030.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_York_by_Piotrus_030.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kobac (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_91.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_91.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_88.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_88.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_86.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_86.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_87.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_87.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_90.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_90.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_85.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pitt_Car_Sci_Mus_85.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Piotrus[edit]

Welcome. Kobac (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)