User talk:Russavia

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Your typical Commons admin



Copyright help and favor[edit]

Can you please read the following:

http://www.sylviastuurman.eu/sitemap/foto/#gebruik says:

you use the photograph through a link to the photograph as it is put on this site: the idea is that you don't copy the photograph to your own site.

I'm guessing that they only want their photos to be linked to or hotlinked. Do you think that you could contact Ernst Anepool and request his permission to host and share the photos on Commons? You seem to be good at doing stuff like that - certainly better than me. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I just don't have time to get into correspondence with the copyright holder on this; particularly as they do seem to be adamant what they do and don't want. russavia (talk) 04:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Aviation barnstar[edit]

WikiCommonsWings2.png Aviation Barnstar
In recognition of your tireless hunting and uploading of quality aircraft images. Cheers, --Rrburke (talk) 12:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC))
Thanks @Rrburke:. russavia (talk) 04:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Not-PD-US-URAA[edit]

Hi,

If you can't accept a community decision, you need to find another project. Sorry, Yann (talk) 18:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

No Yann, I am not going to sit idly by and allow key components of COM:L and COM:PRP thrown out the window, all because of a close that you have gotten totally wrong and should not have done in the first place. russavia (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Would you be so kind to se my message here: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Russavia. Yours faithfully, Yann (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Michael Angelo[edit]

Regarding your move of File:Michael Angelo (6782039978).jpg into Category:Files uploaded by Russavia (delete): that inscription was a formative factor in my experience of culture shock when I arrived in Australia more than 30 years ago; it's a wonderful example why cultural cringe is a perfectly rational attitude here. I would very much like this image to remain on Commons. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

And stay it shall. It was an erroneous move on my part. I would have caught it before I deleted out of scope/problematic images, but good to see you noticed too. Cheers, russavia (talk) 03:27, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Cindy Ashley-Nelson, 2006.jpg[edit]

Hey there! I am requesting restoration of the above image. While I had no intention of using the image a couple of years ago, my role as a member of the Affiliations Committee supports the need for full disclosure and identification. I appreciate your help. Cindamuse (talk) 02:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

@Cindamuse:, ✓ Done russavia (talk) 06:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


File:All Nippon Airways Boeing 747-400D Breidenstein-1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:All Nippon Airways Boeing 747-400D Breidenstein-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--D-Kuru (talk) 08:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Fat Albert low level pass.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fat Albert low level pass.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fat Albert low level pass.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Excess trivial categorisation from Flickr[edit]

Please be careful converting tags to categories. Tags are very lightweight and all sorts of peripheral rubbish gets added to them. Commons categories are rather more firmly defined and applied.

As an example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Normandy_%2710-_American_Cemetery,_Colleville_%284824271539%29.jpg&oldid=120221576

I've created Category:Normandy '10: American Cemetery, Colleville for this group. Category:Colleville (and others) now contains about 900 files that don't belong.

Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 15:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for creating that cat @Andy Dingley:. I am cleaning up uploads as I go, so the 900 wouldn't be there for too long. Thanks for assistance. Cheers, russavia (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
That cat should catch a sizable bunch of them, and could easily be scripted by string matching the filenames. There would need to be some other cats created for what are obviously related images, but from different events. I'd do this quickly and probably over-simplified, just by looking at batches of similar filenames. If these names are wrong or their parent cats are wrong, that's easy to fix later.
I think the root cause of this is that the Flickr uploader had half a dozen different Normandy events, but applied the same tag batch to each of them. We should try and get these batches separated ASAP, which makes the rest of the process easy. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Why?[edit]

I'm a bit courious. Why and for what do we need File:Holly (2355103426).jpg such images on Commons? Where is the educational point at this image? As Dog image we don't need this - we have thousands. The description at last don't tell the race - the minimum what we need to know for a little bit of possible educational sense. So I stay courious... Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC) And these too: File:Silly Dog (2277051513).jpg, File:Fat Cat (2253272298).jpg, File:Fat Cat (2253275016).jpg, File:Fat Cat (2253277972).jpg

There are many things that we don't "need", but it's a long way from saying that we should then remove them. In particular, an issue of removing them then turns into subjective judgement calls. Time is valuable, space is cheap. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but no. We are not a Webspace provider for personal images. We have a goal. And such images are not in our goal. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
@Marcus Cyron:, these uploads are actively cleaned up by myself. This person's stream has 6,400 high quality photos, mainly aviation and cars, and there will be some out of scope images like the bored photo, which will be moved from Category:Files uploaded by Russavia (cleanup) to Category:Files uploaded by Russavia (delete), and then deleted by myself. In relation to the dog and cat photos, they are extremely high quality images, so I see no reason we shouldn't add them to our expanding collection of images. Cheers, russavia (talk) 17:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Watkin Louise in artistic mode (178298728).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Watkin Louise in artistic mode (178298728).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ies (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

These Panoramio Images[edit]

If you have a bit of time, please consider marking some of these panoramio images...mostly from Belarus apparently. I have marked some of them. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Архивы[edit]

Привет. Ты можешь выложить фотографии с tassphoto.com, visualrian.ru, bild.bundesarchiv.de? Особенно архивные?

FP promotion[edit]

Thunderbirds mirror image 2014.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Thunderbirds mirror image 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thunderbirds mirror image 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/Jee 07:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Ville de Québec 189 (8214512120).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ville de Québec 189 (8214512120).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Asclepias (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Ville de Québec 190 (8214511130).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ville de Québec 190 (8214511130).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Asclepias (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Ville de Québec 197 (8213427147).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ville de Québec 197 (8213427147).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Asclepias (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Angelica Rivera de Peña Visita al Estado de Nuevo León. (6958180024).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Angelica Rivera de Peña Visita al Estado de Nuevo León. (6958180024).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cholo 3 (talk) 20:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)