User talk:Wheeke

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wheeke!

-- 18:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Innocence_of_muslims has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Triggerhippie4 (talk) 03:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fur trade in art[edit]

Hallo Wheeke, I put "Furriers in art" in your new category, so you must not categorize that images twice under "fur trade in art". Gruß --Kürschner (talk) 10:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It occurs to me, there is no category Christian business people. I promise, probably also no Muslim business people... Are you sure, that we really should fill te category Jewish business people?
Hallo und vielen Dank, sicher bin ich auch nicht. Nur die Kat besteht ja. Und nicht nur Autobiografen wie Bodo Grafenhorst in So geschah es damals, Seite 169, erinnern sich an das sprichwörtlich gewordene Handelssegment. Aber ich häng nicht dran. grüße--Wheeke (talk) 12:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ist schon klar. Mir fällt nur auf, dass wir da ein Vorurteil pflegen, Juden sind vor allem als Händler von Bedeutung. Ich bin da recht dünnhäutig. Habe keine Lust, zum Ausgleich für alle anderen Religionen gleiche Kategorien einzurichten (und zu füllen...). Fände ich an sich eine akzeptable Lösung. Obwohl, es ist schon fraglich, ob wir Menschen, dann ja auch noch lebende, mit ihrer Religion outen sollten. Wenn vor allem der Begriff, hier Händler, gar nichts mit der Religion zu tun hat. --Kürschner (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Vielleicht wäre dies ein Punkt für eine kompetente Fachgruppe. Beste Grüße--Wheeke (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roosters[edit]

Hi :) I've seen your edits on animals as weather vanes. I think that Category:Tower roosters and Category:Weathercocks should be merged, and the resulting category be a subcategory of Category:Birds as weather vanes. Do you agree? --Superchilum(talk to me!) 12:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. greetings--Wheeke (talk) 13:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, that's not a sculpture, it's a cuddly toy. Hedgehogs in art was as close a category as I could find. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Similary: Category:Toy dogs is a subcat of Category:Sculptures of dogs. I think--Wheeke (talk) 09:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the capitalization doesn't follow English-language conventions, and could be seen as insulting... AnonMoos (talk) 08:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lake in Pakistan[edit]

Hi:

Please note I redirect this category the already existing Category:Lakes of Pakistan, which is according to the convention of names in Commons. In the future, please make a research of categories before you create new ones.

Pierre cb (talk) 12:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thx. the tool: Category redirects is a fine instrument.--Wheeke (talk) 13:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Thefts in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 13:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]