Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Library of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:National Library of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2016 at 11:59:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info National Library of Australia, Canberra. 16-image Panorama. I've spent hours fixing as many stitching errors as I could find; let me know if you find more.- Info Created, uploaded, nominated by Thennicke
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 11:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)- Support -- Spurzem (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:48, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support very nice --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 20:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. Could you please give some information about the panorama? How many single frames did you take? Did you use a panorama head? --Code (talk) 05:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- User:Code I didn't use a pano head (hence all the stitching errors). It's 15 single frames: I've added that info to the description. -- Thennicke (talk) 08:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Jee 07:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- temp.
Oppose lot of stitching errors are visible (8x under the nom page noted) and the building is a bit leaning to the left. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC) - Oppose As Alchemist-hp--Lmbuga (talk) 02:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, we cannot feature this as it is. Sorry. Please Thennicke have a look. --Jebulon (talk) 08:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment User:Alchemist-hp User:Lmbuga User:Jebulon Sorry for the slow reply; I've got exams this week. I'll fix the errors you've noted. Thanks. -- Thennicke (talk) 08:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Done I've fixed the noted errors -- Thennicke (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, but still no. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC) P.S: I ask me: why do you use a stitching, if you can do the same work as a single shoot without errors?
- @Alchemist-hp: Reason 1 is that I can't take this in a single shoot without errors. I don't own a 24mm tilt-shift lens, which I would need to do that. Reason 2 is resolution. My camera is limited to 20MPx. I wanted to create the highest-resolution image of this building that I could, for Wikimedia's sake.
- Is your opposition due to there still being stitching errors? If so could you point them out please? -- Thennicke (talk) 02:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support ~★ nmaia [[mia diskuto]] 00:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 21:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
