Commons:Requests and votes/Ra'ike

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ra'ike

 Support = 34;  Oppose = 1;  Neutral = 0 - 97.1% - Clear consensus to promote. Promoted ++Lar: t/c 16:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links for Ra'ike: Ra'ike (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Dear community.
Today I would like to suggest you Ra'ike as a new Commons administrator. She has not got the lot of edits (around 1000) but she is member of wikimedia OTRS and also a verry active sysop on german wikipedia. In the time she is sysop on dewiki she deleted the copyvios there nearly all alone, so she has really much experience with free licensing and an accurate knowlege about wikimedia projects, so she would be a great help for all the current sysops and the sysop tools would be a great adding for her dayly work in the sysop-relevant-space where she is jet active.
She accepted her nomination on her talk-page. __ ABF __ ϑ 12:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I accept my nomination here, too. -- Ra'ike T C

Votes

Comments

  •  Comment to Mutter Erde's oppose vote: in the German Wikipedia, Mutter Erde is long time indefinitely blocked, so every edit he makes as an IP is invalid and every user is allowed to remove or revert it. Some edits of ME, hovewer, are being tolerated since they provide some encyclopedic sense, but this diff-link was a clear trollery and Ra'ike was completely right removing it. Therefore, ME's vote has no rational reason. --S[1] 14:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You think, Mr. Roletschek (and others) are not able to think or even revert by themselves? I can´t believe that :-) Greetings Mutter Erde 14:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Of course they are, and I'm sure they would have done the same. --S[1] 15:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What was Mutter Erde blocked for on the German Wikipedia (its not entirely clear from the block log)? Is it appropriate for him to be editing Commons? WjBscribe 16:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Currently there is a kind of "riot" of the authors in de,see here. The supporters are even willing to vote for a not really perfect option, only to get a chance to get rid of some bad old admins. Me and around 5 - 10 users are only the most prominent symbols/victims of the old bad days. If you unterstand German, this might be a first introduction [2]. But there are tons of stuff more ... Greetings Mutter Erde 17:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
@WJBscribe: There was a banning poll that you can see here. The reasons were massive offendings, faking of user signatures and putting illegal porn images on user pages. --S[1] 18:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Have I done something to you? And even if I did - but I can´t remember - you should be truthful and you should be more careful with your words. I expect your excuse - here and in de. Have you told them too that Markus Schweiß has brought me to real court because of putting illegal porn images on user pages (that are your words - rubbish as the rest) and that I got a real acquittal that i can show everybody?
Here´s another detail that every German can verify: Why do you think that Unblocking + "Benutzersperrung Mutter Erde"(2) was started? Because "faking of user signatures" (correctly: "faking of one user signature") was a fake accusation of my first block. And now you.... Can´t believe it. Besides: Above, I have shown the link to that story. Here again:[3]. Mutter Erde 20:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just tried to translate, what is written on Wikipedia:Benutzersperrung/Archiv/Mutter Erde as reason for that poll. If I have to excuse, then only for my bad english. Please EOD here, that has nothing to do with this RFA. Thank you. --S[1] 21:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Linkfixes: Mutter Erde-Sperrung 1 (an embarassing document- but not for me) + introduction in the ME case, part 1. btw.: Here´s another work of S1 [4]. In Germany there´s a classic proverb: "Wer schlampig schreibt, denkt schlampig" Mutter Erde 09:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Ra'ike... Please accept the nomination HERE. I don't want to be an unmellow-hardass-stickler about this but for verification purposes, accepting it here means it's in THIS page's history. Again, it's not about not trusting ABF, it's about tracability. Thanks. (Is this not clear enough in the instructions? We can make it clearer I guess?) ++Lar: t/c 16:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok, no problem. I did it now. -- Ra'ike T C 17:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The first question (after 10 votes) to the candidate: Why did you revert an admin problem from an admin´s discussion page? Has somebody invited you to do that? Mutter Erde 09:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    First answere: I think, there is nothing more to say than S1 did. Second answere: Your problem in de.wikipedia and my only action against you (if you really were that, because it was an IP. It also could be a normal vandalism or troll edit) has nothing to do with your account here or the evaluation of my admin qualification at commons. -- Ra'ike T C 12:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal: You put this back into the right place so that these both admins can be de-sysopped (the third has retired "voluntary" in the meantime) Mutter Erde 09:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_and_votes/Ra%27ike&oldid=33102666"