Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg

File:Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2017 at 18:38:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Félix Nadar (Self-portrait) - uploaded, restored (original) and nominated by me. -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 19:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I just wonder if I should remove the white letters too? Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Great self-portrait and restoration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support wonderful picture & restoration + high EV. Great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very expressive portrait and a good restauration. --cart-Talk 10:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Btw, this may just be my monitor I'm using right now, but I see some green and purple patches over the image, whereas surely the photo is neutral brown. -- Colin (talk) 12:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

@Colin: I noticed that me too, this come from the version of the BNF, less visible because less contrasted on the orginal. This is likely a chemichal deterioration through age, I don't know how to fix that. But this is less visible on the version before the upload?!? Just for the record the file, since Gallica was file.jpg (Gallica) → transfered to my PC and then saved in file.tif on my pc → worked in photoshop file.psd → result saved in file.jpg → then uploadeded in Commons. Note that those patches are much less visible both in the psd version, but also in the result.jpg before to be uploaded here. So I don't know what happened between the .jpg on my pc and the .jpg in Commons, if that comes from Wikimedia server or from an issue with color space. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

I'm not aware that MediaWiki do any processing on your JPG so if you download the full size JPG it should be identical to what you uploaded. If you view a thumbnail (any reduced size version) then MediaWiki may replace your sRGB colour profile with a "TinyRGB" profile that Facebook developed that is smaller filesize but close enough to the true sRGB that differences should be small. When you are comparing the JPGs and saying they look different, are you using the same software? If you are comparing an image on Photoshop with an image on a browser, then it is likely the difference is the software. -- Colin (talk) 15:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

I see the jpg on Commons with my browser (IE) and the jpg on my pc with the Windows Photo Viewer, and the jpg seen with Windows Photo Viewer is very similar to the psd seen with photoshop.. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC) I just downloaded the jpg from Commons to my pc and compared with the former jpg, they are quite similar, then it may come from the browser. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Windows Photo Viewer is not colour managed so will neither respect the embedded colour profile in a JPG nor the colour profile you may have assigned/calibrated for your monitor. IE and Edge may respect the JPG profile but not your monitor. See User:Colin/BrowserTest. Photoshop and Lightroom provide the most accurate colours. -- Colin (talk) 21:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Question Do you know what year the original photograph is from? WClarke 18:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Gallica say between 1900 and 1910 Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 05:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People