Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Interior of The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands, Singapore.jpg

File:Interior of The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands, Singapore.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2019 at 06:45:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Interior of The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands, Singapore.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Interior of The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands, Singapore.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Singapore
•  Info created & uploaded by User:Basile Morin - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Let me say at the outset that this isn't my usual idea of beautiful architecture. However, I'd submit that it has its merits, and I think this photo is a really good artwork that can captivate the viewer with its many lines, planes, curves, shapes, levels, reflections, etc., etc. We probably should feature more photos of malls, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Gorgeous. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I like the effect of moving people being blurred and others staying sharp. – Lucas 12:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support It is a little dark, but that might be accurate. -- Colin (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Another good one from Singapore. Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 14:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! Singapore is really a nice place! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Even though it is doped. :-) (I got that comment on one of my FP noms, and I'm paying it forward.) --Cart (talk) 20:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

• Interesting. But this combination of colors is not that frequent in normal photography, then I read that article more as a compliment (and in your case also), because with film posters it's pretty sure professionals work hard to achieve this goal :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
• @W.carter: That was actually a stunning shot ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 03:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks, Ikan, for the nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

My pleasure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support; the shop signs are overexposed, and there's quite a lot of ghosting (but I understand, it's an expected result for longer exposure shots). ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 03:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 06:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support-- EATCHA (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Works better at full size. Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--BoothSift 06:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:17, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Lots of wow here... --Poco² 18:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Singapore