Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NorthBeach WillingaPoint Bawley.jpg

File:NorthBeach WillingaPoint Bawley.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2010 at 05:56:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:NorthBeach WillingaPoint Bawley.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NorthBeach WillingaPoint Bawley.jpg

•  Info all by 99of9 -- 99of9 (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support as nom. -- 99of9 (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose, dull light. --Aqwis (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for your review. I see what you mean. I've now uploaded a version with adjusted levels which brings out the texture better. --99of9 (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry, but while the edit made the picture look better, it didn't (and cannot) alter the light quality. --Aqwis (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

• Ok, then I didn't see what you mean! Can you explain what light quality is exactly? This was taken on a midsummer day in Australia - so I had plenty of light, but that's obviously not what you mean. Do you mean how diffuse/direct it is? If so, which are you after? --99of9 (talk) 10:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

• I suggest that you read [1]. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. --Aqwis (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for the link. Interesting read. The problem is that most of his specific recommendations (dawn, dusk, clearing/oncoming storm) change the behaviour of the people on the beach. The aim here was to include typical beach activities, and for that you need typical atmospheric conditions. The hunk in Speedo's for Durova would probably not be there at dusk :). --99of9 (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Great landscape, with some human presence. Colours, composition and contrast very good now IMO. --Cayambe (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support per Cayambe --Herby ^{talk thyme} 20:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The lower left corner is out of focus, but still a goog quality panorama of an interesting page--Mbz1 (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support per Mbz1 --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, IMO no wow. —kallerna™ 12:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per Aqwis. Nikopol (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas