Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nude stretching.jpg

File:Nude stretching.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2009 at 22:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Nude stretching.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nude stretching.jpg

•  Info created by Robert Swier - uploaded by Max Rebo Band - nominated by Econt (talk) -- Econt (talk) 22:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Econt (talk) 22:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Vignetting and too tight crop. →Diti the penguin — 23:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Diti comments.--Two+two=4 (talk) 23:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Diti also. Wiki ian 04:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop may be acceptable, vignetting is not. Lycaon (talk) 06:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop is a show stopper. I don't have any problem with vignetting, though. This is an artistic shot (desaturated as well). With those, vignetting is normal. -- JovanCormac 07:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Vignetting is a technical lens flaw, they should be corrected. Even if it was added for the purpose of being creative, it is also unnecessary retouching, which is against our current FP guidelines. →Diti the penguin — 21:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
    • How is it unnecessary retouching to leave the vignetting in? There are more justifications to keep vignetting than just being creative. One being to highlight the center of the frame. against our current FP guidelines is nonsense. --Dschwen (talk) 21:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
      • Vignetting as such is no sin of course. I find it rather poorly done here however: it merely touches the corners of the image as if the author was afraid of using it. Lycaon (talk) 05:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• On no, nudity!!!1!!eleven! Must make up reason for opposing! What could it be.. ..right Vignetting is always bad (I red that somewhere online, so it must be true!!!).. and crop.. ZOMG something of the main subject is cut off!! I mean that guy, didn't he look through the viewfinder?! Some advice: ALWAYS show the entire subject! If you take a step back or two I'm sure you can fit the whole girl in!!! --Dschwen (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support per above. --Dschwen (talk) 01:37, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Diti --kaʁstn 17:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Per Dschwen. --Lošmi (talk) 17:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Love the crop and the vignnetting!!! A fine nude. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Vignetting is no problem at all, and could even be considered as a quality here. -- MJJR (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop. —kallerna™ 11:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 09:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Muhammad (talk) 13:46, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment please state reason for opposition as a courtesy to the author/uploader. Lycaon (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

• Per Lycaon --Muhammad (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:24, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like the crop (it's suggestive), the vignetting is ok (I have nothing against it apart from where it shouldn't be), the pose and the model are not too exaggerated, overly sexed up, or touched up. Seems just right. Maedin\^talk 09:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support. I see the crop as this picture's biggest advantage. Airwolf (talk) 11:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)