Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sandvik bay in Brofjorden.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sandvik bay in Brofjorden.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2017 at 22:09:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
Info Not the kind of photo I normally do here but this is my favorite place to go when I need to wind down, so I thought I'd give it a try. When I came here this time, the rain was just moving away from the bay. All by me, -- cart-Talk 22:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Support -- cart-Talk 22:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)- Support The light orange/yellow clouds/reflection make this work. Very Serene. How many photos make up the panorama? PumpkinSky talk 01:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Eight photos, just like it says in the panorama template on the file's page. --cart-Talk 07:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:37, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Info Please look at the note - --Neptuul (talk) 06:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Neptuul, not quite sure what that was, could have been something from the photomerge or just sheets of rain since it was departing that way. It's gone now, thank you for noticing that. :) Some things show up in better contrast in the wiki software than in Photoshop or Lightroom. --cart-Talk 07:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment Large file and good composition but I found two slight stitching errors which should be solved without problems.See annotation.--Ermell (talk) 13:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Ah! I'll fix them tonight when I'm home again. Thanks for finding them. :) --cart-Talk 13:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose No Wow...a lake. And distorted too...sorry --LivioAndronico (talk) 17:07, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for voting. Just to put the record straight, it is not a lake but a horseshoe-formed bay in a fjord, so not deformed. The beach really is curved. I don't think that matters for your voting though, but the info may be relevant to others. :) --cart-Talk 17:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Probably i'm wrong, sorry --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support The small version on the nomination page doesn't do this one justice. It really needs to be viewed full screen and zoomed in to appreciate the many, many details that make for an compelling scene. There may be a little bit of posterization in the clouds at the top, just right of center, but if so it's pretty minor. — Rhododendrites talk | 23:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Nikhil B (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Weak support Maybe a bit too dark. Not 100% sure but it is definitely more support than oppose. -- Pofka (talk) 17:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Tilted - Benh (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Benh, better now? Adjusted -0.3 deg using the reflections to align, otherwise please be more specific. --cart-Talk 18:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- I guess u adjusted CCW (yes I meant CW tilted). Looks a bit better but still there in my view. And besides, the sky shows artefacts of wrong blending (not sure the exposure of the raw images were consistent). - Benh (talk) 16:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow, nothing extra... --Karelj (talk) 21:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of wow for me, also a bit grainy --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose posterization on sky, dull colors. I understand the main idea of the Author, but no WoW for me, sorry -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- No need to be sorry George, this image is already a goner.
I'm just amused by how many users show up at the very last hours to make sure this doesn't get promoted. --cart-Talk 20:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- No need to be sorry George, this image is already a goner.
Confirmed results:
