Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AvMalecon-LaHabanaCuba-04735.jpg

File:AvMalecon-LaHabanaCuba-04735.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2017 at 13:46:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:AvMalecon-LaHabanaCuba-04735.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AvMalecon-LaHabanaCuba-04735.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info all by me --Ezarateesteban 13:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment There is an oil stamp on the left, it isn´t a dust spot Ezarateesteban 13:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 13:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I uploaded a new version (however I reverted myself). This version have a noise fix, WB and shadow fix (How a good practice it could be done from the RAW). Nice picture from Cuba!. --The Photographer 15:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Another version processed from RAW, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban 15:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - I think this deserves a feature, and I didn't think so until I opened the file and looked at it at larger sizes. Good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral It is a good photo and an interesting idea but I want to move the camera more to the right. --cart-Talk 09:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support We haven't too much images from populist dictatorships countries where time stopped. These old carts and Habana pier are an icon. We need more images from Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea --The Photographer 10:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Though the right part is a bit leaning in, and I would like a bit more space at right, the image is very special with a spacious feel, color and composition are harmonious too. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose A QI definitely, but not special enough for FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per cart Poco² 08:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Daniel. lNeverCry 09:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral In spite of the vertical distortion and the lamppost's CAs I like it, especially the high key colors. So if this can be fixed - and the speck obove the boot - it deserves my support. --PtrQs (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi @PtrQs: I uploaded a new version without CA, thanks for you review!!, and I reduced a bit the vertical distortion, I uploaded the RAW version if you want to help me to fix the picture, Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 23:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Ezarate: I've checked the possibility of fixing the distortion. As this causes a cut on the right edge, I took your broader jpg-version from Feb. 8, 16:32. With this version a nearly rectlinear picture is possible without much loss of lampposts on the right. So if you don't want to take the very good 'Alt Version' with a nice warm WB by The Photographer from below, I could fix your problems. - BTW: how do you transfer/put raw-versions on Commons? --PtrQs (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@PtrQs: We can keep both versions IMHO so if you want to fix the picture go ahead, it´s a collaborative project so any help is welcome, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban 14:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

It took me a full hour of hard LR-work to find out, how The Photographer managed to create the alt-version (and I hope I've learned a lot along this way) but aside from a different rating of verticality it did not get any better. Espacially he managed to let the line of the road go rather slighty up than down, wich creates a positive impression, so I'll fully support this version. --PtrQs (talk) 14:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

OK for my last question. As I expected a 'raw'-file from your Sony, I've overseen the 'dng'-Raw file. --PtrQs (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

PtrQs: You can upload RAW on the WMF Labs here. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support the last version. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support the last version, although there still are 2 little specks: each at the end of the clouds left an right of the lamps of the center lamppost (see annotations). --PtrQs (talk) 14:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

 Done --The Photographer 14:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Alt version

•  Info I'm only adding this alt version because the author is acking for help and I'm sorry if the result is not the best. I applied over the raw file light compensation in shadows and lights, White balance, tonemaping balance, fix lens distortion, fix vertical distortions, remove dust spots, noise reduction and chromatic aberration fix, cut element distracting and remove oil spot and finally export in full jpeg quality. --The Photographer 13:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Definitively better. Yann (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

 Comment I decide to use the version final of The Photographer to obtain the best picture, thanks!! If anyone disagree with this please revert to me. Regards!! Ezarateesteban 23:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination We don't need now this alt The Photographer 13:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /--The Photographer 21:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC))

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

The chosen alternative is: File:AvMalecon-LaHabanaCuba-04735.jpg