Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia 02.jpg

File:Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2016 at 13:50:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created by Giorgi Balakhadze - uploaded by Giorgi Balakhadze - nominated by Giorgi Balakhadze -- g. balaxaZe★ 13:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- g. balaxaZe★ 13:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per above. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:29, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Beautiful but unsharp, as you'd expect of shooting something like this at f/2.2. Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment well, given the miniscule size of the camera's sensor (4mm diagonal), the f-stop as such is more than adequate. The lack of sharpness (at least when compared to more advanced photographic systems) is due to the sensor itself. This being said, the picture's still good enough imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support INeverCry 18:55, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Striking, especially that cloud shadow. Also the effort of getting these photos (reading the description) rivals this nom. w.carter-Talk 19:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lack of details. I also miss something special in this scenery. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support For me this image is very good. Perhaps we could look for lacks but we should not overdo. -- Spurzem (talk) 13:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I think this image is beautiful, poetic and deserves a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful but too unsharp for a 6 MP image. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 04:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

• The count is incorrect. There are 7 supporting votes and the vote is to feature. This is the first time I've seen a numerical miscount by FPCBot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

• There was a space in the weak support vote which may fool the bot. Jee 04:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)