Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campus WU EA DSC 1537w.jpg

File:Campus WU EA DSC 1537w.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2014 at 14:12:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Campus WU EA DSC 1537w.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campus WU EA DSC 1537w.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by --P e z i (talk) 14:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Info Campus of the Vienna University of Economics and Business, building EA (Executive Academy), planned by NO.MAD Arquitectos (Madrid), Welthandelsplatz 1, 2nd district of Vienna.
•  Support --P e z i (talk) 14:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive building, excellent photograph, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 20:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support per Jebulon --Kreuzschnabel 21:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting building. --Halavar (talk) 22:52, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks a bit washed out; could the contrast be increased? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for review. I've tried already to enhance contrast but that leads to blown highlights at the window framings. I had also the impression of washed out when looking at the windows on full res, but meanwhile I think this is just the special material used. Please have a look at the new version. --P e z i (talk) 10:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

• weak  Oppose a tiny bit oversaturated and underexposed, imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:20, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Question Thanks for review. Could you give me a hint where you see oversaturation (I didn't touch the settings)? If your impression comes from the foreground: This is not even artificial turf, this is just a synthetic mat. --P e z i (talk) 09:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment I did notice the synthetic mat which had appeared at bit suspicious at first. But still, I'd say the sky is somewhat too blue and dark. I suppose you've applied a polarizer here. So maybe it could help to desaturate the sky - this might also make the whole image a bit brighter. It might be worth a shot. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:43, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Info New version uploaded. Please Jebulon, Kreuz, Halavar and Martin Falbisoner reconsider your vote. --P e z i (talk) 14:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

• weak  Support Interesting. Though the image is imo even darker than before, increasing the contrast had the effect that the picture now does in fact work for me- --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --JLPC (talk) 15:34, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- ChristianFerrer 17:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:35, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment its a good documentation picture of this house, but for me, the crop is too narrow, not enough Wow.--Hubertl (talk) 10:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco² 10:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture