Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Leuste, Bäume im Nebel -- 2020 -- 5041.jpg

File:Dülmen, Leuste, Bäume im Nebel -- 2020 -- 5041.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2021 at 04:23:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Leuste, Bäume im Nebel -- 2020 -- 5041.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Leuste, Bäume im Nebel -- 2020 -- 5041.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fog
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 04:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 04:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Would prefer just a little more space at the top and bottom. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

• Sorry, the image isn't cropped. So there is no more space. But IMO it's good as it is. --XRay 💬 06:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, just doesn't move me. Daniel Case (talk) 23:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Sometimes you get a feeling quite early on whether a picture is a good candidate or not. In this case: "or not". Thank you for your reviews. --XRay 💬 06:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

• OK. I'll wait. --XRay 💬 15:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 11:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I think image is great. I dont miss some on top but should go wide. More grass on both side and tree in third rule, to make in it more panoramic. --Mile (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

• I think grass right and left isn't possible. There are structures of the trees behind and these can't continued. The rule of third is fulfilled with the trees. --XRay 💬 15:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support After looking a while at it in full size (without text etc. around it) this photo really moves me. A great image to depict grief and mourning, but also to intimate the consolation and comfort one can discover in silence and solitude. (Of course this is just my personal interpretation and definitely not the only or “correct” one; there are certainly other ways to see and to appreciate this image.) --Aristeas (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support I'm glad you didn't withdraw; it took me a while to get it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose love the double tree, love the fog, but the over-all composition does not quite convince me. --El Grafo (talk) 08:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 13:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice and interesting but something missing to me for FP, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Another image of trees in fog, I do not see here anything so special for FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 13:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, it is too much "just some trees in fog" and not enough "artistic minimalist". Forget rule-of-thirds. I think it would be better if there was more sky above and left. Without the little tree. Without the distracting green/yellow crop in the foreground. I think for such a simple motif, it needs to be a stronger composition and better choice of elements. -- Colin (talk) 16:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Muhammad (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Gallery changed to Natural phenomena#Fog.--MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:49, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Fog