Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Famille d’un Chef Camacan se préparant pour une Fête.jpg/2

File:Famille d’un Chef Camacan se préparant pour une Fête.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2023 at 05:51:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Famille d’un Chef Camacan se préparant pour une Fête.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Famille d’un Chef Camacan se préparant pour une Fête.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical
•  Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 05:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support. Wilfredor, on COM:FPC, clicking on nomination page leads to the old nomination page, not to this one. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done Thanks RodRabelo7 --Wilfredor (talk) 06:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment The usual naming scheme for re-nominations is “Featured picture candidates/File:<filename>/2”. We should use it here, too, because e.g. the {{Assessments}} relies on this scheme; adding the “2” instead to the filename will confuse the template, maybe also the bot and certainly people, including the poor FP housekeepers. Therefore I have renamed the nomination and updated the links. --Aristeas (talk) 06:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for catching that and making the necessary adjustments. I'll make sure to follow the standard naming scheme for re-nominations in the future to avoid any confusion --Wilfredor (talk) 11:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 14:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support ★ 10:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Question As it's a watercolour, should the image be as grainy as this? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

It's a painting done in two layers; the first is pointillism, and then it was colored over. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support And that's essentially what it looks like. Not a huge reproduction, but it's a small painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your question made me curious, Charles, and I asked a friend of me who is an expert in art history. The answer: High quality watercolor papers for artists usually are very textured. This texture can be visible in good photos/scans of watercolor paintings and that can make them look grainy, especially old ones. (Just Google “water color paper texture”.) So after all the grainy impression confirms the quality of the reproduction. --Aristeas (talk) 06:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

I was only curious as none of the Victorian watercolours on my walls look like this! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 17:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --imehling (talk) 19:54, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support，--Princess 🍵 Rosalina 18548 01:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical