Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Matthew Norman carriage clock with winding key.jpg

File:Matthew Norman carriage clock with winding key.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2017 at 17:18:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Matthew Norman carriage clock with winding key.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Matthew Norman carriage clock with winding key.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info Matthew Norman carriage clock with winding key. My shot. --Mile (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't like the centered composition, empty space on the left and the dark blue shapes in the background. A pure black BG would be much cleaner. – Lucas^T 17:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, but per Lucas. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose. For something shiny like this you're not going to have 0% overexposure, but still this is too much, especially on the columns on the right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose - If you get rid of the strange blue spots in the otherwise black background, I will reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Other option. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
• Moderate  Support - Not perfect, but seems good enough to me. What do you all think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I think we are far too sensitive about "overexposed" parts in a pic sometimes. The very bright and dark parts in an image is what creates the mood/drama/mystery, without it you get clinical catalogue photos with little wow. --cart-Talk 11:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support cart, all true, i was telling that before. I wouldnt go into shot, probably King like, in any case. First what i like, then i can combine other whishes. That image, without "overexposed" parts would seems very "dead", unwow or whatever. --Mile (talk) 12:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - better this way. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ezarateesteban 00:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

The chosen alternative is: File:Matthew Norman carriage clock.jpg