Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Niedertal, Tirol, Österreich.jpg

File:Niedertal, Tirol, Österreich.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2017 at 12:02:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Niedertal, Tirol, Österreich.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Niedertal, Tirol, Österreich.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created by Doronenko - uploaded by Doronenko - nominated by Doronenko -- Doronenko (talk) 12:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Doronenko (talk) 12:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful, and the erosion on the right side is really interesting: It looks like someone took a big bite out of the ground. Do you have any idea how recent that erosion is? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

• Doesn't look like erosion - a lateral glacial moraine I think. Charles (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose some disturbing burned out areas in the sky Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Some mistakes, but saw camera is older type, good anyway. --Mile (talk) 20:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too cloudy. Charles (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 02:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
•  weak oppose The image quality makes this unfeaturable to me, sorry -- Thennicke (talk) 02:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Some blown-out areas, but the overall wow factor is enough for me to overlook the technical issues. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Not perfect, but enough of it works. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Weak support This image is just ok, maybe excesive sharpening. BTW, I improved the sky noise, however, I reverted myself, if you are ok with this "fix", you could revert again to take my version on top of file history. --The Photographer 23:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I think this needs re-processing. --Laitche (talk) 14:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral Stunning light! But the quality is quite not up there even though older camera was used. Nice picture anyhow. --Ximonic (talk) 12:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Jee 14:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural