Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nowruz Zoroastrian (retouched).jpg

File:Nowruz Zoroastrian (retouched).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2015 at 10:43:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Nowruz Zoroastrian (retouched).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nowruz Zoroastrian (retouched).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created by Anatoly Terentiev, retouched and uploaded by MagentaGreen, nominated by Yann (talk) 10:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I think there is a potential here. Hopefully, editing fixed the issues mentioned in the previous nomination. -- Yann (talk) 10:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 12:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 10:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Kasir (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Reguyla (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Thanks for fixing CA. But it's really too soft for me to support, jpeg compression I'd say. Some good wildlife, sport and concert pictures get rejected here having MUCH more detail. Why should this have a special treatment? It is a stone with daylight, for a FP it should be razor sharp with twice the resolution we have now. --Kadellar (talk) 16:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Strongly per Kadellar.--Jebulon (talk) 22:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Alborzagros (talk) 03:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Samak (talk) 08:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Soft, below 4 megapixels despite static subject. Not FP to me. — Julian H.^✈ 20:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 07:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Farshid . Talk 14:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kadellar. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kadellar. --Xicotencatl (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Saghi (talk) 17:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose too soft. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Retouching can solve the flaws but never gain the quality itself (per others). --Laitche (talk) 18:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Thank you all for your comments and contributions. Obviously not good enough. Yann (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)