Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Replica of the Equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius in Rome (2).jpg

File:Replica of the Equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius in Rome (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2021 at 07:14:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Replica of the Equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius in Rome (2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Replica of the Equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius in Rome (2).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The background and foreground are too distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good to me. The background and foreground probably won't change for another thousand years. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just a QI. I struggle to find the wow here, sorry. The subject is a bit boring, and the composition too -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. Not only a good situational photo of that famous statue, the photo captures also something of the special “Rome at night” atmosphere. --Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The background and foreground derive from someone called Michelangelo --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 07:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile. Solid work but nothing outstanding. --Kreuzschnabel 08:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 19:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose The background is still too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 15:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support A bit soft in places but still FP Cmao20 (talk) 21:35, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Andrei (talk) 07:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just a QI. Where is the photographic "wow"? -- Colin (talk) 18:13, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)