Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sagrada Familia March 2015-1a.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2015 at 16:05:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lateral stained-glass window of the Sagrada Familia Cathedral in Barcelona, Spain
  •  Info Lateral stained-glass window of the Sagrada Familia Cathedral in Barcelona, Spain, by the Spanish Catalan architect Antoni Gaudí (1852-1926). -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Not beautiful or educational to me. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 17:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose. I'm going to disagree with Nobel's reasonings even if I agree with the vote. It is beautiful and it is educational to me. But again, the image quality is the issue.... And again, I think it's a missed opportunity due to the camera settings used. Why f/10?? You could probably use f/4 or f/5.6 without any loss of depth of field and then you could use ISO 125 instead of ISO 800. I don't mean to be a stickler for these things but camera settings matter. Also, it's unfortunate that the left quarter is completely blank. It's compositionally awkward. Diliff (talk) 18:24, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Its very interesting. Play of ligth, from dark to ligth, like renaissance. I think left dark part is good combined with rigth ligther part, maybe just some crop from above. Not QI, but its interesting. --Mile (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sure it’s interesting, but poorly composed. I agree with Diliff. Pointing the camera more to the right would show more play of light instead of the dark shade. --Kreuzschnabel 20:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I lay my eyes on this photo for minutes, seriously, it's a graceful place. Notwithstanding the photo has so many mistakes that creates a feeling of a waste... A lot of noise at left, (ISO 800, even with a D800); lack of sharpness in the stained glasses, and in the architectural sculptures; the perspective is a little bit weird also... (OBS: I'm wasting my English to reatin some new words :P)-- RTA 21:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support A very beautiful and moody photo which makes great use of light. I don't think the small technical issues are really a matter here. Maybe author could have gone more easy on NR (and choose better setting), but it's not like the points of it is in the details anyways. I agree that the left part brings nothing and probably may be removed with no regret. - Benh (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Diliff, but a really good photo nonetheless. — Julian H. 16:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I like it! --Tremonist (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose --Hubertl (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /KTC (talk) 22:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]