Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwanenstein, Lohme, Insel Rügen, 170422, ako (3).jpg

File:Schwanenstein, Lohme, Insel Rügen, 170422, ako (3).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2017 at 01:21:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Schwanenstein, Lohme, Insel Rügen, 170422, ako (3).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwanenstein, Lohme, Insel Rügen, 170422, ako (3).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created & uploaded by User:Code - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I find it enjoyable to look around at the various stones, and also, as has been noted on this board, long exposures of tides are quite beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support :-) --XRay ^talk 05:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support absolutely! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect! --Basotxerri (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Like one of those "here's how it's supposed to look" photos you see in camera magazines. Daniel Case (talk) 22:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you for the nomination, Ikan Kekek. I think this is the best one of my "Schwanenstein"-series (there are still some I didn't upload yet). There's an interesting (and sad) story about this rock, I wrote a summary of it on the file description page. You really should read it if you didn't yet. --Code (talk) 07:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

 Comment - I did. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Jee 11:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support A mysterious composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment What's going on here? The nom should have easily gathered 10 supporting votes days ago... FPC, mysterious as always --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Ha ha. There may be so many reasons. For me, some pictures are great in full size. But the thumbnail may not be attractive enough to tempt us to open in full size. Especially the dark ones. Jee 03:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

• Martin, I didn't go for this since, even if I like these long exposures, I like some substance in the water all the same. Like in this. I also followed Partick Smith some years ago and his water pics are usually more "tangible". Here the water looks too strange, like it is evaporating or if there is a methane gas leak nearby. But this is just my taste in these photos, so I won't drag this down by an 'oppose'. --cart-Talk 10:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural