Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:South Loop Chicago June 2015 001.jpg

File:South Loop Chicago June 2015 001.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2016 at 06:31:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:South Loop Chicago June 2015 001.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:South Loop Chicago June 2015 001.jpg

10

10

2980

3740

3000

4500

crop suggestion

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Yes, Sir! Good photo of contemporary architecture in context. The curved part of the building on the left reminds me of one of the better new buildings in Manhattan's Battery. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Do we need foreground? Charles (talk) 09:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice pic, but I find that my eyes get stuck on that big shadow and lines at the bottom of the pic, a crop might be in order. See note. --cart-Talk 12:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek, Charlesjsharp, and W.carter: I have cropped the bottom and uploaded it directly over the original. If anyone prefers the original then I'll revert and create an alt. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Cart's crop made the difference. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - No problem, I still support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Much better, but I'd do more, cropping to leave the board park in... Charles (talk) 09:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

  For me a main feature of the composition was the crisscrossing lines at the bottom, which is why I was loath to crop any of it out at the beginning. I think the current version strikes a reasonable balance between including the lines and getting rid of shadows. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Looks fine now, thanks! :) --cart-Talk 10:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 19:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Samsara (talk) 00:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition. --Laitche (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 21:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes