Commons:Undeletion requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:UR)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:UNDEL • COM:UR • COM:UND • COM:DRV

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.
  • If some information is missing in the deleted image description, you may be asked some questions. It is generally expected that such questions are responded in the following 24 hours.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Projects that accept fair use

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.
  • Do not post e-mail or telephone numbers to yourself or others.
  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

Watch View Edit

File:WH40K Corvus Space Marine.png

Check the author's page, he has a note saying he has released it under Creative Commons.

http://www.coolminiornot.com/422889

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's still Games Workshop Space Marine figurine, even if the coloring is released under a free license.--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[]

@Prosfilaes: Games Workshop's lawyers have explicitly stated that they do not claim copyright over third-party photos of their minis. Kurzon (talk) 15:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[]

GamesWorkshopLogoStacked.svg
Games Workshop has officially stated that it does not consider that photographs of their miniature models taken by members of the public, hobbyists and customers constitute intellectual property owned by Games Workshop. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Warhammer AoS Lind.jpg.

Deutsch | English | español | français | galego | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | українська | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:GamesWorkshop .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Pictogram voting info.svg Info The DR is still open. Ankry (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Peace and Friendship stadium 2014.JPG

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Peace and Friendship Stadium; this had valid fair uses on various Wikipedia pages (as the depiction of an object which was directly discussed in the relevant articles); and the closer of that discussion did not react to my request to spare this bureaucracy, so there you have it. This should be restored and moved to relevant Wiki as appropriate; I assume that one can trace back from which pages on other encyclopedias than the English one this was removed (where it also was likely fair use), likely via the edits of the Commons bot. RandomCanadian (talk) 04:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @RandomCanadian: Commons does not accept Fair Use, see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 07:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@Ankry: This is not a request to undelete this for use on Commons. This is a request to restore it in a temporary fashion so it can be moved to Wikipedia where fair use is accepted. RandomCanadian (talk) 11:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[]
Symbol support vote.svg Support temporary undeletion. But @RandomCanadian: , enwiki no longer applies fair use for images of unfree buildings from no FOP countries. Enwiki applies U.S. freedom of panorama for such buildings, thus w:Template:FoP-USonly. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Restored temporarily -- please advise when this has been moved. Please do not close this UnDR without deleting the file. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[]

I see there are other Wikis where this image is also used. I've restored a copy on english WP under a slightly different title ("File:Peace and Friendship stadium 02 03 2014.JPG"). Noting the others for the record in case the other wikis also want to use it:
Extended content

Usage on az.wikipedia.org

Usage on kk.wikipedia.org

Usage on mni.wikipedia.org

Usage on ro.wikipedia.org

Usage on sr.wikipedia.org

Usage on tr.wikipedia.org

Usage on uk.wikipedia.org

RandomCanadian (talk) 23:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[]
Additional note: mind doing the same treatment for File:Faliro_Sport_Pavillion.jpg and File:OAKA_Olympic_Velodrome.jpg (found via the history of w:Venues of the 2004 Summer Olympics)? Same considerations apply. RandomCanadian (talk) 00:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@RandomCanadian: ensure that all of them must be used. The fact that enwiki has accepted original-resolution images of unfree international buildings from no-FOP countries does not mean enwiki is an indefinite host for all images of unfree buildings, as it is not a media repository. Thus there are only four Burj Khalifa images there and a single image of Burj Al Arab. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@JWilz12345: These all seem to be related to buildings and venues from the 2004 Olympics ([1] shows the Faliro pavillion being removed from multiple pages, including the page about the venue itself; [2] idem for the velodrome). RandomCanadian (talk) 02:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@RandomCanadian: in such case, then I Symbol support vote.svg Support undeletions of the two other files. Be sure to tag them with en:Template:FoP-USonly once they are transferred at enwiki. German Wikipedia also does seem to allow unfree buildings of no-FOP countries, but I cannot remember what is their relevant tag of it. Unsure about other Wikipedias though. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Perfect Dark Logo.png

This is another in the series of User:EugeneZelenko deleting logos I uploaded without notification or discussion. I think in this case (again) the judgement was poor as there are solely text elements in the logo. Otherwise, I wouldn't have uploaded it here. Matt (talk) 16:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The font itself may not be copyrightable, but the brushed metal effect as seen here should be sufficient for the entire logotype to be above the threshold of originality. Anyhow, I agree that this should not have been deleted without a proper discussion. De728631 (talk) 14:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Although Rare is a subsidiary of Microsoft, it is a British company, so the UK's law applies. The UK has a specific copyright for typography and also a low ToO so this almost certainly has a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]


 Not done: as per De728631 and Jim. --Yann (talk) 19:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lugaru Logo.png

User:EugeneZelenko deleted this logo without notification or discussion. This is such a clear case of a text base logo, it is even from an Open Source project, so it could be licensed otherwise as well if that is required. I now assume bad faith and demand User:EugeneZelenko's rights to be revoked. He should still be able to make deletion requests, but not be judge and executioner in one person. Matt (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The logo in question can be seen here. Although Wikipedia claims that the game is licensed under GPL and CC-by-SA-3.0, I could not find any evidence for such licenses. The logo, however, seems to be below the threshold of originality in the US, so we may undelete it. Deleting this speedily instead of opening a deletion discussion may have been bad judgement by Eugene Zelenko, but bad faith is something entirely else, and this is not the place either to raise a request for desysop. De728631 (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree that this appears to be an error on Eugene's part as pure text logos do not have copyrights in the USA and this is a US company. However, I see no reason whatever to suspect bad faith. Please remember that Commons gets around 10,000 new images every day. Around 1,500 or them must be deleted for one reason or another and a handful of active Administrators do must of that work, so we work very fast and occasionally make mistakes. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]


✓ Done: as per De728631 and Jim. --Yann (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Jenny and Eddies Cover Photo.jpg

Hi there recently an image from the page for Jenny & the Eddies ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_%26_the_Eddies ) article was deleted. I ask for it to be undeleted because permissions had been given following a long series of emails with the writer of the book and the person who actually took the photo. See below for the last one. Please let me know what else I can do to get the photo put back up again.

Re: [Ticket#2021071910003678}Jenny and the Eddies Wki

Dear Sharron, thanks for your permission and the attached photo. I loaded it over the previous version on Wikimedia, since the resolution is way better. Your permission has been added to the file page. Please check that the file description contains the correct author attribution you desire. If you have any concerns, please respond to this email. Thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons.

Yours sincerely, Otto Ottensen ---

05.08.2021 11:47 (Europe/Berlin) - Sharron Jackman schrieb:

Hello there Richard, Greg and Otto

>Yes, it was me who took the photo of Dr Clinghan - I have copied and pasted, changing Rich's name for mine, the following ... but have also attached the photograph (overkill? never mind you are free to use it

:))

I hereby affirm that I am Sharron Jackman the creator of the media work as shown here (attached and below link)

File:Richard Clinghan.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realitylink (talk • contribs) 21:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I looked through the history and what is above up to the headline File:Jenny and Eddies Cover Photo.jpg is all one request. If I read it correctly, Sharron Jackman took the photograph of the subject book's author, Richard Clinghan. That's fine, but entirely irrelevant to the question of restoration of the subject file, which is the cover of a children's book. In order to restore the image of the book cover, we will need a free license from the actual copyright holder, which will usually be the book's publisher but might be the illustrator who created the cover. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Deputy Chief Justice Solomon Waktolla presiding the Bench.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The reason behind the removal of your pictures is that the Flicker account has zero followers, zero following and no viewers thus creating the notion that it may be a fake account. this time people are viewing the account and following about 140 profiles.it isn't a fake account. it is genuine and no misrepresentation is involved. Hence i kindly request for the undeletion of this image. Nagenya (talk) 00:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Solomon Areda Waktolla- Harvard Law School graduation.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The reason behind the removal of your pictures is that the Flicker account has zero followers, zero following and no viewers thus creating the notion that it may be a fake account. this time people are viewing the account and following about 140 profiles.it isn't a fake account. it is genuine and no misrepresentation is involved. Hence i kindly request for the undeletion of this image. Nagenya (talk) 01:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Blacked-out images

Per input by Kai Burghardt at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Blacked out versions of images relying on FoP in France. No copyright concerns on blacked-out versions of images. To quote their input: To qualify as a derivative work, you need to create a work. A solid black shape is not a work. There is hardly any creative/artistic process involved in creating that. Even if you claim it was a work, to be derived there still must be recognizable features, discernible clues of the original work present. Without any copyrightable traces of the source work, no violation..

In terms of scope, as these come from no-FOP countries, these are excellent illustrations on one of the effects of having no FOP in a country: censorship just to respect artists' / architects' copyrights.

From the Philippines

I excluded those whose mother files are suspected copyvios, and those whose buildings are from pre-1972 era. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)

From UAE
From Luxembourg

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Plenty of photos to illustrate this subject at Category:Blacked out versions of images relying on FoP. There is no real reason to add another 10 photos, 100 photos or 10 million photos of a black cube. Thuresson (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@Thuresson: but there is nothing specific to the Philippines. All come from other countries. We need demonstrations about the disadvantage of having no FOP in our country. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]
This seems reasonable. But I do not think all 13 are needed for them. Do you intend to use all of them? Ankry (talk) 14:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@Ankry: yep. Off-wiki on social media (of course, complying with attribution conditions). I support not restoring the UAE and Luxembourg ones. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]
Plus I may use several of the Philippine-related images on Tagalog Wikipedia to illustrate the lack of freedom of panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@JWilz12345: Please add File:Hand of epigyny 2 Blacked Out.jpg to undeletion request. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@JWilz12345: And when files are undeleted, will you add the category of countries without freedom of panorama to User:JWilz12345/FoP? Ox1997cow (talk) 15:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@Ox1997cow: my userspace subpage is intended to illustrate those from countries with FOP, excluding those without FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Lion de l'Atlas terrassant un mouflon. 1937.jpg

Also:

Bonjour, je suis Christian Eludut, l'auteur du livre "Le monde animal dans l'art décoratif des années 30 Paul Jouve , Gaston Suisse " ISBN 978-2-9529802-0-3. Tous les documents publiés sur les pages wikipédia par moi (chautard) "gaston suisse" et Paul Jouve proviennent de l'ayant droits de ces 2 artistes Monsieur Dominique Suisse fils de Gaston Suisse. Concernant les photos du studio Harcourt elles furent réalisées avant 1950. Bien cordialement

--Chautard (talk) 12:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose That may be, but we have no way here of knowing who User:Chautard actually is. Also, the fact that the heirs have licensed the paintings for use in a book does not mean that they have given you a license that allows you to freely license the images for use by anybody anywhere for any purpose. Licenses for use in a book are almost always limited to just that. Therefore, in order for these to be restored, either the heirs must freely license them using VRT or you must prove to a VRT volunteer that you have the right to freely license them. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Brizzyimg1.jpg

file is original Ugloud (talk) 21:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ugloud. This does not appear to be in the project scope of Commons. De728631 (talk) 22:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Veterinary_caduceus.jpg

This image is used in almost every veterinarian's office in North America. Therefore, it very likely is in the public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banjodog (talk • contribs) 22:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We need evidence that it is in fact in the public domain because the depiction of the caduceus is not trivial and may be copyrighted. The fact that it is widely used may also result from the design being frequently sold to veterinarians in North America. De728631 (talk) 22:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[]
  • @Banjodog: Hint: you may try eg. to find an evidence that it was used in US before 1978 without copyright notice. Ankry (talk) 11:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:STARSABAH Logo.svg

1. Added this logo to wikimedia commons because it only can be used in English wikipedia.

2. This logo is for malaysia political party and it must and be used in Malay Wikipedia too.

3. This logo only being uploaded for malay wikipedia page. (Politic Malaysia Only).

Great Jesselton (talk) 04:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Pictogram voting info.svg Info "Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons" at en:File:Homeland Solidarity Party Flag.svg. Thuresson (talk) 05:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Great Jesselton: In order to host the logo in Wikimedia Commons it must freely licensed by the logo copyright holder (assuming: the party). And the uploader is required to provide an evidence of free license. If Malay Wikipedia community accepts Fair Use logos, it is up to them; but Fair Use images cannot be hosted in Commons. Ankry (talk) 11:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Huma Anwar.jpg

Good Morning, There is a page with name of Huma Anwar in Urdu language, this is the related pic there. Please don't delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Najman (talk • contribs) 06:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Najman: In order to undelete you need to refer to Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Huma Anwar providing information where a free license has been granted by the photographer. Ankry (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Altaf Fatima.jpg

Good Morning, There is a page with name of Altaf Fatima in Urdu and English language, this is the related pic there. Please don't delete it. I never mentioned that it is my work. So how can it be the violation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Najman (talk • contribs) 06:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • The initial upload contains information that you declared this to be your own work. If the photo is not your work, then you are not authorized to grant a license. An attempt to grant a license while not being authorized to do so is just copyright violation. And you are required to provide a free license evidence in such cases. Ankry (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Yes, because I took it from her (Altaf Fatima's) personal archives, it's a free content. I misunderstood by "who owns the work" thing and mentioned it's my work, thinking that I've got it. But it's a free content being used on her published books also, very few of her pictures are available, so I request you not to delete it, please. Najman (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Copyright to a photo by default is owned by the photographer. Unless transferred explicitely in a written contract or due to operation of law. If copyright transfer appeared, we need an evidence of it. Owning a photo print does not grant any right to license it. Ankry (talk) 12:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Files by User:Exxelia Groupe

Please undelete

We have permission per Ticket:2021101510005801.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]


✓ Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 12:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Makale CAMARA.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The picture is of Makale CAMARA president of the political party FAN. I am Mac Amara Bangoura, in charge of International Relations of the party. The picture is part of a photo shoot done by the party in preparation of the October 18 2020 Guinean Presidential Election of which Mrs. Camara was a contending candidate. So it's normal that the picture was used by https://guineevote.org/team_members/makale-camara/ since she was a candidate. However, that does not mean that the website owns the picture. On the contrary the website freely used pictures that were posted on the party's Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/lepartifan/photos/a.120400996382579/172294701193208/?type=3 So please undelete it.

Thanks,

Mac Amara Bangoura - AmorozoB AmorozoB (talk) 10:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

@AmorozoB: Wa cannot verify your identity on-wiki and, per policy, {{Own}} cannot be used for photos that were (a) already published, or (b) not uploaded by the photographers themselves. Please ask the photo copyright holder (or their official representative) to send free license permission to VRT. Please, note also that if the copyright holder is not the photographer, we may need also an evidence of copyright transfer . Ankry (talk) 10:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]
@Ankry: I am a little confused because I am the one who took this picture and there is no copyright associated with the photo. I went to the website were the picture has been published and i don't see any claim from them that they own the photo (because they don't) and there is no copyright associated with it there. Or was it previously uploaded on Wikipedia? Or is it just because they have published it on their website? I just want to know where that copyright you claim exist is so i can contest and correct it since i took the photo and represent the party. Plus there is no licence on that photo.--AmorozoB (talk) 15:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]
In most jurisdictions, copyright is automatically granted to the photographer once they release the camera to make a photo. So as you are the photographer and the file has been used elsewhere without a free licence, we need a permission from you by email to verify your authorship. Please see COM:VRT for instructions. De728631 (talk) 20:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ဘဒ္တကောဝိဒဘိဝံသ.jpg

I am sure this file is no need to be deleted. We just need to rename it with the correct spelling. Please let this jpg be renamed. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 117.18.230.70 (talk) 13:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Procedural close, file is not deleted. This is not the forum to propose a change of name. Thuresson (talk) 15:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]
Deleted. File from Facebook. Please upload the original image, or ask the copyright holder to send a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 19:12, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:V-RTI-logo.png

Hi,

I have added this Logo on behalf of Round Table International (round-table.org). It has a copyright on it, but I have the right to use it for Wikipedia. Is there a way to undelete it?

Thomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas.Menneckemeyer (talk • contribs) 14:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

@Thomas.Menneckemeyer: Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Note that the permission should be for a free license, i.e. a license which allows any use for anybody. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Topless on cruise ship.jpg

Deleted as out of scope, with no discussion, based on a mass deletion request. This happened even though a specific discussion gave specific reasons that the file is in scope and was closed as "keep". There are no images currently available on Commons that claim to depict pregnancy stretch marks. Brianjd (talk) 15:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Category:Stretch marks has plenty of photos, including a photo of Travis Walls. Thuresson (talk) 16:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Ammerland Mühlen-Route.svg

--SilverJapan2006 (talk) 15:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

@SilverJapan2006: This is a complex logo. So we need a formal written permission from the copyright holder. If you have this, please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:PiramideUPACIFICO Wikipedia.gif

The image is found in the following wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PiramideUPACIFICO.gif

HarveyPrototype (talk) 17:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)HarveyPrototype Oct. 25 2021[]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Commons:Fair use. Thuresson (talk) 18:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[]

File:Demiromantic Pride Flag.svg

This file is still used in Wikipedia interwikis and has its own wikidata item. YT0 (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[]

Bonifacio Monument images by 14macgirl

Reasons:

  1. The monument is in public domain here (Philippines) as a monument whose copyright had expired, by virtue of Act 3134 (30 years protection from registration), with no evidence of Tolentino's renewal.
  2. Proof: discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bonifacio National Monument (Caloocan City)#Files in Category:Bonifacio National Monument (Caloocan City) 2.
  3. These two files were put into doubt the "own work" claims as per the closing admin at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-09#File:Andres Bonifacio Monument.jpg. However, I am sure that 14macgirl (talk · contribs)'s photos are fine; they have one image that is decent enough (File:Rizal Monument.JPG). Their two other uploads — File:Magellan's Cross.jpg and File:Manila Cathedral .jpg — don't return results on TinEye and reverse Google Images search.

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[]