Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:VIC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
33,365 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
29,677 (88.9%) 
Undecided
  
1,680 (5%) 
Declined
  
2,008 (6%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Al Hirschfeld.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
GMGtalk on 2018-12-05 13:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Al Hirschfeld in 2000
Reason:
Despite being born in 1903, it doesn't appear that Hirshfeld began gaining notoriety until the late 20s or early 30s, and saw his fame peak in the late 20th century. So there appear to be few free images of him available. This is one of a growing set of photos uploaded by User:Surtsicna in coordination with the photographer. It's high quality, with good focus and composition, and is overall very humanizing for the subject in a way that just makes you wanna give him a hug. -- GMGtalk
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very beautiful image and excellent comment. It would be interesting to know the year of the shooting and to add it to the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Edit the scope accordingly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Done? I'm not sure I understand. It is the best image of the subject, and it is the only image in 2000. Does that constitute a scope? Or is that overly specific? GMGtalk 01:10, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
  • It's sometimes been argued that it's too specific, but that's what Archaeo was asking for. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
E 499 0093, Brno výstaviště 8.7.1989 (Czechoslovakia).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Daniel Holý (talk) on 2018-12-09 14:15 (UTC)
Scope:
CS Class E 499.0
Open for review.
Bemberg Fondation Toulouse - Portrait du Prince Auguste Frederick, duc de Brunswick-Luneburg, troisième fils de Georges III - Henri-Pierre Danloux - 1794 Inv.1148.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-10 06:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait du Prince Auguste Frederick, duc de Brunswick-Luneburg, troisième fils de Georges III by Henri-Pierre Danloux, Fondation Bemberg, Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm not very impressed with this painting, based on the reproduction, but he and it seem to be notable enough to be worth a VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:40, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Bettel wegekreuz2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-12-11 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross near Bettel, Luxembourg
Used in:
lb:Lëscht vun de Weekräizer zu Lëtzebuerg
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 20:40, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Koerperich Schlossstrasse 8.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-12-11 21:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Historical building Schlossstr. 8 in Körperich, Germany (view SW).
Used in:
de:Niedersgegen
Open for review.
Theretra indistincta MHNT CUT 2010 0 288 Cooktown Australia male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-12 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Theretra indistincta moutned specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 16:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Capitole Toulouse - Grand escalier - Philippe de Bertier.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-12 06:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Bust of Philippe de Bertier, Capitole de Toulouse

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bemberg Fondation Toulouse - Nu au tub - 1903 - Pierre Bonnard 44x50 Inv.2147.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-12 06:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Nu au tub (Naked in the tub) by Pierre Bonnard, Fondation Bemberg Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Lovely and useful. I changed the English name to "Naked at the tub", which is a direct translation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:26, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Correct translation is 'in the tub'. Charles (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Gavia arctica MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.36.5.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-12-12 07:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Gavia arctica (Black-throated loon), eggs

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 16:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Theatre Gyumri.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Armenak Margarian (talk) on 2018-12-12 15:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Drama Theatre in Gyumri, Armenia

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Schaffhausen - Schwabentor - Tower clock.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-12-12 16:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Schwabentor Schaffhausen, "Kosmos" by Carl Roesch, with tower clock

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pollia wagneri 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-12-12 16:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Pollia wagneri (Wagner's Goblet), shell
Open for review.
Mainz 10 Pfg 1921.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-12-12 18:19 (UTC)
Scope:
10 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote, Mainz, 1921
Used in:
Money of Germany
Open for review.
Theretra indistincta MHNT CUT 2010 0 288 Cooktown Australia female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-13 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Theretra indistincta mounted specimen female dorsal
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Barcelona Cathedral Interior - Blessed Pere Tarrés by Montserrat García Rius.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-13 06:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Barcelona Cathedral Interior - Blessed Pere Tarrés by Montserrat García Rius
Open for review.
Capitole Toulouse - Salle des Illustres - L'entrée à Toulouse du pape Urbain II en 1096 par Benjamin Constant.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-13 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Capitole de Toulouse, L'entrée à Toulouse du pape Urbain II en 1096, by Benjamin Constant
Open for review.
Tachybaptus ruficollis MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.37.9.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-12-13 06:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Tachybaptus ruficollis (little grebe) eggs
Open for review.
Waltensburg-Vuorz. Ruïne Burg Kropfenstein (Casti Grotta) (actm) 06.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2018-12-13 07:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Burg Kropfenstein Detail ruïne.
Open for review.
Daphnis nerii MHNT CUT 2010 0 290 Aurangabad Maharashtra India male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-14 06:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Daphnis nerii mounted specimen male dorsal
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
École supérieure des beaux-arts de Toulouse - Façade - l'Architecture par Abel Fabre.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-14 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Allégorie de l'Architecture (Allegory of Architecture) by Abel Fabre, École supérieure des beaux-arts de Toulouse.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Musée des arts décoratifs - Vanité au crâne - Jan van Kessel - Collection de la Baronne Henri de Rothschild Inv.25794.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-14 06:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Vanité au crâne (Vanity with a skull) by Jan van Kessel (I), Musée des arts décoratifs, Paris
Open for review.
Podiceps cristatus MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.38.1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-12-14 07:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Podiceps cristatus eggs (great crested grebe) eggs
Open for review.
Close wing position of Yasoda tripunctata Hewitson, 1863 – Branded Yamfly.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 14 December 2018
Scope:
Yasoda tripunctata, (Branded Yamfly), ventral
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Would be more valuable if added to Wikipedia article. Charles (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Charles is right, perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Close wing position of Jamides pura Moore, 1886 – White Cerulean DSC 1923.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 14 December 2018
Scope:
Jamides pura, (White Cerulean), ventral
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Would be more valuable if added to Wikipedia article. Charles (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - You're putting the cart before the horse. If it's more valuable, we should make it a VI, thereby encouraging people to use the image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Only picture of this butterfly alive on Commons, apparently, and therefore, obviously useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Close wing position of Halpe zema Hewitson, 1877 – Zema Banded Ace DSC 1917.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 14 December 2018
Scope:
Halpe zema, (Zema Banded Ace), ventral
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Would be more valuable if added to Wikipedia article. Charles (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Best in scope by far, which, except for the obvious usefulness, is basically the only thing we're supposed to judge here. We debated a requirement for nominees to already be in Wikipedia articles and voted it down. Please stop trying to fight a rear-guard battle on that. Add it to a Wikipedia article if you feel inspired to do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Close wing position of Thaumantis diores Doubleday, 1845 – Jungleglory.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 14 December 2018
Scope:
Thaumantis diores, (Jungle glory), ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Would be more valuable if added to Wikipedia article. Charles (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
2 Islington Square, Liverpool.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-12-14 09:45 (UTC)
Scope:
2 Islington Square, Liverpool
Used in:
en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L3, Wikidata:Q26568810
Open for review.
Liverpool Dock exit, Queensway Tunnel.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-12-14 09:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Liverpool Dock exit, Queensway Tunnel
Used in:
en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L3
Open for review.
Pushkin statue.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Armenak Margarian (talk) on 2018-12-14 10:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Pushkin in Gyumri, Armenia
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I suggest to include the category of the statue instead of the person in the scope. --MB-one (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Thank you.--Armenak Margarian (talk) 17:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Porsche GT2 RS, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2769).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
MB-one (talk) on 2018-12-14 12:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Porsche 991 GT2 RS - front
Used in:
de:Porsche 911 GT2, zh:保时捷911 GT2
Open for review.
Koppie foam grasshopper (Dictyophorus spumans spumans) nymph.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-12-14 18:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Dictyophorus spumans spumans (Koppie foam grasshopper) nymph
Open for review.
Koppie foam grasshopper (Dictyophorus spumans spumans).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-12-14 18:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Dictyophorus spumans spumans (Koppie foam grasshopper) lateral view
Open for review.
Koppie foam grasshopper (Dictyophorus spumans spumans) 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-12-14 18:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Dictyophorus spumans spumans (Koppie foam grasshopper) dorsal view
Open for review.
FAB 1 Thunderbirds car 2004.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-12-14 20:54 (UTC)
Scope:
FAB 1 Thunderbirds car from 2004 film - front
Used in:
en:Thunderbirds (2004 film)
Open for review.
Land Rover series IIa 'Pink Panther' SAS desert car 1968.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-12-14 20:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Land Rover series IIa 'Pink Panther' 1968 SAS desert car in the British Motor Museum
Used in:
en:Land Rover series
Open for review.
Zerynthia polyxena MHNT CUT 2013 3 8 Male Ventre Montferrier-sur-Lez.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-15 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Zerynthia polyxena mounted specimen male ventral
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
La rue Sainte-Anne (Toulouse) - N°22 Hôtel Bernet - Le porche.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-15 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel Bernet, in Toulouse, the porch

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bemberg Fondation Toulouse - Le Pont des Saints-Pères - Pierre Bonnard vers 1910 34.2x56.8 Inv.2004.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-12-15 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Le Pont des Saints-Pères by Pierre Bonnard, Fondation Bemberg Toulouse
Open for review.
Podiceps nigricollis MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.39.2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-12-15 06:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Podiceps nigricollis (black-necked grebe) eggs
Open for review.
Bergtocht van Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië) 40.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2018-12-15 06:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Chiesa dei Santi Filippo e Giacomo (Cogolo) Church tower.
Open for review.
Southern masked weaver (Ploceus velatus) male building nest composite.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-12-15 09:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus velatus (Southern masked weaver) male building nest
Open for review.
Slate sprites (Pseudagrion salisburyense) mating.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-12-15 09:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Pseudagrion salisburyense (Slate sprites) mating
Open for review.
Common fiscal (Lanius collaris subcoronatus).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-12-15 09:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Lanius collaris subcoronatus (Common fiscal)
Open for review.
Paris Motor Show 2018, Paris (1Y7A1960).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
MB-one (talk) on 2018-12-15 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Peugeot 205 GTI 1.6 - front
Used in:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?target=Paris+Motor+Show+2018%2C+Paris+%281Y7A1960%29.jpg&title=Special%3AGlobalUsage&limit=50
Open for review.
Ehrenbreitstein 25 pfg Brentano.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-12-15 17:30 (UTC)
Scope:
25 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote (1921) of Ehrenbreitstein (Germany), RV: C. Brentano.
Used in:
Money of Germany
Open for review.
50pfg-malente.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-12-15 17:37 (UTC)
Scope:
50 Pfennig "Notgeld" banknote of Malente (Germany) (1920).
Used in:
Money of Germany
Open for review.
Cancellaria reticulata 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-12-15 20:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Cancellaria reticulata (Common Nutmeg), shell
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

   
Garden acraea butterfly (Acraea horta) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2015-12-11 11:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea horta (Garden acraea) male, dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 20:40, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Garden acraea (Acraea horta).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-12-14 18:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea horta (Garden acraea) male dorsal
Open for review.
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.