Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:VIC)
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
29,893 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
26,428 (88.4%) 
Undecided
  
1,556 (5.2%) 
Declined
  
1,909 (6.4%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Tinamus major MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.2.3.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-02-16 17:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Tinamus major egg blue of (great tinamou)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Seems most useful. I suppose the different color of these eggs is simply a variant, like brown vs. white chicken eggs? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - In the collection it is the only egg of this species. --Ercé (talk) 06:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Do you have any idea which color is more common? Should we have two separate scopes for each color of tinamus eggs? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentSorry, but I do not see why we should separate "deviant" colors from common colors-which we do not know; it is precisely the interest of this remarkable collection of eggs! --82.237.200.214 20:13, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Of course the photo is valuable! That's not the question. We have different categories for different varieties of shells of the same species and for different subspecies of the same bird, for example. And I could well imagine that we would want different scopes for white and brown chicken eggs. So my question remains. If this is the typical color for this bird's eggs, we can simply promote this photo under the given scope and give a variant scope for the other photo. But is this color most typical? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - If I understand, and the answer is in your questions ... sorry but I do not have another egg of this kind to compare (I repeat) and I do not venture to categorize at random! --Ercé (talk) 07:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Paeonia 'Duchesse de Nemours'. Locatie, De Kruidhof 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2018-02-17 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Paeonia 'Duchesse de Nemours' ( peony) Flower.
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - I find it hard to choose one photo as best in scope, but why do you think this one is best? The flower is certainly smaller in this photo, as shown on its file page, than in various other photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
    • Answer: afterwards I think, maybe File: Paeonia 'Duchesse de Nemours'. Location, De Kruidhof 01.jpg is better.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jannatul Nayeem Avril, Dhaka 2017 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2018-02-18 15:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Jannatul Nayeem Avril
Used in:
See Global usage
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Mazda Koeru IAA2015.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2018-02-18 23:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mazda Koeru
Used in:
de:Mazda CX-4, fr:Mazda Koeru, ja:マツダ・CX-4, ru:Mazda CX-4, zh:馬自達CX-4
Reason:
It's unlikely to get a better shot of this model anytime soon -- Alexander-93 (talk)
Open for review.
Mazda Koeru IAA2015 Heck.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2018-02-18 23:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mazda Koeru - rear
Used in:
de:Mazda CX-4, fr:Mazda Koeru, ja:マツダ・CX-4, zh:馬自達CX-4
Reason:
It's unlikely to get a better shot of this model anytime soon -- Alexander-93 (talk)
Open for review.
Reformierte Kirche Molinis in Graubünden (Zwitserland) 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2018-02-19 06:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Reformierte Kirche Molinis Reformierte Kirche. Main entrance.
Open for review.
Prevert-Alassio.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2018-02-19 08:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Muretto di Alassio: signature of Jacques Prévert
Used in:
br:Jacques Prévert, fr:Jacques Prévert, it:Jacques Prévert,, tr:Jacques Prévert, etc.
Open for review.
Wey VV7 S at IAA 2017 back IMG 0454.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2018-02-19 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Wey VV7 - rear
Used in:
de:Wey VV7
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Wey P8 Back IMG 0435.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2018-02-19 09:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Wey P8
Used in:
de:Wey (Automarke), de:Wey P8
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Onésime Reclus Nadar GALLICA.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-02-19 18:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Onésime Reclus, portrait photograph
Used in:
fr:Onésime Reclus
Reason:
Alone in scope. Very good quality portrait of this geographer, famous for being the inventor of the word "francophonie". By Nadar, restored by me. Brother of Armand Reclus (above). In use, without geocode as it is a studio portrait. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 19:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Daimler Grafton Phaeton 1897 - rear.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-02-19 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Daimler Grafton Phaeton (registration mark AD 1897) - rear three-quarters
Used in:
British Motor Museum, en:Phaeton body
Open for review.
Canal de l'Ourthe à Poulseur - Ourthe's river at Poulseur (Belgium).JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
PJDespa (talk) on 2018-02-19 22:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Canal lock in Poulseur (old canal lock)
Used in:
Ourthe canal, Project of canal to link Meuse to Moselle
Reason:
This picture has an historical and technical interest : see Project of canal to link Meuse to Moselle. -- PJDespa (talk)

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Of more than local interest? Charles (talk) 11:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I answered your question by fullfilling the field reason. I hope you will be convinced by the reason. Tank you.--PJDespa --PJDespa (talk) 11:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Marumba dyras dyras MHNT CUT 2010 0 192 Ban Kheum Laos male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-20 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Marumba dyras dyras Mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful Charles (talk) 11:39, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Scuola Grande dei Carmini - Cappella della Madonna del Carmelo - Allegoria della speranza - Niccolò Bambini.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-20 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Allegory of Hope by Niccolò Bambini in Scuola Grande dei Carmini (Venice)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It looks as if the right hand picture is not the same scale as the left: comparing the two pieces of the anchor and the putti look different sizes too. Charles (talk) 09:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's weird because they are not the same length. I don't think they can have been made for the position they are in now. Or it was rubbish workmanship! Charles (talk) 23:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
:
Augustins - David by Antonin Mercié (D 2005 1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-20 06:12 (UTC)
Scope:
David slaying Goliath, by Antonin Mercié, Musée des Augustins de Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 07:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Phaethon lepturus MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.2.12.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-02-20 07:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Phaethon lepturus egg of (white-tailed tropicbird)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Église - Intérieur (Mackenheim) (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-02-20 09:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Pulpit of église Saint-Étienne, Mackenheim
Open for review.
Yellow wagtail (Motacilla flava thunbergi) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-20 11:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Motacilla flava thunbergi (Yellow wagtail) male
Open for review.
Abyssinian admiral (Vanessa abyssinica abyssinica) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-20 11:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Vanessa abyssinica abyssinica (Abyssinian admiral) underside
Open for review.
Acraea (Acraea safie).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-20 11:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Acraea safie (Acraea butterfly) dorsal
Open for review.
10 - 16 Bold Street, Liverpool.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-02-20 16:21 (UTC)
Scope:
12 - 16 Bold Street, Liverpool, 10 Bold Street, Liverpool
Used in:
en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L1
Open for review.
Camp du Struthof - chambre à gaz (Natzwiller).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-02-20 17:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Gas chamber, Natzweiler-Struthof concentration camp
Open for review.
Camp du Struthof - mémorial du Struthof (Natzwiller).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-02-20 17:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Mémorial national de la déportation, view from north-west
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment For this type of monument that has a complex shape must give the sense of shooting (view from south or north ...) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks you. Gzen92 [discuter] 07:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Central Hotel, Liverpool 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-02-20 19:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Central Hotel, Liverpool
Used in:
en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L1
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Nyceryx stuarti MHNT CUT 2010 0 198 Guyane française Belizon Pk4 973 female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-21 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Nyceryx stuarti Mounted specimen female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Scuola Grande dei Carmini - Cappella della Madonna del Carmelo - le scale di Baldassare Longhena.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-21 06:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Scuola Grande dei Carmini (Venice) - The stairs of Baldassare Longhena and the theological virtues of Niccolò Bambini.
Open for review.
Labit - Buddah méditant - Hadda Afghanistan - Art gréco-bouddhique D 69 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-21 06:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Head of meditating Buddha, Greco-Buddhist art - Musée Georges Labit Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 07:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Wey VV5s IMG 0442.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2018-02-21 08:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Wey VV5
Used in:
de:Wey VV5, wikidata:Q39080173
Open for review.
Wey VV5 S at IAA 2017 back IMG 0443.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2018-02-21 08:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Wey VV5 - rear
Used in:
de:Wey VV5
Open for review.
Wey VV5 S at IAA 2017 cockpit IMG 0438.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2018-02-21 08:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Wey VV5 - cockpit
Used in:
de:Wey VV5
Open for review.
Bugatti 35, Bj 1924, M Nicolosi - 1976.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2018-02-21 10:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Bugatti Type 35 (original) from 1924 in the Südkehre of Nürburgring, driven by Marc Nicolosi
Used in:
de:Bugatti, fr:Saint-Gaudens, fr:Circuit automobile du Comminges, fr:Rétromobile, gl:Bugatti, ja:ブガッティ・タイプ35, pl:Bugatti Type 35
Open for review.
Lewis's, Liverpool 2018-2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-02-21 14:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Lewis's department store, Liverpool - general exterior views
Used in:
en:Lewis's, en:Lewis's Building, en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L1
Open for review.
Jean Aicard Nadar GALLICA.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-02-21 17:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Jean Aicard, portrait photograph
Used in:
fr:Jean Aicard
Reason:
Best photo in scope for this french poet, friend of Verlaine and Rimbaud, IMO. By Nadar, restored by me. In use as usual, original available as first upload. No geocode for a studio shot. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.
Scriwaneck Nadar GALLICA.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-02-21 18:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Scriwaneck, portrait photograph
Used in:
fr:Scriwaneck
Reason:
New category, new character in "Commons" !! A lady. Scriwaneck, now forbidden, was a very famous french theatre actress, at the end of the 19th.century. By Nadar, restored by me. Illustrates now a formerly "blind" article. No geocode, it is a studio shot. -- Jebulon (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I have checked this image against all six VI criteria. Since the image was taken in a studio, there is no geo-code, but the other five criteria were satisfied. I am happy to support this nomination. Martinvl (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Haguenau well place Thierry.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-02-21 22:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Well (15th century) in Haguenau, France
Used in:
de:Hagenau
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Of course I would support, but "Water well" sounds funny to me; may I delete the word "water" from the scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I really don't bother if it's a well or a water well as in in the English Wikipedia. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I guess an encyclopedia could use the term "water well" to distinguish from oil wells, inkwells and so forth, but in everyday usage, "well" by default means a hole in the ground used to obtain water. Anyway, I support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Nyceryx stuarti MHNT CUT 2010 0 198 Guyane française Belizon Pk4 973 female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-22 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Nyceryx stuarti Mounted specimen female ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful & used, Gzen92 [discuter] 07:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Scuola Grande dei Carmini (Venice) - Cappella della Madonna del Carmelo - Madonna del Carmelo - Sante Piatti.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-22 06:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady of Mount Carmel by Sante Piatti in Scuola Grande dei Carmini (Venice)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful & used, Gzen92 [discuter] 07:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Augustins - Saint Dominique - Anonyme français D 1952 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-22 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Dominique (D 1952 3), Musée des Augustins, de Toulouse

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful & used, Gzen92 [discuter] 07:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Manoir (Le Conquet) (2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-02-22 07:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Manoir de Cosquiez
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good image. Not yet used but useful as I think. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Used now, replacing the other image. Gzen92 [discuter] 12:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Phaethon rubricauda MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.2.14.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-02-22 07:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Phaethon rubricauda egg of (red-tailed tropicbird)
Open for review.
African clouded yellow (Colias electo pseudohecate) underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-22 09:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Colias electo pseudohecate (African clouded yellow) underside
Open for review.
African swallowtail (Papilio dardanus antinorii ) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-22 09:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio dardanus antinorii (African swallowtail) male
Open for review.
African swallowtail (Papilio dardanus antinorii ) male underside.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-22 09:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio dardanus antinorii (African swallowtail) male underside
Open for review.
Station de pompage du Haut-Koenigsbourg.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-02-22 11:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Water pumping, château du Haut-Kœnigsbourg
Open for review.
BMW Isetta - Motor u. Getriebe (Sp).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2018-02-22 21:22 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW Isetta: engine and gearbox, left side
Used in:
de:BMW Isetta
Open for review.
Mimas christophi MHNT CUT 2010 0 183 Ussuri, Gornotajosnoje, Russia female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-23 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Mimas christophi Mounted specimen female dorsal.jpg
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 07:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Scuola Grande dei Carmini - Cappella della Madonna del Carmelo - L'assunzione di Maria - Niccolò Bambini.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-23 06:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Assumption of Mary by Niccolo Bambini in Scuola Grande dei Carmini (Venice)
Open for review.
Labit - Dâkinî - Minor Goddess - Tibet 19th century.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-02-23 06:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Tibetan Dakini, Musée Georges Labit Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 07:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Fregata magnificens MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.2.16.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-02-23 07:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Fregata magnificens egg of (magnificent frigatebird)
Open for review.
Cream flat (Eagris denuba obliterata).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-23 09:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Eagris denuba obliterata (Cream flat) dorsal
Open for review.
Ethiopian cabbage white (Pieris brassicoides brassicoides).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-23 09:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Pieris brassicoides brassicoides (Ethiopian cabbage white) underside
Open for review.
Orange sprite (Celaenorrhinus galenus) Ethiopia.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-23 09:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Celaenorrhinus galenus (Orange sprite) dorsal
Reason:
I can't id the bug! -- Charles (talk)
Open for review.
Pont tournant (Vendenheim) (3).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-02-23 11:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Pont tournant de Vendenheim
Open for review.
Opeas pyrgula 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-02-23 17:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Opeas pyrgula, shell
Open for review.
2005-08-27 Lloyd 600 Kombi 04c.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2018-02-23 18:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Lloyd LS600 from 1956 in motion, front and right side
Used in:
de:Lloyd (Automarke)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Columba guinea guinea (Speckled pigeon)[edit]

   
Speckled pigeon (Columba guinea guinea).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2017-01-31 10:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Columba guinea guinea (Speckled pigeon)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - You've got strong competition from File:Speckledpigeon.JPG, which is arguably a clearer though lower-resolution picture of the bird itself, but ultimately, the deciding factor for me is the glary window in that photo vs. your bokeh background, which makes it easier to see the pigeon. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Very good picture, but the other one is more useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Speckled pigeon (Columba guinea guinea) Ethiopia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2018-02-10 16:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Columba guinea guinea (Speckled pigeon)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - More useful because of the greater contrast. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Portrait of Jessia Islam[edit]

   
Jessia Islam in Dhaka 01 (cropped).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2018-02-21 18:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Jessia Islam
Used in:
See Global usage
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I was suggesting the uncropped version of this photo, but I'm happy with this one, which is much nicer than the other, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Jessia Islam in Dhaka 03 cropped.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2018-02-18 15:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Jessia Islam
Used in:
See Global usage
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Don't we have a better portrait of this girl? Here she looks very sad. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree with Spurzem that this is not best in scope. File:Jessia Islam in Dhaka 01.jpg is best in scope, IMO, or if we want just a head shot, File:Jessia Islam.jpg is best of all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I recognize that my vote is not very charitable. But the expression of the young lady who realizes suddenly that winning the contest she will have to pose with a feather of the head is extraordinary and reflects its disarray Face-smile.svg.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:50, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - That's funny, and I see the value in it, but maybe more for representing the absurdity of the Miss World pageant than of this particular woman. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
If ~Moheen (keep talking) wants to propose a new image we will be many to vote favorably. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Moved to MVR for the further discussion. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well, it wont win Pulitzer, this portrait. But isnt that bad, and better than left. --Mile (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Do I need to re-oppose now that it's in an MVR? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]