Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:VIC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment My comment. -- Example
You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg  Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
31,283 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
27,727 (88.6%) 
Undecided
  
1,608 (5.1%) 
Declined
  
1,948 (6.2%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
15 Jagiellonska Street in Bydgoszcz 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tournasol7 (talk) on 2018-06-17 15:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Southern exposure of the building at 15 Jagiellońska Street in Bydgoszcz
Used in:
pl:Budynek CM UMK w Bydgoszczy
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support , useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Ceramic Golden Horde GIM.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Лапоть (talk) on 2018-06-17 16:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Golden Horde ceramic
Open for review.
Flaxweiler Bildstock (1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-06-17 21:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside shrine in Flaxweiler (Luxembourg), rue Berg 5.
Used in:
lb:Lëscht vun de Weekräizer zu Lëtzebuerg
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Elmhurst, Neston 2018.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-17 21:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Elmhurst, Neston
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston, Walter Aubrey Thomas
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Elm Grove House, Neston.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-17 21:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Grade II listed buildings in Neston - Elm Grove House
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Women carrying stalks.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Afifa Afrin (talk) on 2018-06-18 04:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Women at work in Bangladesh.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment There are two scope in one. You must choose the most effective or make two different appointments.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment The scope is imprecise. ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Rhodoprasina callantha MHNT CUT 2010 0 227 Doi Inthanon Chiang Maï Thailand male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-18 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhodoprasina callantha Mounted specimen male ventral
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Barcelona Cathedral Interior - Altar of Saint Barnhard of Siena 1783-1785.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-18 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of San Bernardino de Siena, Barcelona Cathedral
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Musée du Vieux Toulouse - Le cloître et l'église des Augustins - Georges Castex 1942 - Inv. T0013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-18 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
The cloister and the Augustinian church, by Georges Castex
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support , useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bredevoort (NL), Rembrandt's Hendrikje -- 2018 -- 1847.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2018-06-18 05:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Hendrickje Stoffels in Bredevoort, Netherlands
Used in:
de:Hendrickje Stoffels, en:Bredevoort, nl:Bredevoort
Open for review.
Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 27.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2018-06-18 06:30 (UTC)
Scope:

Noordterp (Schokland) Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Pollard willows at the foot of the former island (on the flight port road).

'
Open for review.
Entrance to Wirral Way, Station Road, Parkgate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-18 09:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Wirral Way entrance, Station Road, Parkgate
Used in:
Wirral Country Park
Open for review.
Vatel, Charles, Nadar, Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-06-18 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Charles Vatel portrait photograph
Used in:
wikidata
Reason:
New character, first in scope. No geocode for a studio shot. Uploaded and restored by me. Original available as first upload. In use of course. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.
11 Station Road, Parkgate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-18 13:08 (UTC)
Scope:
11 Station Road, Parkgate
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston
Open for review.
13 Station Road, Parkgate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-18 13:32 (UTC)
Scope:
13 Station Road, Parkgate
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston
Open for review.
14 Station Road, Parkgate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-18 14:09 (UTC)
Scope:
14 Station Road, Parkgate
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston
Open for review.
Dover and Nelson Cottage, Parkgate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-18 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Dover and Nelson Cottages, Parkgate
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston
Open for review.
Comblain Fairon Bloquay creek.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
PJDespa (talk) on 2018-06-18 16:15 (UTC)
Scope:
View of the 'rue du ruisseau' in Comblain-Fairon, Hamoir, Wallonia, Belgium.
Open for review.
Barnoon, Parkgate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-18 17:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Barnoon, Parkgate
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support , shame we lost the chimney tops, but still useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Neritina pulligera 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-06-18 17:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Neritina pulligera (Dusky Nerite), shell
Open for review.
Vila Gottlieba a Stely Fantelových, Český Těšín 2018 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
T.Bednarz (talk) on 2018-06-18 19:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Gottlieb and Stela Fantel's villa
Open for review.
Prospect House, Parkgate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-18 21:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Prospect House, Parkgate
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston
Open for review.
Clanidopsis exusta MHNT CUT 2010 0 231 Nainital district, Uttarakhand, India, female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-19 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Clanidopsis exusta Mounted specimen female dorsal
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 07:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Aspet - Eglise saint Martin.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-19 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Martin of Aspet, Haute-Garonne France. South exposure.
Open for review.
Musée du Vieux Toulouse - L'arrestation de Calas - Casimir Destrem 1879 Inv.92 12 1.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-19 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
The arrest of Calas, by Casimir Destrem
Open for review.
Rosa 'Pea Glow' (d.j.b) 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2018-06-19 05:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Rosa 'Pea Glow' Flower.
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Useful, but can you get rid of the lens flare just above the flower? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Answer: Thanks for your response. I will try. It is probably a water drop.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
    ✓  Done . Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Sundial of the Saint-Maurice church (Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost) - 3.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Benoît (d) on 2018-06-14 09:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Sundial of the Saint-Maurice church (Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 02:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
16 - 19 The Parade, Parkgate.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-06-19 09:08 (UTC)
Scope:
16 - 19 The Parade, Parkgate
Used in:
Listed buildings in Neston
Open for review.
Iaroslavl Cathédrale de la Dormition (6).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André on 2018-06-19 09:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Icons of Saint Pantaleon in the cathedral of the Dormition, Yaroslavl, Russia
Used in:
Cathédrale de la Dormition de Iaroslavl
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment should be used in the article Olivier LPB (talk) 09:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
✓  Done Thank you for your advice.--Pierre André (talk) 10:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Saint Pétersbourg Interieur de la cathédrale Saint Isaac (7).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André on 2018-06-19 09:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Doors of Saint Isaac's Cathedral Saint Petersburg, Russia
Open for review.
SPB Ermitage - Madonna and Child with Saints (Antonio Da Firenze).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André on 2018-06-19 14:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Antonio da Firenze Madonna and Child with Saints. Ermitage Saint-Pétersbourg
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment Problem of crushing the image. The dimensions are known it is easy to correct. There is a problem of rebuilding (see the note on the image), the clipping is not finished. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓  Done correction the crushing of image, and fixing clipping on the left; Thank you for your advise. --Pierre André (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
CIM-F66-1-10-1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thomas Linard (talk) on 2018-06-18 12:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Capitalis monumentalis
Open for review.
Moscou.- St. Basil's Cathedral intérieur (en2018) (2).JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André on 2018-06-19 14:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Nicolas-le-Thaumaturge Cathedral Saint-Basile-the-Blessed. Moscow
Open for review.
Clanidopsis exusta MHNT CUT 2010 0 231 Nainital district, Uttarakhand, India, female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-20 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Clanidopsis exusta Mounted specimen female ventral
Open for review.
Barcelona Cathedral Interior - Chapel of Saint Sebastian and Saint Thecla 1486-1498 Jaume Huguet.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-20 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Capella of Saint Thecla and Saint Sebastian, Cathedral of Barcelona
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Musée du Vieux Toulouse - La rue du Taur - François Gauzi.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-20 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
La rue du Taur by François Gauzi , Musée du Vieux Toulouse
Open for review.
Seffern St. Nepomuk 1823.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-06-20 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Saint John of Nepomuk (1823) in Seffern, Germany.
Open for review.
Waldorf Astoria 20180615.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sir Shurf (talk) on 2018-06-20 14:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Waldorf Astoria hotel, Jerusalem. Outside view.

talk]]) 04:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Septaria porcellana 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-06-20 16:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Septaria porcellana (Porcelain Limpet-like Nerite), shell
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Polaskia chende 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-06-20 16:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Polaskia chende, habitus, bloomy
Open for review.
Rosa 'Amulett' (d.j.b).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2018-06-20 18:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Rosa 'Amulett' Flower bud.
Open for review.
Agnosia orneus MHNT CUT 2010 0 231 Dehra Dun female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-21 04:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Agnosia orneus Mounted specimen female dorsal
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Barcelona Cathedral Interior - St. Thecla - 1486.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-21 04:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Capella of Saint Thecla and Saint Sebastian, Cathedral of Barcelona - Saint Thecla 1486
Open for review.
Augustins - L'Etoile du Berger - Camille Corot Ro60 1864.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-06-21 04:10 (UTC)
Scope:
The evening Star by Camille Corot, Musée des Augustins, Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Useful depiction of a wonderful painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Syrmaticus ellioti MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.9.1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-06-21 09:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Syrmaticus ellioti egg of (Elliot's pheasant)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Useful, used and best in scope Olivier LPB (talk) 09:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Aspidosperma carapanauba MHNT.BOT.2018.6.2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2018-06-21 09:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Aspidosperma carapanauba, fruits and seeds, dried specimen
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Unique and used --Llez (talk) 17:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Junius Paul.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2018-06-21 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Junius Paul
Used in:
de:Junius Paul, wikidata:Q20828530
Open for review.
Kenyatta A.C. Hinkle.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2018-06-21 15:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Kenyatta A. C. Hinkle
Used in:
en:Kenyatta A.C. Hinkle, wikidata:Q19560981
Open for review.
Simone Leigh 2.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2018-06-21 15:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Simone Leigh
Used in:
en:Simone Leigh, wikidata:Q16200002
Open for review.
Arnauné, Auguste, Nadar, Gallica.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-06-21 15:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Auguste Arnauné portrait photograph
Used in:
wikidata
Reason:
New character, alone in scope, new illustrated article. No geocode for a studio shot, original by Nadar and/or workshop, available as first upload. In use of course. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.
Wardell Milan.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2018-06-21 15:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Wardell Milan
Used in:
en:Wardell Milan, wikidata:Q7969120
Open for review.
Cleistocactus samaipatanus f. cristata 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-06-21 16:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Cleistocactus samaipatanus forma cristata, habitus
Open for review.
Cleistocactus samaipatanus f. cristata 02.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-06-21 16:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Cleistocactus samaipatanus forma cristata, flower
Open for review.
Echinocereus viereckii 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-06-21 16:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Echinocereus viereckii, habitus
Open for review.
Manjuvara, Prehistoric & Archeological Gallery, CUM 770 (01).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2018-06-21 17:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Manjuvara, Chittagong University Museum
Used in:
See global usage
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]