Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:VIC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
31,957 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
28,368 (88.8%) 
Undecided
  
1,627 (5.1%) 
Declined
  
1,962 (6.1%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
SOŠ dopravy a cestovního ruchu, Krnov 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
T.Bednarz (talk) on 2018-08-09 00:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Střední odborná škola dopravy a cestovního ruchu Krnov

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, according to the rules, nominations should be in english.--Jebulon (talk) 20:42, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 21:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Raghunath Murmu.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Masum-al-Hasan (talk) on 2018-08-09 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Raghunath Murmu
Open for review.
Sunny green paddy fields with water reflection.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gerifalte Del Sabana on 2018-08-10 04:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Paddy fields in Laos
Reason:
Best picture in scope IMO. -- ― Gerifalte Del Sabana
  • Thanks, GerifalteDelSabana, for the nomination. I have no idea if this can be considered as the best picture within that scope, but I'm certain it's not the worse :-) Let's hear what the specialists think -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Very hard to choose. I'm unconvinced anyone wants to make the very subjective choice between all the photos of paddies in Laos, but if someone does, be my guest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Pairi Daiza (Brugelette) PKP Ty 3297.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2018-08-11 10:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Ty 3297 in Pairi Daiza Railway (Belgium)
Open for review.
Butorides striata @ KL, Malaysia.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gerifalte Del Sabana on 2018-08-11 14:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Butorides striata javanica (Striated Heron)
Reason:
Best representation of scope IMO. -- ― Gerifalte Del Sabana

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this image is much better. Charles (talk) 16:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 21:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Strakonice - tower.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Adámoz (talk) on 2018-08-11 16:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Tower in Strakonice in the Czech Republic
Open for review.
Hortus Haren (actm) 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2018-08-11 17:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Petra Boshart Hortus Haren. "Tasmaanse", by Petra Boshart.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, lighting could be better, but useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:06, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 21:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
5 & 7 Hope Place 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-08-11 17:50 (UTC)
Scope:
5 & 7 Hope Place, Liverpool
Used in:
en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L1
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 21:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Hosta 'Grand Slam'. (d.j.b.).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2018-08-11 18:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Hosta 'Grand Slam' Inflorescence and flower bud.
Open for review.
Bufonaria margaritula 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-08-11 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Bufonaria margaritula, (Small Pearled Frog Snail), shell
Open for review.
Close wing position of Lethe sinorix Hewitson, 1863 – Tailed Red Forester WLB DSC 1041.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 12 August 2018
Scope:
Lethe sinorix (Tailed Red Forester) ventral
Open for review.
Close wing position of Lethe mekara Moore, 1857 – Common Red Forester (Male) WLB DSC 9986.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 12 August 2018
Scope:
Lethe mekara (Common Red Forester) Male, ventral
Open for review.
Rhagastis castor aurifera MHNT CUT 2010 0 249 Malaysia dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-12 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhagastis castor aurifera mounted specimen dorsal
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 12:00, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Alfred Mayssonié par Bourdelle 1922.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-12 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Alfred Mayssonnié by Antoine Bourdelle
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bemberg Fondation Toulouse - Portrait paintings of Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor by Jan Cornelisz Vermeyen Inv.1056.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-12 05:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor by Jan Cornelisz Vermeyen Fondation Bemberg Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Dům Ernesta Rügera, Krnov 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
T.Bednarz (talk) on 2018-08-12 09:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Ernest Rüger's villa, view from the east
Reason:
Cultural monument in the Czech Republic -- T.Bednarz (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, can we have the view direction in the scope please. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done As you wish. --T.Bednarz (talk) 10:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, thanks. Now useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Walmer Castle from the west.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-08-12 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Walmer Castle from the west
Used in:
en:Walmer Castle
Open for review.
Deal Castle from the south.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-08-12 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Deal Castle from the south
Used in:
en:Deal Castle
Open for review.
Dover Castle - Henry II's Great Tower.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-08-12 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Dover Castle - Henry II's Great Tower from the north
Used in:
en:Dover Castle
Open for review.
Dover Castle from the north.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-08-12 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Dover Castle from the north
Used in:
en:Dover Castle
Open for review.
Dover Eastern Docks.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-08-12 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Dover Eastern Docks from the White Cliffs of Dover to the west
Used in:
en:Port of Dover

Best view from the cliffs. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rhagastis castor aurifera MHNT CUT 2010 0 249 Malaysia ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-13 04:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhagastis castor aurifera mounted specimen male ventral
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 15:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Musée du Vieux Toulouse - Vierge à l'Enfant - Arthur Legoust - C.1625 Inv.27.1.21.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-13 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna and Child by Arthur Legoust, Musée du Vieux Toulouse
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bemberg Fondation Toulouse - La montée au calvaire - Jacopo Bassano - Inv.1002.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-13 04:49 (UTC)
Scope:
The Way to Calvary by Jacopo Bassano, Fondation Bemberg, Toulouse
Reason:

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. On n'a pas idée des richesses que recèle Toulouse, à Paris ! Il va vraiment que je vienne faire un tour (avec un guide particulier) Clin.--Jebulon (talk) 16:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Legentil, Alexandre, Nadar, Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-08-13 09:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Alexandre Legentil, portrait photograph
Used in:
wikidata etc...
Reason:
New character in "Commons". This man was a trader and a merchant. Christian man, organizer of many charity societies, he is one of the two who decided the building of the Basilica of the Sacré-Coeur in Montmartre (Paris). Alone in scope. Studio shot by Nadar restored by me, therefore not geocoded. Original available as first upload. In use. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.
Laisant, Charles-Ange, Nadar, Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-08-13 14:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Charles-Ange Laisant, portrait photograph
Used in:
wikidata & others
Open for review.
Cloué, Georges-Charles, amiral, Nadar, Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-08-13 15:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Georges Cloué portrait photograph
Used in:
wikidata and others
Reason:
New photograph in "Commons" therefore best in scope for this politician, admiral, and governor of the Martinique. Original available as first upload, by Nadar, top quality, restored by me. No geocode for a studio shot. In use, of course. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.
Ranularia gutturnia 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-08-13 15:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Ranularia gutturnia (Orange-mouthed Triton), shell
Open for review.
Freycinet, de Saulces de, Charles, Nadar, Gallica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2018-08-13 16:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Charles de Freycinet, portrait photograph
Used in:
wikidata and many others
Reason:
Best in scope IMO for this French "Président du Conseil" (Prime Minister). Very good quality of this portrait by Nadar, original available as first upload, restored by me. No geocode for a studio shot. In use. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.
Chevrolet Vectra 20150831-20150831 160810.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
MB-one (talk) on 2018-08-13 16:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Chevrolet Vectra sedan (Delta platform), rear 3/4 view
Used in:
pt:Chevrolet Vectra
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, I think the perspective in the background needs correcting. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2018-08-13 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Jan van Luijn Location: Vrijhof in Ferwerd. War memorial 'As it is nedich'. Made by Jan van Luijn.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Elne Cathédrale Sainte-Eulalie-et-Sainte-Julie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2018-08-13 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale "Sainte-Eulalie-et-Sainte-Julie", Elne, France (view W).
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, I think the tower on the right is tilted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version uploaded. --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Used, useful and best in scope. It is the only image of this cathedral in the commons where the towers do not seem to overthrow. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Open wing position of Pseudocoladenia fatua Evans, 1949 – Ruddy Pied Flat.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 14 August 2018
Scope:
Pseudocoladenia fatua (Ruddy Pied Flat) dorsal

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question There is a fun mystery. In the category there are two images. They are very similar because it is the same individual, on the same sheet. These are two different authors with the same camera, but one day apart. Is there one author and two accounts? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment@Archaeodontosaurus: This two images of Ruddy Pied Flat (Pseudocoladenia fatua) are part of the Wiki Loves Butterfly Project shot at passingdang, Dzongu valley, North Sikkim [here] by two WLB Project field photographer Sandip Das and Tamaghna Sengupta who shot the same species at same location but with two different cameras. Sandip Das using NIKON D7000 and Tamaghna Sengupta with Canon EOS 7D Mark II. There was no species category in Commons, hence I am creating the category.--Atudu (talk) 08:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Rhagastis olivacea MHNT CUT 2010 0 250 Doi Inthanon Chiang Mai Thailand male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-14 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhagastis olivacea mounted specimen male dorsal
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Musée du Vieux Toulouse - Piano du compositeur Louis Deffès.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-14 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
The piano of the composer Louis Deffès, Musée du Vieux Toulouse

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used. --MB-one (talk) 10:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bemberg Fondation Toulouse - Le Fauconnier - Veronese - Ca 1560 Inv.1079.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-14 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
The falconer by Paolo Veronese Fondation Bemberg Toulouse

Symbol support vote.svg Best in scope--Jebulon (talk) 08:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Turner Contemporary gallery.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-08-14 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Turner Contemporary gallery, Margate - from the south-west
Used in:
en:Turner Contemporary

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral this one has better quality, but Café patio and west of Turner Contemporary gallery Margate Kent England.jpg has fewer distracting elements (people) in the foreground. --MB-one (talk) 10:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, MB-one, for me, the people help to portray the character and popularity of the place. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Café patio and west of Turner Contemporary gallery Margate Kent England.jpg has a problem of perspective distortion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Embracing the Sea (1998) Jon Buck.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2018-08-14 06:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Embracing the Sea (1998) by Jon Buck, Deal Pier
Used in:
en:Deal, Kent

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful and used. --MB-one (talk) 10:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Open for review.
Muscat Fort 2013, Muscat (20130331-DSC04113).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
MB-one (talk) on 2018-08-14 13:37 (UTC)
Scope:
General view of Muttrah Fort
Used in:
ar:حصن مطرح
Open for review.
ChapmansPeakDrive.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2018-08-14 14:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Chapman’s Peak Drive near Cape Town
Used in:
Reason:
One of the most spectacular drives in South Africa, passing through a UNESCO World Heritage Site that also hosts part of the annual "Two Oceans" ultramarathons. The sea in this image is part of the Atlantic Ocean while the Indian Ocean is 11 km to the south east of this spot. -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.
Town hall of Autoire 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tournasol7 (talk) on 2018-08-14 16:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Northern facade of the town hall of Autoire
Used in:
fr:Autoire, pl:Autoire
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 13.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2018-08-14 17:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Gerard Heymans Vrijhof 2 in Ferwerd. Birth house of Gerard Heymans (detail).
Open for review.
Lyceum Post Office 2018.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-08-14 20:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Lyceum Post Office, Liverpool
Used in:
en:The Lyceum, Liverpool
Open for review.
Pouldrezic, la Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Penhors (1).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2018-08-14 21:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Our Lady Chapel of Penhors, from the south-west.
Open for review.
Pouldrezic, Calvaire de la Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Penhors (3).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2018-08-14 21:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Triumphal Gate of Notre-Dame-de-Penhors Chapel from the North.
Open for review.
Rhagastis olivacea MHNT CUT 2010 0 250 Doi Inthanon Chiang Mai Thailand male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-15 04:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Rhagastis olivacea mounted specimen male ventral
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 12:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Cathedrale St Etienne Toulouse - Tenture murale- La naissance de saint Etienne - Jean Pechault 1532 .jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-15 04:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Toulouse, The birth of Saint Stephen by Jean Pechault
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Toulouse translates as "Saint Etienne Cathedral of Toulouse", not "from Toulouse", but I think trying to translate the name of a cathedral is an error. Please use the French name of the cathedral. As this seems to be the only photo of the tapestry on Commons, of course it's useful, a valuable image, once the scope is appropriate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thank you for your advice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bemberg Fondation Toulouse - Zuan Pietro Ghisi - Jacopo Tintoretto - Inv.1052.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2018-08-15 04:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Zuan Pietro Ghisi by Jacopo Tintoretto Fondation Bemberg Toulouse
Open for review.
Blackburne House 2018.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-08-15 09:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Blackburne House
Used in:
See global usage
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful, used and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Pouldrezic, Calvaire de la Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Penhors (1).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2018-08-15 09:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Calvary Chapel Notre-Dame-de-Penhors from west.
Open for review.
Hahnemann Hospital, Hope Street.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-08-15 12:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Hahnemann Hospital, Liverpool
Used in:
en:Liverpool Homeopathic Hosital, en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L1
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful, used and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Open for review.
Sarzeau.- La chapelle Notre Dame de la Côte, Penvins.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2018-08-15 13:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of Our Lady of the Coast Penvins, France (view N).
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.
8 - 22 Hope Place, Liverpool.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-08-15 14:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Hope Place, Liverpool : 8 - 22 Hope Place
Used in:
en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L1
Open for review.
9 - 17 Hope Place, Liverpool.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-08-15 14:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Hope Place, Liverpool : 9 - 17 Hope Place
Used in:
en:Grade II listed buildings in Liverpool-L1
Open for review.
Steinküppel von Osten.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Milseburg (talk) on 2018-08-15 15:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Overall view of Steinküppel (Wildflecken)
Used in:
de:Steinküppel (Wildflecken), de:Liste von Bergen in der Rhön
Reason:
Objekt and shooting position are located in a restricted military area. An opportunity for such a photo arises rarely, only during brief openings of the ground every few years for two days. -- Milseburg (talk)
Open for review.
Ranularia sarcostoma 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2018-08-15 16:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Ranularia sarcostoma (Flesh-coloured Hairy Triton), shell
Open for review.
Legutiano -BT- 01.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Basotxerri (talk) on 2018-08-15 17:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Legutio, in Álava, Basque Country, Spain, view direction NE
Used in:
en:Legutio and others
Open for review.
Eleanor Rigby 2018-1.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2018-08-15 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Eleanor Rigby statue
Used in:
en:Stanley Street, Liverpool, en:Eleanor Rigy (statue)
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

The Africa Cafe, front[edit]

   
The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (01).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2018-08-12 04:34 (UTC)
Scope:
The Africa Cafe, front
Used in:
See global usage
Open for review.
The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (02).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
~Moheen (keep talking) on 2018-08-12 04:35 (UTC)
Scope:
The Africa Cafe, front
Used in:
See global usage
Open for review.

Tashichho Dzong, Bhutan (general view)[edit]

   
Tashichoedzong-Bhutan-2001.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
MrPanyGoff on 2011-06-02 17:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Tashichho Dzong, Bhutan (general view)

Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 20:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 21:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Tashichho Dzong, Bhutan 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Bgag (talk) on 2018-08-14 18:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Tashichho Dzong, Bhutan (general view) NW view
Open for review.

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.