Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:VIC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,377 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
49,793 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
3,092 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
2,492 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-06-09 17:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Clitocybe nebularis (clouded agaric) in decay.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-09 22:24 (UTC)
Scope:
European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-10 11:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Emberiza sahari (House bunting)
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-11 15:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Škoda Superb IV Combi - right rear view
Used in:
de:Škoda Superb IV, en:Škoda Superb, pl:Škoda Superb
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-11 15:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Ineos Grenadier Quartermaster - right rear view
Used in:
en:Ineos Grenadier
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-11 16:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Station missionnaire Botshabelo tea garden, Middelburg (South Africa)
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-11 16:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Outflow of river Flem in Lag da Breil
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-11 20:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Cercotrichas galactotes (Rufous-tailed Scrub Robin)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-12 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Dandolo (Venice) - Main entrance (Hotel Danieli)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-12 05:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Le Crâne de Goya - Ecole Française du XXe d'après Dionysio Fierros Musée Goya - Castres France
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-12 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Funerary stele of Zosimos - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-12 07:41 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Zaruddia, Vinnytsia Raion
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-12 16:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Bridge Mountain (Utah), view from Zion Human History Museum
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 17:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-12 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Trier, Wasseruhr Brunnen, at the Willy-Brandt-Platz Fountain with animal sculptures VIII (horse).
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-13 04:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Arca noae var. abbreviata (Noah's Ark shell), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-13 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Larass by Adolfo Wildt - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-13 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
St. John the Baptist by Francisco Varela in Goya Museum‎ Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-13 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Kore - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-13 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Zakrynychia
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-06-13 21:38 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Veronica Lake – studio portrait photo, circa 1952
Used in:
en:Veronica Lake and 16 others
Reason:
Useful portrait with good image quality. For other available portraits, see gallery page -- --Thi (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previous reviews

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-14 04:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail Alter Krahnen (Trier) Detail (barred window)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-14 04:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Arca noae var. abbreviata (Noah's Ark shell), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-14 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to the dead of the parish of San Cassiano in Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-14 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Ophrys apifera (Bee orchid) - flower
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-14 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Head of Kore - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-14 09:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Former town hall of Nieuwkerke, view from Niepkerkestraat (Be)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-14 13:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Ramphocoris clotbey (Thick-billed lark)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-14 15:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Nieuwkerke, Kruisbeeld, gelegen aan de voet van de Zwarte, view from Bellestraat Heuvelland (Be)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC) on 2024-06-14 16:56 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Fresco Jesus on the cross in the Reformierte Kirche San Bastian (Zernez)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 14 June 2024
Scope:
Celastrina lavendularis limbatus (Eastern Plain Hedge Blue), ventral
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-14 19:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Dibrovyntsi
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-14 22:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Westhof Farm Cemetery, view from Eikelstraat, Nieuwkerke (Be)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-15 03:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Alcedo atthis (Common kingfisher) in water fishing

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support This species is quite the fisherbird and there are several in the scope link showing this activity. This one, PoY 2020, is of exceptional quality and valuable. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-15 04:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Bagnante by Max Klinger - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-15 04:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Altarpiece of Saint Martin - The death of Saint Martin Musée Goya, Castres France

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-15 04:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Head of Hermes - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-15 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Astarte elliptica (Elliptical Astarte), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-15 08:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Mazda3 (BP) X - right front view
Used in:
en:Mazda3
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-15 08:55 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW Z4 (G29, facelift) M40i - right rear view
Used in:
de:BMW G29, pl:BMW Z4
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-15 10:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Baruch Spinoza, circa 1665, Herzog August Library.
Used in:
en:Baruch Spinoza etc.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-15 10:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Arthur Schopenhauer, second photograph made by Johann Schäfer (1859)
Used in:
en:Arthur Schopenhaue etc.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-15 13:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Phoenicurus moussieri (Moussier's Redstart) Female
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-15 13:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Cursorius cursor (Cream-colored courser)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-06-15 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Closed flower of a Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea'. fragrant evening primrose.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Günther Frager (talk) on 2024-06-15 15:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Fats Fernández
Used in:
de:W:Fats Fernández, es:W:Fats Fernández
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-15 22:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Bedside of Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk (Nieuwkerke), view from Bassevillestraat (Be)

 Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-16 03:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Diagram of a tropical cyclone

Previous reviews

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-16 04:22 (UTC)
Scope:
view from the Petrisberg on the Cathedral of St. Peter (East side.)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-16 04:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Orsola's farewell to her mother - Storie di sant'Orsola by Tommaso da Modena- Complesso di Santa Caterina - Treviso

 Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-16 04:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Erannis defoliaria – mounted specimen Male ventral

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-16 04:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Bust of Athena by Kresilas

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:49, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-16 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Astarte elliptica (Elliptical Astarte), left valve

 Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-16 07:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Mazda3 (BP) X - right rear view
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-16 08:05 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Honoratka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-16 08:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Nieuwkerke Churchyard, Commonwealth Plot, view from Markt (Be)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-16 10:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Tachybaptus ruficollis (Little grebe)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-16 10:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Fringilla spodiogenys spodiogenys (African Chaffinch) male
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-16 10:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Fringilla spodiogenys spodiogenys (African Chaffinch) female
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Günther Frager (talk) on 2024-06-16 13:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Divya Deshmukh
Used in:
en:W:Divya Deshmukh, de:W:Divya Deshmukh, pl:W:Divya Deshmukh, pt:Divya Deshmukh, etc.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-16 17:05 (UTC)
Scope:
lookout tower at Im Sabel 16/18. in Trier.
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Scope

[edit]
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Ken Billington (talk) on 2010-12-29 20:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Calidris minuta (Little Stint)

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-11 20:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Calidris minuta (Little stint)

 Oppose Sorry - the nomination is a good image of this species, but the little stint is a very popular and personable bird with 172 images in the scope-link category alone, many of which are also good. IMHO, this one, this one, or this one show a tighter view of the bird and would be considered more valuable. --GRDN711 (talk) 11:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GRDN711 One of the images you linked is a VI with the same scope as this nomination. Opening a MVR might be the best option. Zzzs (talk) 20:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.