User talk:C messier/Archive 12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σκαλάνι 1973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σκαλάνι 1966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks ok, but there is some tilt, look at the sea horizon --Poco a poco 20:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 20:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 Support Ok --Poco a poco 20:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Result decisions at QI discussion

Dear C meddier, I just wanted to inform you, that I had to revert several edits you made at the QI discussions page. You did set a view discussions to "result". I know you did this carefully. And in all cases the outcome of the voting can be seen as save. But there is one rule we have to follow strictly: We can set a discussion to result not earlier than exactly 48 hours after the last valid vote was made. Just keep that in mind. --August Geyler (talk) 16:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μέγαρο Ησαΐα, Αθήνα 9713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λεωφόρος 3ης Σεπτεμβρίου, Αθήνα 9777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αγία Βαρβάρα Ηρακλείου 1945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αϊτάνια 1941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οδός Μαυροματαίων, Αθήνα 9795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Θησεύς σώζων την Ιπποδάμειαν 9803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οδός Μάρνη, Αθήνα 9814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πρώην Ξενοδοχείο, Ελλάς 9828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οδός Νιγρίτης, Αθήνα 9750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Ανδρέα, Παραμερίτες 9423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AStiasny 10:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πετριές Ευβοίας 9488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πλατεία Βικτώριας 9806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I would prefer a vertical or square crop to remove some of the distractions, to focus on the statue. --Tagooty 02:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Εθνικό Θέατρο Αθηνών 9854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μέγαρο Ησαΐα, Αθήνα 9710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καθολικός ναός Αγίου Διονυσίου Αρεοπαγίτη 2136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Mild noise on the upper portion of the cathedral, good quality overall. -- Ikan Kekek 20:09, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οφθαλμιατρείο Αθηνών 2137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice building and good picture. -- Ikan Kekek 20:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καταστροφές από σεισμό 28-9-2021 Σγουροκεφάλι 0381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Γαλλική Πρεσβεία 2091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πεζά 3896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 06:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καταστροφές από σεισμό 28-9-2021 Χουμέρι 0465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγία Καθολική, Ίος 6443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παρεκκλήσι, Χώρα Ίου 6231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 23:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πόρτο Μπούφαλο 9538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κτίριο Μπον Μαρσέ, Ηράκλειο 3345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Ίου 6511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Γαβαλοχώρι 2215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λεωφόρος Πατησίων 9781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 15:44, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Φορτέτσα 0368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ενετικό λιμάνι Ρεθύμνου 0301-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 19:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οδός Μαυροματαίων, Αθήνα 9787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Δημητρίου, Ψυρρή 9880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bahia palace celing 1205.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bahia palace celing 1205.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Στέργιου, Γαβαλοχώρι 2210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Ίου 6393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καλές Ιεράπετρας 0718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καταστροφή από σεισμό, Μοναστηράκι Πεδιάδας 0497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πεζά 0662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Μελεσών 2681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου, Κάτω Αστρακοί 0650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 22:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πεζά 0659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 22:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πεζά 0665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 22:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Μελεσών 2689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 22:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καλημεριάνοι 2073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 22:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ενορία 2027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καλημεριάνοι 2060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βώροι 2745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Γιαμαλάκη και Καζαντζάκη, Ηράκλειο 8603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οθωμανικό σπίτι, Ηράκλειο 8618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Τριόπετρα 2887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καλές Ιεράπετρας 0724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 14:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ακρωτήριο Μέλισσα 2814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αμμόλοφοι Αγίου Παύλου 2853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Τριόπετρα 2937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, beautiful environment --Michielverbeek 21:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Γαράζο 2150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άγιος Παύλος Ρεθύμνου 2822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 12:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Γαβαλοχώρι 2237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πύλη Ιησού, Ηράκλειο 8613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Τριόπετρα 2950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Τριόπετρα 2870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λαογραφικό Μουσείο Γαράζου 2169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Δεξαμενή Γαράζου 2183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Τριόπετρα 2903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:44, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λίμνη Βουλισμένη 2517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Καλά Χριστούγεννα!

A somewhat naive, but nice nativity scene in Weil der Stadt, Germany Happy Holidays, C messier
  • Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
  • Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года!

--Aristeas (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

  * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, C messier! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Βωσάκου 0011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 15:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αγία Αικατερίνη Σιναϊτών 8941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πέραμα Μυλοποτάμου 2599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you reduce the noise in the sky? --Milseburg 21:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 Support The noise is not that strong; okay for QI. --A.Savin 14:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Βωσάκου 0020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Τριόπετρα 2953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σίσες 0004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Βωσάκου 0014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Διαβατικό Μονής Βωσάκου 0023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Γαράζο 2166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Βωσάκου 0031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 16:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγία στο Καστρί Μυλοποτάμου 0059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 16:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Ειρήνης, Άγιος Μάμας Ρεθύμνου 0067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μαχαιροί Χανίων 0102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Βωσάκου 0015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κρήνη Μονής Βωσάκου 0030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγία στο Καστρί Μυλοποτάμου 0056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ραμνή Χανίων 2166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μαχαιροί Χανίων 0097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 21:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βαφές Χανίων 0162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 19:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βαφές Χανίων 0172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 19:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παϊδοχώρι 0112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βαφές Χανίων 0180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 22:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πηγάδια Γαβαλοχωρίου 0313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Αγίου Γεωργίου στο Καρύδι 0322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλαιοχριστιανική βασιλική Βραυρώνας 5311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Βασιλείου και Υπαπαντής, Κορωπί 5563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίων Σπυρίδωνος και Κωνσταντίνου, Κορωπί 5565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παϊδοχώρι 0115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:17, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλαιοχριστιανική βασιλική Βραυρώνας 5325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Βασιλείου και Υπαπαντής, Κορωπί 5561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καρέας 5495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Καρέα 5512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγία Βαραμπά 5348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου στο Πουρνάρι Οινόης 0296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αρτέμιδας στη Βραυρώνα 5241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (A little bit too dark at first glance, but at 100% it looks solid and good.) --Aristeas 10:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Καρέας 5510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:06, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agios Mamas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 13:47, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλαιοχριστιανική βασιλική Βραυρώνας 5307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 13:47, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κορωπί 5560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πηγάδια Γαβαλοχωρίου 0307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Difficult – because the wells are all in shadow and the background is bright –, but IMHO well handled. --Aristeas 09:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βαφές Χανίων 0192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Φρες 0136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Question Is the plant species of the tree also known? Or would we have to place it into Category:Unidentified Pinus and Category:Unidentified trees in Greece, from a botanical point of view? -- Martinus KE 23:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 Comment I think it's Pinus brutia, added category. --C messier 21:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. A little bit of CA on the power lines but hardly noticeable at roasonable zoom level. --Trougnouf 13:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Τριόπετρα 2950.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Τριόπετρα 2950.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Deletion Notices on very old images.

I have noticed you proposed deletion on some images that are linked to pages I created. Rest assured most of the images associated with my Greek painter's project are of paintings with expired copyrights. There is also wiki data associated with most of the project. I will invite other Wikipedia administrators to overlook our relationship.Tzim78 (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Please read Commons:ART. I only proposed for deletion photos of objects that are 3D, thus a PD-Art tag can't apply. --C messier (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User is accusing me of copyright violations. The user is accusing me of copyright violations and is adamant that I uploaded 3d images to Wikipedia, which is false. I do not own a 3d phone..

Tzim78 (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

A better way to add the template

I noticed you showed an interest in my Greek arts project. A better way to add the art template would be to include the death of the artist. PD-Art|PD-old-100-1923|deathyear= artists death. For instance, for the death year of Georgios Klontzas, we would add 1608. See template below:

This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

The author died in 1608, so this work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.

The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".
This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details.

.Tzim78 (talk) 15:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σταθμός Λαρίσσης, Αθήνα 9793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ξενοδοχείο Σαν Ριβάλ, Αθήνα 9720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οδός Αχαρνών 9746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κρήνη Μεταξουργείου 9663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 15:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μέγαρο Γιάνναρου 0088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πάρκο Φωκίωνος Νέγρη, Κυψέλη 9904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πλατεία Κοραή 9629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πλατεία Τράιμπερ 9714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πάρκο Μπακογιάννη, Αθήνα 9883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA should be removed. --Ermell 14:51, 19 February 2022 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 13:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Όμορφη Εκκλησία Αίγινας 1488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support--Lmbuga 21:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βαγία 1522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Pity for the wires. Good quality Lmbuga 14:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πλατεία Κυψέλης, Αίγινα 1502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Οδός Καποδιστρίου, Αίγινα 1381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγίτσα, Αίγινα 1471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αίγινα 1384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πόρτες Αίγινας 1341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παναγίτσα, Αίγινα 1476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:28, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σουβάλα 1517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ανεμόμυλοι Χώρας Ίου 6238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 17:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Αικατερίνης, Χώρα Ίου 6518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 17:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άγιοι Ασώματοι Θησείο 0680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σπηλιά του Κουφού 0441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Namıka Hanım Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αίγινα 0975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Noise in the sky should be reduced. --Ermell 21:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 15:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 16:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίων Αποστόλων, Κάτω Επισκοπή Σητείας 6570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πλατεία Μύλων, Χώρα Ίου 6236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Ιωάννη του Θεολόγου και Αγίου Παντελεήμονα, Χώρα Ίου 6441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ανεμόμυλοι Χώρας Ίου 6386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου του Γιαλού, Ίος 6526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but messy background --Michielverbeek 21:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Χώρα Ίου 6434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αίγινα 0980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίων Αποστόλων, Κάτω Επισκοπή Σητείας 6566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Time to say “thank you!” again

Hello C messier,

it’s again time for me to say “Thank you so much!” to you. Your photos from Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας are wonderful. I have been in this ruins village only once quite some years ago (1994 or so) and was fascinated by that place. It’s not as noble as Μυστράς or Μονεμβασιά etc. and not as spectacular as the rocks of Meteora etc., but that hill with all the chapels was so charming, it was embedded so nicely into its landscape and at the same time so full of severe history that I never forgot it. Now you have visited it, even in the most beautiful season (spring) when there are blossoms and flowers between the ruins, and brought back so many photos. Thank you very much for that!

All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind world Aristeas and I am glad you enjoyed the photos. Palaiochora is such an interesting location, yet not as famous as other now deserted medieval towns, like Mystras or Anavatos. Aegina is more famous for the temple of Aphaia, pistaccios, Saint Nektarios and being the first seat of the Greek goverment. Unfortunately, as I visited it late afternoon didn't have time to photograph all the chapels before sunset. --C messier (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
You are right, C messier: all guidebooks I know mention for Aegina the temple of Aphaia etc. in big letters, but Palaiochora is mentioned only in the margin. It was a happy chance that I have visited Palaiochora it at all when I was on the island; I was all the more excited about this site. – It’s a pity that you had no time for all of the chapels; but there is also a big advantage of your visit in the late afternoon: you had good warm light which makes chapels much more beautiful. IMHO it’s better to have good photos of some of the chapels than boring photos of all of them ;–). Thank you again, --Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Μονή Πετράκη 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίων Γεωργίου και Δημητρίου, Παλαιόχωρα Αίγινας 0908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Επισκοπή Αγίου Διονυσίου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλαιοχώρα, Αίγινα 0935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Επισκοπή Αγίου Διονυσίου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (No perspective correction necessary: We are clearly looking down in a steep angle.) --Aristeas 07:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Ταξιάρχη, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Ελευθερίου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Ταξιάρχη, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 22:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Βαθύ Αίγινας 0919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Στεφάνου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --aismallard 21:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Στεφάνου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 21:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου του Φόρου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινα 1545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 21:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Ταξιάρχη, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Very instructive view of (almost) the complete hill. The focus is a bit near, so the background is not that sharp, but IMHO it’s still good given the resolution (and that obviously no strong sharpening has been applied). --Aristeas 09:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would crop the chain at the bottom --Llez 05:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, very good overview of the complete site. Hint: I would try to change the colour balance slightly – a tiny little bit warmer (more yellow) and a bit more green/less magenta could make the photo look even better. --Aristeas 10:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λαούσες 1108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 06:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Βαρβάρας, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Μεταμόρφωσης, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 0945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Βαρβάρας, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Matutinho 18:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ξωκκλήσι Αγίας Άννας, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Matutinho 18:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Επισκοπή Αγίου Διονυσίου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Matutinho 18:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άγιοι Θεόδωροι, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Matutinho 18:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Ταξιάρχη, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Matutinho 18:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου του Φόρου, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινα 1539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Κάστρο Παλαιοχώρας, Αίγινα 0909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Άγιοι Θεόδωροι, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Σπυρίδωνας, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Μακρίνας, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Μακρίνας, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Κυριακής, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίων Γεωργίου και Δημητρίου, Παλαιόχωρα Αίγινας 0905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 20:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 15:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Μηνά, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Χαραλάμπου, Κερατέα 1072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Δημητρίου, Κερατέα 1091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Παρασκευής, Κερατέα 1115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σιδηροδρομικός σταθμός Κερατέας 1137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Γεωργίου, Κουβαράς 1274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αίγινα 2193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Κυριακής, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Given the difficult circumstances I think it’s OK and a very useful reproduction. --Aristeas 08:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σιδηροδρομικός σταθμός Κερατέας 1138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίου Χαραλάμπου, Κερατέα 1134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αίγινα 2203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ωρωπός 2226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Συκάμινο 2195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αίγινα 2190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Μεταμόρφωσης Σωτήρος, Κορωπί 1253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:18, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ναός Αγίας Κυριακής, Παλαιοχώρα Αίγινας 1594.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Αίγινα 2162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:43, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ασωπός 2154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 06:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Νέα Επίδαυρος 0252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λυγουριό 0279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πέρδικα Αίγινας 2121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Υπουργείο Ανάπτυξης, Αθήνα 1948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Λυγουριό 0284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Σοφικό 2234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Πρώην ξενοδοχείο Exelcior, Αθήνα 1910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:40, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)