Commons:Candidatas a Imagens de qualidade

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 77% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Ir para as nomeações
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский
float

Estas são as candidatas a tornarem-se Imagens de qualidade. Por favor, fique claro que não é o mesmo que Imagens especiais. Além disso, se você deseja obter informações sobre as suas imagens, pode consegui-las em Críticas fotográficas.

Objectivo[edit]

O objectico das Imagens de qualidade é incentivar as pessoas que são a base do Commons, os utilizadores individuais que fornecem imagens para ampliar esta colecção. Enquanto que as imagens especiais são as melhores de todas as imagens carregadas no Commons, as Imagens de qualidade servem para identificar e encorajar os esforços dos utilizadores para carregar imagens de qualidade no Commons.
Além disso, as imagens de qualidade podem ser um local onde outros utilizadores expliquem métodos para melhorar uma imagem.

Orientações[edit]

Todas as imagens nomeadas devem ser trabalho próprio dos utilizadores do Commons

Para os nomeadores[edit]

Aqui estão as diretrizes gerais para Imagens de qualidade, Below e orientações gerais para Imagens de qualidade; e outras orientações mais detalhadas estão disponíveis em Diretrizes de imagens.

Requisitos das imagens[edit]

  1. Status de direitos autorais. As candidatas a Imagens de qualidade foram carregadas no Commons pelo proprietário dos direitos autorais sob uma licença adequada. Os requisitos completos de licença estão disponíveis em COM:CT
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. As Imagens de qualidade devem ser categorizadas, possuir um título principal e descrição. Isto incluiria o nome taxonômico dos organismos.
  4. Sem anúncios ou assinaturas na imagem. Os direitos de autor e informações de autoria devem ficar na página da imagem e podem estar nos metadados da imagem, mas não deve interferir no conteúdo da imagem.
Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Requisitos técnicos[edit]

Critérios mais detalhados estão disponíveis em Diretrizes de imagens.

Resolução[edit]

As imagens do Commons podem ser usadas não só para visualizá-las no ecrã. Também podem ser usadas para impressão ou visualização em monitores de alta resolução. Não podemos prever quais dispositivos serão usados no futuro, por isso é importante que as imagens que são nomeadas tenham uma resolução razoavelmente alta. Normalmente o limite inferior é de 2 megapixels, mas para imagens 'fáceis de tomar', os revisores podem exigir muito mais.

Não se aplica a imagens SVG.

Qualidade das imagens[edit]

As imagens digitais estão sujeitas a vários problemas resultantes da captura e processamento da imagem, tais como ruídos, problemas com a compressão JPEG, falta de informação de zonas ou realces, ou problemas com a captura de cores. Todas estas questões devem ser tratadas adequadamente.

Composição e iluminação[edit]

A disposição do objecto principal de uma imagem deve contribuir para a própria imagem. Objectos em segundo plano não devem desviar a atenção. A iluminação e o foco também devem contribuir para o resultado global; o objecto principal tem de se destacar, ser completo e estar bem exposto.

Valor[edit]

Nosso principal objectivo é melhorar a qualidade das imagens que contribuem para o Wikicommons, algo valioso para os projectos da Wikimedia.

Como nomear[edit]

Basta adicionar uma linha deste formulário no topo da lista de candidatos da secção de Nomeações.

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição  --~~~~ |}}

A descrição deve ser não mais do que algumas palavras, e por favor deixe uma linha em branco entre sua nova entrada e as demais.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição  --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations[edit]

A descrição deve ser não mais do que algumas palavras, e por favor deixe uma linha em branco entre sua nova entrada e as demais. A adição de mais de um par de imagens de uma só vez pode ser considerado flooding, o que é desaprovado.

Avaliando as imagens[edit]

Qualquer utilizador registado pode revisar um nomeação.
Quando um revisor avalia uma imagem deve considerar as mesmas diretrizes do nomeador.

Como revisar[edit]

Como actualizar o status

Examine cuidadosamente a imagem. Abre-a na resolução máxima, e veja se ela atende aos critérios de qualidade.

  • Se você decidir promover a nomeação, altere a linha relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Breve descrição --Assinatura do nomeador |Por que você gostou. --~~~~}}

Em outras palavras, altere a predefinição de /Nomination para /Promotion e adicione a sua assinatura, possivelmente com algum pequeno comentário.

  • Se você decidir rejeitar a nomeação, altere a linha relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Breve descrição --Assinatura do nomeador |Por que você não gostou --~~~~}}

Em outras palavras, altere a predefinição de /Nomination para /Decline e adicione a sua assinatura, possivelmente declarando os critérios pelos quais a imagem fracassou (podes usar os títulos das secções de diretrizes). Se houver muitos problemas, notifique os 2 ou 3 mais graves, ou adicione múltiplos problemas. Ao rejeitar uma nomeação, por favor, explique as razões na página de discussão do nomeador - em regra, seja agradável e estimulante! Na mensagem, você deve dar uma explicação mais detalhada de sua decisão.

Nota: Por favor, avalie primeiramente as imagens mais antigas.

Período de tolerância e promoção[edit]

Se não houver objecções no período de 2 dias (exactamente 48 horas) desde a sua revisão, a imagem será promovida ou rejeitada, de acordo com a revisão que recebeu. Se você possuir objecções, mova a imagem para a secção Consensual review.

Como executar uma decisão[edit]

QICbot trabalha automaticamente nisso 2 dias depois de a decisão ter sido tomada, e as imagens promovidas são armazenadas em Promovidas recentemente à espera de categorização e inserção automática em uma página apropriada das Imagens de qualidade.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • As imagens que esperam uma revisão são mostradas em uma caixa azul
  • As imagens que o revisor aceitou são mostradas em uma caixa verde
  • As imagens que o revisor rejeitou são mostradas em uma caixa vermelha

Imagens não avaliadas (quadro azul)[edit]

As imagens nomeadas que não foram promovidas nem rejeitadas, ou que acabaram em consenso (que haja um número igual de oposições e apoios) após 8 dias nesta página devem ser removidas desta página sem promoção, armazenadas em Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives outubro 2014 e a categoria Unassessed QI candidates acrescentada à imagem.

Processo de revisão de consenso[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

Como pedir uma revisão consensual[edit]

Para pedir uma revisão consensual, basta alterar /Promotion ou /Decline para /Discuss, e adicionar o seu comentário imediatamente após a revisão. Um bot automático irá movê-lo para a secção de revisão consensual dentro de um dia.

Por favor, somente envie coisas para a revisão consensual que foram revisadas como promovidas/rejeitadas. Se, como revisor, você não pode tomar uma decisão, adicione seu comentário, mas deixe o candidato nesta página.

Regras de revisão consensual[edit]

Veja Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules.

Actualização da página: purge this page's cache


Contents

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 02h39min, 25 outubro 2014 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

October 25, 2014[edit]

October 24, 2014[edit]

October 23, 2014[edit]

October 22, 2014[edit]

October 21, 2014[edit]

October 20, 2014[edit]

October 19, 2014[edit]

October 18, 2014[edit]

October 17, 2014[edit]

October 16, 2014[edit]

October 15, 2014[edit]

October 14, 2014[edit]

October 13, 2014[edit]

October 12, 2014[edit]

October 11, 2014[edit]

October 10, 2014[edit]

October 9, 2014[edit]

October 7, 2014[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Ayuntamiento,_Tallin,_Estonia,_2012-08-05,_DD_03.JPG[edit]

Ayuntamiento, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 03.JPG

  • Nomeação Gargoyle at the Town Hall, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 17:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão {{o}} Sorry, not QI IMO: artifacts, perhaps too much noise reduction and too much sharpened--Lmbuga 20:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Poco a poco 20:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Better, but the detail it's not good IMO, others can think--Lmbuga 21:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Catholic_Parish_Church_St._Agatha_North_East_view.jpg[edit]

Catholic Parish Church St. Agatha North East view.jpg

  • Nomeação Catholic parish church St. Agatha Kimratshofen / Altusried / Bavaria / Germany --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promoção
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition but the building is entirely in shadow (hence a blue cast), contrast is too flat, and image is noisy --Kreuzschnabel 14:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I liked the blue. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI now for me, nice colours. And rule No. 1: Never compare an image with past promotions :-) --Kreuzschnabel 06:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Reus-slogan-1409.jpg[edit]

Reus-slogan-1409.jpg

  • Nomeação Independence slogan in Reus, Catalonia. --PereslavlFoto 21:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please check the image. IMO it needs perspective correction.--XRay 17:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    *Symbol support vote.svg Support Not an architectural photo, so perspective issue not disturbing. --Smial 11:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    It's a photo of a building, that makes it architectural. Perspective correction is something we ask of most photos, I don't see why this one would get a pass on that. --Mattbuck 19:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bignor Roman Villa MMB 13.jpg[edit]

Bignor Roman Villa MMB 13.jpg

  • Nomeação Bignor Roman villa. Mattbuck 06:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Do you think that it is our job to preselect your photos??? Not QI at all! --Hubertl 08:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
    Hubertl, I'd appreciate it if you would show some good faith. I do preselect my photos, I have a big list of those which need nomination. When I upload, I add to the list those images I think might be QI. I thought this one might be QI. Honestly it was a borderline case - this isn't one of my best photos, but QI was never about "best" photos. This to me would not be a clear decline, though it wouldn't be an obvious promote either. I welcome constructive criticism, such as Jebulon's below. But saying "Not QI at all" is not really helpful to anyone. If you told me what was wrong, perhaps I could fix it. Mattbuck 17:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could be sharper and get a bit more of contrast but QI for me. Hubertl, keep in mind that Mattbuck somehow appreciates the detail :-) --Kreuzschnabel 09:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition. Symmetry is necessary for a symmetrical subject, IMO. --Jebulon 18:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hubertl's comment indeed comes across a bit too harsh, but I agree that this image does not stand out from random tourist snapshots in any way. And to be honest, the author has been making a lot of QI nominations. Maybe not enough to call it flooding, but still, more rigorous preselection on his part would be appreciated. --Yerpo 09:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
    Even the King of QI, Poco a poco, gets images declined fairly regularly. I nominate ones I think are QI, and ones I think might be. Sometimes non-QI-worthy images slip through the gaps, but given that roughly 75% of my nominations get promoted (averaging 4.94 per day this year, counting days when I didn't nominate any which is probably about 2 weeks total brings this to 5.22 per day or 74.6% of my nominations) I don't think there's any reason for me to change the way I've been doing things. Mattbuck 09:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Kunak_Sabah_Mostyn-Cave-01.jpg[edit]

Kunak Sabah Mostyn-Cave-01.jpg

  • Nomeação Kunak, Sabah: Entrance to Mostyn Cave. Because of it's location on the WWII Japanese Military Camp, it is also referred as "Japanese Tunnels" --Cccefalon 05:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:54, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree, the only part which is sharp is the wooden barrier in the foreground. --Hubertl 10:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
    See the bright side, at least there's something QI. I hope that somebody don't insult me for this. However, we can discuss. Clin --Livioandronico2013 11:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
    I shot a complete series of the cave. Some of the photos offer intentionally a focus in the foreground. I thought, it is very obvious that it is intentional to get the focus to the foreground when there is a sign board... I also completly disagree the statement that the only sharp is the barrier. This big red thing with the white letters, haven't you checked the sharpness of it? --Cccefalon 12:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:DC-TOWER_1_from_Danube_River_to_Northnorthwest_-_Vienna-4551.jpg[edit]

DC-TOWER 1 from Danube River to Northnorthwest - Vienna-4551.jpg

  • Nomeação DC-Tower 1, view from Handelskai to northnorthwest --Hubertl 20:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentDust spot removed even here... --Hubertl 10:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Blue cast, and lack of contrast, IMO.--Jebulon 19:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    • These are exactly the colors you will have at this time of the day - short after sunrise - in a distance of about 2.3 km. There is no strange blue in this picture. --Hubertl 17:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Paris - The Eiffel Tower in spring - 2307.jpg[edit]

Paris - The Eiffel Tower in spring - 2307.jpg

  • Nomeação Eiffel Tower (by Jorgeroyan) --Paris 16 13:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão The trees in front of the tower aren't nice. A few areas seem burned. Jakec 17:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    quality is good for me and composition is nice --Taxiarchos228 20:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    There's also purple and blue/green CA on the trees and red CA on the tower. Jakec 12:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB «C2 Canary Wharf.jpg[edit]

London MMB «C2 Canary Wharf.jpg

  • Nomeação Canary Wharf. Mattbuck 06:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too dark --Taxiarchos228 08:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    • That would be because it was taken at night. --Mattbuck 23:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Too bright, streetlamps are blown :-) No, no, Symbol support vote.svg Support for me. --Kreuzschnabel 06:35, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Ship_procession_fresco,_part_4,_Akrotiri,_Greece.jpg[edit]

Ship procession fresco, part 4, Akrotiri, Greece.jpg

  • Nomeação Ship procession fresco, part 4, Akrotiri, Greece. --Yann 19:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 20:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
    New version. Please check. --Yann 13:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    Better, but not at QI level IMHO, sorry, Poco a poco 19:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Ford_Mustang_Convertible_de_1968,_Helsinki,_Finlandia,_2012-08-14,_DD_01.JPG[edit]

Ford Mustang Convertible de 1968, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 01.JPG

  • Nomeação Ford Mustang Convertible of 1968, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 13:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão I am not convinced of this image: very tight crop, disturbing advertising of Texaco in the background, lop-sided pillars. We should discuss. -- Spurzem 17:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version with a bunch of improvements (but the Texaco sign) Poco a poco 19:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.06.21.-25-Mannheim Rheinau--Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg[edit]

2014.06.21.-25-Mannheim Rheinau--Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg

  • Nomeação Kleiner Sonnenröschen-Bläuling - Aricia agestis --Hockei 20:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO not sharp enough for this kind of image. --XRay 15:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You forget that these butterflies were in hectic motions. Please another opinions. --Hockei 18:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Norwood Junction railway station MMB 03 377439.jpg[edit]

Norwood Junction railway station MMB 03 377439.jpg

  • Nomeação 377439 at Norwood Junction. Mattbuck 07:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Rejeição
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Much too dark. Far away from QI. -- Spurzem 11:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - IMHO contrast too high... --Ehsc 11:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Not sure who set this to discuss, but ok. ✓ Brightened. Mattbuck 15:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose right part of the image simply to dark (equal shadowed). --Alchemist-hp 19:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    It was getting to evening, the sun was low, I contend this is a realistic portrayal of conditions. Mattbuck 23:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    The dark shadows are still a photographers error. Please use simple another daytime for a better illumination for the entire image. --Alchemist-hp 19:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support realistic and QI, even good IMO --Christian Ferrer 04:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Olustvere mõisa peahoone, 1900-1915.a.a*.jpg[edit]

Olustvere mõisa peahoone, 1900-1915.a.a*.jpg

  • Nomeação Olustvere manor main house (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 20:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good, but a bit tilted CCW--Lmbuga 20:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Good quality, I cannot see tilted parts --Hubertl 12:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)It need description --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ok for description but 1 dustspot (see note) and both sides are leaning in a bit --Christian Ferrer 05:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ok, but it needs a little perspective correction. See notes. Vertical lines are not stright. Improvable--Lmbuga 20:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Roundabout_September_2014_12.jpg[edit]

Roundabout September 2014 12.jpg

  • Nomeação Roundabout Vällingbyvägen/Råckstavägen. --ArildV 07:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 10:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
    could the exposure be optimized? Additional Opinions? --Ehsc 10:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Did you have a opinion? If so, please explain.--ArildV 19:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image is underexposed. A correction is possible, so I'd like to change to support. --Alchemist-hp 19:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thank you. New version uploaded.--ArildV 11:10, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Hotel_The_Rubens,_Londres,_Inglaterra,_2014-08-07,_DD_001.JPG[edit]

Hotel The Rubens, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-07, DD 001.JPG

  • Nomeação The Rubens hotel, London, England --Poco a poco 10:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Top too unsharp. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Poco a poco 08:54, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
    I think it's acceptable now, please let's discuss, please --Poco a poco 20:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Bystrzyca_Kłodzka,_Brama_Wodna_11.JPG[edit]

2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Brama Wodna 11.JPG

  • Nomeação Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 8 --Jacek Halicki 22:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Noisy and unsharp at the top. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    noise isn't disturbing here in the dark areas, good QI for me --~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good quality. I have no insight for the criticism above. -- Spurzem 10:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Bazylika_Nawiedzenia_NMP_we_Frydku-Mistku_06.jpg[edit]

2014 Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP we Frydku-Mistku 06.jpg

  • Nomeação Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady, Mariánské náměstí, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 15:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
    Lacking contrast, top very unsharp. Mattbuck 10:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão ✓ Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 18:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    Yes, but as with the other there's a strange horizontal graining. Mattbuck 20:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
overexposed areas from Picture


✓ Done Fixed. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Better, but there is still quite a bit of general noise/grain, and the top of the spire is not sharp. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Mattbuck 17:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Not sure as well. --Hockei 15:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed. Yann 17:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's not true. Pleaae show us a printscreen from your software, showing us that this image has overexposed parts. I have 2, and both didn't show it. --Halavar 19:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overexposed and/or blown-out lights. --Alchemist-hp 19:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version nuploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 22:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me now!--Hubertl 14:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_rynek_03.JPG[edit]

2014 Lądek-Zdrój, rynek 03.JPG

  • Nomeação Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Too strong shadow in the foreground for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Can you brighten the shadow area (or black level) a bit? --Hockei (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 22:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good, for me QI. --Hockei 17:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good for me now. --Hubertl 11:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bayon,_Angkor_Thom,_Camboya,_2013-08-16,_DD_27.jpg[edit]

Bayon, Angkor Thom, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 27.jpg

  • Nomeação Documentation work at Bayon, Angkor Thom‎, Cambodia --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient focus. Above all, the person is disruptive behind the statue. --Steindy 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness should be better but it is enough for me. The image is an impressive document of the painter. Please diskuss. -- Spurzem 10:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version with increased sharpening Poco a poco 15:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 17:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately, the main subjekt should be sharp enough but it isn't IMO. --Hockei 20:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness not perfect, but acceptable. Nice documentation. -- Smial 14:11, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:34_cours_Jean-Jaurès,_Pézenas,_Hérault.jpg[edit]

34 cours Jean-Jaurès, Pézenas, Hérault.jpg

  • Nomeação Entrance of the 34 Cours Jean-Jaurès. Pézenas. --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Unfortunate lighting imo Poco a poco 18:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)Poco a poco, it's a good light, I presume that you speak rather about shadows --Christian Ferrer 07:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão As discussed, due to the shadows not a QI to me --Poco a poco 15:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Good quality and nice contrast between shadows and nice light, I ask to discuss, thank you Diego --Christian Ferrer 15:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Sorry. But for me this is not a good image. The shadows are very disturbing. -- Spurzem 21:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like playing with light and shadow. No details lost in dark parts, probably slight overexposure in bright areas, but not disturbing. -- Smial 14:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Here I increased the contrast in a deliberate way :) --Christian Ferrer 16:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 07:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC) as smial

File:2014.06.21.-04-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg[edit]

2014.06.21.-04-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg

  • Nomeação Hufeisenklee-Widderchen - Zygaena transalpina --Hockei 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
    Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me--Holleday 12:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Seems a bit unnatural to me - oversharpened maybe? Hard to say, but for me this is not QI. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me yes --Livioandronico2013 18:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blurred, lack of detail, jpeg artifacts Alvesgaspar 10:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others--Lmbuga 23:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.06.21.-03-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg[edit]

2014.06.21.-03-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg

  • Nomeação Hufeisenklee-Widderchen - Zygaena transalpina --Hockei 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me--Holleday 12:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Seems a bit unnatural to me - oversharpened maybe? Hard to say, but for me this is not QI. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support For me yes --Livioandronico2013 18:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blurred, lack of detail. Alvesgaspar 10:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others--Lmbuga 23:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Brixner_Dom_Orgel_4.JPG[edit]

Brixner Dom Orgel 4.JPG

  • Nomeação Organ of Brixen Cathedral --Uoaei1 06:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão slightly tilted and quite dark. --MB-one 10:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ fixed --Uoaei1 20:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    Now, it has weird effects at the window part. Maybe you want to ask for discussion. --MB-one 22:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done CAs removed at the window. More opinions please! --Uoaei1 07:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Hubertl 10:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür3.jpg[edit]

Bettingen - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Tag der offenen Tür3.jpg

  • Nomeação TV Tower St. Chrischona --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Could you crop/paint out that little blue thing at the bottom left? Mattbuck 16:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão  Not done --Mattbuck 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support. The "little blue thing" can not be a reason to decline a very good image. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür11.jpg[edit]

Bettingen - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Tag der offenen Tür11.jpg

  • Nomeação TV Tower St. Chrischona, view from operating pulpit --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Noticable barrel distortion. Mattbuck 16:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  •  Not done --Mattbuck 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    The left side quite clearly bends out. Taxiarchos has had 10 days to fix this. Mattbuck 23:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
here is n.th. to be fixed, we have a wideangle view --Taxiarchos228 09:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
That’s no excuse. Good wide-angle lenses don’t show any barrel distortion, for the others it’s easily fixed. --Kreuzschnabel 19:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Chromatic noise in shady areas. Improvable--Lmbuga 23:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür10.jpg[edit]

Bettingen - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Tag der offenen Tür10.jpg

  • Nomeação TV Tower St. Chrischona, view from operating pulpit --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Perspective/tilt issues. Mattbuck 16:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective/tilt issues --Mattbuck 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. QI for me. Please diskuss but not decline! -- Spurzem 22:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why should he? Discuss is set when a contradictory opinion comes up, that’s the normal prodecure as shown in the guidelines. The first reviewer has his own opinion about the image, which may be a clear deline, and he does not yet know you’ve got a different view of things. – As for the image, Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it’s clearly tilted (look in full view at any vertical line, e.g. the panel or the steel structures hanging from the ceiling). The window framing is leaning for real of course. And it’s quite noisy, I wasn’t aware of the Nikon top range to have such problems at ISO 400. --Kreuzschnabel 20:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit of chromatic noise in shady areas. Improvable--Lmbuga 23:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB C7 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg[edit]

Castle Combe Circuit MMB C7 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg

  • Nomeação Saloon car racing at Castle Combe. Mattbuck 07:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment QI? The main object is not very sharp. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 11:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    • was this a opposing vote? --LC-de 09:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support focus is on the car, it's ok IMO, in more weather conditions were not the best. --Christian Ferrer 10:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I know better images of racing cars which were declined. Therefore no QI for me. Sorry. -- Spurzem 22:55, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Spurzem --Livioandronico2013 00:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing really sharp. For a racing photo the main subject is way too small depicted. For an overview of the location it is way too unsharp. -- Smial 12:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 09:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140614_-_Course_en_ligne_handbike_37.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne handbike 37.jpg

  • Nomeação Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne handbike. --Pleclown 16:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Revisão
  • Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --~~~~ I don't feel like searching the right user for this comment.... --LC-de 08:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --Steindy 21:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:42, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 13:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 08:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_58.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre 58.jpg

  • Nomeação Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 15:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --Steindy 23:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:44, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Pleclown, every athlete has a starting number and the start lists and result lists can these names read. If you write that it is insignificant athletes, where should because then the images so well these are also used in Wikipedia? --Steindy 20:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
        • The fact that the person depicted is not named is not relevant here.
        • As for the educational value, and the possible use in Wikipedia, if this is relevant, use your imagination. A disabled person on a trike... Where can this kind of picture be used in Wikipedia ? Pleclown 20:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good and impressive photo. This we should have to judge and not the description. -- Spurzem 22:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A good file description and categorization is an essential prerequisite for QI - See the guidelines --Moroder 21:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose to Spurzem's affirmation. This person should be identified.--Jebulon 17:19, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Why will you know the name of this woman? I see absolutely no reason. Perhaps soon we will get the telephone number too? -- Spurzem 21:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, and still valuable without the name of the person. Yann 09:47, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Are you sure that this girl is a professional cyclist? I'm not sure, and I don't have problem with the name if she is amateur, but the template {{Personality rights}} is convenient.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In my opinion chromatic aberrations (or halos), and lack of detail (see notes)--Lmbuga 23:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Image is shareable and usable, I'm sure--Lmbuga 23:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes? Yann 09:47, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB »0D4 City Canal.jpg[edit]

London MMB »0D4 City Canal.jpg

  • Nomeação Reflections in the City Canal. Mattbuck 09:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Color noise at right especially at bottom --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Mattbuck 17:49, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Missing sharpness. I can only detect a narrow sharp area in the lower third of the photo with the best intentions. --Steindy 23:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support sharp enough IMO --Christian Ferrer 04:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me the word "sharp" is totally absent here --Livioandronico2013 12:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Livioandronico2013 12:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür16.jpg[edit]

Bettingen - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Tag der offenen Tür16.jpg

  • Nomeação TV Tower St. Chrischona, view to Rührberg --Taxiarchos228 05:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Pleclown 16:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose until a more accurate description --Christian Ferrer 18:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Christian. Mattbuck 18:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others --Livioandronico2013 11:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Livioandronico2013 11:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:JasperCountyCourthouse_retouched.jpg[edit]

JasperCountyCourthouse retouched.jpg

  • Nomeação Jasper County courthouse in Carthage, Missouri. --Kbh3rd 03:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Promoção
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad time of the day, wrong light direction, IMO. One side is in full shadow, the other in half shadow.--Jebulon 11:22, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support technical quality ok for QI. --MB-one 11:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Livioandronico2013 22:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Jebulon--Lmbuga 16:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If the clock isn't wrong, we look at a north facade, which will all time of the day be in shadow if the sun shines. Some very small overexposed spots, but ineglible. High contrast well handled, good detail also in shadows. The lighting shows the structures of the facade clearly. Good sharpness. -- Smial 18:50, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Hubertl 09:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose full per Jebulon. --Alchemist-hp 05:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Alchemist-hp 05:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Tabela de tempo (8 dias após a nomeação)[edit]

sex 17 Out. → sáb 25 Out.
sáb 18 Out. → dom 26 Out.
dom 19 Out. → seg 27 Out.
seg 20 Out. → ter 28 Out.
ter 21 Out. → qua 29 Out.
qua 22 Out. → qui 30 Out.
qui 23 Out. → sex 31 Out.
sex 24 Out. → sáb 01 Nov.
sáb 25 Out. → dom 02 Nov.