Commons:Candidatas a Imagens de qualidade

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 77% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Ir para as nomeações
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska
float

Estas são as candidatas a tornarem-se Imagens de qualidade. Por favor, fique claro que não é o mesmo que Imagens especiais. Além disso, se você deseja obter informações sobre as suas imagens, pode consegui-las em Críticas fotográficas.

Objectivo

O objectico das Imagens de qualidade é incentivar as pessoas que são a base do Commons, os utilizadores individuais que fornecem imagens para ampliar esta colecção. Enquanto que as imagens especiais são as melhores de todas as imagens carregadas no Commons, as Imagens de qualidade servem para identificar e encorajar os esforços dos utilizadores para carregar imagens de qualidade no Commons.
Além disso, as imagens de qualidade podem ser um local onde outros utilizadores expliquem métodos para melhorar uma imagem.

Orientações

Todas as imagens nomeadas devem ser trabalho próprio dos utilizadores do Commons

Para os nomeadores

Aqui estão as diretrizes gerais para Imagens de qualidade, Below e orientações gerais para Imagens de qualidade; e outras orientações mais detalhadas estão disponíveis em Diretrizes de imagens.

Requisitos das imagens

  1. Status de direitos autorais. As candidatas a Imagens de qualidade foram carregadas no Commons pelo proprietário dos direitos autorais sob uma licença adequada. Os requisitos completos de licença estão disponíveis em COM:CT
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
  4. Sem anúncios ou assinaturas na imagem. Os direitos de autor e informações de autoria devem ficar na página da imagem e podem estar nos metadados da imagem, mas não deve interferir no conteúdo da imagem.


Creator

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Requisitos técnicos

Critérios mais detalhados estão disponíveis em Diretrizes de imagens.

Resolução

As imagens do Commons podem ser usadas não só para visualizá-las no ecrã. Também podem ser usadas para impressão ou visualização em monitores de alta resolução. Não podemos prever quais dispositivos serão usados no futuro, por isso é importante que as imagens que são nomeadas tenham uma resolução razoavelmente alta. Normalmente o limite inferior é de 2 megapixels, mas para imagens 'fáceis de tomar', os revisores podem exigir muito mais.

Não se aplica a imagens SVG.

Qualidade das imagens

As imagens digitais estão sujeitas a vários problemas resultantes da captura e processamento da imagem, tais como ruídos, problemas com a compressão JPEG, falta de informação de zonas ou realces, ou problemas com a captura de cores. Todas estas questões devem ser tratadas adequadamente.

Composição e iluminação

A disposição do objecto principal de uma imagem deve contribuir para a própria imagem. Objectos em segundo plano não devem desviar a atenção. A iluminação e o foco também devem contribuir para o resultado global; o objecto principal tem de se destacar, ser completo e estar bem exposto.

Valor

Nosso principal objectivo é melhorar a qualidade das imagens que contribuem para o Wikicommons, algo valioso para os projectos da Wikimedia.

Como nomear

Basta adicionar uma linha deste formulário no topo da lista de candidatos da secção de Nomeações.

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição  --~~~~ |}}

A descrição deve ser não mais do que algumas palavras, e por favor deixe uma linha em branco entre sua nova entrada e as demais.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição  --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations

A descrição deve ser não mais do que algumas palavras, e por favor deixe uma linha em branco entre sua nova entrada e as demais. A adição de mais de um par de imagens de uma só vez pode ser considerado flooding, o que é desaprovado.


Avaliando as imagens

Qualquer utilizador registado pode revisar um nomeação.
Quando um revisor avalia uma imagem deve considerar as mesmas diretrizes do nomeador.

Como revisar

Como actualizar o status

Examine cuidadosamente a imagem. Abre-a na resolução máxima, e veja se ela atende aos critérios de qualidade.

  • Se você decidir promover a nomeação, altere a linha relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Breve descrição --Assinatura do nomeador |Por que você gostou. --~~~~}}

Em outras palavras, altere a predefinição de /Nomination para /Promotion e adicione a sua assinatura, possivelmente com algum pequeno comentário.

  • Se você decidir rejeitar a nomeação, altere a linha relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Breve descrição --Assinatura do nomeador |Por que você não gostou --~~~~}}

Em outras palavras, altere a predefinição de /Nomination para /Decline e adicione a sua assinatura, possivelmente declarando os critérios pelos quais a imagem fracassou (podes usar os títulos das secções de diretrizes). Se houver muitos problemas, notifique os 2 ou 3 mais graves, ou adicione múltiplos problemas. Ao rejeitar uma nomeação, por favor, explique as razões na página de discussão do nomeador - em regra, seja agradável e estimulante! Na mensagem, você deve dar uma explicação mais detalhada de sua decisão.

Nota: Por favor, avalie primeiramente as imagens mais antigas.


Período de tolerância e promoção

Se não houver objecções no período de 2 dias (exactamente 48 horas) desde a sua revisão, a imagem será promovida ou rejeitada, de acordo com a revisão que recebeu. Se você possuir objecções, mova a imagem para a secção Consensual review.

Como executar uma decisão

QICbot trabalha automaticamente nisso 2 dias depois de a decisão ter sido tomada, e as imagens promovidas são armazenadas em Promovidas recentemente à espera de categorização e inserção automática em uma página apropriada das Imagens de qualidade.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • As imagens que esperam uma revisão são mostradas em uma caixa azul
  • As imagens que o revisor aceitou são mostradas em uma caixa verde
  • As imagens que o revisor rejeitou são mostradas em uma caixa vermelha

Imagens não avaliadas (quadro azul)

As imagens nomeadas que não foram promovidas nem rejeitadas, ou que acabaram em consenso (que haja um número igual de oposições e apoios) após 8 dias nesta página devem ser removidas desta página sem promoção, armazenadas em Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives abril 2015 e a categoria Unassessed QI candidates acrescentada à imagem.

Processo de revisão de consenso

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

Como pedir uma revisão consensual

Para pedir uma revisão consensual, basta alterar /Promotion ou /Decline para /Discuss, e adicionar o seu comentário imediatamente após a revisão. Um bot automático irá movê-lo para a secção de revisão consensual dentro de um dia.

Por favor, somente envie coisas para a revisão consensual que foram revisadas como promovidas/rejeitadas. Se, como revisor, você não pode tomar uma decisão, adicione seu comentário, mas deixe o candidato nesta página.

Regras de revisão consensual

Veja Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules.

Actualização da página: purge this page's cache


Contents

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 11h58min, 28 abril 2015 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.
Please nominate only a maximum of 5 images per day. [1]

April 28, 2015

April 27, 2015

April 26, 2015

April 25, 2015

April 24, 2015

April 23, 2015

April 22, 2015

April 21, 2015

April 20, 2015

April 19, 2015

April 18, 2015

April 15, 2015

April 13, 2015

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:Πρόσοψη αρχαιολογικού μουσείου Αθηνών 8616.jpg

Πρόσοψη αρχαιολογικού μουσείου Αθηνών 8616.jpg

  • Nomeação Facade of the National Archaeological Museum of Athens --C messier 12:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Good quality. --Bgag 13:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose My graal !Clin But looks hazy, lack of crispness. And the sky is too noisy IMO. I ask for a discussion, please.--Jebulon 14:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Den_Haag_Centraal-1584.jpg

Den Haag Centraal-1584.jpg

  • Nomeação View to the Central Station The Hague --Hubertl 07:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment See notes please --Livioandronico2013 08:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment thanks, Livioandronico2013, part removed! --Hubertl 12:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry no for now. The dust spot is still here, and the correction of the top left corner is disturbingly visible (a different blue circle).--Jebulon 16:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done, @Jebulon:, Thanks for reviewing, I did it now with PS, not with LR. --Hubertl 17:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine now. --Palauenc05 17:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 11:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Dome_of_Bernini's_Parish_Church_in_Castel_Gandolfo.jpg

Dome of Bernini's Parish Church in Castel Gandolfo.jpg

  • Nomeação Dome of Bernini's Parish Church in Castel Gandolfo --Livioandronico2013 20:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Very good -- Spurzem 20:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition: too tight crop at right left, (sorry).--Jebulon 16:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good 4 me. --Palauenc05 20:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    Better Jebulon? thanks--Livioandronico2013 21:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Penampang_Sabah_Unduk-Ngadau-2014-Winners-of-subsidiary-titles-01.jpg

Penampang Sabah Unduk-Ngadau-2014-Winners-of-subsidiary-titles-01.jpg

  • Nomeação Penampang, Sabah: Winners of the Unduk Ngadau subsidiary titles and awards --Cccefalon 00:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Good quality. --ArildV 07:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    I disagree. Just a snapshot, poor composition --Moroder 21:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    I strongly disagree on this mind set: By accepting this opinion, we can drop all event photos and also disgrace all photographers which are trying to get photos with encyclopedial value from events. Having been part of the Kaamatan media corps in 2014, this photo was one of the for sure not accidentally snapshots as it shows all three winners of the subsidiary titles together with the key persons of the organization. cheers, --Cccefalon 02:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good quality, nothing wrong with the compo IMO --Christian Ferrer 11:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Maria im Weingarten 01.jpg

2014 Maria im Weingarten 01.jpg

  • Nomeação Church Maria im Weingarten, Volkach in Bavaria --Derzno 15:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Very inclined lines and too tight crop below. -- Spurzem 15:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC) bad combo and inclined --Denkmalhelfer 19:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC) The inclined are a part of personal art of this picture and teh crop to cut off disturbing parts in teh front --Derzno 19:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    Das mag ja alles sein, und die Geschmäcker sind verschieden. Aber ich kann in den schiefen und verzogenen Linien nichts Künstlerisches erkennen und dass unten Störenendes weggeschnitten wurde, ändert nichts daran, dass die Kirche zu dicht auf dem Bildrand steht. Schade, und bitte nichts für ungut. Vielleicht gibt es aber auch noch andere Meinungen, die mir widersprechen. Gruß -- Spurzem 07:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Church_of_San_Tolomeo_(Nepi).jpg

Church of San Tolomeo (Nepi).jpg

  • Nomeação Church of San Tolomeo (Nepi) --Livioandronico2013 07:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Overexposed and CA on top, nice composition --Moroder 18:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Not done --Moroder 17:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    I was blocked Moroder,better? Thanks --Livioandronico2013 08:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks better now --Moroder 05:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 11:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 11:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Passer_domesticus_-_House_sparrow_-_Serçe_07.jpg

Passer domesticus - House sparrow - Serçe 07.jpg

  • Nomeação A female House sparrow (Passer domesticus). Cambazlı, Silifke - Mersin, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I don't think this image is QI. Not sharp enough. --Charlesjsharp 11:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)*Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness is OK, IMHO. --C messier 15:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • {{Comment}} Sorry, I don't like the composition: The subject is too litle. Dust spots! a little bit of noise. Perhaps not sharp enough--Lmbuga 13:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose See above--Lmbuga 13:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree to all above. --Denkmalhelfer 18:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Passer_domesticus_-_House_sparrow_-_Serçe_01.jpg

Passer domesticus - House sparrow - Serçe 01.jpg

  • Nomeação A male House sparrow (Passer domesticus). Ayaş, Mersin, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    Sorry, I don't think this image is QI. Not sharp enough. --Charlesjsharp 11:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Liebfrauenkirche_Säben_Marienkapelle.jpg

Liebfrauenkirche Säben Marienkapelle.jpg

  • Nomeação Chapel in the Our Lady church in the Säben Abbey in South Tyrol --Moroder 04:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão The quality is ok, but your photobag and your own jacket is distracting. Sorry, You should take care of such details. --Hubertl 21:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    I disagree. Sorry Hubertl, what's wrong with o more "personal" rendering? I don't buy that --Moroder 22:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Great_Egret_during_mating_season_at_Smith_Oaks_Sanctuary,_High_Island.jpg

Great Egret during mating season at Smith Oaks Sanctuary, High Island.jpg

  • Nomeação Great egret (Ardea alba) during mating season at Smith Oaks Sanctuary, High Island --Frank Schulenburg 03:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    The head is not very sharp and the white feathers are overblown. --Charlesjsharp 14:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No problem with the sharpness. Too tight at bottom (paws are cropped). Little chromatic aberration (see the edges of the white head)?--Lmbuga 13:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2015-02-28_Electric_Avenue_Museumsquartier_Wien_Kunstmeile_9519.jpg

2015-02-28 Electric Avenue Museumsquartier Wien Kunstmeile 9519.jpg

  • Nomeação Electric Avenue, Museumsquartier, Vienna --Hubertl 07:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Strong reflection of the flashlight on the metal --Denkmalhelfer 15:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC). Yes, there is a flashlight. So what? Übrigens: In Deutschland herrscht Vermummungsverbot. Benötigen wir hier Abstimmsocken? --Hubertl 20:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)


[[:Category:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] The quality is ok, but your photobag and your own jacket flashlight is distracting. Sorry, You should take care of such details. --Denkmalhelfer (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Hausdülmen,_Ehrenfriedhof_--_2015_--_5403.jpg

Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2015 -- 5403.jpg

  • Nomeação Cemetery in honor Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality. Mostly out of focus, sorry --Moroder 07:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO, the choise of a shallow DOF is deliberate and as long as the placque is all in focus, it is acceptable. Please discuss. --C messier 13:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Code 20:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Hostal_Centro_Histórico_Regina,_México_D.F.,_México,_2013-10-16,_DD_158.JPG

Hostal Centro Histórico Regina, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 158.JPG

  • Nomeação Historic Center Regina Hostel, Mexico City, Mexico --Poco a poco 17:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is a diproportion between h and w--Moroder 07:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ New version, better now? Poco a poco 14:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Good quality. --Moroder 16:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unnatural distorsions IMO. The sky at left looks overexposed. I ask for a discussion, please.--Jebulon 23:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OE is irrelevant imho --Moroder 11:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong perspective distortion (horizontal perspective distortion): Unnatural, it seems overprocesed IMO. Areas of the sky are blown out (As Jebulon)--Lmbuga 13:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose perspective distortion --Denkmalhelfer 18:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_Santo_Domingo,_Puebla,_México,_2013-10-11,_DD_02.JPG

Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG

  • Nomeação Chapel of the Rosary, Santo Domingo, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 19:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It looks a bit dark to me. Do you think you could lighten up the darker part a bit? --Moroder 09:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Poco a poco 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Good quality. --Moroder 22:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I ask for a discussion, because the perspective correction of the tower is too strong, this looks unnatural to me.--Jebulon 23:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perspective correction of a building seen from the bottom always looks unnatural. What is the limit? --Moroder 11:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong perspective distortion (horizontal perspective distortion): Unnatural, it seems overprocesed IMO--Lmbuga 13:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree to Lmbuga --Denkmalhelfer 18:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Nottingham railway station MMB 90 170519 222018.jpg

Nottingham railway station MMB 90 170519 222018.jpg

  • Nomeação Nottingham railway station. Mattbuck 07:43, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much contrast between roof and rest, hard shadows --Denkmalhelfer 15:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Discussion neccessary. --Hubertl 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Mattbuck, please lighten the shadows a bit, it will be QI for me then.--Hubertl 22:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Κηφισιά Πλάτανος 7863.jpg

Κηφισιά Πλάτανος 7863.jpg

  • Nomeação The centre of Kifissia, Attica, Greece. --C messier 16:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There are really many problems. its leaning in (on the right side more than left) that means, it tilted too, additionally the lack of contrast. I can´t imagine, that this is just haze. What shall we do, C.? --Hubertl 15:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I can fix the low contrast issue, but are you sure that it is leaning in? I checked them again and they were IMHO, fine. --C messier 11:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment With PS, I would stretch the upper left corner a bit. There are so many lines, even the doors are not straight to others, and the lantern is skewed. Have a try. --Hubertl 12:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose see comment from Hubertl --Denkmalhelfer 17:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thank you Hubertl for your review, I had overcorrected tilt. --C messier 12:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support sufficient good work.--Hubertl 22:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 23:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2015 04 08 014 35mm camera Fuji Fujica Compact S.jpg

2015 04 08 014 35mm camera Fuji Fujica Compact S.jpg

  • Nomeação Kleinbildkamera Fuji Fujica Compact S/35mm camera Fuji Fujica Compact S --F. Riedelio 06:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not very fond of these vertical lines specially on the left --Moroder 06:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Vertical lines corrected. --F. Riedelio 09:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Moroder 22:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    IMHO, It is distorted now, F. Riedelio is it possible to photograph it again from a more face-on position? --C messier 14:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Rügensche Kleinbahn 02.jpg

2014 Rügensche Kleinbahn 02.jpg

  • Nomeação Rügen Island, Germany, Train "Rasender Roland" --Derzno 16:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: sharpening artifacts --MB-one 18:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question As far as I can remember "Rasender Roland" is a steam train, isn't it? --Code 07:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good composition but the image is overexposed (and tilted). Alvesgaspar 11:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose same as Alvesgaspar --Denkmalhelfer 15:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 22:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Rohrbach 01.jpg

2014 Rohrbach 01.jpg

  • Nomeação Rohrbach, Village view, Bavaria --Derzno 16:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Please reduce colour noise --Cccefalon 17:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)✓ DoneNot sure where you saw some colour noise but anyhow, reduced it now with photoshop. --Derzno 18:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
    new version uploaded by 17th-April but no further feedback received. --~~~~

    Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice --Moroder 21:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough -- Alvesgaspar 11:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 15:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 22:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014.09.20.-12-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Wolfspinne-Xerolycosa nemoralis-Weibchen.jpg

2014.09.20.-12-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Wolfspinne-Xerolycosa nemoralis-Weibchen.jpg

  • Nomeação Xerolycosa nemoralis, Weibchen (female) --Hockei 12:30, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose no clear subject to background --Denkmalhelfer 18:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm convinced it's not the nature's intention.--Hockei 05:53, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Subject blurred, too strong shadows -- Alvesgaspar 11:26, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is not a FPC. And there is no strong shadow at all. Maybe I should take a miniature LED-lamp to illuminate the hole in the wood the next time. --Hockei 14:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 22:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Singapore_High-rises-at-Marina-Bay-02.jpg

Singapore High-rises-at-Marina-Bay-02.jpg

  • Nomeação Singapore: Highrises at Marina Bay: OUE Bayfront, The Fullerton Bay Hotel, Change Alley Aerial Plaza and The Fullerton Pavilion --Cccefalon 02:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promoção
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Water on the front have no structure and partly CA --Denkmalhelfer 17:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    I disagree: I cannot see any relevant CA. --Cccefalon 21:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Milseburg 14:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice photo despite the less-than-optimal light. Alvesgaspar 11:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive image. I see no lack. -- Spurzem 19:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 22:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --C messier 09:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Ruddy_darter_dragonfly_(Sympetrum_sanguineum)_almost_adult_male_wings_forward.jpg

Ruddy darter dragonfly (Sympetrum sanguineum) almost adult male wings forward.jpg

  • Nomeação Ruddy darter dragonfly (Sympetrum sanguineum) almost adult male --Charlesjsharp 20:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dark and a bit noisy. --Hockei 12:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Noise is acceptable and looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 17:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The quality in the abdomen is acceptable but not in the head -- Alvesgaspar 11:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --C messier 11:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Myra_theatre.jpg

Myra theatre.jpg

  • Nomeação Demre - Ruins of Myra - Theatre --Imehling 08:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMHO, overexposed at the orchestra and too tight crop at the bottom. --C messier 12:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done --Imehling 17:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    The surface shows no detail, just grey. I don't think this can be saved. --C messier 11:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC) I think we should discuss that. In my view the surfaces of the stones in the theatre show no structure because they are sleek. There are structures visible on other grey stones. --Imehling 12:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose left part of circle end in nothing and not sharp. --Denkmalhelfer 17:06, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor framing and lighting, not sharp enough. Alvesgaspar 11:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2012-05-02 GoWwest-USA (385).jpg

2012-05-02 GoWwest-USA (385).jpg

  • Nomeação Le village fantôme à Calico, près de Barstow, Californie du sud.(USA).--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 08:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment could you brighten the dark areas and check, if you can remove the CA (see notes)? --Hubertl 08:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Thank you Hubertl for your note correction CA and brighten the dark areas.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment puhhhh! Have you seen the first version from November? I Don´t know really, why you darkened this one. I set it on Discuss, maybe I´m wrong. --Hubertl 18:00, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose to much shadow without CA --Denkmalhelfer 18:21, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the strong contrast and the composition. The man on the right is leaning because of lens distortion. Alvesgaspar 11:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 23:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Viooltje (Viola cornuta), Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonker vallei 02.jpg

Viooltje (Viola cornuta), Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonker vallei 02.jpg

  • Nomeação Viola cornuta, Location, Tuinreservaat Jonker vallei.
    Famberhorst 04:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose DOF a tick too shallow. Besides. Please fix the description. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 10:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think, for a non studio work it is well done. The center is sharp. This is whats possible with f/13. --Hubertl 15:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Dust spot (see note) is disturbing IMO. F/13, but the DOF is a bit sparse to be QI IMO. Personal opinion: I don't know if it has too much contrast or if it is oversaturated. I don't like the red halo of the yellow edge (see note)--Lmbuga 16:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Dust Spot and edge removed.--Famberhorst 17:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 10:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree that Dof is too shallow. All petals should be sharp. I don't like the distracting backgroud either. Alvesgaspar 11:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 23:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Fürstliche_Gruft_für_Karl_Fugger_Babenhausen-5.jpg

Fürstliche Gruft für Karl Fugger Babenhausen-5.jpg

  • Nomeação Neuromanischer Zentralbau in Kapellenform, Einfriedung mit Schmiedeeisengitter, von Leonhard Romeis und Jakob Raffler, 1889/90 --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 07:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Rejeição
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Probably could have been cropped below but otherwise good --Daniel Case 21:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Needs perspective corrections before promotion IMO. The compo is not good for a QI (to be cropped below, indeed. Consensual review, please.--Jebulon 21:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not a good combo, frame cutted --Denkmalhelfer 18:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Jebulon it needs perspective correction.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As said above. --Palauenc05 10:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --C messier 11:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Geranium sylvaticum20140704 481.jpg

Geranium sylvaticum20140704 481.jpg

  • Nomeação Flower of Wood cranesbill (Geranium sylvaticum). --Bff 14:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • {{o}} 2,048 × 1,536 pixels. The minimum resolution for submissions is 4 megapixels. Too tight at top IMO--Lmbuga 15:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Please don't apply this ominous rule before there is a real consensus about it which isn't found during a ad-hoc-eastern-holiday-pseudo-vote. --LC-de 22:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't apply the rule. Flowers of Geranium sylvaticum have 2-3 cm. With 3 cm is 4 megapixels too? This is QIC! The picture don't has good composition IMO, but it's a good picture--Lmbuga 16:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Lmbuga. --Code 18:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough for me, the new rule is not in force. Alvesgaspar 11:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Ok Alvesgaspar. Composition, see below --Lmbuga 13:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 23:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File: Bad Wörishofen, Klosterkirche, Fresko - Geißelung.JPG

Bad Wörishofen, Klosterkirche, Fresko - Geißelung.JPG

  • Nomeação Fresco Flagellation of Christ in the monastery church of Bad Wörishofen -- Spurzem 09:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeToo blurred. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 20:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Where? Perhaps you should get new glasses? ;-) I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 21:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ah, I see. The fresco painter used a resolution not sufficient for QI. Additionally his brush strokes were a bit uneven and blurred -> too much alcohol? No, taking a look at the edges I dont think its blurred, even if its starting to loose contours due to ISO noise. But this is IMHO still tolerable in this case. --LC-de 11:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me --Rjcastillo 15:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In my opinion the image lacks contrast, probably as a result of the poor lighting conditions. It is possible to fix though. Alvesgaspar 22:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 22:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 23:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2009-05-31 Bonn-Endenich Schumannhaus Bueste (1).JPG

2009-05-31 Bonn-Endenich Schumannhaus Bueste (1).JPG

  • Nomeação Bust of Robert Schumann, Bonn, Germany (by Sir James).--Leit 09:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Rejeição
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Below 4Mpix. Sorry --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 20:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Please don't apply this ominous rule before there is a real consensus about it which isn't found during a ad-hoc-eastern-holiday-pseudo-vote. --LC-de 22:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Tobias "ToMar" Maier. --Code 18:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ominous rule without real consensus. --Ralf Roletschek 19:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not because of the rule, which is not in force, but owing to the distracting background and blurred subject. Alvesgaspar 11:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --C messier 11:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2015-02-21_Samstag_am_Karmelitermarkt_Wien_-_9440.jpg

2015-02-21 Samstag am Karmelitermarkt Wien - 9440.jpg

  • Nomeação Farmersmarket on a saturday at the Karmelitermarkt, Vienna --Hubertl 00:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • {{o}} Both sides leaning out Poco a poco 09:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promoção
  • ✓ Done New, perspective correctioned version uploaded, Poco a poco.
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks fine to me now Poco a poco 20:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose crop bad with cut sign --Denkmalhelfer 17:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The sign itself is not subject of this picture, Denkmalhelfer. Außerdem gilt in Deutschland Vermummungsverbot! --Hubertl 08:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose CA. Saturation. -- Smial 10:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done CA korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis, Smial --Hubertl 11:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment CA now acceptable, but why has the new version now this reddish tint? Reds are partly oversaturated now. I don't understand. -- Smial (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment red-saturation reduced. Thanks a lot for your friendly suggestion. @Smial: --Hubertl 20:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK IMO. --C messier 15:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 21:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough. I like the composition but the photo looks slightly overexposed. A big dust spot near the upper left corner. Alvesgaspar 11:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks, dustspot removed.--Hubertl 22:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --C messier 09:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Hondeghem Estaminet de l'ancienne maison commune.jpg

Hondeghem Estaminet de l'ancienne maison commune.jpg

  • Nomeação Hondeghem Estaminet de l'ancienne maison commune.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality. --Touzrimounir 18:31, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Touzrimounir Can you give me the pleasure to motivate your opposition? Pierre and I do you'd be terribly grateful! Thanks --Livioandronico2013 18:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A pic ‎(4 608 × 3 456 pixels, taille du fichier : 11,73 Mio, type MIME : image/jpeg), corrected with RawTerapee ! Please, Touzrimounir I would be happy to know why it's Insuffisant quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support The left part of the picture is blurry, perhaps may be cropped Ezarate 01:50, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ Ezarate thank you for your review. The left part croped, gives a pic too tight.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:29, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too noisy, tight crop. Alvesgaspar 11:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alvesgaspar. --C messier 11:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 20:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Ξυλόσκαλο 3751.jpg

Ξυλόσκαλο 3751.jpg

  • Nomeação Fog on Lefka Ori, Crete. --C messier 13:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but: no meaningful file naming, stains, uncalibrated Colorspace. --F. Riedelio 15:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
    Name is in greek (i think this acceptable) and is the name of the place (+ image number from the camera). Uncalibrated Colorspace maybe due to RawTherapee, I think I can fix it. Can you note the stains on the picture? --C messier 18:38, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
I note some stains on the picture. --F. Riedelio 15:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose fog blow out half of the picture --Denkmalhelfer (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @F. Riedelio, thank you for your review. Cloned out the noted features, although I think it is more possible that these were real world objects, propably garbage. I cannot fix the color space in EXIF data, but sRGB was selected when saving from RawTherapee. --C messier 18:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
@Denkmalhelfer, I can't understand your comment. There is visible structure in the fog (which is also the subject of the image) and as is a thick fog it covers the top of the hills/mountains. I don't see a technical shortcoming there. --C messier 18:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment here we are not talking about creative or idea behin the picture, it is pure quality of the pciture. And this is not good due too half of the picture flooded in white fog. --Denkmalhelfer 12:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support with less of the half of the picture flooded in white fog. --Ralf Roletschek 11:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as Ralf.. It was the fog that makes you capture this moment. --Hubertl 15:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Even the front of the image, which is not affected by the fog is unsharp and undetailed. Alvesgaspar 22:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not bad, just foggy. --Hockei 13:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 22:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Webysther_20150321171849-2_-_Painel_Tiradentes_de_Candido_Portinari.jpg

Webysther 20150321171849-2 - Painel Tiradentes de Candido Portinari.jpg

  • Nomeação Painel Tiradentes, Candido Portinari. One of best works. --Webysther 14:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 18,431 × 3,351 pixels, but sorry, blurried, noise, poor detail, CAs. With this resolution other users may think differently: Discuss--Lmbuga 18:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info In place of exposition is not possible use tripod, flash and have low light. O do no how fix this issues. To create this image i used another 20 joined. -- Webysther 11:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me the resolution is good enogh to resolv the problems. In 3k pixel is impossible to see any problem. -- Webysther (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC)The nominator is not allowed to vote --Christian Ferrer 07:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too unsharp. Alvesgaspar 22:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 20:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Iglesia_de_San_Nicolás,_Tallinn,_Estonia,_2012-08-11,_DD_17.JPG

Iglesia de San Nicolás, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-11, DD 17.JPG

  • Nomeação St. Nicholas' Church, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 10:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Steeple unsharp, with CA --Daniel Case 05:29, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • No reaction, please, let's discuss this one --Poco a poco 20:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. Daniel Case 20:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral No good perspective for me. Overall we see tilted lines. -- Spurzem 11:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC).
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The tilted lines underline the character of the subject: beeing high. And leads the eye up to the sky in good colour and with beautiful clouds. --ArishG 15:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree. Look to the hauses at the right. They don't lead me to the beautiful sky. I only think they will fall in. -- Spurzem 20:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: you are voting in 2 different directions Poco a poco 10:20, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The verticals should be rectilinear. --Code 16:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • @Daniel Case: Are you still opposing? --Code (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but only without unnatural distortion. Verticlas not must be rectilinear. --Ralf Roletschek 11:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective distortion is disturbing--Lmbuga 17:47, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Correcting the distortion would give an absurd impression of the tower. --ArishG 06:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The top of the subject is too unsharp. Alvesgaspar 22:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose While the tilted lines are ok for the tower itself, it's disturbing on the other buildings. --MB-one 11:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → More votes? Code 20:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Lycaena thersamon - Lesser Fiery Copper 01.jpg

Lycaena thersamon - Lesser Fiery Copper 01.jpg

  • Nomeação Wing upperside of male Lesser Fiery Copper (Lycaena thersamon). Adana - Turkey. --Zcebeci 10:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 10:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wings not in focus and are the colours not over-saturated? --Charlesjsharp 13:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support fine for me --Denkmalhelfer 12:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 20:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose All wings should be focused, which is not that difficult when the insect is presented this way. Alvesgaspar 22:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 02:44, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

File:PlacaenEscuelaNormal.JPG

PlacaenEscuelaNormal.JPG

  • Nomeação Plaque infront of Escuela Normal, Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 21:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Cayambe 08:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Could easily be taken with exactly frontal view, so distortion is not acceptable for me. --Uoaei1 18:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not symetric, bad for a such plate. --Denkmalhelfer 15:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 02:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Tabela de tempo (8 dias após a nomeação)

seg 20 Abr. → ter 28 Abr.
ter 21 Abr. → qua 29 Abr.
qua 22 Abr. → qui 30 Abr.
qui 23 Abr. → sex 01 Maio
sex 24 Abr. → sáb 02 Maio
sáb 25 Abr. → dom 03 Maio
dom 26 Abr. → seg 04 Maio
seg 27 Abr. → ter 05 Maio
ter 28 Abr. → qua 06 Maio