Commons:Candidatas a Imagens de qualidade

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 77% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Ir para as nomeações
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский
float

Estas são as candidatas a tornarem-se Imagens de qualidade. Por favor, fique claro que não é o mesmo que Imagens especiais. Além disso, se você deseja obter informações sobre as suas imagens, pode consegui-las em Críticas fotográficas.

Objectivo[edit]

O objectico das Imagens de qualidade é incentivar as pessoas que são a base do Commons, os utilizadores individuais que fornecem imagens para ampliar esta colecção. Enquanto que as imagens especiais são as melhores de todas as imagens carregadas no Commons, as Imagens de qualidade servem para identificar e encorajar os esforços dos utilizadores para carregar imagens de qualidade no Commons.
Além disso, as imagens de qualidade podem ser um local onde outros utilizadores expliquem métodos para melhorar uma imagem.

Orientações[edit]

Todas as imagens nomeadas devem ser trabalho próprio dos utilizadores do Commons

Para os nomeadores[edit]

Aqui estão as diretrizes gerais para Imagens de qualidade, Below e orientações gerais para Imagens de qualidade; e outras orientações mais detalhadas estão disponíveis em Diretrizes de imagens.

Requisitos das imagens[edit]

  1. Status de direitos autorais. As candidatas a Imagens de qualidade foram carregadas no Commons pelo proprietário dos direitos autorais sob uma licença adequada. Os requisitos completos de licença estão disponíveis em COM:CT
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. As Imagens de qualidade devem ser categorizadas, possuir um título principal e descrição. Isto incluiria o nome taxonômico dos organismos.
  4. Sem anúncios ou assinaturas na imagem. Os direitos de autor e informações de autoria devem ficar na página da imagem e podem estar nos metadados da imagem, mas não deve interferir no conteúdo da imagem.
Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Requisitos técnicos[edit]

Critérios mais detalhados estão disponíveis em Diretrizes de imagens.

Resolução[edit]

As imagens do Commons podem ser usadas não só para visualizá-las no ecrã. Também podem ser usadas para impressão ou visualização em monitores de alta resolução. Não podemos prever quais dispositivos serão usados no futuro, por isso é importante que as imagens que são nomeadas tenham uma resolução razoavelmente alta. Normalmente o limite inferior é de 2 megapixels, mas para imagens 'fáceis de tomar', os revisores podem exigir muito mais.

Não se aplica a imagens SVG.

Qualidade das imagens[edit]

As imagens digitais estão sujeitas a vários problemas resultantes da captura e processamento da imagem, tais como ruídos, problemas com a compressão JPEG, falta de informação de zonas ou realces, ou problemas com a captura de cores. Todas estas questões devem ser tratadas adequadamente.

Composição e iluminação[edit]

A disposição do objecto principal de uma imagem deve contribuir para a própria imagem. Objectos em segundo plano não devem desviar a atenção. A iluminação e o foco também devem contribuir para o resultado global; o objecto principal tem de se destacar, ser completo e estar bem exposto.

Valor[edit]

Nosso principal objectivo é melhorar a qualidade das imagens que contribuem para o Wikicommons, algo valioso para os projectos da Wikimedia.

Como nomear[edit]

Basta adicionar uma linha deste formulário no topo da lista de candidatos da secção de Nomeações.

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição  --~~~~ |}}

A descrição deve ser não mais do que algumas palavras, e por favor deixe uma linha em branco entre sua nova entrada e as demais.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição  --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations[edit]

A descrição deve ser não mais do que algumas palavras, e por favor deixe uma linha em branco entre sua nova entrada e as demais. A adição de mais de um par de imagens de uma só vez pode ser considerado flooding, o que é desaprovado.

Avaliando as imagens[edit]

Qualquer utilizador registado pode revisar um nomeação.
Quando um revisor avalia uma imagem deve considerar as mesmas diretrizes do nomeador.

Como revisar[edit]

Como actualizar o status

Examine cuidadosamente a imagem. Abre-a na resolução máxima, e veja se ela atende aos critérios de qualidade.

  • Se você decidir promover a nomeação, altere a linha relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Breve descrição --Assinatura do nomeador |Por que você gostou. --~~~~}}

Em outras palavras, altere a predefinição de /Nomination para /Promotion e adicione a sua assinatura, possivelmente com algum pequeno comentário.

  • Se você decidir rejeitar a nomeação, altere a linha relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Breve descrição --Assinatura do nomeador |Por que você não gostou --~~~~}}

Em outras palavras, altere a predefinição de /Nomination para /Decline e adicione a sua assinatura, possivelmente declarando os critérios pelos quais a imagem fracassou (podes usar os títulos das secções de diretrizes). Se houver muitos problemas, notifique os 2 ou 3 mais graves, ou adicione múltiplos problemas. Ao rejeitar uma nomeação, por favor, explique as razões na página de discussão do nomeador - em regra, seja agradável e estimulante! Na mensagem, você deve dar uma explicação mais detalhada de sua decisão.

Nota: Por favor, avalie primeiramente as imagens mais antigas.

Período de tolerância e promoção[edit]

Se não houver objecções no período de 2 dias (exactamente 48 horas) desde a sua revisão, a imagem será promovida ou rejeitada, de acordo com a revisão que recebeu. Se você possuir objecções, mova a imagem para a secção Consensual review.

Como executar uma decisão[edit]

QICbot trabalha automaticamente nisso 2 dias depois de a decisão ter sido tomada, e as imagens promovidas são armazenadas em Promovidas recentemente à espera de categorização e inserção automática em uma página apropriada das Imagens de qualidade.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • As imagens que esperam uma revisão são mostradas em uma caixa azul
  • As imagens que o revisor aceitou são mostradas em uma caixa verde
  • As imagens que o revisor rejeitou são mostradas em uma caixa vermelha

Imagens não avaliadas (quadro azul)[edit]

As imagens nomeadas que não foram promovidas nem rejeitadas, ou que acabaram em consenso (que haja um número igual de oposições e apoios) após 8 dias nesta página devem ser removidas desta página sem promoção, armazenadas em Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives outubro 2014 e a categoria Unassessed QI candidates acrescentada à imagem.

Processo de revisão de consenso[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

Como pedir uma revisão consensual[edit]

Para pedir uma revisão consensual, basta alterar /Promotion ou /Decline para /Discuss, e adicionar o seu comentário imediatamente após a revisão. Um bot automático irá movê-lo para a secção de revisão consensual dentro de um dia.

Por favor, somente envie coisas para a revisão consensual que foram revisadas como promovidas/rejeitadas. Se, como revisor, você não pode tomar uma decisão, adicione seu comentário, mas deixe o candidato nesta página.

Regras de revisão consensual[edit]

Veja Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules.

Actualização da página: purge this page's cache


Contents

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 06h08min, 31 outubro 2014 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

October 31, 2014[edit]

October 30, 2014[edit]

October 29, 2014[edit]

October 28, 2014[edit]

October 27, 2014[edit]

October 26, 2014[edit]

October 25, 2014[edit]

October 24, 2014[edit]

October 23, 2014[edit]

October 22, 2014[edit]

October 21, 2014[edit]

October 20, 2014[edit]

October 19, 2014[edit]

October 18, 2014[edit]

October 17, 2014[edit]

October 16, 2014[edit]

October 11, 2014[edit]

October 10, 2014[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Knock_Out_IMG_3830.jpg[edit]

Knock Out IMG 3830.jpg

  • Nomeação Rosa 'Knock Out' in the Volksgarten in Vienna. Identified by sign. --Hubertl 15:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Very good. --Livioandronico2013 16:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The leaf colour looks really strange to me. Anna reg 18:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment this is now the original, not processed file.--Hubertl 21:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, underexposed. Not QI IMO--Lmbuga 13:15, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Lahore Fort view from Baradari.jpg[edit]

Lahore Fort view from Baradari.jpg

  • Nomeação Lahore Fort in Lahore — top-10 finalists of WLM Pakistan 2014. (by User:Rohaan Bhatti) --Saqib 00:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Perspective correction needed. Can be corrected. Yann 14:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
    I think this works as is. Mattbuck 23:33, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Kreuzkapelle_--_2014_--_2741.jpg[edit]

Dülmen, Kreuzkapelle -- 2014 -- 2741.jpg

  • Nomeação Masonry of the Holy Cross chapel, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 03:32, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not convinced of the sharpness. --Hockei 19:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Fixed I tried to sharpened the image. Hopefully it's OK.--XRay 17:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Better, but I'm still not sure. We should discuss. --Hockei 21:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Head_of_Lion_on_Porta_Furba.jpg[edit]

Head of Lion on Porta Furba.jpg

  • Nomeação Head of Lion on Porta Furba --Livioandronico2013 19:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Not crisp, some overexposure. --Mattbuck 22:59, 29 Octoben pleaser 2014 (UTC)
    strong desagree, more sense opinions please --Livioandronico2013 23:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:P-rubtsova-7481.jpg[edit]

P-rubtsova-7481.jpg

  • Nomeação Visitor admires the artistic exhibition in Pereslavl museum-preserve. --PereslavlFoto 08:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment
  • Nice image. The permission of the person is missing. Why is this image categorized as "to be improved"? --XRay 08:50, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Because any non-QI image has to be improved. --PereslavlFoto 14:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose IMO the image is tilted CW and the person in the background is too unfavorable. The composition with the thinking woman looks good, but IMO another would not help. Sorry. --XRay 06:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Not the image is tilted, but the paintings are fixed under some angle to vertical walls. Check the shadows Smile--PereslavlFoto 23:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment May you're right with the tilted image. I checked the window. IMO the main problem is the person in the background.--XRay 17:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
        • This is not about QI as technology, it's about composition. --PereslavlFoto 23:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Бюст_юноши_Ск._БАРАТТА_П..JPG[edit]

Бюст юноши Ск. БАРАТТА П..JPG

  • Nomeação Летний сад, СПб. --Max A. Khlopov 12:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol support vote.svg Support crop tight and sky just ok, however ok for me --Christian Ferrer 12:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
    Fails COM:FOP#Russia (which explicitly excludes sculpture). --Mattbuck 22:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
    According to the catalog entry linked in the WLM-template (sorry, seems I can't link this here), the sculpture was created in 1719-1720, so it's probably old enough to be in the Public Domain, FOP or not. Should probably use {{Art Photo}} instead of {{Information}} though … --El Grafo 09:55, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Baños_del_Rey_y_de_la_Reina,_Bath,_Inglaterra,_2014-08-12,_DD_42.JPG[edit]

Baños del Rey y de la Reina, Bath, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 42.JPG

  • Nomeação Roman Baths, Bath, England --Poco a poco 19:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    Quite a lot of CA, cyanotic sky. Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
     Not done Mattbuck 20:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Poco a poco 21:09, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
    I feel it is QI now, please, let's discuss to avoid that the bot sweeps it Poco a poco 15:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, the sky is not really better IMO.--Jebulon 21:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I see no lack at the sky. But the crop at the bottom is too tight for me and the perspective correction seems not to be the best. -- Spurzem 22:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Църква_св._Йоан_Канео,_Охрид.JPG[edit]

Църква св. Йоан Канео, Охрид.JPG

  • Nomeação en:Church of St. John at Kaneo with lake Ohrid in the background, Ohrid, Macedonia. --Tropcho 09:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose noise, perspective distortion --A.Savin 16:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
    The image is certainly not super sharp (probably as good as it gets with that camera). But regarding the perspective distortion - perhaps it's a matter of taste, but I don't think that it's hurting the shot in this case. I'd be happy if someone else would care to give additional feedback. Thanks! --Tropcho 22:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not enough detail on the main subject. --MB-one 13:07, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Botanischer Garten Berlin-Dahlem 10-2014 photo17 Dianthus imereticus.jpg[edit]

Botanischer Garten Berlin-Dahlem 10-2014 photo17 Dianthus imereticus.jpg

  • Nomeação Dianthus imereticus in the Botanical Garden of Berlin --A.Savin 11:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 13:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is too noisy for QI IMO. Maybe chromatic noise(?). --Hockei 13:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support: Quality is ok, but I would prefer a tighter crop. --MB-one 13:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei --Livioandronico2013 14:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. As MB-one. The crop should be tighter. -- Spurzem 22:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Nysa,_Dom_Wagi_Miejskiej_07.JPG[edit]

2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 07.JPG

  • Nomeação City Scales House in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI IMO, description in English wood be appreciated. --P e z i 10:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
    • 🇬🇧...And maybe "would" should be more appreciated than "wood"...😃--Jebulon 21:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
      • To do a description "in English wood" is too problematic :) --Brateevsky 20:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good quality. Not Featured, maybe, but it's a QI at least. --Brateevsky 20:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Nysa,_Dom_Wagi_Miejskiej_09.JPG[edit]

2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 09.JPG

  • Nomeação City Scales House in Nysa 3 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Nysa,_Dom_Wagi_Miejskiej_15.JPG[edit]

2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 15.JPG

  • Nomeação City Scales House in Nysa 4 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If I am right we have no limit per nominator. -- Spurzem 18:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment STOP THIS ! Imo, QIC is becoming completely crazy ! Here we have a flooder, an illegal delister because of flooding, a CR pusher because of illicit withdrawn, and a support vote because "no limit per nominator" !!!!!! And what about the picture ? Does somebody have a technical opinion about it ? --Jebulon 20:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes Sir, I have also an opinion on the image; the reason for "pushing" to CR was to avoid treatment by the bot. BTW Pictogram voting question.svg Question what is the correct behaviour in that case? Setting back to "Nomination"? --P e z i 09:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes I think so. Sorry, I apologize, I was a bit angry, you were not my "target" in this case, but the situation was a bit strange, wasn'nt it ?--Jebulon 21:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness is borderline, but still QI IMO. --P e z i 09:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Yamaha_XV_535_Virago.JPG[edit]

2014 Yamaha XV 535 Virago.JPG

  • Nomeação Yamaha XV 535 Virago --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
    If I remember right we saw only one photo of this Yamaha, which I would like a bit brighter. And that is no flooding for me. In my opinion nominations should be limited, for instance five per week of the same photographer. But we may not say by feeling: that is flooding and this is no flooding. -- Spurzem 13:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Kłodzko,_ul._Sienkiewicza,_01.JPG[edit]

2014 Kłodzko, ul. Sienkiewicza, 01.JPG

  • Nomeação Sienkiewicza Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Kłodzko,_ul._Sienkiewicza,_02.JPG[edit]

2014 Kłodzko, ul. Sienkiewicza, 02.JPG

  • Nomeação Sienkiewicza Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Kłodzko,_ul._Sienkiewicza,_03.JPG[edit]

2014 Kłodzko, ul. Sienkiewicza, 03.JPG

  • Nomeação Sienkiewicza Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Sorry, but 70 nominations in 2 weeks is flooding.--Hubertl 07:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Set to Discussion; IMO you can only withdraw images which you have nominated. --P e z i 22:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The shadow in front is too disturbing.--Jebulon 20:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done I cutted this shadow. --Jacek Halicki 23:53, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Votivkirche (Обетная церковь).jpg[edit]

Votivkirche (Обетная церковь).jpg

  • Nomeação Votivkirche, Обетная церковь.
    Max A. Khlopov 12:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)At first, it need an accurate description --Christian Ferrer 06:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão  Not done --Mattbuck 20:27, 23 October 2014 (UTC)✓ Done--Max 20:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me this perspective have something pleasant IMO --Christian Ferrer 18:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Ayuntamiento,_Tallin,_Estonia,_2012-08-05,_DD_03.JPG[edit]

Ayuntamiento, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 03.JPG

  • Nomeação Gargoyle at the Town Hall, Tallinn, Estonia --Poco a poco 17:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão {{o}} Sorry, not QI IMO: artifacts, perhaps too much noise reduction and too much sharpened--Lmbuga 20:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Poco a poco 20:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Better, but the detail it's not good IMO, others can think--Lmbuga 21:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose main subject unsharp --Christian Ferrer 18:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Christian Ferrer.--Jebulon 20:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Reus-slogan-1409.jpg[edit]

Reus-slogan-1409.jpg

  • Nomeação Independence slogan in Reus, Catalonia. --PereslavlFoto 21:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please check the image. IMO it needs perspective correction.--XRay 17:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    *Symbol support vote.svg Support Not an architectural photo, so perspective issue not disturbing. --Smial 11:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    It's a photo of a building, that makes it architectural. Perspective correction is something we ask of most photos, I don't see why this one would get a pass on that. --Mattbuck 19:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • This is a photo of a poster, in which the building is only incidental accessory. -- Smial 13:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Spurzem 13:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective issues (and btw, this is not really an "independence" slogan, but a demand for a vote.) --Jebulon 20:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The flags make us think they demand a vote against independence? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
      • 🇪🇸--Jebulon 21:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Kunak_Sabah_Mostyn-Cave-01.jpg[edit]

Kunak Sabah Mostyn-Cave-01.jpg

  • Nomeação Kunak, Sabah: Entrance to Mostyn Cave. Because of it's location on the WWII Japanese Military Camp, it is also referred as "Japanese Tunnels" --Cccefalon 05:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:54, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree, the only part which is sharp is the wooden barrier in the foreground. --Hubertl 10:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
    See the bright side, at least there's something QI. I hope that somebody don't insult me for this. However, we can discuss. Clin --Livioandronico2013 11:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
    I shot a complete series of the cave. Some of the photos offer intentionally a focus in the foreground. I thought, it is very obvious that it is intentional to get the focus to the foreground when there is a sign board... I also completly disagree the statement that the only sharp is the barrier. This big red thing with the white letters, haven't you checked the sharpness of it? --Cccefalon 12:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:DC-TOWER_1_from_Danube_River_to_Northnorthwest_-_Vienna-4551.jpg[edit]

DC-TOWER 1 from Danube River to Northnorthwest - Vienna-4551.jpg

  • Nomeação DC-Tower 1, view from Handelskai to northnorthwest --Hubertl 20:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentDust spot removed even here... --Hubertl 10:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Blue cast, and lack of contrast, IMO.--Jebulon 19:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    • These are exactly the colors you will have at this time of the day - short after sunrise - in a distance of about 2.3 km. There is no strange blue in this picture. --Hubertl 17:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Paris - The Eiffel Tower in spring - 2307.jpg[edit]

Paris - The Eiffel Tower in spring - 2307.jpg

  • Nomeação Eiffel Tower (by Jorgeroyan) --Paris 16 13:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão The trees in front of the tower aren't nice. A few areas seem burned. Jakec 17:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    quality is good for me and composition is nice --Taxiarchos228 20:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    There's also purple and blue/green CA on the trees and red CA on the tower. Jakec 12:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, nice picture. I think it meets the QI criteria. --Code (talk) 13:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB «C2 Canary Wharf.jpg[edit]

London MMB «C2 Canary Wharf.jpg

  • Nomeação Canary Wharf. Mattbuck 06:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too dark --Taxiarchos228 08:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    • That would be because it was taken at night. --Mattbuck 23:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Too bright, streetlamps are blown :-) No, no, Symbol support vote.svg Support for me. --Kreuzschnabel 06:35, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support4metoo --Christian Ferrer 17:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Ship_procession_fresco,_part_4,_Akrotiri,_Greece.jpg[edit]

Ship procession fresco, part 4, Akrotiri, Greece.jpg

  • Nomeação Ship procession fresco, part 4, Akrotiri, Greece. --Yann 19:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 20:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
    New version. Please check. --Yann 13:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    Better, but not at QI level IMHO, sorry, Poco a poco 19:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Ford_Mustang_Convertible_de_1968,_Helsinki,_Finlandia,_2012-08-14,_DD_01.JPG[edit]

Ford Mustang Convertible de 1968, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 01.JPG

  • Nomeação Ford Mustang Convertible of 1968, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 13:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão I am not convinced of this image: very tight crop, disturbing advertising of Texaco in the background, lop-sided pillars. We should discuss. -- Spurzem 17:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version with a bunch of improvements (but the Texaco sign) Poco a poco 19:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me. --MB-one 13:32, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.06.21.-25-Mannheim Rheinau--Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg[edit]

2014.06.21.-25-Mannheim Rheinau--Kleiner Sonnenroeschen-Blaeuling.jpg

  • Nomeação Kleiner Sonnenröschen-Bläuling - Aricia agestis --Hockei 20:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO not sharp enough for this kind of image. --XRay 15:58, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You forget that these butterflies were in hectic motions. Please another opinions. --Hockei 18:43, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You're right. So it is difficult to take the photo of the butterflies. IMO 1/60 s is too long for this kind of photo.--XRay 06:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
The compromise was to select F13 in order to get enough DOF. And that's borderline. Therefore the relatively long shutter time with flash. More opinions? --Hockei 08:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can see why you chose those settings, but in the end it's just not sharp enough for me. Great composition and beautiful colors, though! --El Grafo 09:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Olustvere mõisa peahoone, 1900-1915.a.a*.jpg[edit]

Olustvere mõisa peahoone, 1900-1915.a.a*.jpg

  • Nomeação Olustvere manor main house (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 20:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good, but a bit tilted CCW--Lmbuga 20:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Good quality, I cannot see tilted parts --Hubertl 12:26, 19 October 2014 (UTC)It need description --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ok for description but 1 dustspot (see note) and both sides are leaning in a bit --Christian Ferrer 05:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ok, but it needs a little perspective correction. See notes. Vertical lines are not stright. Improvable--Lmbuga 20:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Roundabout_September_2014_12.jpg[edit]

Roundabout September 2014 12.jpg

  • Nomeação Roundabout Vällingbyvägen/Råckstavägen. --ArildV 07:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 10:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
    could the exposure be optimized? Additional Opinions? --Ehsc 10:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Did you have a opinion? If so, please explain.--ArildV 19:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image is underexposed. A correction is possible, so I'd like to change to support. --Alchemist-hp 19:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC) . Symbol support vote.svg Support I stike my oppose. --Alchemist-hp 17:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thank you. New version uploaded.--ArildV 11:10, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI.--P e z i 22:23, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dirtsc 11:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Hotel_The_Rubens,_Londres,_Inglaterra,_2014-08-07,_DD_001.JPG[edit]

Hotel The Rubens, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-07, DD 001.JPG

  • Nomeação The Rubens hotel, London, England --Poco a poco 10:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Top too unsharp. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Poco a poco 08:54, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
    I think it's acceptable now, please let's discuss, please --Poco a poco 20:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective issue.--Jebulon 20:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


File:2014_Bystrzyca_Kłodzka,_Brama_Wodna_11.JPG[edit]

2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Brama Wodna 11.JPG

  • Nomeação Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 8 --Jacek Halicki 22:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão Noisy and unsharp at the top. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    noise isn't disturbing here in the dark areas, good QI for me --~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good quality. I have no insight for the criticism above. -- Spurzem 10:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--MB-one 14:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Bazylika_Nawiedzenia_NMP_we_Frydku-Mistku_06.jpg[edit]

2014 Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP we Frydku-Mistku 06.jpg

  • Nomeação Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady, Mariánské náměstí, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 15:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
    Lacking contrast, top very unsharp. Mattbuck 10:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão ✓ Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 18:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    Yes, but as with the other there's a strange horizontal graining. Mattbuck 20:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
overexposed areas from Picture


✓ Done Fixed. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Better, but there is still quite a bit of general noise/grain, and the top of the spire is not sharp. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Mattbuck 17:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Not sure as well. --Hockei 15:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed. Yann 17:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's not true. Pleaae show us a printscreen from your software, showing us that this image has overexposed parts. I have 2, and both didn't show it. --Halavar 19:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overexposed and/or blown-out lights. --Alchemist-hp 19:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version nuploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 22:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me now!--Hubertl 14:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Brixner_Dom_Orgel_4.JPG[edit]

Brixner Dom Orgel 4.JPG

  • Nomeação Organ of Brixen Cathedral --Uoaei1 06:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussão slightly tilted and quite dark. --MB-one 10:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ fixed --Uoaei1 20:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    Now, it has weird effects at the window part. Maybe you want to ask for discussion. --MB-one 22:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done CAs removed at the window. More opinions please! --Uoaei1 07:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Hubertl 10:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:JasperCountyCourthouse_retouched.jpg[edit]

JasperCountyCourthouse retouched.jpg

  • Nomeação Jasper County courthouse in Carthage, Missouri. --Kbh3rd 03:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Promoção
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad time of the day, wrong light direction, IMO. One side is in full shadow, the other in half shadow.--Jebulon 11:22, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support technical quality ok for QI. --MB-one 11:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Livioandronico2013 22:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Jebulon--Lmbuga 16:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If the clock isn't wrong, we look at a north facade, which will all time of the day be in shadow if the sun shines. Some very small overexposed spots, but ineglible. High contrast well handled, good detail also in shadows. The lighting shows the structures of the facade clearly. Good sharpness. -- Smial 18:50, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Hubertl 09:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose full per Jebulon. --Alchemist-hp 05:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Alchemist-hp 05:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Tabela de tempo (8 dias após a nomeação)[edit]

qui 23 Out. → sex 31 Out.
sex 24 Out. → sáb 01 Nov.
sáb 25 Out. → dom 02 Nov.
dom 26 Out. → seg 03 Nov.
seg 27 Out. → ter 04 Nov.
ter 28 Out. → qua 05 Nov.
qua 29 Out. → qui 06 Nov.
qui 30 Out. → sex 07 Nov.
sex 31 Out. → sáb 08 Nov.