User talk:Adbar

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

For older content, see the Archives subpage


Rearranging[edit]

Greetings Adbar: I noticed you placed several photographs on pages about Mendocino, Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, California. Nice trip, but your locations of your photos are sometimes quite off place. File:High Bluff Overlook Del Norte Coast.jpg isn't in Crescent City. File:US 101 Fortuna.jpg isn't in Fortuna; but Alton, California, (you might wish to go to COM:RENAME and request renaming) and the images of HSU really don't need to be on quite so many pages, nor did the extra beach need to be added to Mendocino County. I have fixed the location also of the entrance to Humboldt State University which wasn't there at all. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 09:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Hi Ellin, thank you for your effort. I am sorry that I did not tag the proper locations, the heuristics I use do not seem to work well when population density is low, I should have checked the city boundaries first. I'll handle the renaming. I quite sure the geocodes are correct though, so that I maintain that File:High Bluff Overlook Del Norte Coast.jpg was taken in Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park for example. As for the Humboldt State University, the picture of the entrance is better than nothing, as available pictures for the university are scarce. The same is true for the beach in Mendocino County, there is no category "Beaches in Mendocino County" and I do not see much of it in Category:Parks in Mendocino County, California. I do not upload pictures just for the sake of it but I generally hope to fill an empty space. The beach may not be strictly necessary as it is not particularly well-known, but if you agree I am going to use File:High Bluff Overlook Del Norte Coast.jpg and File:US 101 Fortuna.jpg once they are properly renamed. Cheers and happy easter --Adbar (talk) 18:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
    • I was wrong about the first image, due to the checkered nature of parks in that area. As far as I know everything is correct now. --Adbar (talk) 08:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Big Bend Chihuahuan Desert.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chisos Mountains, N view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Blue Mesa Painted Desert.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petrified Forest National Park - Blue Mesa, view towards NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Pacific Beach southwards.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pacific Beach, San Diego, view towards south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Hvar panorama south.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama photos of Hvar, view from south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Västra hamnen Malmö panorama.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Västra hamnen Malmö panorama.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Toudon seen from the east.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Toudon, from the east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tulips at Lund's Botanical Garden.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulips at Lund's Botanical Garden.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Port Orsoy (Rheinberg), Rhine and Duisburg-Walsum.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port Orsoy (Rheinberg), Rhine and Duisburg-Walsum.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Prosopis velutina Anza-Borrego.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prosopis velutina Anza-Borrego.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:South Korea Population Density.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:South Korea Population Density.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

211.215.156.184 02:09, 31 October 2014 (UTC)