User talk:Badzil

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Leave me a message. Badzil (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Tugboat in ... Morbihan, Finistère[edit]

L'affectation des remorqueurs change régulièrement. L'Abeille Languedoc est je crois basé à La Rochelle. La catégorie créée ne me semble pas très pérenne. Le port d'attache pourrait être également utilisé mais il est souvent peu significatif (Brest pour l'Abeille Languedoc). Pline (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Pline,
je suis nouveau sur Commons (pas sur Wikipédia France) donc je ne maîtrise pas forcément les ficelles de la catégorisation des illustrations. Je n'ai pas inventé le rangement que j'ai fait mais ai copié la catégorisation des bateaux de pêche (exemple : Category:Trawlers in Charente-Maritime). Le nom de la catégorie dit "in Charente-Maritime", donc on parle ici de localisation du bateau et non pas de l'origine. C'est ce que j'ai fait en me basant sur le lieu de la prise de vue et non pas sur le port d'attache du bateau.
Je peux me tromper, ou ces catégories peuvent être superflues. Si vous estimez que c'est le cas, merci de corriger mes erreurs.
Cordialement. Badzil (talk) 07:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Bonjour, effectivement ce n'est pas la catégorie qui est en cause mais le lien entre la photo et la catégorie. J'ai tendance à interpréter cette catégorie comme un lien de rattachement relativement permanent entre le bateau et le lieu cité. Personnellement j'aurais tendance plutôt à remplacer cette catégorie par la catégorie Lorient qui indique le lieu de la photo. Le port d'attache des bateaux de pêche est généralement moins fluctuant donc, dans mon interprétation, la catégorie retenue porte un véritable sens. Bon courage pour la suite. Cordialement. Pline (talk) 20:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Projet Monuments Historiques français[edit]

Dear Commons user,

We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français !

In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français.

We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 01:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Category:CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier[edit]

Tu viens d'ajouter la catégorie ''Category:CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier'' à l'image du bateau du même nom. Cette catégorie n'existe pas et, à ma connaissance, il n'y a pas d'autres images référant au même bateau. As-tu l'intention d'ajouter des image à cette catégorie et de la relier à une autre catégorie ?

Pierre cb (talk) 00:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Salut,
non je n'avais pas l'intention de laisser cette catégorie vide, j'étais juste en train de faire un inventaire des photos pour voir les catégories à créer dans la catégorie "Canadian coast guard ships". J'ai fini à présent et ajouté les informations de provenance et de date deconstruction sur tous les navires. Badzil (talk) 15:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
OK. Pierre cb (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Search and rescue[edit]

Very good to create a category by country. But realise that a lot of these boats are more ship than boat, only named boat. So please add also ships of country so and so. I already did for the Netherlands. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Yep, the ship vs boat question again. Just in the beginning of the effort so some patience will be needed. I plan to create all the needed categories. Badzil (talk) 08:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
No extra category needed in my opinion, just the two categories will do. KNRM is the Dutch organisation, so I removed Sweden. Moved the Dutch ships already. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Yehudi-Menuhin-Tabor.jpeg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Yehudi-Menuhin-Tabor.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

You need to find out, when the artist (Mackenzie) died. --Túrelio (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 7da86cd75fec158cd1e2ecf0d377e8a7[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category:Police_motorcycles_of_Costa_Rica[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Police_motorcycles_of_Costa_Rica has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Biker Biker (talk) 23:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

You're not joking[edit]

Coucou! Non effectivement, après avoir regardé les autres modifs, c'était la seule qui était fausse donc oui, j'avais remarqué que c'était vraiment une erreur mais j'avais déjà écrit le commentaire! ;-) Vonvon (talk) 21:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Jersey[edit]

Hélas, l'erreur me semblait si simple et évidente que je ne me suis pas rendu compte! Man vyi (talk) 07:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Règles OTRS[edit]

Bonjour.

Ceci concerne l'autorisation OTRS pour le fichier File:Marc-Thiercelin-Vendée-Globe-2004.jpg‎. J'ai suivi à la lettre les règles de l'OTRS écrites sur la page Commons:OTRS. Vous me répondez en en inventant une nouvelle et marquez le fichier comme manquant de permission. Modifiez donc d'abord la page OTRS afin qu'elle reflète la réalité de la procédure.

2. When you receive a reply, please check that the permit authorized by the copyright is appropriate to the Commons. If so, upload the image to Commons and add {{OTRS pending}}
3. Then forward the e-mail with the author's clear statement of permissions to permissions-commonswikimedia.org, including the full header and the previous exchanged correspondence with the copyright holder, and a link to the image on Commons.

Cordialement. Badzil (talk) 20:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Inutile de me contacter ici : je ne peux rien faire sur Wikimedia Commons pour débloquer le problème et vous avez une reçu une réponse vous détaillant ce qu'il vous faut faire. En tout cas, il n'y a, pour le moment, de permission validable pour ce fichier.--Bapti 20:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Marc-Thiercelin-Vendée-Globe-2004.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

"Libres de droit" ne veut pas dire grand chose et le petit texte servant de licence ne correspond pas vraiment à la CC-BY-SA (qui est pourtant indiqué comme licence). En l'occurrence, la modification n'est pas explicitement autorisé et l'autorisation de l'usage commercial est ambigüe. Voilà au moins deux raisons pour considérer que cette image n'a pas de permission valide en l'état. Désolé.--Bapti 10:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Temporarily disable the vote buttons.[edit]

What was that for ? Jean-Fred (talk) 21:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Hum, ok, I quickly caught up with the discussions you took part in. So voting has not started yet ; this is a real mess, I hope it will get sorted out − thanks for helping with that. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 21:55, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
No problem. I should have linked to the discussion in my edit summary. Badzil (talk) 01:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

File:DragonClassLogo.png[edit]

Great hint. All references to this file are replaced by the .svg version. Thanks RudyVYGOcommons (talk) 15:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Badzil. You have new messages at Indif's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Rotate[edit]

Hallo Badzil, you requested rotation here: diff. However, the image was right - it just needed a Wikipedia:Purge. If you switch your interface language to English or German temporary (sorry it is not yet translated more) you will also see a purge link inside the template. The same could happen at files which were uploaded before - before the software update (1.18) these photos were showing up wrong. Now they do show up correctly (although a purge may be needed). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 12:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

OK. Thanks for the notice. I will purge next time before requesting a rotation. Badzil (talk) 12:45, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Facebook credits[edit]

Ce fichier est à l'origine du logo des facebook credits qui est directement inspiré du logo de la Banque mondiale auquel FB a rajouté 2 flèches. Salutations, --Copyleft (talk) 13:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

OK. Merci pour la précision. Badzil (talk) 13:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Merci à toi pour ton travail Smile et bonne journée --Copyleft (talk) 13:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Gm-lampost-6629.jpg[edit]

Sorry, but this is not a miniature fake image. This is a photo focused in the center, where the focus plane is perpendicular to the image plane. I did not try to make a fake miniature, and IMHO it does not look like miniature. That is why I denied your category.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

OK. Fine with me. Badzil (talk) 14:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

User : Galerie Duboys[edit]

Bonjour Badzil,

Ce petit mot car je viens de voir que sur presque toutes les images que j'avais uploadées très récémmment il y a un problème de license que vous avez relevé. J'ai donc du faire des erreurs dans l'enregistrement de mes données? Je vais donc travailler à résoudre ce problème, mais étant complètement novice sur Wikimedia commons, il n'est pas impossible que cela me demande quelques temps... De plus, je viens de voir que je pouvais avoir l'aide en français, alors que j'utilisais l'interface de commons en anglais, qui est plus aride pour moi que celle de wikipédia. Il y a donc eu du "lost in translation" lors des téléchargements.

Désolée de ces erreurs de débutante. Je vais suivre les liens qui indiquent comment faire, je croyais que en signant le mot de license au départ cela suffisait. Je suis propriétaire du copyright sur toutes ces photos... mais cela n'a pas l'air d'être si simple à vous lire... puisqu'il me faut un "ORTS" (!?)... Je vais donc lire beaucoup plus soigneusement les procédures. Il est indiqué qu'elles seront détruites d'ici 7 jours (plus que 5J... maintenant...).

Puis-je revenir vers vous si je ne comprends pas comment faire?

Merci d'avance, Dominique, alias DomDub

Quality images of Portugal[edit]

Hi Badzil, Considering your recent edit here, it makes no sense to remove the category Category:Quality images of Portugal from this particular image. Either you propose to eliminate the category or leave things as they are. However the issue should be discussed first, as this type of categorization applies to other countries too. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi.
This is an obvious case of COM:OVERCAT. And by the way, Category:Quality images by Alvesgaspar should be a sub-category of Category:Photographs by Alvesgaspar. Actually no. Cheers. Badzil (talk) 18:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Maps of France[edit]

Hi.

By removing the category Category:Maps of France of the image File:Température mer janvier 2009 .png, you remove it from the category "Maps". This image is a map and should be tagged as such. Maybe we need a better map category, but for now, Category:Maps of France should be sufficiently good. Cheers. Badzil (talk) 14:18, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Bin en fait, je pense qu'il manque plutôt une Category:Maps of Gulf of Biscay, ptèt à rajouter à la Category:Maps of regions of France ou plus pertinent si tu vois mieux.
@ + ! Papatt (talk) 14:27, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Aussitôt dit, aussitôt fait : Category:Maps of the Bay of Biscay. Badzil (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
'Tin, t'es un rapide, toi , ya déjà du monde dedans ! :) (Désolé pour mon piège, il était involontaire.)
Sinon la Category:Maps of France me dérange un peu. Si la Category:Maps of regions of France ne te plait pas, on pourrait peut-être penser à une Category:Maps of coasts of France où on pourrait aussi trouver une Category:Maps of the Gulf of Lion voire la Category:Maps of the English Channel.
Kestandi ? Papatt (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Le problème avec Category:Maps of regions of France est que la dénomination region reprend le concept de région administrative, et pas région géographique au sens large. C'est pourquoi je pense qu'il n'est pas forcément judicieux de rajouter la catégorie que je viens de créer à cette catégorie. Pourquoi pas pour la catégorie Category:Maps of coasts of France ? Badzil (talk) 19:32, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Allons-y comme ça alors. :) Papatt (talk) 21:40, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging[edit]

Hello Badzil,

The four items you mention in http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pyt#File_tagging_File:HuusnoomenS.jpg and following, are indeed my own work and I want to release them into the public domain. I uploaded them a long time ago and I have no idea, how to act now. Will you please guide me in what I have to do now? Greetings, --Pyt (talk) 17:18, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Pyt.
The instructions you need to follow are indicated in the messages I left on your page. "Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)." Cheers. Badzil (talk) 17:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Badzil,
My problem is, that I have no idea, what is meant with “a webpage with license information”. I also once uploaded a page File:HuusnoomenS.jpg, which seems to follow the rules, but I can’t see the difference. Such problems will often appear with people who don’t make uploads regularly. But perhaps can give a hint? Greetings, --Pyt (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
The problems with maps is that people tend to copy them from sources that are not allowing for modifications and commercial uses. This is why I tagged your images. You need to send an email to the email address listed above. You can find examples on the page Commons:Email templates. If it's easier for you, you can write to OTRS in Dutch: Commons:E-mailsjablonen. Badzil (talk) 19:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I will try to. --Pyt (talk) 11:11, 14 November 2011 (UTC)



Ship maintenance list[edit]

Hi Badzil,

I noticed you edit frequently in the field, helping us improving/maintaining the categories and categorizing images. Thanks!

A list at Commons:Ships by name (category name check) shows categories that still need the year of completion and thus couldn't be standardize. It's similar to Category:Ship categories with missing year, but the format can be more convenient. Ships longer on the lists are obviously hard to sort as someone probably already attempted to find the year, but couldn't find it.

There are a few other lists at Category:Ships_by_name#mw-pages. If there are more lists you'd find useful, I can try to implement them. --  Docu  at 08:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


New iw feature[edit]

If you add an interwiki to a category, JarektBot now retrieves all related interwikis and adds them to the category. This saves us adding/maintaining them manually, e.g. on Category:USS New York (LPD-21). --  Docu  at 08:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Viking-ship-sculpture.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Viking-ship-sculpture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JD554 (talk) 12:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Tonnerres de Brest 2012[edit]

Bonjour Brazil. Oui, j'avais effectivement commencé à mettre en structure à l'identique certaines catégories que j'avais vu étrangement en écart par rapport à la structure que nous avions défini avec thesuperamat et VIGNERON lors de la collecte des données à Brest. J'ai effectivement identifié que tout cela venait d'un seul utilisateur, mais tu as devancé mon message. Pas de problème pour discuter, au contraire. ---Strogoff- (talk) 20:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Salut.
Merci de ta patience. Je travaille aux États-Unis et ne suis pas disponible pour converser avant ce soir. Je t'écris un message en rentrant à la maison et tu devrais le trouver demain matin. Smile Badzil (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Salut Brazil. A mon tour de t'écrire pour que tu trouves mon message demain matin ? (tu bosses où aux USA ?). Premièrement, concernant la catégorie "ships at Tonnerre de Brest 2012", rien à dire, çà apporte effectivement un plus non négligeable. Maintenant concernant les catégories "ship machin at tonnerre de brest 2012" ou équivalent, il s'agit d'une problématique classique où deux arbres de catégorisation se croisent. Ici, le premier, c'est celui des organisateurs, participants de Brest 2012, qui vont chercher par cette arbre de catégorie à trouver des photos de "leur" bateau, etc.. Une catégorie "globale" ships at tonnerre de brest 2012 se verra remplie d'un bon millier de photo au moins et il sera difficile d'y retrouver un navire particulier. C'est pour cela que nous avons créer au sein de la catégorie mere "tonnerres de brest 2012" des sous catégories par bateaux. La seconde arborescence de catégorie, c'est celui des bateaux eux mêmes. L'avantage de créer la catégorie "bateau machin à brest", c'est qu'on peut satisfaire les deux besoins de catégorisation avec une catégorie "commune" aux deux arborescences. Je ne sais pas si je suis très clair, je te laisse me le dire. Voilà. Maintenant, c'est vrai çà fait un peu "lourd" mais bon.. je ne connais pas d'autres moyens tant qu'on ne pourra pas fournir aux membres de commons un moyen de faire des recherches croisées sur 2 catégories. "category: Brest 2012" ET "category=bateau machin"... ---Strogoff- (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Ships_at_Tonnerres_de_Brest_2012[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Ships_at_Tonnerres_de_Brest_2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

--  Docu  at 16:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, je constate un mix dans le nommage des bateaux dans Category:Ships_at_Tonnerres_de_Brest_2012. Le nommage du style "<bateau> at Tonneres de Brest 2012 " comme vous le creéz est conforme aux conventions Commons. Afin de régler ça relativement vite, je vous propose de mettre dans COM:DL les instructions nécessaires du style {{Move|Tonnerres de Brest 2012 - Gulden Leeuw|Gulden Leeuw at Tonnerres de Brest 2012}}. Ainsi, nous pourrions uniformiser cette catégorie rapidement. Cordialement. --Foroa (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Toiles de mer[edit]

Salut,

Honnêtement, je ne sais pas trop quoi penser de ces toiles de mer… Strictement parlant, elles n'ont pas été crées ex nihilo, il y a donc un auteur qui possède des droits. Ceci dit, la tradition des toiles de mer est telle que je pense ces « toiles » acceptables sur Commons. D'abord, la plupart d'entre-elles ne passe le seuil d'originalité (forcément, celles sur Commons ne sont pas représentatives, ce sont les plus « jolies » qui ont été importées). Ensuite, en plus d'être faites expressément pour être exposés, ces toiles n'ont pas vraiment d'auteur, en tout cas pas d'auteur identifiés. Légalement, j'hésite entre la qualification d'œuvre anonyme ou d'œuvre collective (sous la direction du bateau ? de l'équipage ?), en tout cas on n'est clairement pas dans le concept classique auteur pma. Un bon indice est l'absence de signature. Juridiquement, je vois mal quel auteur pourrait venir de plaindre. Pragmatiquement, chaque fichier est différent et en cas de suppression, il faudrait avant le transférer sur Wiki-Brest.

Qu'en penses-tu ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 23:36, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Je pense que tes arguments sont valides, sauf pour

juridiquement, je vois mal quel auteur pourrait venir se plaindre

. Le fait qu'il soit difficile de retracer l'auteur ou les auteurs pourrait justifier que l'on garde ces fichiers sur Commons. Après, je ne pense pas que ces fichiers seront utilisés sur Wikipédia, donc il vaudrait mieux les transférer sur Wiki-Brest où les règles sont certainement moins strictes que sur Commons. Badzil (talk) 00:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
C'est pire que difficile de retrouver le ou les auteurs, c'est que techniquement l'auteur me semble collectif (dont personne morale et non personne physique). Ah le out of scope… plus le temps passe, plus je trouve cette règle mal faite (euphémisme inside). D'abord, il n'y a pas que Wikipédia, il y a tout les projets de la Wikimédia Foundation. En plus de cela, tout les mediawikis à jour (dont Wiki-Brest) peuvent directement utiliser les fichiers stockés sur Commons. Du coup, le concept de scope est un peu dépassé et étriqué.
Dans le doute, je vais tout de même demander à l'utilisateur de faire le transfert sur wiki-Brest. Mais sur le fond, j'ai l'impression que Commons est perdant dans ce genre de transfert (que je croise de plus en plus souvent). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Dernier rebondissement, tout ou partie des droits à été transférés à la Ville de Brest. Je m'occupe de me renseigner pour savoir si il s'agit uniquement de la propriété ou bien si les droits d'auteur sont aussi concernés (on pourrait alors demander le placement sous licence libre par la ville). Je te tiens au courant. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
OK. Merci pour l'info ! Badzil (talk) 15:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Images en copyvio[edit]

Bonjour.

Cela est fait en page de discussion des images désolé cordialement Fantassin 72 (talk) 16:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

File:French soldiers in Afghanistan.jpg and the other one[edit]

Hello!

Do not use "Accuracy dispute"-templates for such issues. They are not designed to get used for such things - just try to understand for what this template this template should be used. Do not revert angain. Use talk pages of the images for such issues. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Stop moving Summer Olympics athletes to Summer Olympics sportspeople[edit]

You are moving without any discussion, please cease or you will be blocked for disruption. Summer Olympics athletes is long standing and all of your changes will be reverted when I get free time, next time discuss the changes. Bidgee (talk) 02:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

The move to categories per year (2012 Summer Olympics sportspeople from South Korea etc.) looks for me okay, but it must be done for all years. Means: You can't remove Olympic sportspeople from ...' until not ALL years are created the athlete participated at the Olympics. --Florentyna (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough. It was my plan to move everything to "sportspeople" and I thought that it would be a non-controversial modification. Apparently I was wrong. I am currently waiting for Bidgee to unprotect the categories so that I can start a discussion on the topic. Badzil (talk) 13:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Permission ?[edit]

Hi. You tagged File:Samson Ngoepe 800.jpg with a "No permission". May I ask why? --MGA73 (talk) 17:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Of course! This file is of very low resolution and does not have EXIF data which usually shows that it has been copied from the web. Therefore I ask for the uploader of the file to prove that he is indeed the author. Badzil (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Well in this case you could perhaps ask Manguela at en.wikipedia and tell why you think a permission is needed? Or start a deletion request instead of a speedy tag and tell why you think that the uploader is not the copyright holder. --MGA73 (talk) 18:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
I started a DR and notified the user on Wikipedia. Badzil (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you.
I noticed File:Guliev Salihova.jpg. I asume it is the missing EXIF here that is the problem. If you check the first version there is EXIF - they were just removed on the rotated version. --MGA73 (talk) 19:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for converting my no permission to DRs. In the future, I will favor the latter. Badzil (talk) 20:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Bodies of water[edit]

Good day Badzil. Appreciate your attention on the "bodies of water" issue with User:Tm. But, it seems that this issue is more intrinsic than merely a user who does not like to communicate. I noticed today, after looking through User:Tm's comments on the noticeboard that other editors have incorrectly classified "fountains", etc. as "bodies of Water". Unfortunately, I did not participate in the recent discussion on noticeboard, since I did not see it (owing to personal commitments). I believe that this issue should be brought forward for discussion, in order to resolve the mis-categorization of a whole group of images. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 18:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Rebecca_de_Mornay[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Rebecca_de_Mornay has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Dobie80 (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Jaakko_Tallus[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Jaakko_Tallus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Motopark (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)