User talk:Cherfc
File:Cher_at_GG.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:Cher na Armênia em 1993.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
Martin H. (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.
|
Well, this account was blocked in February 2010. The same day the sockpuppet/sockpuppeteer Djosci was blocked. With Djosci you uploaded ~30 images, all with false source or license claims or even with the copyfraud/copyright infringement claim that you are the author. That did not happen one or two time, it happend a whole year!!
Recently, and thats what you meen with 'keep on blocking' you continued this. 7 sockpuppets were created the last months. Someone who tries to comply with the rules of this project will not abuse so many multiple accounts. Most of the uploads try to claim a website operator (or so) the copyright holder of something that they simply collected from other sources: Press photo galleries, television screenshots, etc. The permission must come from the copyright holder, not someone else. It will not help to provide a permission from some other fan who also not owns anything. And it will not help to hide this false permissions under many, many sockpuppet accounts. --Martin H. (talk) 17:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)