User talk:Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH)!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Can you put a note linking to the CDC copyright policy on this document, in the file description? (So I can confirm it is a US Gov document and not a contractor report.) 01:16, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, it says that it's PD on the copyright page of the file. That's what I'm basing it off of. Is that enough? (Sorry it took me so long to see this - hadn't been back to Commons since!) Best, Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) 04:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Allyl glycidyl ether synthesis.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Allyl glycidyl ether synthesis.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --ChemNerd (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


@ChemNerd: Thanks for letting me know - I've added the missing methylene and it should be accurate now. Best, Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) 01:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Workers clearing dust from highway (2492832218).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chienenkatze (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]