User talk:Llez/Archives/2011 (1)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Allium lusitanicum (Mountain Garlic).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Allium lusitanicum (Mountain Garlic).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trochactaeon conicus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eucomis comosa, Pseudo-Peloria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good argument --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Albinaria corrugata corrugata forma inflata 01.jpg

• I suggest a dark gray background, or gradient to better see the apex.

and

• happy New Year --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:21, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

QIC

Hey Llez, out of curiosity, where did you get the template for your eecent QIC nomination? I'm asking because you included a 2= at the end. If there is any documentation that still recommends that I'd like to fix it. --Dschwen (talk) 19:13, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Lambis lambis 01.JPG

One Spot arrond A and 3 Spot arround D. Blue Fringe Right part of A... Tu peux réparer --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hexaplex radix 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hexaplex radix 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Focus stacking

Hallo, nutzt Du für Deine vielen (Muschel) Aufnahmen die focus stacking Softwaretechnik? So wie ich es sehe wohl nicht. Das wäre aber noch ein (Schärfe-)Gewinn für Deine tollen Bilder! Bei Interesse einfach hier antworten. Ich kann gerne helfen. Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

J’ai vu ta discussion avec Alchimist pour le Focus Stacking. Nous ne sommes pas encore très nombreux sur ce sujet.

As-tu un plateau micrométrique ? moi je fais tout avec celui-ci et j’en suis très satisfait

http://www.digit-photo.com/trepied_rotule_ball_3D_niveau-aFA0070/MANFROTTO_454_Plateau_Micrometrique_Longueur_18cm-rMAN454.html

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Alchemist. Meine ersten Aufnahmen sind mit einer einfachen Lumix-Handkamera gemacht, da ist Focus stacking nicht möglich.Ich habe gerade in den letzten Wochen Versuche mit Canon EOS 500 D und Stacking genmacht. Das Stacking hat bei verschiedensten Objekten funktioniert, brachte aber bei manchen Schnecken meist nur unbrauchbare Ergebnisse. Bei komplizierteren Obfflächenstrukturen treten massiv Fehler auf. So hatte ich eine Schnecke mit einer gitterartigen Oberflächenstruktur, nach dem Stacking trat an jeden Kreuzungspunkt (also an über hundert Stellen) ein Fleck auf, das Bild sah scheußlich aus. Die Versuche haben gezeigt, dass diese Technik nur bedingt für meine "Lieblinge" geeignet ist. Im ein oder anderen Fall mag es gehen (und da werde ich es auch in Zukunft machen), aber meistens ist das Ergebnis nicht so überzeugend. Ich hatte zwar Bilder von ungeheurer Tiefenschäfe, aber voll von Artefakten. Oder gibt es eine Lösung? Viele Grüße --Llez (talk) 07:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Llez, es kommt auf eine wirklich gleichmäßige Belichtung an. Ich knipse erst einmal ein Zeitautomatikbild, schaue mir die Zeit an und knipse dann manuell. Vorherige Blende f/8 bis max. f/16. Bei Deinen Muscheln würde ich vielleicht f/10 oder f/12 nehmen. Nun folgt das knipsen für das stacking. Du fokusierst erst ganz vorne und knipst, danach einen kleinen Schritt weiter nach hinten fokusieren usw. bis ganz nach hinten zum letzten Punkt. Die Einzelbilder werden nun "zusammengerechnet". Fertig ist der stack. Nun folgen Deine Bearbeitungsschritte. ... Du kannst mich gerne per Wiki E-Mail kontaktieren. Ich kann Dir die ersten Tests "verrechnen". Viele Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Alchemist, meine Antwort hat sich etwas verzögert, aus folgendem Grund: Deine erste Anfrage kam in meine Experimetierphase "Focus stacking bei Schnecken" und ich war mitten im Ausprobieren. Meine erste Antwort bezog sich auf den aktuellen Stand meiner Erfahrungen. Da ich jedoch z.Zt. Urlaub habe, habe ich die beiden letzten Tage intesiv genutzt, um zu einer Lösung zu kommen. Das Problem bestand darin, dass ich das Verfahren so angewendet habe, wie es immer beschrieben wird und wie auch Du es größtenteils machst: Sukzessive durchfokussieren, in kleinsten Schritten. Bei anderren Objekten hat das bei mir auch ganz gut geklappt. Bei winzig kleinen geometrischen Strkturen auf den Schnecken (wie Gitternetz oder feine Rippen)stößt das Stacking an Grenzen, es treten Artefakte auf, die nicht zu übersehen sind (hatte ich ja schon geschrieben). Ich nahm an, dass bei Verrechnen der vielen Bilder Fehler passieren (und je mehr Bilder, desto mehr Artefakte). Ich habe daher in den letzten beiden Tagen Versuche gemacht mit Stacking von jeweils einer unterschiedlichen Anzahl von Aufnahmen, wobei es mir mehr auf die Bildqualität als auf die Tiefenschärfe ankam. Meine Vermutung war richtig: Je weniger Bilder, desto weniger Artefakte. Damit war die Vorgehensweise klar: Möglichst wenig Bilder, die Einzelbilder aber mit möglichst hoher Schärfentiefe. Ich habe daher Versuche mit Blende 32 gemacht (die Belichtungszeit ist - wegen Stativ - in diesem Fall zweitrangig) und erhielt Bilder mit einer solchen Tiefenschärfe, dass 2 - 4 Bilder normalerweise für das Stacking ausreichen. Dann treten auch keine Artefakte auf. Für ausreichende Beleuchtung sorgt ein Blitz. Das erste so erzeugte Bild ist fertig und hochgeladen (s. [File: Xenophora pallidula 01]). Ich habe extra ein etwas schwieriges Motiv ausgesucht, denn wenn es da klappt, funktioniert es auch bei einfacheren Gehäusen. Ich bin mit dem Ergebnis ganz zufrieden. Details zur Aufnahme findest Du auf der Beschreibungsseite unter den Metadata (wie angegeben, beziehen sich die Angaben auf das Einzelbild links oben). Vielen Dank für Deine Unterstützung und Dein Interesse an meiner Arbeit. --Llez (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Llenz, gut ich berichte mal was bei Dir noch nicht ganz OK ist.

1) die Blende f/32: dadurch handelst Du Dir wieder sehr deutliche Unschärfen ein, das nennst sich Beugungsunschärfe. Du verlierst all die Feinheiten. "f/16" ist so die kleinste Blede die man noch sinnvoll einsetzen kann.

2) Blitzeinsatz ist fast ein NO GO. Da Du eh mit Stativ arbeitest benutze doch einfach das vorhandene Licht, evtl. Beleuchtung mit einer Mattscheibe (Mattpapier) davor: Stichwort: Lichtzelt. 3) Combine ZM (ZP) ist bei Dir das Problem. Ich nutze die andere, die "kommerzielle" Software (inzwischen auch Archaeodontosaurus).

4) Je mehr Bilder bei je größer geöffneter Blende (f/10, f/8 oder noch kleiner) desto "schärfer" und desto mehr Einzelbilder wären zu knipsen.

5) Ich kann für Dich mal eine "Berechnung" mit meiner Software anbieten. Du wirst sehen das Du dann alles andere in die Tonne treten wirst. Schau Dir einfach mal meine Bilderchen an. Belichtung wie weiter ober beschrieben.

6) Wenn ich Dich mit meinem Test nicht überzeugen kann dann kannst Du immer noch so weitermachen wie bisher ..

Viele Grüße und allzeit gutes Licht, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Alchemist, warum ist Blitz ein NO GO? Schau bitte mal unter http://www.femorale.com.br/femorale/phototips.asp, ist das die falsche Technik? Zumindest das Ergebnis sieht doch ganz gut aus. --Llez (talk) 18:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Beim Focus stacking habe ich zumindest immer nur schlechte Erfahrungen gemacht, da die Bilder eben nicht 100%-ig gleich belichtet waren. Die absolut gleichmäßige Belichtung ist eine Grundvoraussetzung, denn sonst hat man auf den Bildern, wie Du, so komische Artefakte. Beim Blitzen gilt eh generell so diffus wie nur möglich. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Genau das Problem hatte ich, als ich kürzlich von der Lumix (nur einzelne Bilder) auf die Canon (und damit auf Focus stacking)umgestiegen bin. Die gleichmäßige Belichtung war ein Problem. Aufnahmen bei Tageslicht wie bisher gingen nicht mehr, da die Aufnahmen sehr unterschiedlich belichtet waren, auch wenn mit dem bloßen Augen keine Helligkeitsunterschiede erkennbar waren (hätte nie gedacht, dass das Licht innerhalb von ganz kurzer Zeit so schwanken kann). Mit dem Blitz kann ich annähernd gleichmäßige Bedingungen erreichen, wobei ich indirekt blitze und z.T. auch Spiegel benutze, um das Licht zusätzlich auf bestimmte Stellen zu leiten. --Llez (talk) 23:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Wie ich schrieb: ein vorab Bild knipsen, Werte für die Belichtung übernehmen und dann manuell die Zeit für die Focus stack Reihe einstellen und knipsen. Zusätzlich gilt: Spiegelvorauslösung. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amphiperca multiformis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albinaria corrugata corrugata forma inflata, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albinaria corrugata corrugata forma draparnaldi, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:51, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lambis lambis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 01:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Achillea atrata (Black Yarrow), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lambis lambis (Spider Conch), Male Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Lambris femal

Red margin on the right side for C. It seems there have supersaturation. The first step in, Focus Sacking, are always difficult --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Turbo imperialis 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turbo imperialis 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albinaria corrugata leonisorum, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lambis lambis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tetragonias njalilus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, very good job of trimming. --Archaeodontosaurus 09:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tetragonias Skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All crieria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support well done! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dorstenia foetida (Foetid Dorstenia), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:49, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lambis lambis (Common Spider Conch), Female Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. (I suggest to make a picture that shows the two sexes to see the difference)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

 Info Done, per annotation --Llez (talk) 08:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:12, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Parkinsonia and steneosaurus

“Parkinsonia” There is a small spot on the left side of background. Can you read the caption of steneosaurus in German because I am not sure of the translation (it is in QI). Merci --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murex pecten 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Chmee2 03:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Actaea racemosa (Black Cohosh).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Actaea racemosa (Black Cohosh).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tetragonias njalilus 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tetragonias njalilus 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Considérations diverses

Je saisi cette occasion pour te faire un petit mot. Nous avons des préoccupations communes sur un projet commun, se qui suffit à mes yeux pour créer une fraternité. C’est pour çà que je regarde avec plus de soins que pour les autres ton travail, et que je défends tes photos comme si elles étaient les mienne; j’ai été très déçu pour Amphiperca multiformis de ne pas le voir promu. Pour Acca sellowiana ma première réaction a été de ne rien faire. Mais j’ai pensé qu’il y avait là une tricherie envers les autres. J’ai donc mis les deux photos ensembles. Je suis très contant de nos relations et de nos travaux.

Ces temps ci je termine une série de photo sur deux morceaux de Razanandrongobe que j’ai acheté et que je vais confier au musée de Milan pour avancer l’étude de cet animal. Dans l’année je vais essayer de mettre en place un projet de musée de paléontologie de grande ampleur en réunissant des collections privées, française et allemande. Si çà marche j’espère que tu viendras à Toulouse m’aider à faire les photos… Bien amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Xenophora pallidula

A: a spot toward the top left

B: Error clipping and especially in the lower right CA

C: CA to the bottom with a spot

D: CA

E: a spot at the bottom

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:04, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Archeo, but it is a very interesting shell. Is it only one animal carrying shells of others (alive ?) or what ?--Jebulon (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbium cymbium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice. --ElHeineken 11:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkinsonia parkinsoni 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very detailed and without blur. --ElHeineken 11:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hassiacosuchus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xenophora pallidula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good version --Archaeodontosaurus 08:11, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haliotis midae 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haliotis midae 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Parkinsonia parkinsoni 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parkinsonia parkinsoni 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cypraecassis rufa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Template

For the Museum of Karlsruhe you should make a template, as there are for many museums. I make you an email tomorrow. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PLeuroceras solare 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tonna sulcosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oh yes !--Jebulon 10:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Macrocephalites rotundus 01.JPG promoted as Valued image now.
VICbot has problems, therefore I have finished this promotion manually. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Murex pecten (Venus Comb), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbium cymbium (False Elephant's Snout), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Homoeoplanulites funatus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pleuroploca trapezium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 19:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Hyperlioceras

Hyperlioceras discites 01.jpg Tu devrais avoir un meilleur résultat si tu reste à F20 ou F24 car F36 tu perds de la résolution. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:12, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Xenophora pallidula 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xenophora pallidula 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marmota marmota (Alpine Marmot), Fat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met. We want hope for marmots, that this tradition "medical" not going to last. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Question Why is the color of oil different in each bottle? --Myrabella (talk) 08:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

 Comment There exist two kinds of fat, the outer (so called "Speck", at the back) and the inner (so called "Schmär") fat (this information now also added in the description page). The first is whitish, the second is brownish. It is said, that the "Schmär" is better than the "Speck". Both are fluid oils, if rendered down. The picture shows both, the "Speck" and the "Schmär". For further information see e.g. [1] --Llez (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fossil Strombus alatus (Florida Fighting Conch), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tectus niloticus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyperlioceras discites 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 11:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gramma loreto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That is a pretty fish. However, there is some strange fringeing going on around the nose in orange and on the background to the left in blue. Mattbuck 12:51, 26 January 2011 (UTC)  Info Colour corrections done as proposed --Llez 15:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 09:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Gomphocarpus fruticosus (Balloon Cotton).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Gomphocarpus fruticosus (Balloon Cotton).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leioceras paucicostatum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harpago chiragra 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Lmbuga 00:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litoria infrafrenata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful - Best in scope go to VA --Archaeodontosaurus 14:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pugilina morio (Giant Hairy Melongena), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leuciscus oeningensis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Indosphinctes comptoni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Melo broderipii

Dear Llez, there is a common misunderstanding about M. aethiopica and M. broderipii; both look alike, but M. broderipii can grow to 35-36 cm, whereas M. aethiopica stays below 25 cm. If you have a shell that is 23 cm plus, you can be quite certain it is M. broderipii. see also http://www.gastropods.com/5/Shell_5215.shtml and http://www.gastropods.com/8/Shell_148.shtml. The shell I have on photo, is quite an odd one. Still I believe it is a well known species. I haven't come across such a shell in encyclopedia, the 25 years I have collected them. I am busy unpacking the hundreds of species I have. Terrible those packing materials...I am digging like a mole down here. By the way, do you use a macro objective for a greater field depth (sharpness on backside of the shell)? Is the 60 or 100mm lens recommended? Or just the AV modus on the camera? Love your photos. Just got a good camera at my disposal, the EOS1000, much better than the fujipix8000 that can only do large shells. Great fun. Still I am not used to discussion pages...where and how to reach others...I hope this will do MerlinCharon (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello Llez, thank you for your reply. Why it is not a giant M. aethiopica? Well, it is possible, but...there are world size records, and it is only one in several thousands that can measure up to record size. What are the odds you stumble upon just that? Generally speaking, yes the apex of M. broderipii is quite high, usually. If a shell gets damaged, the snail repairs it but it can grow in a different direction, also when young. These become the so called 'freak shells'. Another possibility is that environmental factors can cause the shell to grow differently. The snail reacts and adapts to the environment and consequently the shell gets another shape, colour, size, or weight. Even when young the spines can already begin to spire upwards instead of downwards (while the rest of the shell stays the same). Or, with some species, grow even further downwards than normal and become 'fusiform'. So that is a reason for me as well. ++ searching the internet ++ Now it is about 25 minutes later, and I have seen more material at conchology.be, the site of Guido Poppe. I will use that site for reference in the future. I guess the last M. broderipii photograph (from Guido Poppe as well) on gastropods.com has been a mix up. Yes, I do believe it is Melo aethiopica...pity though it has two large chips at the posterior, and a hole drilled in the anterior to hang it on the wall...but it would be a monstrously large aethiopica...I will revert the change, if possible. I have found a good way to use the camera, manual is the answer, 1/200 sec., ISO low, and F between 10 and 14. Works great. A macro objective is still on my wish list...expensive stuff. Best regards, MerlinCharon (talk) 18:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

hello Llez, it is me again. It seems your shell on the photo IS Melo broderipii...great fun this...All the best MerlinCharon (talk) 18:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

I just read you other question, was it labelled as such...no, like I said, I have never come across such a shell before. I bought it from a private person, in his house, about 25 years ago. ~The man was not a big collector of shells, he only had a handful of commercial grade and very common shells, along with some stones and other gray stuff. I found this one interesting, and he told me it was from Indonesia (does the shell come from the Dutch colony back then?). but since then it remained an odd shell in my collection, because I was never able to find anything about it...until internet came and I decided to unpack and review it once more...quite an unbelievable story: only one shell somewhere in a village and bingo! that is also why I couldn't believe it MerlinCharon (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strombus alatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 20:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cymbium cymbium 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cymbium cymbium 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tonna sulcosa 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tonna sulcosa 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harpago chiragra (Chiragra Spider Conch), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question The main accepted binominal name is Lambis chiragra.
  

Source: WoRMS NCBI Incorrect scope? --George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Lambis chiragra is often used, for it was the accepted name for a long time, and therefore cited erroneously until today as such, and you find it in the www on pages, which not have been updated in the last time. But according to the newest revisions and the actual nomenclature the correct name is Harpago chiragra (see [2], updated recently (2011-01-06) according the actual nomenclature) and it is also the name used in wikispecies (see [3]).
•  Abstain More opinions needed --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment As Harpago chiragra and Lambis chiragra are identical, one could also consider to nominate it in both scopes (the old and the new name) --Llez (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment As per mail --Llez (talk) 16:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support criteria met --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Litoria infrafrenata (Giant Tree Frog).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pleuroceras solare.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• support criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:20, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I think it is Pleurocera spinatus which is the marker of the biozone upper Pliensbachian. This ammonite is even more interesting! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

• Temporary withdraw my support: wait for identification verify. Sorry --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment As per mail --Llez (talk) 16:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

*  Support Sorry to have doubted and thank you for your demonstration is perfect, it's P. Solar. I still find P. Spinatum that our work is complete. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support now --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:38, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xenophora pallidula (Pallid Carrier Shell).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Pleurocera.... Spinatum!

Thank you for your support, these days I'm a bit battered. I found a Pleurocera Spinatum. It is not very nice but it has only one we have. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hexaplex erythrostomus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--Jebulon 23:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkinsonia wuerttembergica 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbium tritonis 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Far much better ! Come on Llez ! and 5 are enough (private joke)--Jebulon 10:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC) Bravo --Archaeodontosaurus 19:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Geum rivale (Water Avens).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Geum rivale (Water Avens).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Harpago chiragra 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Harpago chiragra 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyperlioceras discites.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hexaplex erythrostomus (Pink Mouthed Murex), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lithoconus leopardus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and useful. --Cayambe 08:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melo broderipii 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really nice composition and useful but there is a problem with the blown white scratches on the upper ones --Mbdortmund 21:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)  Comment This are no scratches. The shell has a high-gloss surface (like a mirror) so that you can not always avoid light reflections. --Llez 05:02, 9 February 2011 QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)(UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protogrammoceras depressum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melo broderipii, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siphocypraea carolinensis floridana, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryssota otaheitana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful. --Mbdortmund 20:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Llez/Archives. You have new messages at George Chernilevsky's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pugilina morio 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 08:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, Vielen Dank

Hello Llez

Many thanks for your support vote in FPC, the rhino is very happy.

As you are one of the greatest specialists of this kind of work in "Commons", your opinion is very important to me.

I appreciate very much.

Thanks again, --Jebulon (talk) 00:29, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Cymbium marocanus 01.JPG

Attention a 100% de résolution tu as une frange rouge sur le bord gauche pour A B et C... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tibia insulaechorab curta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, even at high resolution. Congratulations !--Jebulon 17:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Echinofulgur dalli, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orthosphinctes colubrinus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Magenta comment in QIC

Bonjour Llez.

J'essaie en français.

Bravo pour tes images, je les aime toujours autant et elles sont très bien.

Pour ta dernière production, je ne parle pas d'aberration chromatique aux franges de l'image (phénomène bien connu dû aux lentilles), ou aux limites entre diverses parties, mais d'une décomposition générale de la couleur nacrée très visible à haute résolution, qui donne sur toute la surface de chacun des specimens des marbrures "magenta" qui ne sont pas la couleur réelle, mais bien une dégradation (à mon avis).

I'm sorry, it could be much better understandable in english, but I don't know the good words (nor in german...)

Peut-être es-tu trop ambitieux en résolution et taille d'image ?

à bientôt

--Jebulon (talk) 10:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbium marocanus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 18:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Re Pleuroceras categories

Hi Llez, in regards to the Pleuroceras categories, could you visit and comment on the Species level categorization of extinct taxa thread at the Tree of Life wikiproject. Also when you do create categories it would be very helpful if you would fully complete them such has been done at Category:Pleuroceras by including the taxonavigation and wikispecies tamplates. Also a Paleobiology Database (for fossils) and/or World Register of Marine species for marine taxa link is preferred if the databases have an entry for the taxon. --Kevmin § 17:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Haustellum brandaris 01.jpg

Hallo Llez, ich habe soeben Dein fantastisches Bild der Brandhornschnecke auf der "Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list" gesehen und würde es nun trotz des Kommentares irgendwie positiv bewerten, da dieser meiner Meinung nach nicht zutreffend ist! Mein Problem ist aber jetzt folgendes: Sobald ich ein "Pro" oder ein Kommentar auf der Seite einfügen will, erscheint dieser in meiner Vorschau immer außerhalb der gelben Markierung. Gibt es dabei irgendein ein Trick oder mache ich was falsch? Entschuldige bitte die Frage aber ich bin noch nicht so lang auf diesen Abstimmseiten und versuche diese gerade zu verstehen!Viele Grüße H. Krisp (talk) 17:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC) Hallo Llez, es hat alles sehr gut geklappt! Vielen lieben Dank für den Tip! Ich glaube von selber wäre ich nicht darauf gekommen (Wenn ich bedenke das ich gestern 4 Stunden davor gesessen bin und es nicht funktioniert hat:o()! Viele Grüße und nochmals Danke H. Krisp (talk) 11:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Genus or not Genus

Bonsoir, I told Kewin I disagreed with this approach. I am fully aware of the problem and I agree entirely-made hunting synonyms, too many, that we find everywhere. But I especially hope that we can freely create the category that seems useful. If there is a problem we solve piecemeal. Anyway, even for the genus Homo is not complete consensus. It is the position I will try to defend. What do you think? Bien amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albinaria praeclara praeclara, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellobium aurismidae 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I know there is like "mother-of-pearl", but I can see some disturbing magenta CA at high resolution. --Jebulon 00:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC))* Comment The Magenta/Lilac colours especially on the ventral side and near the sutur are the natural colours. If I try to reduce Magenta, they would disappear, but that wouldn't be the original colour then (if you mean something other, please make an annotation on the description page, I will correct then) --Llez 07:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)* Done Thanks for further information, I did my best in correcting --Llez 12:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Far much better !--Jebulon 15:46, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellobium aurismidae (Midas' Ear Cassidula), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met for a studio photo - George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Silene baccifera (Berry Catchfly).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Silene baccifera (Berry Catchfly).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haustellum brandaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendroconus figulinus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 20:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albinaria lerosiensis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grammoceras thouarcense 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fantastic--Holleday 18:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tricornis latissimus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture -- Holleday 18:40, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grammoceras thouarcense.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support too --George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Just a note

Hi Llez, I just wanted to let you know that I updated and moved one of your images, the "Lithymnates" laurenti specimen, to the current binomial Archepseudophylla laurenti. The species was transferred from Lithymnetes to the newly erected genus Archepseudophylla by Nel, Prokop, & Ross (2008). It would be wonderful to have more extinct insect image loaded onto commons if you have access to specimens! I have uploaded several for the fossil site where I work already, see Allorapisma, Palaeopsychops marringerae, and Nymphes georgei. --Kevmin § 19:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tectus niloticus (Commercial Trochus), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Tonna sulcosa

Dans VI tu as oublié le Scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leioceras comptum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Luffa operculata (Esponjilla).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Luffa operculata (Esponjilla).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerithium nodulosum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 17:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Meandrina meandrites (Maze Coral)

Hallo Citron, there are severe chromatic aberrations (blue) at the top left border of the coral nominated by you as FP. Should be corrected (before W.S. or Benh come along ;-) ). --Llez (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

You're right! I've done it. :)

I take this opportunity to tell you that I like your photographic work. My comment in your last nomination isn't a reproach, just an explanation of W.S. and Benh's comments. I know well that the shell is completely covered by tissue in many marine gastropods, but isn't the case of the majority of your FP of shells... Sometimes, I think really that your photos have more them place in the category "objects", as the skeletons (ex:file:Diceros bicornis MNHN.jpg), because the shell is actually solely an external bone!

Maybe, your work would be more appreciated! :)

Cordialy--Citron (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helianthemum nummularium ssp. obscurum (Rockrose), Habitus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Too black white rhino

Hello Llez.

Thanks for your message and your appreciated review (as always).

I understand what you mean, and you are not totally wrong ().

When I began this masking job, I had the same idea.

(well, it is not so bad at high size...)

I don't know how you do, but for myself, my maskings are all "hand made", with GIMP.

Then it should be very boring to re-do all the work at the boundaries, with the small and detailed soft brushes.

Do you know a special tip to avoid this ?

It is a good occasion for me now to congratulate you another time for your great job with the shells or amonites.

It is absolutely not boring to me, even if I'm not a specialist.

Winter panoramas are sometimes boring too !! But spring is coming, and critters, bugs and flowers will be back soon... (Heeeelp!)

I like very much the marvels of the nature you show, and you (your pictures!) make me feel sometimes the (too) famous "wow" effect.

I agree with your general opinion about the encyclopedic "spirit" of Commons, even in the FPC page.

IMO, it must be a place for all contributions and contributors, even with different goals.

There is sometimes too much testosterone in reviews...

--Jebulon (talk) 11:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

PS: may I suggest a little archive of your talk page ?

Archive: I know how to do, but it is hard to explain in english. I'll do this myself for you.

 Done I hope you'll enjoy. If no, it is possible to reverse. Please ask in this case. I've made a page for the six first months of 2010, and another for the six last. I've created a new page for 2011, but it is empty for now. You have only to copy the current discussions, and drop (copy-paste) them in the new page. Easy ! (I do the same, every six months, for Archaeodontosaurus, which is absolutely unable to do that !!!)--Jebulon (talk) 14:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dendroconus figulinus 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dendroconus figulinus 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tonna sulcosa (Great Rapa Chank), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Criteria met for a studio photo --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leioceras opalinum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me a good QI picture--Holleday 15:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Bravo

pour la photo du jours!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reineckeia eusculpta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 10:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busycon radula 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 14:08, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leioceras comptum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I suppose geocoding a piece dating to Jurassic period would be strange.--Mile (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Abramis-brama-laichausschlag

Hallo Llez, vielen Dank für den Tip! Ich habe versucht die CA ein wenig zu reduzieren (mein allererster Versuch in dieser Richtung:-)).Ist das Bild nun ein wenig besser geworden? Vielen Dank und viele Grüße H. Krisp (talk) 19:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC) Hallo Llez, ich habe jetzt die Positionskoordinaten hinterlegt! Nochmals vielen lieben Dank für Ihre Hilfe (alleine hätte ich das alles vermutlich niemals herausgefunden:-()!Es ist wirklich sehr nett von Ihnen! Viele Grüße H. Krisp (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbium marocanus (Moroccan Cymbium), Shell..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leioceras opalinum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:23, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haustellum brandaris (Purple Dye Murex), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Combat contre les Sock Puppet

Va voir à "Featured picture candidates/File:Limule(dD).jpg" ma discussion avec W.S qui est amusante et qui te concerne. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harpa articularis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hildoceras sublevisoni 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 21:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fulguropsis radula 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fulguropsis radula 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegocrioceras spathi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me a good QI--Holleday 19:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tricornis sinuatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pleuroploca trapezium (Trapezium Horse Conch), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calocochlia pan 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very careful work --Archaeodontosaurus 19:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Dactylorhiza-maculata-gefleckte-knabenkraut .jpg

Hallo Llez, entschuldige bitte die Frage aber ich verstehe den Kommentar nicht so richtig? Meinst Du das ursprüngliche oder das bearbeitete Bild? aber ich hätte noch ein paar weitere kleinere Fragen und es wäre wirklich toll wenn Du mir da weiterhelfen könntest: 1.) Wenn mir jemand z.B. einen Kommentar auf die Diskussionsseite schreibt und ich auf meiner Seite darauf antworte, bekommt er dann eine Benachrichtigung oder muss ich auf seiner Disk.Seite antworten? 2.) Wertvolle Bilder: Ab wann ist ein Bild denn allgemein wertvoll? Also ich habe gestern eine Spinne hochgeladen, deren Art in Wikipedia noch nicht beschrieben ist bzw. es auch noch keine Bilder in Wikimedia gibt. Das müßte doch wertvoll sein? Aber wie sieht es mit Bilder aus, bei denen es schon eine Kategorie mit 1-2 relativ kleinen Bildern gibt? Ist dann ein neueres, größeres und detaillierteres Bild auch wertvoll? 3.) Wie geht man im bei einem Bilderupload richtigerweise vor, d.h. wie weit taxiert man die jeweilige Art? Ich habe bis jetzt nur die jeweilige Art und Familie angegeben (auch bei den Kategorien). Ist das richtig so oder sollte man alles angeben (Klasse, Unterklasse, Ordnung usw.)? 4. Exzellente Bilder: Ich habe demletzt probehalber zwei Bilder in diese Kategorie eingestellt und geschaut was dort alles geschrieben wird und was nach dem Nominierungszeitraum passiert. Wenn ich ehrlich bin, dann verstehe ich die Abschlussprozedur nicht ganz richtig. Beendet die Person die das Bild nominiert hat das schwierige Verfahren oder macht das jemand anderes? 5. Bild des Tages: Irgendwann ist ein Bild von mir in diese Kategorie gerutscht und deshalb habe ich mir das Verfahren mal genauer angeschaut. Wenn ich aber auch hier ehrlich bin, versteh ich es wieder nicht ganz so genau:-(! Ab wann wird ein exzellentes Bild ein Bild des Tages? Sollten alle Bewertungen positiv sein und wer lädt es dann hoch und wie macht er das? Entschuldige bitte die vielen Fragen aber das waren bzw. sind meine Anfängerproblemchen und es wäre toll wenn du weiterhelfen könntest (gern auch via mail: holleday@gmx.de). Vielen Dank und viele Grüße H. Krisp (talk) 12:11, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aegocrioceras spathi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murex trapa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice and for me a QI--Holleday 14:56, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus leopardus (Leopard Cone), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, very good photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corylus avellana 0007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scutalus alauda 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haugia variabilis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithium nodulosum (Giant Knobbed Cerith), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:49, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angaria delphinus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very careful work QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Calocochlia pan 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Calocochlia pan 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Momordica charantia (Bitter Melon).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Momordica charantia (Bitter Melon).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbium tritonis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:26, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Osperlioceras bicarinatus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:47, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mauritia histrio 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One of your better ones. Qiqritiq 22:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harpa harpa (True Harp), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Bravo

Pour la photo du jour! Tu ne devrai pas mettre qu'il n'y a pas de géocodage. Tu as l'air de t’excuser alors que c'est tout à fait normal. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holcophylloceras calypso 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:11, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holcophylloceras calypso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amphidromus atricallosus leucoxanthus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 15:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pterois antennata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me a QI--Holleday 17:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amphidromus atricallosus leucoxanthus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:45, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Octopus vulgaris 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some strong colour fringing at full size, often hard to avoid in an aquarium. DOF a bit shallow, but nicely lit. Borderline but QI IMO. --Avenue 22:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhizoconus vexillum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I don't like the background (it's disturbing to me, perhaps can be better a black background). Five images (each one 1400x1300 2200 x 2000 pixels approximately) and noise and not too much DOF in the three of above. I don't like it, but the image can be QI to me. I'm not sure--Lmbuga 19:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)  CommentI tried first a black background, but this one was better because of the dark "base" of the upper ones --Llez 19:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC) Ok. I tink that the image can be QI, I only can say that I'm not sure, but to me QI--Lmbuga 20:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asperitas inquinata penidae 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus vexillum (Flag Cone), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Could be downsized a bit. Sometimes no use of oversizing if no additional infos could be get.--Mile (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support good VIC -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:30, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 17:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Angaria delphinus 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Angaria delphinus 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zebrasoma desjardinii (Desjardin's Sailfin Tang).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudogrammoceras expeditum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me a QI and usefull--Holleday 10:53, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chlamydosaurus kingii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 20:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sinustrombus latissimus (Heavy Frog Conch), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudogrammoceras expeditum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busycon contrarium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice--Holleday 18:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harpa articularis (Articulate Harp), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pogona vitticeps 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Red/brown background isnt perfect, but the quality is otherwise good.--Ankara 16:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echium wildpretii 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hexaplex cichoreum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Cypraea tigris

Tu peux éviter les réflexions de deux façons. Avec un filtre polarisant (le plus simple) ; soit en mettant devant le flash ou les lampes un feuille de papier blanc pour diffuser la lumière. Certains flashs sont vendu avec un kit spécial. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

J’ai essayé de faire plusieurs photos avec Oliva oliva, (je ne sais pas où j’ai mis mes Cyprae). Avec plusieurs solutions. Je renonce car je fais encore moins bien que toi ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Je l’ai essayé aussi. Tu perds la moitie de la lumière et tu n’arrive, au mieux, qu’à atténuer une partie périphérique du reflet. Cà marche bien sur les cristaux qui sont des surfaces planes mais pas avec les surfaces courbes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

QIC

Hallo Llez, du hast bei zwei meiner Bilder auf QIC eines promoted, aber das andere kommentiert, deswegen ist nicht ganz klar, welches der beiden Bilder du gut findest (vielleicht beide? ;-) ). Auf jeden Fall danke für dein Votum. Viele Grüße, --Quartl (talk) 05:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, --Quartl (talk) 06:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinofulgur dalli 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Busycon contrarium (Lightning Whelk), Fossil Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corucia zebrata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Quartl 11:40, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cypraea tigris (Tiger Cowry), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope (with subscope Shell) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Missing data in picture

Hi Llez,

Sorry I was away from FPC for short while. I'd like to justify the missing EXIF on my pictures of Invalides. It's a stitch as you may have guess, and at that time, the soft I use (Hugin) did not include them in the final panorama. Also, I used a rectilinear projection, and this usually stretch the details, as we're getting farther from the center of the image, hence some soft parts. I'll try to reshot this one day, and I'll take into account the reviews. Thanks (by the way, you should consider archiving some of the talks here, as the page takes quite some time to display ;) ). - Benh (talk) 17:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclophorus rafflesi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:15, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cypraea tigris 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There seems to be quite a lot of reflections in the shells. --Lokal Profil 22:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Comment The shell surface is glossy like a mirror, impossible to make a photo without reflections --Llez 06:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Good to me.--Jebulon 15:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC) Impossible to do better. --Archaeodontosaurus 15:24, 23 April 2011 (UTC)  Comment What I reacted to was what looked like the outline of the photographer in the reflections. This could possibly be fixed by using a remote or standing in front of a darker/less reflective background. Not opposing QI though. --Lokal Profil 12:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclophorus rafflesi, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirabilistrombus listeri 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 17:57, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis diversicolor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirabilistrombus listeri (Lister's Conch), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haliotis diversicolor (Variously Coloured Abalone), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus 07:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harpa harpa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me a QI--Holleday 18:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Busycon contrarium 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Busycon contrarium 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Wahre Worte

Hi,

wäre wirklich schön, wenn das hier in Zukunft ausbliebe. Besonders bei einem guten Fotografen, wie Benh es zweifelsohne ist, kann ich dieses unsachliche Geblöke nicht nachvollziehen. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dorcasia alexandri, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mauritia mauritiana (Chocolate Cowry), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:04, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asperitas inquinata penidae, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 23:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neverita didyma 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work with this one! Great quality! --Ximonic 14:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Corylus avellana (Common Hazel).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Corylus avellana (Common Hazel).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Good set. By talk way: almost all photos it this set are good QI candidates
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Award

		The Barnstar of Biology
		The award for lots of very lovely photos of animals and plants and other Your tireless contributions. Very good work! Viele Grüße -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neverita didyma (Bladder Moon Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asperitas trochus sparsa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 09:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomacea canaliculata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 09:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

The one-of-a-kind valued and quality images barnstar

			The one-of-a-kind valued and quality images barnstar
			I hereby award you this special one-of-a-kind valued and quality images barnstar for having taken 148 quality images and 133 valued images. Well done! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:40, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pomacea canaliculata (Golden Apple Snail), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 6 May 2011
 Support Very clear and helpful. -- Michaelphillipr (talk) 10:41, 7 May 2011

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asperitas trochus sparsa, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very clear and helpful. -- Michaelphillipr (talk) 10:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angaria delphinus (Common Delphinula), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Tomer T (talk) 14:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plioplatecarpus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great picture --Schlaier 16:45, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ficus gracilis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rostellariella delicatula 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work again! --Ximonic 13:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ficus gracilis (Graceful Fig Shell), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochetoceras canaliculatum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 16:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rostellariella delicatula (Delicate Tibia), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support good work and good specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Juglans regia (Common Walnut).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Juglans regia (Common Walnut).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Asperitas inquinata penidae 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Asperitas inquinata penidae 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museumsmühle im Weiler.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ochetoceras canaliculatum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mühle im Weiler, Stühlingen, Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment - You should decide which scope name to use because now you specified two different scopes in one name. 1)Gypsum mills in Germany and 2)Mühle im Weiler Museum, Blumeggweiler. The first scope refers the all mills of this kind in Germany while the second scope refers only the building we see in the photo.--MrPanyGoff 08:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Info Scope changed to this specific mill. --Llez (talk) 08:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

It is better now. Just one more thing: usually we put the name of the building first, being the main subject, and the name of the place goes after that because it is only explanatory. Examples: 1, 2, 3, 4. Now I find the town of Stühlingen as the main subject ;) --MrPanyGoff 06:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Done As proposed --Llez (talk) 11:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

 Support - The only image of this museum in commons. Good quality.--MrPanyGoff 11:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scutalus alauda, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Plioplatecarpus 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plioplatecarpus 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dyakia salangana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dyakia salangana, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astyanax mexicanus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. But the focus is not on the eye !!!--Jebulon 09:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euthriofusus burdigalensis forma typica 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euthriofusus burdigalensis, forma typica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very Good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:17, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bufonaria rana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent detail --Saffron Blaze 14:36, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigia murchisonae 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 09:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ludwigia murchisonae.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parque nacional del Teide, La Tarta de Tenerife.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment - Isn't this volcanic outcrop located in Teide National Park? If yes, the category you created with this only photo should be placed in Category:Parque nacional del Teide which is the main category.--MrPanyGoff 12:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Done --Llez (talk) 18:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me with the new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astyanax mexicanus (Mexican Tetra), Blind cave form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bufonaria rana (Common Frog Shell), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and Very Useful work --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:43, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebrasoma flavescens 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow! --King of Hearts 06:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicoreus brunneus flavicunda 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 20:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Aesculus glabra (Ohio Buckeye).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Aesculus glabra (Ohio Buckeye).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chicoreus brunneus flavicunda (Adusta Murex, dark form), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zebrasoma flavescens (Yellow Tang).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment File:Zebrasoma flavescens Luc Viatour.jpg is very good, could be geocoded, but does not show habitat (aquarium) or feeding behavior. This is a crowded scope; I may have missed other worthy candidates. A "captive" subscope may be appropriate. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment This image shows perfectly the species and quality is better. I propose to promote it. If an image in the natural habitats it happens to be promoted with a reduced scope "Habitus". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Done Scope reduced to "Habitus". --Llez (talk) 06:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry for my bad English but Walter is right or writing "Captive" or nothing, but not "Habit, "which supposes that it is in its natural environment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment OK, I re-establihsed the original scope and removed the addition "Habitus".(Misunderstanding? I had added "Habitus", i.e. the animal itself, its shape - as proposed by you above -, not "Habitat", which means the environment). --Llez (talk) 11:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla inutilis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Contrary to its name it is useful :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euthriofusus burdigalensis grateloupi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla inutilis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:39, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthurus leucosternon 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work. --Tomer T 12:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Louis XVII

Thank you very much Llez for your very kind message, I'm very sensitive to. But I'm really disgusted by FPC now. But I'll support your pictures here if needed (and if featurable !!)--Jebulon (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euthriofusus burdigalensis grateloupi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:11, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxymeris dimidiata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 20:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haustellum haustellum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done -- George Chernilevsky 14:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acer trilobatum, Leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:19, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haustellum haustellum (Snipe's Bill), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceratophrys cornuta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! For me a QI--Holleday 16:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Bravo

Bravo pour la photo du jour, et pour ton squelette de Spheniscus voila une photo que j'aurais aimé faire!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Et vive les "Museum pictures" !--Jebulon (talk) 08:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oxymeris dimidiata (Orange Auger), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mauritia histrio (Minstrel Cowry), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spheniscus magellanicus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI and useful. --Archaeodontosaurus 18:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calocochlia pan, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Nelumbo nucifera (Indian Lotus).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Nelumbo nucifera (Indian Lotus).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euthriofusus burdigalensis costaria 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice--Holleday 05:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spheniscus magellanicus, Skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very Good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euthriofusus burdigalensis costaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 12:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laevistrombus canarium turturella 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice--Holleday 17:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhizoconus mustelinus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 08:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevistrombus canarium turturella (Dog Conch), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Civility

Llez, I didn't appreciate your flaming post at Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#File:STS-134_EVA4_view_to_the_Russian_Orbital_Segment.jpg. I'm not a perfect human being, and if I nominate an image, it's because I trust other users at FAC to share with me what they find wrong with it, if they find anything at all. Several times, and certainly in this case, I'll enjoy an image so much that I'll completely overlook (if accidentally) any technical issues, and I appreciate it when others catch those for me. If I wasted your time, I apologize. But damn, I didn't realize I'd set some sort of standard expected of me! I'm just trying to appreciate photography, so take it down a notch, and oppose without being uncivil. Thanks. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 09:43, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conus mustelinus (Weasel Cone), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:09, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calocochlia albaiensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good !--Jebulon 15:20, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calocochlia albaiensis, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 23:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rasenia involuta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Bravo

Pour l'image du jour! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Abies koreana (Korean Fir).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Abies koreana (Korean Fir).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Viele Grüße -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fulguropsis radula.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cypraecassis rufa (Red Helmet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in scope. W.S. 16:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygoplites diacanthus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thersites fraseri 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cellana rota 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and useful--Holleday 15:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cellana rota (Wheel Limpet), Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thersites fraseri, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support criteria met for a studio photo. - George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Coquillage

Thank you very much for this nice POTD ! It's always a pleasure to look at your works.--Jebulon (talk) 14:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

• Bravo pour l'image du jour! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

MVR result

Hi! Your Astyanax mexicanus 01.jpg still VI after MVR.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)