User talk:NicolasGrandjean

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nicolas, i don't mind when people use images i have created for other purposes but i do when they put it on their "my contributions" account. -- BorisTM 19:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't put it on *my* contribution!!! It is specified nowhere that I am the author! All appologies for this, it was not ment to be an annoyance--NicolasGrandjean 16:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Butterfly[edit]

If you can indentify them, please don't hesistate to edit the articles/images and add info. I don't trust my French enough to reply in it, excuse-moi :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lycaena virgaureae female kz.jpg[edit]

Of course, picture presents Lycaena tityrus. My mistake. I have changed the description of picture and its location in species gallery. Kenraiz (talk) 20:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opéron lactose[edit]

Salut, tes illustrations concernant l'opéron lactose sont vraiment bien faites mais, à moins de me tromper, tu as fais une erreur d'orthographe sur le mot "Promoteur". Il ne prend qu'un 't'. Bref, rien de grave mais si tu sais modifier ça un de ces jours :) Tu ne penses pas qu'il faudrait faire le transfert de ces paragraphes vers la page "Opéron lactose" (sur fr je veux dire) ? Julius86 (talk) 20:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Regulation glycemie.png is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Regulation glycemie.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 13:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Fuchsine schiff c.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Fuchsine schiff c.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 01:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Fuchsine schiff l.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Fuchsine schiff l.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 01:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Import sur Commons d'une illustration effacée d'fr.[edit]

Bonjour,

File:Gtp.png a été importé sur commons. ce matin. Kyro l'avait effacé d'fr. avec comme motif "sur Commons", mais je ne l'avais pas trouvée ici. --Dereckson (talk) 08:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ornithine.png[edit]

File:Ornithine.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

LordOider (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nihydrine réaction2.png[edit]

File:Nihydrine réaction2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Marbletan (talk) 18:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NicolasGrandjean&oldid=657564487"