User talk:Nilfanion

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

If you want to leave a message to me on any issue relating to Commons, or Commons-hosted imagery please leave it here. Please only leave messages on my en.wikipedia talk page if it is strictly an en.wikipedia matter.

Archives Feb 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007 and 2008-09

Contents 1 + 2 Lewis Roberts' botanical illustrations 3 "view" type one 4 Quality Image Promotion 5 OTRS 6 Blason de chartres sous le 1er Empire 7 EPSA 8 The Stroll 9 Insuffiicient permission on OTRS) 10 Licensing 11 Hum 12 Hello 13 Quality Image Promotion 14 Why? 15 Deletion of photos 16 Deletion of pictures from the page Precision Glass Moulding 17 Cohen Brothers of Canada photo (File:CohenBrothers.jpg) 18 Quality Image Promotion 19 PHOTO 20 Undeletion request 21 Quality Image Promotion 22 Dartmoor 23 Vénus d'arles 24 Pictures of ICYE 25 Quality Image Promotion 26 Rodin_Auguste_Cupid_and_Psyche_1905.jpg 27 Undeletion request 28 Your assistance please 29 Orgue 30 Images-deleter! 31 Quality Image Promotion 32 Quality Image Promotion 33 File:Sharp Tor, Bolt Head.jpg 34 Quality Image Promotion 35 some licences needed 36 Uploads 37 File:Von.Dreyse.J.N.jpg 38 Quality Image Promotion 39 Quality Image Promotion 40 Mohsen Subhi 41 Quality Image Promotion 42 Nilfabot 43 File:Bur logo 90.jpg 44 Note 45 FlickrLickr cat 46 Quality Image Promotion 47 Quality Image Promotion 48 unlinking image 49 Deletion of File:Lady_Young.jpg it will be Public Domain 50 Quality Image Promotion 51 Paro de Federici 52 Valued Image Promotion 53 Yeah, yeah - no time....:) 54 What?? 55 Commons:Deletion requests/Laminate

[edit] +

Welcome back. :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Odd, it seems you've missed this... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Lewis Roberts' botanical illustrations

Thank you so much for your kind help and advice. I have left a message for you at User talk:John Hill. Thanks again, John E. Hill (talk) 01:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi again! I have just finished uploading all the Lewis Roberts images I have on my computer so far. He visited here briefly today and is pleased that this is all happening. He has done quite a number of illustrations since the ones I already have copies of. I will ask him sometime if he would like to have more scanned and uploaded.

Thank you so much for all your help and advice and for smoothing the way for me to upload all these files. It did take a while - but I certainly enjoyed looking at them all again, and am very happy they will be available now for others to enjoy and use. Sincerely, John E. Hill (talk) 09:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] "view" type one

Not sure where you think this might be useful? (if at all). Smalljim also has a view type one which he has annotated with the tor names on - useful? Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Re landscape stuff - more discussion I guess - on the Dartmoor pages somewhere I think. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

(copied to User talk:Nilfanion/Dartmoor)

Thought you'd gone. Been working on that area just now. Will look some more. If still around enjoy - if not hope you did! --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Little Trowlesworthy Tor.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] OTRS

Thanks for the OTRS tag on File:TJ Rooney photo.jpg!--Blargh29 (talk) 02:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Blason de chartres sous le 1er Empire

Bonsoir, Vous avez fait enlever le blason de chartres sous le 1er empire donnez moi la raison merci bonne soirée--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

la licence est

self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0

sorry pour l'oubli --Ssire (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] EPSA

Hello Nilfanion! Why have you deleted EPSA logo on my contribution on the European Pharmaceutical Students' Association wiki page? I am the responsible to upload on wikipedia a description about our association in order to enlarge the knowledge of the pharmacist students around Europe about our work and projects. I don't know exacly how to give references about our photos or text because EPSA and myself are the owners of these files. If you could help me on the autentication i would be thankful. Regards, EPSA Information Officer

[edit] The Stroll

Why did you delete the picture of "The keel on land" from the Diosa Del Mar web page? It is my picture and I released it into public domain. I put it back and please leave it alone.

The Stroll

moved from your userpage. best regards, Huib talk 18:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Insuffiicient permission on OTRS)

Hello, i saw 3 files i uploaded were deleted.I had sent an email myself as well as the creator.Did i forget to do something? The permission was going to be this one {{PD-user-w}}.Megistias (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

The files were "File:Cavlegillyrien final.jpg" ,"File:IllyrianFootmanDiscHelmet.jpg","File:IllyrianFootman.jpg" .And there are some more from the same creator.ThankouMegistias (talk) 14:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

I received a mail from permissions at the 6th of September saying they received my mail.I dont know about the creator's mails.Megistias (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok i dont know when will the email i sent them will get processed but David told me that he didnt have the time and that he will sent this weekend.I can forward you the mail if need be.Megistias (talk) 10:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Could you restored them till this is resolved,if not thats ok.Megistias (talk) 18:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

While i received a thanks from Permissions the creator received this. "permissions-common@wikimedia.org  : Apparent dead links, i have every time a mailer-demon..." He sent them twice this weekend.Megistias (talk) 13:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Its sure this is not a ticket? Re: [Ticket#2009083110028551] license information for images? It was the title of one of their emails.Megistias (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok thankou , i have emailed them, the creators emails are coming back daemon failiure.Megistias (talk) 10:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Licensing

Hi, in two of my picture files (File:Aluminium pigment paste.JPG and File:Aluminium_pigment_powder_.JPG I found a "no license"-tag. If you look into the files, you see PD-self. I always thought this is an information about the license. If not please tell me what I have to do. Please note that all my pictures you find here are self-made and Public Domain. CU, --FK1954 (talk) 13:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Hum

Like the way the QI one turned out - nice one & deserves QI. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Ramblings

Headless crosses - generally crosses (Petre's cross I have uploaded but it ain't - now - a cross) are crosses. However if that is a menhir (not looked into it) then you are right.

Rocks in reservoirs - not tors imho (though point taken about pre reservoir maps.

More generally

I think we should be looking for QI/VI & FP on some Dartmoor material. I'd be inclined to look carefully at categories before going for any VIs to be sure we have good definitions (I'd be inclined to break up crosses for example into "older" & "modern").

On that subject this one anyway should be QI - conditions obviously not wonderful for many more from that trip. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Interesting. On "sets" I agree that is the direction to take. Maybe a discussion page somewhere in due course.

On panos - maybe worth a Dartmoor panos cat. 1 uploaded at the time of typing this - the other will follow soon. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Worthwhile I think :). I'm quite pleased so obviously others will disapprove of something! Even zoomed at 150% there is one issue I am not certain of but I'll work on that. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Don't see anything fascinating on the left but it does frame the image quite well?

I think we should look at a cat for Dartmoor clappers (maybe a Dartmoor bridges -> D Clappers)? Just uploaded an Avon clapper one (& a couple more from that walk following). Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

& a "menhir" one too (sub of Archaeology?)? --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Anyway.... If you follow the track out from the moor gate (zoomed almost fully) you can see the spot? Yours is well to the right of the actual location.

Meh - might be somewhere between. Harbourne Head would be a better description but either the OS location is out or it is to the left of the wording. Looking some more later. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah - I've changed it, tho not quite the same as yours & amended the description. Now if I knew an admin I could re-upload with a better name & get the old one deleted get it renamed ......--Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Off out but 697651? Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes - apologies - rather hasty this am trying to get stuff done, yours was much closer than mine.

Harbourne Man (or more strictly Maen if you wish) would be the best name for it. The "com" is 'cos not everything is on commons....

Cats I'll look at this week. Gone now, honest! --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

On cats - I would happily be bold - I created quite a few of them anyway but it would seem sensible to try and co-ordinate it with the Dartmoor pages sp some thought first I think? --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Hadn't realised I had uploaded there under both accounts. Probably they should be transferred to Commons anyway. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Of course it should really be "Rivers of Dartmoor" etc etc ....:) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

I want to know the reasons you delete File:Escuela103.jpg Do you read the discusion?. I believe, I don´t need more arguments.

and what happens in?:

• Estatua_de_educadoras_chilenas.JPG
• Paro_de_Federici_(De_Gloria_Maldonado).jpg

(excuse me my bad english) --Ciberprofe (talk) 04:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

OK:

I will try to put the pictures again. When i make it I m new in wikipedia and I dont Know, how it is the correct way.

Bye

The answers

• 1) 1 it`s my own camera. It`s my photo. Somebody take me the picture with my camera, then It is my work.
• 2) Thank
• 3)It a text from Students`s federation of the university where I studied. . Universidad de Chile. The author was a ("persona jurídica" en español) authorized person in name of the institution. This text don`t need permission

Thank. Excuse me my bad english--Ciberprofe (talk) 21:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

PS: (put=restore?? ok its no important)

OK Thank... I will go next week to the institution--Ciberprofe (talk) 21:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:River Avon below Huntingdon Warren.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Why?

Hi! I would like to know what is the problem with the File Iraola Lezama.png, that you deleted. It was an own work photo by user Jatamendi, what's wrong? Electro07 (talk) 23:16, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Wouh! it's great that you discover that! In fact, Jatamendi was expelled from spanish wikipedia some months ago. Thanks for the explanation Electro07 (talk) 15:01, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of photos

Nifanion:

Emails were provided on Sept 8, 2009 (in two separate mailings), to the permissions-commons@wikimedia.org email address, as follows:

To: Wikipedia Commons @Wikipedia Commons.........re: File:Martha_Cohen.jpg I represent Martha Cohen (age 88) and by virtue of this email, I declare that the photo “Martha Cohen” is owned by her, and Martha Cohen has full rights to grant its usage as she sees fit. As such, I am granting permission to Wikipedia to exhibit the following photo at its site:

File:Martha_Cohen.jpg

Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

David Cohen C. Correspondents (6) Please note the C. memorialization at the bottom, a step that was taken so that various "concerned parties" could be apprised of the fact that permission was granted, then sent to Wikimedia Commons. I am now providing those same concerned parties with memorialization of this message to you. C. Correspondents (11) Guest disputant (talk) 10:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

---

Nifanion:

Emails were provided on Sept 8, 2009 (in two separate mailings), to the permissions-commons@wikimedia.org email address, as follows:

@Wikipedia Commons.........re: File:CohenBrothers.jpg To: Wikipedia Commons

I represent the Harry B. Cohen estate and by virtue of this email, I declare that the photo “Cohen Brothers of Canada” is owned by the estate, and the estate has full rights to grant its usage as it sees fit. As such, I am granting permission to Wikipedia to exhibit the following photo at its site: File:CohenBrothers.jpg Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

David Cohen C. Correspondents (6)

Please note the C. memorialization at the bottom, a step that was taken so that various "concerned parties" could be apprised of the fact that permission was granted, then sent to Wikimedia Commons. I am now providing those same concerned parties with memorialization of this message to you. C. Correspondents (11) Guest disputant (talk) 10:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit]Memorialization of a Discussion with WIkipedia Editor Vejvančický Concerning Photo Permissions (Martha Cohen and Cohen Brothers of Canada)

Here is the memorialization taken from the discussion page of WIkipedia Editor Vejvančický pertaining to emails sent to permissions-commons on Sept. 8, 2009. Obviously this Wikipedia editor erred in his assessment of Wikimedia Commons competence since they either failed to receive the emails or chose to ignore them. Maybe you could explain what happened????

[edit]Wikimedia Commons Vejvančický: As requested by Wikimedia, emails granting permission for use of the following pictures were sent to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on Sept. 8, 2009, yet WikiMedia has yet to remove the labels threatening removal by Sept. 13 of the two pictures listed below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Martha_Cohen.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CohenBrothers.jpg

Is there any way you can check to ensure that the emails were received by Wikimedia granting permission to use the photos? Would hate to see the photos removed, then have to go through the trouble of placing them up again. Thanks very much. CanadianBiographies111 (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Canadian, the files were "prodded" on 6 September, so if you've sent the e-mail two days later, it should be OK. I can't check it, but I have some experience with this procedure, and it has always worked well. The correct procedure is described in the "How to Obtain a Free Image" guide, check it, please. We'll see. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Guest disputant (talk) 10:44, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of pictures from the page Precision Glass Moulding

File:Precision_glass_mould.PNG File:Precision_glass_mould2.PNG

I have sent the permission to permissions@wikimedia.org: Am I allowed to restore the picture?

Best regards Marian

[edit] Cohen Brothers of Canada photo (File:CohenBrothers.jpg)

Nilfanion, something has gone wrong with the ROTATEBOT......allmost an entire day has passed since photo rotation was requested, yet the photo position has NOT been corrected.

Please advise.

Guest disputant (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Tottiford Dam.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] PHOTO

Can you please tell me what I did wrong, I took the picture, have all the rights to it, and I guess you erased it because I did not file it correctly. Thanks. --Renemesis (talk) 00:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Even though your tone indicates you are in disbelief, I uploaded it avoiding the website. I dont feel like arguing so I will email you. Please restore picture. thank you --Renemesis (talk) 00:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Undeletion request

Hallo Nilfanion! You have once deleted the file File:Joachim_Gauck_IGFM_01.jpg due to missing license. I have received a proper permission through OTRS. Could you please undelete and add {{OTRS received|2009090210033508}}? I will take care of the rest. Nillerdk (talk) 10:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your fast reaction. I have filled in the required information and closed the ticket. Nillerdk (talk) 10:51, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Cow on Pupers.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Dartmoor

1. Yep agreed
2. ??

Looks good so far. Courses now started so on wiki time will be very limited. I'll try and get some uploads done. I got some yesterday including panos & the flag flying on Steeperton. Soon hopefully. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Vénus d'arles

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous avez enlever la photo du bronze de cette statues. Des informations capitales ont en outre été perdues concernant l'autorisation donnée pour cette photo (date et nom de la personne dans la société). Dommage. C'est contreproductif. Cordialement. Alain Darles

(Sorry for the English) I deleted File:Bronze-venusdArles.jpg as it came from http://www.expertissim.com/statuette-bronze-representant-aphrodite_o861207.html . The photograph is copyrighted irrespective of the status of the statue and the replica.--Nilfanion (talk) 20:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Pictures of ICYE

Why were the two pictures I uploaded to Wikipedia Commons deleted? I e-mailed a certificate to the Commons e-mail address as requested. I also sent an e-mail to ask why there had been no response to it. Those are pictures that are owned by an organisation I work for that would be used for a page about this particular organisation - and this organisation accepts them being openly distributed. How can this be SO difficult?!?!?!?! Vmujunen (talk) 08:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Lydford Gorge.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Week Down Cross.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Newfoundland National War Memorial.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Rodin_Auguste_Cupid_and_Psyche_1905.jpg

This picture was uploaded from permissed sourse, marked as recommended in common Wiki rules. The reason that categjry was "undefined" was just my own lack of the catefories. Please give more detailed explanation about this spesific case. Timmpa (talk) 05:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC) September, 2009

The picture is located on the following exact adress: http://www.artrenewal.org/asp/database/image.asp?id=13398. According to the paragraph Help:Public domain image resources the image can be used and I see no reasons to delete it. Of course, it is nessesary to define the rights of using and it could be my fault not to ask for help in this case. Timmpa (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Undeletion request

I have received a permission for File:Ivo Lollobrigida sw.jpg. {{otrs received|2009090910028467}}. Please undelete. Thanks for you time. Nillerdk (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Your assistance please

I noticed, over on the wikipedia, that the commons delinker had removed File:Canadiancoast_guard_improve_version.jpg. The record shows that you removed it, stating "no source".

My recollection, from the summary information from that image, is that the uploader claimed he or she drew it.

I checked, there were some similar, smaller proprietary images. But this image was not only of higher resolution, but it differed from those images. I took the uploader at face value that they had used a drawing program to draw a brand new image.

I'd like to ask you to tell me who uploaded the image. Have they logged on since the image was challenged? Are they a relative newbie? Am I incorrect that the summary clearly said the uploader drew the image? If not what would it have taken you to believe their claim?

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 22:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

I got your reply. Thanks. I agree. You are correct, his upload logs do look suspicious. I left a couple further questions on my talk page. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 05:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Orgue

I saw your have suppresse Louis Vierne ( 1927) picture of St Nicolas du Chardonnet Church with carillons of Westimsonters

Why??? --BAILLEUL (talk) 15:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Images-deleter!

I'm an italian user of Wikipedia, so you could find some mistake in my english :) but I'd like to know... why did you delete the image od the Gravina in Puglia's panorama? That's my city, and I think that image was very very beautiful... and it wasn't any trouble of copyright... I don't know... I would'n like to get angry, and I don't want to offend anyone, paticurarly because you're an admin and I esteem you, bue I DEMAND an answer!!! P.s. you should answer me on my discussion page... go to Wikipedia in italian and search Discussioni Utente:Antonello Zito, and plaese answer with simple words ;) --Antonello Zito (talk) 19:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Brat Tor.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Dartmoor Prison and North Hessary.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] File:Sharp Tor, Bolt Head.jpg

Hi Nilfanion, I remved some CA from your image and saved my edit over your original. I am not sure I've done a good job, so please do delete my two versions, if you like your original one better. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Lee Moor Leat.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] some licences needed

please check your gallery, there are some pictures that will needed licence information--Motopark (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Uploads

Done a few from the north moor. Not placed any of your pages cos I'm a bit short on time. Cosdon I have put in "Tors of" which is not really true but...? Equally I've uploaded a couple of circles & I guess a separate cat will be needed.

Maybe Steeperton should have some military related cat? I have annotated it. Will try and get some work done soon. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:20, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Von.Dreyse.J.N.jpg

I have restored this image. It is clearly PD and was PD reviewed. Online sources are not required and this is so old it is obviously PD. Personal collections are valid sources, but I've found it still online and inserted that anyway so there should not be an issue now. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Sharp Tor, Bolt Head.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Berry Head lighthouse.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Mohsen Subhi

hello, i need help meeting the copyright requirements to undelete "MohsenSubhiMawasem.jpg", (it was deleted from Commons by Nilfanion because: Copyright violation: cd cover.) similarly, Mohsen-Subhi-Oud.jpg‎ has been flagged for "missing evidence of permission." these two pictures --from his CD--are everywhere on the web, and i have no access to any member of the deceased artist's family. what options to i have? thanks,—Preceding unsigned comment added by July271997 (talk • contribs) (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Kennick Reservoir.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Nilfabot

I find Nilfabot's behaviour to be very strange. It fixes licenses by removing the flickr pass as in this action It has done this to hundreds of images. (I added back the pass for this 1 photo) This is asking for problems. Anyone who does not see the pass will assumed it did not pass the review and will nominate the image for deletion if the license is not free today on flickr. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment: Thanks for the clear explanation. I was scared there for a minute that this would cause a cascade of needless DRs in the future. I reverted my actions here and here Regards from Western Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:32, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Bur logo 90.jpg

Hi there. Image File:Bur logo 90.jpg was tagged with {{OTRS pending}} template - maybe we should wait a bit longer before deleting this file? Bot automatically replaces this template with subst:npd after 30 days. --Leafnode 22:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

OK, I understand the case now. Thanks for clarifying :) --Leafnode 06:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Note

In this DR, your bot was criticised. Just thought you should....know? Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] FlickrLickr cat

Admin MGA73 has succesfully placed all the FlickrLickr images in this FlickrLickr Category with his bot. Now his bot can detect unmarked flickr images which are Not FlickrLickr images and subject them to a {{flickrreview}} Just letting you know about this category. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Roos Tor.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Starstreak launcher on Dartmoor.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] unlinking image

I think your edit here is a copyright infringement, because File:Questionmark copyright.svg is licensed with GFDL/CC, editor must be noted if you don't have the permission of the uploaderauthor to unlink the image. Greetings,--Luxo 16:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of File:Lady_Young.jpg it will be Public Domain

From reading WS logs, I see http://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Page:Early_Reminiscences.djvu/135&action=history and that you deleted Lady_Young.jpg. The image will have been taken from a File:Early Reminiscences.djvu which is out of copyright. Could you please return the picture, and I will then look to apply requisite information. Not sure how we can resolve the issue of images used at Wikisource being notified for nomination for deletion, and the process is a bit sucky. :-( Thanks Billinghurst (talk) 01:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Image File:Rocks on Great Staple Tor.jpg, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Paro de Federici

I talk with people of Federation of Student (FECH) and they study to publish the picture like own in commons. I will send the document to give the rigth and in a few moment they will have an answer. (van a estudiar si pueden publicarla ellos mismos como propia, si no me van a firmar la plantilla habitual cediendo derechos. Están en elecciones y viene el cambio de autoridades ... habrá que esperar)

Other question: How is the license here [File :Derecho en Paro UChile de AlejandroJimenez2.JPG]] it`good? I will put in the article. --Ciberprofe (talk) 19:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

---

Please see:

File:Arquitectura en paro de Federici.jpg

I dont put en page of wikipedia while I wait for your opinion. It is OK?.

Bye (No la pongo aun en wikipedia hasta que la revises la licencia)--Ciberprofe (talk) 16:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Valued Image Promotion

[edit] Yeah, yeah - no time....:)

However this page has some early and fairly dire images on (with apologies to those who uploaded them). They are generally not good res ones never mind hi res. Maybe one of us will get to it :) Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for that - didn't know the page existed. I uploaded quite a good pano of Paignton yesterday (not QI but ok) which indicates the edge of the moors quite well - hence finding the Dartmoor page here was not good. Hopefully a Torquay one soon too. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] What??

Hi! It seems you deleted some files on Commons and that made problems on dawiki [1]. Will you look at it? --MGA73 (talk) 16:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Commons:Deletion requests/Laminate

I just wanted to know whether "meta-data" refers to the image captions, the category, both, or something else I missed. TIA, Paradoctor (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)