User talk:Poco a poco/2017-03

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lori Berd, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The stuff of poetry, and another potential FP. -- Ikan Kekek 07:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matenadaran, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Akhtala, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 59-62 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me (I guess it's the longest possible focal length for this motif and some distortions are inevitable) --A.Savin 15:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Hafez, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very distorted and too tight cut at the bottom. -- Spurzem 12:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 20:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC) The new version seems unnaturally hoisted and the crop is too tight now as before. Sorry. -- Spurzem 20:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC) I see it as a QI, if you disagree, please, decline it Poco a poco 22:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC) As there is no reaction here, further opinions are welcome Poco a poco 10:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Tight crop of the bottom of the stairs as noted above, but the photo of the mausoleum is a QI. If anyone disagrees, they should feel free to take this to CR. -- Ikan Kekek 12:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-07, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salar de Tara, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 64-67 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salar de Tara, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 64-67 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

The image with the fan

Because the box at the QIC page is too short: I'm not an expert, but yes, it's a fan; I added it to the file page. To the crop: I think the windows are important to show the surrounding and to give a frame; and I don't think it's useful to use an HDR here for white windows. To me, they aren't that distracting, because they are decent at the sides. I tried to crop it, but it looks strange IMO. I think the image can be QI with the overexposure; but if you don't agree, I can try it again. --Carschten 21:32, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Carschten, insbesondere die rechte Seite kommt mir zu hell vor, es lenkt ab. Ist aber m.M.n. auch nicht die Welt, und ich es nicht als Muss, wenn ein anderer Reviewer das Bild so wie es ist befürwortet. Poco² 19:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Naqsh-e Jahan, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Casa histórica de Abbasi, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 77.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Casa histórica de Abbasi, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 77.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciudadela de Meybod, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de Fin, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita de Malek, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Hasht Behesht, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 78-80 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita del Viernes, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 12-14 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Hasht Behesht, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 84-86 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 12-14 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Building is deformed, but in this case it seriously add something to the composition. --Michielverbeek 20:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 24-26 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment - We featured File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 27-36 HDR PAN.jpg, the non-rectilinear version that goes back a little further. Should this one also be featured? -- Ikan Kekek 14:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC) I think that the subjet and quality are good enough but maybe it is too similar to the other one. In any case I've it categorized in my FP candidates cat Poco a poco 19:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Is tilt/perspective OK? Looks tilted to the left. --C messier 11:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 21:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jabalieh, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect! --Ermell 09:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 89-91 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please reapply the noise reduction. --C messier 06:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 13:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 11:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 88-90 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banco Nacional de Rumanía, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mezquita de Agha Bozorg, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 81.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mezquita de Agha Bozorg, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 81.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 61-63 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 11:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio del Círculo Nacional Militar, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sky looks like a little bit overexposed. And please fix the CAs. Thank you. --XRay 12:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 12:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Svetitskhoveli, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not sure about the WB, perhaps you could check it. It look a bit yellowish to me. Good quality anyway. --Basotxerri 09:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Plaza de la Libertad, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 01.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Libertad, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panteón de Mtatsminda, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narikala, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín del Príncipe, Mahan, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 76-78 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 58-60 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio CEC, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 88-90 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Tulcea, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lada junto al monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lori Berd, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Zoravor, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 10:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment right side of the image is leaning in! --Carschten 09:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC) True,  fixed, thanks Poco a poco 19:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Casa histórica de Tabatabaeis, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 65.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Casa histórica de Tabatabaeis, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 65.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Svetitskhoveli, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment perspective distortion and a bit too dark IMHO. Correctable, otherwise ok. --Carschten 16:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)  Done, thank you Poco a poco 20:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC) maybe a bit overcorrected, but QI to me now. --Carschten 10:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Faro de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 135.JPG

And also:

• File:Faro de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 136.JPG
• File:Faro de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 137.JPG
• File:Faro de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 146.jpg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 18:51, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Iglesia de Hallgrímur, Reikiavik, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 111.JPG

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Khajou, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puesto de venta de antenas, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Technology can be so simple :-o --Ermell 20:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Acueductos subterráneos de Cantalloc, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 09.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Acueductos subterráneos de Cantalloc, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 09.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --XRay 09:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Sevanavank, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 86-88 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good even if I would have preferred a less tight crop. --ArildV 08:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Tara, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:29, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Paniri, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:12, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:12, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Iquique, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 08-11 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality! --Ermell 08:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Akhtala, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 16:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 52-58 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support likely a bit too bright but ok --Christian Ferrer 18:08, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:09, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Sanahin, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Tatev, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 80-82 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:36, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Khajou, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 16:27, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Fátima bint Musa, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario Shah Nematollah Vali, Mahan, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Aali Qapu, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe to harsh contrast, but OK for me. --C messier 17:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gran Mezquita de Isfahán, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Noravank, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Pudelek 20:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Haghpat, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 12-14 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! --Ermell 20:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Svetitskhoveli, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio en Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting building; blown highlights on the right and poor sharpness on top edge due to perspective correction but otherwise it is a fine image. Dllu 08:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narikala, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panteón de Mtatsminda, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Sevanavank, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition is so irresistible that lens flare is forgiven --Daniel Case 06:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC) Flares should be removed anyhow,  Done Poco a poco 12:28, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jardín de Fin, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 17.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jardín de Fin, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 17.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Shah Cheragh, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 08:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Aali Qapu, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque, Kerman, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita del Viernes, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not too bad but I find the crop a bit tight considering the camera you're using. Is there a specific reason for that?--Peulle 20:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 21:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC) A bit better - is it possible to get a bit more room on the right side as well?--Peulle 21:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC) I uploaded a new version with some adjustments, but not much difference regarding the crop. I cannot offer more than this. Poco a poco 16:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC) Support Well, declining it would be overkill, I think, but I am a bit puzzled why there isn't more room on the sides. Is there something else there (a building or something) that has been cropped away, perhaps?--Peulle 21:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Geghard, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 83-84 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It is quite noisy at the bottom right. --C messier 12:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 17:36, 15 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment Still some at the table (bottom centre). --C messier 17:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC) Ok,  new version Poco a poco 17:00, 18 March 2017 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 09:39, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Carcote, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 54-58 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Most impressive, and yet another FP, if/when nominated. -- Ikan Kekek 18:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Pujsa, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. I love the appearance of the salt in the foreground and middleground. -- Ikan Kekek 18:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Öxarárfoss, Parque Nacional de Þingvellir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Long exposure with a nice result. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC) There's one dust spot in a cloud near the top of the picture frame in the middle. -- Ikan Kekek 18:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC) Sorry, I should have seen it. Poco a poco, could you remove it, please? --Basotxerri 19:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC) Thank you. I'm sure Basotxerri will agree that this image is of quite good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Hnevank, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caballero de Madara, reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Jvari, Miskheta, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dllu 18:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Tu opinión

Hola Diego, necesito tu sincera opinión sobre esta foto que promocioné para imagen de calidad. Muchas gracias. Dorieo (talk) 11:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Hola Dorieo, no la has propuesto para imagen de calidad, sino para imagen destacada (aquí el listón aún está más alto). En cualquier caso en mi opinión le falta nitidez tanto para ser imagen de calidad como destacada, aunque es una buena toma de un buen momento. Buen trabajo! Poco² 12:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Vaya, me equivoqué, quería nominarla para imagen de calidad (¿cuál es el enlace?). Tienes razón le falta nitidez. Muchas gracias. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 12:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Dorieo, el enlace para QI es éste Poco² 13:00, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Muchas gracias. Dorieo (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to serve as a judge

I would like to have you as of one the judges of Commons:Wiki Loves Uniformed services (India). Wiki Loves Uniformed services (India) (WLUS) is a public photo competition on Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation. With the inspiration drawn from Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) and Wiki Loves Food (WLF), this is first iteration of its kind in 2017. For this year, the predominant aim of the the project is the improve the quality of images of different uniformed services of the Indian sub-continental region. We're having two kinds of judges, subjective and qualitative. The subjective judges will look into the subject of the image, whom we're considering from services background and one qualitative judge, who would look into the various image parameters such as saturation, focus, lighting etc. The first filtration will be done by the coordinators, then goes a subjective analysis, followed by a qualitative one, which will be done by you, then followed by fine filtration of images which tells us the best story. So would you like to help us. As the motto of WMF, this would be a volunteer work, but however, you will receive a "Certificate of Acknowledgement" and special gifts if possible. Please reply as soon as possible. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 05:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello Krishna, ok, that sounds different, I can surely help out but I need to know when (appproximate dates) and (roughly) how many images you expect me to review. I ask because if I'm travelling when you expect me to review many pictures it would be tricky. Regards. Poco² 10:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for fast reply. The probable dates of the contest are from 15 May 2017 to 15 July 2017. From then we'll have 75 days for judgement. I cannot guarantee you a count. There could be around 500 photographs. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 10:57, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Krishna, From middle approx. August 10th to September 10th I'll be travelling and with no or very limited access to Internet (high see, Alaska, Yukon,...). So, if I can finish my review before August 10th it should be no problem. Regards, Poco² 11:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

That would be great, so may I confirm you on the panel? You would just be required to say yes or no. The images you say "yes", will proceed further, and "no" will be cut off. That's it. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 11:06, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Krishna, go ahead, I'm in :) Poco² 11:09, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

I would love if you provide me a short profile of contributions. Just the counts would. I know it is difficult to cut short your endless contributions, but I require some to put them on the judge's profile. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 11:20, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Ok Krishna, here a brief summary:

Diego Delso is a Spanish electrical engineer and passionate photographer for 20 years. He has been involved in the Wikimedia movement as editor since 2007, and is administrator in the Spanish Wikipedia as well as Wikimedia Commons. He's created about 1200 articles in Wikipedia and has uploaded over 16500 photographs to Commons. Among them around 10000 have been awarded the Quality Image status and 400 Featured Picture status. He's been member of the Wiki Loves Earth and Wiki Loves Monuments international jury as well as jury member of these and other photo contests in a lot of different countries since 2010. The Wikimedia Blog dedicated an entry to him last summer if you want to find out more.

What do you think? is that good enough or do you need more? Poco² 11:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Good. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 13:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleo de Hafez, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 08-10 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Khajou, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo de Kaliakra, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Ruse, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The plants in front look a bit overprocessed, do you think you could get it better? --Basotxerri 19:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)  New version, thanks Poco a poco 16:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Paracas, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puca Pucara, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 79.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)  Info There is a dust spot in the sky, could you please remove it? --Llez 15:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza junto a la iglesia y convento de Santa Catalina, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 71.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pisac, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 98.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de Arte Religioso del Arzobispado, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 59.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puesta de sol en isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 162.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Grande, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 100.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:35, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 157.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:35, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Riazor, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-24, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Sangenjo, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de la Caleta, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

POTD/2017-04-23

Hello, you've added an image for POTD/2017-04-23. I'd like to ask you if it will be possible to replace it with this picture for the World Book Day. Regards. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello Moheen Reeyad, no problem with that. Would you then please, relocated the Pelicanus POTD to a new date? Regads, Poco² 21:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

 Done I've moved this here. Thanks. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lori Berd, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 63-65 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lori Berd, Armenia, 2016-09-30, DD 63-65 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Diego, what happened? Any recent conflicts or just personal decision? Jee 04:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello User:Jkadavoor, I just got fed up after this discussion. I have no fun in contributing in such a dictatorship. Regards, Poco² 06:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Looking into this. Will be back. Jee 08:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

This photo is really far from being amongst your best, so already for this reason I wouldn't make much drama about it. On Commons, the Precautionary principle is very strong and numerous of my photos were deleted in the past too, however I'm still standing ;) I would say: the removal of your profile from MOP is fine, but giving up uploading isn't. --A.Savin 11:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A.Savin: it is not about the picture, it is about the way, here, there and over there. You can consider this topic as the straw that broke this camel's back. I will still be around but trying to be quiet and having a low profile Poco² 11:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

And what exactly is wrong. The PRP? I think PRP is a very reasonable policy on Commons, given all the clutter of various copyright restrictions in different countries. The fact that you always have to be sure to add your pictures to Wikipedia yourself, is well-known, and given the high amounts of pictures there always will be occasional conflicts somewhere. I add all my pictures to all notable language versions of WP/Wikivoyage etc., and sometimes there is indeed hostile behaviour by some users, but given the whole amount of work it's really very rarely, no reason to resign. --A.Savin 13:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, thanks for sharing your experiences A.Savin, some time ago I'd probably answer a colleague the same way you do not. But somewhen enough is enough, at least, that is how I feel and that's why I based on that I take my decisions. Another thing still to mention and that frustrates me is the fact that out there my work is used and credited about 120,000 times, but I estimate that other 400,000 it is just used without any consideration of the license I also here we can just watch. If I had my images let's say on Getty, apart from making money, they would take care of addressing corpyright violations. Nobody here cares about that. Amazing that so many good photographers are still around and contributing...Poco² 13:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

That is rather the problem with courts and the caselaw, so that for example even in Germany (despite highly developed copyright rules) they are tending to refuse a value of any more than ~100€ (or, which is more likely, less) of a photo. It is also good to know for me that only when my pictures are used on Wikipedia, there is a chance that other users see and reuse something of that. This wouldn't work when uploading pictures on Flickr, Panoramio, etc.. --A.Savin 13:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

1. Wikipedia(s) has a different priority on the encyclopedic value of an image compared to Commons. For example, for an image of a flower, wiki prefers one which shows the flower, leaf and stem in a single picture for their taxa-box. So for me, I'm learning something new even from a revert. 2. For copyright enforcement, I prefer a middle ground. We encourage free culture, and we've the right to fight against copyright violations. I'm not happy with the attack happened against Der Wolf im Wald from the wiki itself. 3. Flickr is also very good for free culture promotions though it looks very outdated nowadays. My CC BY-NC licensed works are reused a lot from there. Jee 16:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de Entrepeñas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de toros de la Maestranza, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Mayor, Medinaceli, Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 97.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pradilla de Ebro, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-31, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Alameda, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 83.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Arpa, Jermuk, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la República, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks good, except ... what are those white lines on the left? They look like jet trails.--Peulle 19:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Yeah, it looked like that, I have removed it Poco a poco 20:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Comment All good. --Peulle 09:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinfonía de las Piedras, valle de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)