User talk:Reda Kerbouche/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:MiG-21R at Smuravjovo-2 (11).jpg[edit]

File:MiG-21R at Smuravjovo-2 (11).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Niaz Mahmud Joy (talk) 06:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karl Marx street House 4 (Gdov) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post station in Chirkovitsy (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:03, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument of road roller in Kingisepp (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --MaedaAkihiko 10:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karl Marx street House 4 (Gdov) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument to the fallen compatriots in Lyalitsy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SHTZ 15-30 in Gdov tractor Of Gdov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SHTZ 15-30 in Gdov tractor Of Gdov 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tablet of the monument Tank T-34 of Gdov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque of the monument to the fallen compatriots in Lyalitsy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tablet of the memorial of the mass grave at the Gdov cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echeikh Mosque 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque of the monument to the fallen compatriots in Lyalitsy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The plague is sharp (much better than the one in discussion right now), yet I'd suggest cropping out the distracting right edge. --Nefronus 18:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)@Nefronus: done.--Reda Kerbouche 14:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 21:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque of the Echeikh Mosque street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction left necessary. --Steindy 00:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)@Steindy: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 13:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:29, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Neptune in Monrepos 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Druzhba In Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mikhaïl Vassiliev Street 11 in Vyborg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of St. Olav (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väinämöinen monument in Vyborg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Milseburg 13:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Ali Khamraev on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:03, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Bank on Lenin Prospekt, 8a in Vyborg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please first crop the car at the bottom left? --Poco a poco 14:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 09:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Örnen House on Krepostnaya Street, 6 in Vyborg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Are the falling vertical lines for real or didn't you apply a perspective correction? --Poco a poco 14:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Corrected.--Reda Kerbouche 10:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please crop a bit more on the right to get rid of the cropped items on top and at the bottom? --Poco a poco 07:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)@Poco a poco: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 08:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of St. Olav (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 17:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)@Steindy: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 08:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 11:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wall of the Tower of St. Olav (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 17:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)@Steindy: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 08:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see white lines at the top and bottom which remained after image rotation. Alexander Novikov 20:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC) @Саня Новиков: the image is corped now, thank you--Reda Kerbouche 22:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 11:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Alexeï Guerman on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Alexeï Petrenko on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Georgiy Zhzhonov on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Gérard Depardieu on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Karen Shakhnazarov on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Anatoli Kouznetsov on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Viatcheslav Tikhonov on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Tatiana Samoïlova on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Stanislav Rostotski on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Stanislav Govoroukhine on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Romashkin Anatolii on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Piotr Todorovski on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Oleg Strijenov on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Nina Menchikova on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Nikita Mikhalkov on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star of Leonid Kouravliov on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 18:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Я в арабской Википедии
[edit]

Не могли бы объяснить мне, почему я заблокирован в арабской Википедии?

217.117.125.83 10:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@217.117.125.83: Добрый день, откуда мне знать :) я не являюсь админом данного языкового раздела и чтобы мне спросить нужен хотя бы ваш ник который заблокирован. --Reda Kerbouche (talk) 10:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Заблокирован тот же самый IP, с которого я сейчас пишу.
217.117.125.83 18:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@217.117.125.83: написано что временно, почему не знаю. А вы там вондализмам не занимались? --Reda Kerbouche (talk) 22:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Нет, см. мой вклад.
217.117.125.83 16:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Тогда советую написать на английском админу который вас заблокировал.так у вас будет более понятно. --Reda Kerbouche (talk) 16:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Блокировка уже́ закончилась, поэтому попробовал написать, но не пропстил фильтр правок…
217.117.125.83 16:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ceramic Algerian anthem lyrics - Kassaman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shop in Gamla Stan Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support I think the quality of this photo is adequate, but don't be surprised if this ends up in Consensus Review. -- Ikan Kekek 21:38, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermitage road sign 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting photo, but please remove the CA's just above the warning sign (see note) --Michielverbeek 16:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Michielverbeek: ✓ Done.--Reda Kerbouche 18:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Categorization could be better, maybe also add a cat (no pun intended) for the location in St. Petersburg? Transcription of the text on the sign would also be nice. --Marsupium 19:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For me good quality now --Michielverbeek 20:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water level in 1824 at Central children’s public library A.S. Pushkin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque to the employees of the department store Saint-Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dmanisi Pentecostal Church 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of the Juma Mosque 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juma Mosque of Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support This one is sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 22:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Vazha-Pshavela, Tbilisi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Vaso Abashidze 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Outside decoration on the Orbeliani Baths.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Ivane (Vano) Paliashvili.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque to Orbeliani Baths.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
QI to me if you add at least one category about the item displayed here --Poco a poco 09:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Poco a poco: you want me to create a sspecial category for this plaque ? this item is at the entrance of the Orbeliani Baths. I have add some other categories.--Reda Kerbouche 10:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I was asking for existing categories to be added here, not new ones. I added a last one, QI. --Poco a poco 07:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Niko Pirosmani 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doorof the Orbeliani Baths.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Vertical perspective distortion. --F. Riedelio 06:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC); @F. Riedelio: Corrected--Reda Kerbouche 23:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 11:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reda_Kerbouche/Archive_4&oldid=649665616"