Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grjótagjá caves in summer 2009 (2).jpg

File:Grjótagjá caves in summer 2009 (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2010 at 14:09:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Grjótagjá caves in summer 2009 (2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grjótagjá caves in summer 2009 (2).jpg

3414

2466

346

51

3777

2534

bad crop

•  Info created by Chmee2 - uploaded by Chmee2 - nominated by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support High quality cave pictures are rare. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:39, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support per HFSW Steven Walling 23:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment, looks good. I've uploaded a derivate with reduced over- and underexposure: File:Grjótagjá_caves_in_summer_2009_(2)_by_DerHexer.jpg. Feel free to do whatever you want to do with. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 02:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Bright beautiful colours. Looks like the right amount of exposure. --Korman (talk) 06:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I think the shadows add to the mood. I prefer the original version. --99of9 (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful; thin mist in the background adds to the athmosphere. --Myrabella (talk) 08:30, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 10:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Awesome caves, awesome reflection and the blue is nice. Everything is sharp, composition is good. --Aktron (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The quality is really bad, some rocks are unsharp, some overexposed. Also that green thing that looks as graffiti on the right hand side spoils the image for me. Sorry. The crop in the right lower corner should be fixed.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

 Done Corner is fixed, thx for notice --Chmee2 (talk) 22:28, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Neutral, looks good but to low quality. Trance Light (talk) 22:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry but per Mila. Quality could be much better. --mathias K 09:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpless. --Mile (talk) 10:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Petritap (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Tlusťa (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sharpness could be much better, also over-exposure in the lower right corner, some CA in the left part of the image. Sorry. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely. --Calibas (talk) 04:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural