User talk:Calibas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bobcat[edit]

I am writing regarding the picture you have placed in Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bobcat2.jpg . We, with our friends from the Otryt Association (connected with the Bieszczady mountains), have decided to trace and mark the first in the Ukrainian Bieszczady didactic route (historical-natural scientific). We have been preparing it with the Ukrainians from Old Sambor, in which neighborhood the route is going to be placed. The route consists of ten boards, some of which are devoted to fauna and flora of the Bieszczady. We would like to use your graphics mentioned above on one of the boards. Of course, we will give information about your authorship.

And I have some request - is it possible sending me this photo in higher resolution (900x900 or 1200x1200)?

I look forward to hearing from you in the nearest future.

Please, answer by e-mail (patryk HERE-SIGN-"AT" samorzad.uw.edu.pl) or my discussion page (http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_Wikipedysty:Avadoro).

Best regards

Patryk Slowicki

wikipedian Avadoro (http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedysta:Avadoro

Mite[edit]

Please reconsider your vote on this nomination as to avoid compromising our guidelines. Regards. Lycaon 14:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiery Skipper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female fiery skipper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


Star[edit]

>Thank you very much for the barnstar, Calibas. Greets --Richard Bartz 11:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Young night heron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

I can personally say that my photographic skills have greatly increased by listening to the critiques of the editors here[edit]

"I can personally say that my photographic skills have greatly increased by listening to the critiques of the editors here Calibas 19:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)". I agree, but that don't make me better and motivated when reviewers using uncorrect standards. --Beyond silence 22.5px 20:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Bryce Canyon[edit]

Hi Calibas, thanks for your comment on my Bryce Canyon Photo in QIC. You mentioned that the colours should get fixed. What exactly do u mean? Do u mean the red of the stones? --AngMoKio 19:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiery skipper pair2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Young night heron.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Young night heron.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 22:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greategret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Proposal concerning User PH-n templates[edit]

Hi Calibas, I've written a proposal concerning the {{User PH-0}},...,{{User PH-3}} templates, that you may be interested in. And thank you for the note on my talk page concerning a QI that you helped me crop. I had noticed it got promoted, but thanks anyway. Best regards Slaunger 09:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Californiakingsnake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cooper's hawk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Poignant[edit]

Hi Calibas, Thank you extending my (English) vocabulary with the word poignant on QIC today. Now that I have looked it up, I understand what you mean, and I'll remeber that word. -- Slaunger 21:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

=) Calibas 23:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 01:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

I nominated this image for FP, great shot! Calibas 16:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Las Vegas NY NY Hotel[edit]

Hi Calibas, thank you for your comment to my picture on the QI Page.

But could you explain what your sentence means: "...some tweaking of the levels might soften up the lighting..." ? I really have no idea, but I'm very interested in everything that might help to make my pictures better. Talking about pictures in English is nothing that I do very often, so I'd be thankful for a easy explaination. :-)

And now to something completely different: Is your picture of the night heron taken with your Canon 70-300 mm lens? I'm looking for a lens at the moment, and it seems that I will make my decision between this one and the 70-200 mm 1:4 L. The 70-200mm is said to show more sharpness, but I really like your picture, it seems very sharp to me. --Flicka 18:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fox squirrel2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pipevineswallowtail.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Le_Grand_Heron.jpg Featured Candidate[edit]

Since there is no opposition on Fir0002 point of view about the deasaturation background, I've deceided to replace it with the original background version. So you can replace your support in the alternate version since it's the same now. Thanks, ;)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Ardea alba4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ardea alba4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- Cecil 05:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Brown Pelican3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Brown Pelican3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- Cecil 05:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you suggest to adjust the crop? I have tested several possibilities, but it's not easy because the axis of the fly is not parallel to the margin (I should have punished her on the spot ;-) )-- Alvesgaspar 13:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I tried a few different crops myself and I see what you mean. I think a tighter crop makes a slight improvement. Calibas 19:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Sorting quicksort anim.gif, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sorting quicksort anim.gif has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- Cecil 03:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Nycticorax nycticorax12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Nycticorax nycticorax12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- Benh 17:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paint shop pro[edit]

Hi. What brought this on? Lycaon 06:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and questions[edit]

Thanks for your kindness. I’m new in Commons. The edition you made on my photo is great. The problem is that in my wiki I’ve been told that I had to upload the file with a small size and this way it’ll lose most of its quality. That’s the reason why I would like to give it a try by myself and apply the program you told me about on the original picture to see what results can I get. new version by me Could I submit the rejected picture once it’s fixed?? And the Church of Cambre, can I upload a new better version? And if I can’t make it better as much as you could, could I upload the improved version made by you? How should I do in each case? Finally, I would like to tell you that I took a look at your photo gallery and I would love to learn from you, you are an amazing photographer. Greetings. --Alma Gal 20:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC) (Alma in Galipedia)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Male mallard3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Male mallard.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cecil 12:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupeodes americanus1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northern Mockingbird3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupeodes americanus2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calochortus luteus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araneus diadematus3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telescopic handler2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

American Badger[edit]

Thank you for the comment on the badger photo I uploaded. Could you, if you have the time, be so kind as to sharpen the image in the way you suggested? Perhaps you have better software for that than I do. Jonathunder 13:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Fiery skipper pair5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Fiery skipper pair5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cecil 15:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization/species galleries[edit]

Hi, while browsing some of your beautiful photos, I noticed you have added several plant and animal species to species specific dead-link categories (like your two recent QIS). It could be an idea to go through your photos and do the same things as you did here on them I think. Not the most interesting task perhaps, but it would be a pity if other users of Commons were unable to locate your very nice high-quality photos. -- Slaunger 10:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but no thanks[edit]

Thanks for that thing you sent me but I really like the screenshots. -- carol 04:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green bottle fly2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nymphaea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pig racing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flame skimmer2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Thanks[edit]

Hi Calibas, thank you very much for the barnstar. I'm proud to receive an award from a very good photographer like you! --LucaG 20:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Eupeodes americanus1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Eupeodes americanus1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 17:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oakland LDS temple2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zalophus californianus2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Colorado River-edit.jpg[edit]

align=left Thank you very much, I really love this new version of the picture.. Bye, Adrille 19:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of contrast[edit]

Thanks for taking the time of working on my image on the Annakirche: In short, you are 100% right. I realize my image is boring flat. Do you have any rule of thumb you can provide me with?

I have to admit that I have some problems with increasing contrast. I don't trust my notebook screen. In case of doubt, I connect my pc to my 60-inch full HD LCD tv to check for colors.

I uploaded a new picture of fresco as QI Candidate. Your suggestions will be appreciated. Alberto Fernandez Fernandez 17:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you be willing to look at the (slightly) new and improved image? I went into Photoshop to clean up artifacts and tweak the histogram. Best regards, Durova 07:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Valuable Image Proposal[edit]

Hi Calibas, I am working on a Valuable Image (VI) Proposal in my sandbox. I noticed your recent discussion at COM:QIC and i would like to hear your opinion about the idea? I thought of posting it on COM:VP once it has been fine-tuned a little. I am not a native writer and I think the language/formulations can be improved here and there feel free to do so if you like. Secondly, I am a real idiot at writing something in a clear, short and concise form. If you think it could be shortened down while still keeping the essence there I appreciate your comments. -- Slaunger 16:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Greenspun illustration project[edit]

I don't really know the details but I thought you might be interested in this. Apparently someone donated money and you can win actual cash for you illustrations for Wikipedia.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Philip_Greenspun_illustration_project

Calibas 07:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Calibas. I already subscribed to this project, but the drawing phase is not started yet. Sémhur 10:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks too. I had no clue ;-). Lycaon 10:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Calibas.
Thanks for the info. Yes, I know about this project and I'm looking at it from time to time, but it seems it has some difficulties to start as the first round still hasn't been launched. Also, at this level, the maps aren't included in the project but it may change for the further rounds, so I will see when the first round really starts.
Greetings. Sting 15:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lotus flower image[edit]

HI Calibas, thanks for the comment on my offering. I might have a play with this (I've tried blurring the background to reduce background and cropping...not sure if I'm happy with it though), but I might be better off trying another shot and taking more care (camera off full-auto mode for a start!). Nice collection of images you've had acknowledged. - Peripitus 11:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Calibas, there where some concerns by Dori that i did mayor changes while fixing the posterization spoken by Laitche and Alvesgaspar. I did small changes in the lower right corner which is a tad lighter now. To make shure everything is going correctly i kindly asking you if you can vote again and would be very thankful. Best regards --Richard Bartz 13:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much --85.181.34.2 21:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate bridge pillar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Convergent-ladybugs5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melanoplus yarrowii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! French Broom2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Car in Oradour-sur-Glane4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Car in Oradour-sur-Glane4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Mywood 11:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Weiße Baumnymphe Idea leuconoe 5 Richard Bartz edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Weiße Baumnymphe Idea leuconoe 5 Richard Bartz edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

I have nominated your picture of a heron for a Wikipedia featured picture. Crassic (talk) 03:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Mockingbird Image Editing Request[edit]

Would you mind if I create and upload a version of your Northern Mockingbird photo that is cropped in much tighter on the bird itself? I'll credit you as author and link to the original in the 'Other Versions' section. The reason for my request would be that I'm working on improving the Northern Mockingbird Wikipedia article, and I'd like to add an image to the taxobox that clearly illustrates the major identifying characteristics of the bird, even when viewed at thumbnail size. Your image seems like the best we have available that shows the Mockingbird's key features. Thank you. - Ken Thomas 01:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valued images evaluation[edit]

Dear Calibas,

This is a standard message to the 18 different users who so far have been involved in testing Valued images candidates as either a nominator, reviewer or project editor. We are interested in hearing what you think about the project and what your positive and negative experiences have been. We would be grateful if you would voice your opinion here. Thank you,

-- Slaunger 19:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Calibas, this image is being test reviewed as a valued image candidate within the scope Pillar of the Golden Gate Bridge. However, to fulfill all criteria it has to be geocoded. Could you help with that? It would be pretty easy if only I knew which pillar it was. -- Slaunger 12:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Cuzco-Pano edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cuzco-Pano edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Congratulations! :-) --Richard Bartz 10:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Lubber.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Lubber.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

And again ... :-) --Richard Bartz 10:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Red-eyed Tree Frog - Litoria chloris edit1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Red-eyed Tree Frog - Litoria chloris edit1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Major triad ... Congratulations! :-) --Richard Bartz 10:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Roche.gif[edit]

Hi, Calibas, Could you please explain to me what Image:Roche.gif is about. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not enough resistance today[edit]

It has been all I could do not to paste different ones of these around as I have been running through them. This one defied my ability to control myself and I paste it here and now:

http://xkcd.com/95/ -- carol (talk) 03:10, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehehe. --Calibas (talk) 06:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know -- it was a combination of my age and gender which prohibited me from grabbing my sock and answering with a "Hihi" here. That being said, I miss my friends back in the not as corny as everyone likes to think Midwest.
I am actually here for a real reason, btw. I was wondering if you could encourage User talk:SriMesh to "tone it down" some? -- carol (talk) 07:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Leaf epidermis.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Leaf epidermis.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templates[edit]

Hi Calibas. Mine was a polite request to follow established, community constructed guidelines. I had not expected this kind of inappropriate answer from you. Lycaon (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Arachnis picta.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Arachnis picta.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed this as not featured. naerii 02:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Buteo swainsoni (Calibas).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buteo swainsoni (Calibas).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Odocoileus hemionus (Calibas).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odocoileus hemionus (Calibas).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

New FP[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Xanthippus corallipes.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xanthippus corallipes.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Phrynosoma hernandesi (Calibas).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phrynosoma hernandesi (Calibas).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

File:Ernesto Cardenal a la Chascona.jpg[edit]

Perhaps you can have a look at that QI-candidat, I reduced the noise --Mbdortmund (talk) 09:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Website?[edit]

"Firefox can't find the server at www.indepthexposure.com." Blearner (talk) 17:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reddit[edit]

Hi Calibas. On Commons:Featured_picture_candidates you wrote that you saw File:Rome - Vatican Museum - Spiral Staircase by Giuseppe Momo - 0673.jpg on reddit. Would you have a URL for me, so I can see it too? I'm definitely interested when my pictures are used. Thnx in advance! -- NormanB (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 22:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Related Links[edit]

lcd tv

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Populus angustifolia CO.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Populus angustifolia CO.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eupeodes americanus2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

122.162.130.106 11:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture[edit]

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture. I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.169.8.9 17:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo use[edit]

I am working with the Forest Service at the Spring Mountains NRA on their new interpretive center in Kyle Canyon. The new center will include several interpretive exhibits that aim to help visitors better understand the interconnected ecosystems of the Spring Mountains, and the role they play as stewards of this special place.

We came across your wonderful California King snake photo on Creative Commons and would like to incorporate it into the interpretive exhibits. I would just like to confirm your CC license that this is free for the Forest Service to use in their exhibits and that it should be attributed to "Calibas".

We are very grateful for your contribution to this project and hope that your image will help to inspire visitors to take a closer look at the incredible plants and animals around them. Please contact me at kdaley@aldrichpears.com thank you

Location?[edit]

Hi Calibas - do you have a photo location for File:Nycticorax nycticorax12.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 14:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was taken at Lake Merritt in Oakland, California. I've updated the description page with the location. --Calibas (talk) 16:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Calibas,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)